Search
Close this search box.

Search Results for: terror – Page 2

Taxpayer-Funded CRAZY: Public Radio Co-Produced New Yorker ‘Eco-Terrorism’ Propaganda

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/business/joseph-vazquez/2021/09/27/taxpayer-funded-crazy-public-radio-co-produced-new-yorker By Joseph Vazquez A subsidiary of a taxpayer-funded radio organization co-produced a podcast segment with the liberal New Yorker magazine that actually promoted “eco-terrorism.” WNYC Studios co-produced an eco-extremist segment with The New Yorker that was headlined, “How to Blow Up a Pipeline.” The segment, headed up by magazine editor David Remnick, was the nexus of the entire Sept. 24 edition of The New Yorker Radio Hour. The podcast had an asinine headline: “Should the Climate Movement Embrace Sabotage?” Remnick fear-mongered how “the effects of climate change are already here and they’re catastrophic” before it gave a platform to the crazy views of Lund University Human Geography Professor Andreas Malm. “‘I am recommending that the [climate] movement continues with mass action and civil disobedience, but also opens up for property destruction,’” Malm said. “So, I am in favor of destroying machines, property.” WNYC listed at least 66 radio stations where the podcast could be heard across the U.S. and abroad. WNYC Studios is a subsidiary of the taxpayer-funded New York Public Radio (WNYC), a member station of National Public Radio. “How to Blow up a Pipeline” is the title for Malm’s latest book. Remnick pushed how Malm wants “environmental activists to rethink their commitment to nonviolence and embrace tactics of sabotage.” Malm boasted how he was part of a Swedish eco-group in 2007 that deflated “thousands” of SUVs in rich neighborhoods to discourage their usage and had the audacity to say it was a mere “inconvenience” to owners and “not property destruction.” Malm said his book was a “call for escalation,”or “a call for the movement” to “move away from an exclusive focus on polite, gentle and perfectly peaceful civil disobedience.” It got worse. “I think property can be destroyed in all manner of ways, or it can be neutralized in a very gentle fashion, as when we deflated the SUVs, or in a more spectacular fashion as in potentially blowing up a pipeline that’s under construction,” Malm spewed. Malm said “most social movements that have struggled against overwhelming odds” have “diversified and used a number of different tactics” like property destruction and confrontation with the police.” He praised the Marxist Black Lives Matter riots in 2020 for causing “tremendous property destruction” and “conquering and burning down police stations in Minneapolis”. He called the riots an “integral part of [the] uprising.” Climate Depot founder and “Green Fraud” author Marc Morano excoriated The New Yorker for pushing “eco-terrorism” in comments to the MRC: “The New Yorker appears to be joining the growing movement of green activists endorsing intimidation and coercion to achieve environmental and climate goals.” He continued: “Many environmental activists seem to be asking themselves why not use violence and threats of violence to achieve their ends.” Morano said that “[t]his era of COVID mandate coercion may be further radicalizing environmental and climate activists to get the same attention as the COVID.”

NPR / New Yorker feature Eco-terrorist threats to UN climate summit (COP26) – New Yorker asks: ‘Should The Climate Movement Embrace Sabotage?’

National Public Radio and New Yorker magazine provided their media outlets to Swedish Eco terrorist Andreas Malm whose book is titled “How to Blow up a Pipeline.” The New Yorker featured the headline: “Should The Climate Movement Embrace Sabotage?” Malm believes the Earth is on fire and society cannot delay waiting for democracy or non-violent change. Instead, Malm calls for the destruction of pipelines, machinery, and burning cars and buildings and says Black Lives Matter (BLM) would never have advanced or had an impact without violence.  Malm calls for sabotage to achieve his desired ends. The German Edition of his book adds to the title: Battle lessons for a world in flames. Malm says UN process a waste and calls for protests at COP 26 to go beyond nonviolence in a break with past demonstrations. Malm says protesters should not assassinate CEOs or hurt people, just property. https://www.newyorker.com/podcast/the-new-yorker-radio-hour/should-the-climate-movement-embrace-sabotage https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/tnyradiohour/episodes/should-the-climate-movement-embrace-sabotage # Marc Morano, author of Green Fraud comments:  “The New Yorker appears to be joining the growing movement of green activists endorsing intimidation and coercion to achieve environmental and climate goals. It should not be surprising given that NASA’s former lead global warming scientist James Hansen endorsed a book over a decade ago that suggested “razing cities to the ground” and “blowing up damns” to lower CO2 emissions. Many environmental activists seem to be asking themselves why not use violence and threats of violence to achieve their ends. We live in an age where COVID lockdowns and mandates are being coercively imposed upon societies and many face unemployment and disenfranchisement if they don’t comply. This era of COVID mandate coercion may be further radicalizing environmental and climate activists to get the same attention as the COVID. Watching politicians threaten to cut off your home’s utilities if you don’t comply with COVID mandates may be emboldening green campaigners to use force and (in the word of Andreas Malm) “intelligent sabotage” to gain the same type of attention and power from the public.” Related: New York Magazine climate reporter David Wallace-Wells, also provided a featured review of Malm’s book: “If a livable world requires an all-over transformation, where and when and how do we start? Perhaps with this book, a provocative manifesto from the pioneering theorist of the climate age.” – David Wallace-Wells, author of The Uninhabitable Earth In 2010, NASA’s former lead climate scientist also endorsed a similar sounding book. See: James Hansen declared author ‘has it right…the system is the problem’ — Book proposes ‘razing cities to the ground, blowing up dams and switching off the greenhouse gas emissions machine’ 2013: Video: Eco-Terror Threats Issued at Rally: Climate Depot attended: ‘We will dismantle the Pipeline’ sign prominently displayed at rally — ‘By any means necessary’ Watch: Morano on RT: Green radicals are ready to kill for their cause

Newsweek Headline Celebrates Taliban Vow to ‘Fight Terror and Climate Change’ & Seek ‘World Recognition’

    https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/business/joseph-vazquez/2021/08/25/disgusting-newsweek-headline-celebrates-taliban-vow-fight By Joseph Vazquez Has Newsweek lost its mind? The outlet published an insane article giving the Taliban praise for promising to fight “terror” and “climate change” in order to gain legitimacy in world politics. The magazine’s headline read like a Babylon Bee joke: “Seeking World Recognition, Taliban Vows to Help Fight Terror and Climate Change.” Newsweek Senior Writer of Foreign Policy Tom O’Connor pushed how Taliban Cultural Commission member Abdul Qahar Balkhi “told Newsweek that his group sought worldwide recognition of the Islamic Emirate.” Balkhi propagandized to the outlet how the organization’s drive for “recognition” would be bolstered in part by the terror group’s commitment to “fight terror” and so-called climate change. “‘We hope not only to be recognized by regional countries but the entire world at large as the legitimate representative government of the people of Afghanistan,’” Balkhi said in part, according to Newsweek. It is damning that a U.S. publication would lower itself so far down the eco-extremist cesspool that it would attempt to humanize an Islamic terrorist group currently slaughtering people in Afghanistan as a result of President Joe Biden’s massive foreign policy failure. O’Connor propagandized how Balkhi “argued that such a move [for world recognition] would be to the benefit of not only Afghanistan but nations across the globe.” He dedicated several lines  to allowing Balkhi to direct attention away from the murder his organization is inflicting on the Afghani people onto climate change: ‘We believe the world has a unique opportunity of rapprochement and coming together to tackle the challenges not only facing us but the entire humanity,’ Balkhi added, ‘and these challenges ranging from world security and climate change need the collective efforts of all, and cannot be achieved if we exclude or ignore an entire people who have been devastated by imposed wars for the past four decades.’ O’Connor even puffed how “the Taliban have expressed their concern for the environment and its future.” He did this before adding a qualifier that the group’s takeover placed it “effectively in control of what’s estimated by the U.S. Geological Survey to be up to $1 trillion in mineral resources.” Newsweek’s decision to provide a megaphone to the Taliban wasn’t the first time a prominent outlet has tried to nonsensically lump the terrorist group and climate change together. Recently, CBS News published an outrageous story blaming climate change for the Taliban’s rise. CBS News climate and energy reporter Cara Korte’s absurd story was headlined: “How climate change helped strengthen the Taliban.” But O’Connor’s Taliban spin was horrific in another context as well. The United Nations reported in July that “[m]ore women and children were killed and wounded in Afghanistan in the first half of 2021 than in the first six months of any year since records began in 2009.” The UN said these records followed “the Taliban offensive to take territory from Government forces.” But that didn’t stop O’Connor from summarizing the Taliban’s absurdity that “militants would never again be allowed to launch attacks against other countries” in the first paragraph of his story.

Biden’s nominee to lead the Bureau of Land Management supported population control & eco-terrorist tree spiking

    https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2021/06/24/bidens-nominee-to-lead-the-bureau-of-land-management-supported-population-control-and-tree-spiking-n398841 BY JOHN SEXTON Her name is Tracy Stone-Manning and she’s President Biden’s pick to lead the Bureau of Land Management. Yesterday the Daily Caller dug up Stone-Manning’s 1992 graduate thesis which was titled “Into the heart of the beast| A case for environmental advertising.” It contained a series of environmental adds, at least one of which was focused on population control: “The origin of our abuses is us. If there were fewer of us, we would have less impact,” Stone-Manning wrote in her thesis. “We must consume less, and more importantly, we must breed fewer consuming humans.”… Stone-Manning’s thesis was centered around eight advertisements she created to bring attention to issues of overpopulation, overgrazing, the corporate timber industry and an 1872 mining law… The first advertisement featured in the paper was a picture of a shirtless American baby with the headline: “Can you find the environmental hazard in this photo?” Here’s the ad itself. The text at the bottom reads: “That’s right, it’s the cute baby. Americans believe that overpopulation is only a problem somewhere else in the world. But it’s a problem here too.” It goes on to say, “We breed more than any other industrialized nation.” Speaking about the proposed ad, Stone-Manning admitted it was harsh. “Harshly, the ads say that the earth can’t afford Americans. More softly, they ask people to think about how their family planning choices affect the planet,” she wrote. Stone-Manning has already made headlines this week after the former head of the Bureau of Land Management under President Obama called for her to withdraw her name over a tree-spiking incident she was involved with in 1989. [Robert] Abbey, who served as BLM director from 2009 to 2012, told E&E News that he had initially supported Tracy Stone-Manning’s nomination. But said he is “now one of the people who believe that she should withdraw her name from further consideration for the BLM director position.”… “As a 30-year BLM career employee, I don’t take her actions lightly, nor should anyone else,” Abbey said. “If Stone-Manning participated in any aspect of planning, implementation or cover-up in the spiking of trees, then she should not be confirmed.” Tree-spiking has been called a form of eco-terrorism and presents a serious hazard to anyone cutting into a tree with a chainsaw or at a sawmill. A sawmill worker named George Alexander was nearly killed in 1987 when a massive blade hit a spike and exploded. Stone-Manning admitted to sending a letter on behalf of her friend who spiked the trees: Stone-Manning has admitted that she sent a letter to the US Forest Service on behalf of her friend and former roommate John Blount in 1989, when she was a graduate student at the University of Montana. The letter revealed that 500 pounds of “spikes measuring 8 to 10 inches in length” had been driven into trees in Idaho’s Clearwater National Forest… The letter warned officials that the trees “were marked so that no workers would be injured and so that you a–holes know that they are spiked. The majority of the trees were spiked within the first ten feet, but many, many others were spiked as high as a hundred and fifty feet.” “P.S., You bastards go in there anyway and a lot of people could get hurt,” concluded the letter, which was obtained by Fox News last week. Blount was convicted and sentenced to 17 months in prison. Stone-Manning got a pass because she agreed to testify against him. As recently as yesterday the White House was still defending her nomination. The fact that she was clearly an extremist doesn’t seem to concern the Biden administration.

Energy Infrastructure Terrorism Taking Root in Germany, Europe

https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/4rUNGyamP_fC4uaI9e3MYmW0GqTRQSgk Energy Infrastructure Terrorism Taking Root in Germany, EuropeClimate Change Dispatch / 3hblackout germanyBlackout News reports on how radical activists are attempting to paralyze the power supply in Germany. It’s already bad enough that the European power grid is already highly unstable and could collapse due to just minor disturbances, this in large part due to the shutdowns of unwanted nuclear and coal-fired power plants and the feeding in of unsteady wind and solar energies. But now the unstable supply situation is being exacerbated by radical activists sabotaging power supply infrastructure. Blackout News reports: “For example, radical activists tried to paralyze the power supply for the Tesla plant in Grünheide. There, the Vulkan group claims to have set a cable fire in order to paralyze the power supply.” Luckily the Tesla plant power supply attack was unsuccessful. The Grünheide attack was not an isolated incident. Blackout News also reports: “Left-wing radical activists have also claimed responsibility for an arson attack on power cables in connection with a power outage in parts of Munich. The attack was intended to target a supplier of the German Armed Forces.” The authorities are investigating. That attack was successful: “The cable fire left around 20,000 households in eastern Munich without electricity for more than 24 hours on May 21.” A letter claiming responsibility for the Tesla plant and German Army attacks was allegedly written: “The primary target of this action was arm’s manufacturer Rhode & Schwarz at Munich’s Ostbahnhof, which we were, fortunately, able to cut off the juice for at least 24 hours.” It took several days to fully repair the damage. The power outage was localized, but “vaccine and insulin spoiled in the refrigerators of pharmacies and doctors’ offices,” writes Blackout News. The deputy chairman of the Bundesverband für den Schutz Kritische Infrastrukturen (German Association for Critical Infrastructure Protection), Dr. Hans-Walter Borries, sees “a new danger for critical infrastructure facilities” in Germany, which are “hardly protected”. These include infrastructure for the supply of electricity, natural gas, water supply, and telecommunications. “There have already been several attacks on electricity pylons, telephone converters, and telephone junction boxes.” Experts now worry that copycats will repeat attacks and do a better job of learning where to hit infrastructure more effectively. “There are many virtually unprotected facilities on the European power grid at which an attack would have far more serious consequences, reports BlackOut News. “It is only a matter of time before militant groups acquire the relevant information and plan attacks on a much larger scale.” Read more at No Tricks Zone SHAREVISIT WEBSITE

Why is Biden energy sec. smiling!? Skyrocketing energy prices are all part of the ‘Green Fraud’ – Welcome Back, (Jimmy) Carter -2021: ‘Maybe Pipeline Terrorists Are Just Environmentalists’ – 2013: ‘We will dismantle the Pipeline…by any means necessary’

Energy Sec Granholm can’t suppress her smiles over gasoline shortages – Claims ‘supply crunch’ NOT ‘shortage’ Thomas Lifson: “Don’t you realize it’s good for you to learn to get along without fossil fuels? Did you realize that if you drive an electric car, this wouldn’t be a problem? Watch as a reporter’s question on whether the shutdown would ‘speed up’ the transition to green energy yields utterly inappropriate (and chilling, if you think about it) smiles from Granholm…Sacrifices are going to have to be made, and it’s the little people who must make them. Don’t expect Granholm to take the bus to work or swear off private jets..And don’t call what’s going on a ‘gasoline shortage’! That’s too reminiscent of Jimmy Carter. Call it a ‘supply crunch’! She’s got her glasses on to show how concerned and well informed she is, but the smiles still sneak through.” # . Obama called it in 2008! Get ready for electricity prices to ‘necessarily skyrocket’‘Put them in jail’: Biden demanded fossil fuel execs be locked up in 2019 & Noam Chomsky: Biden on climate is ‘farther to the left than any Dem candidate in memory’ & Net-Zero = ‘Soviet-style central planning’ Flashback 2011: Morano on Fox News on Obama’s energy policies: Sec. Chu said he favored gas prices at level of Europeans…Holdren once said the greatest ‘hazard’ in U.S. faced was cheap energy An Inconvenient Statement on European gas prices, Retracted: Sec. Chu: ‘I no longer share that view. Of course we don’t want the price of gasoline to go up. We want it to go down’ Flashback April 2009: Energy Sec. Chu admited he was ‘Silly’ to call for $8 per gallon gas in U.S. Energy Sec. Chu: My Job is to Take the Pain Out of High Gas Prices — Despite Endorsing European-Style Gas Prices For U.S. Flashback 2011: Morano on Fox News on Obama’s energy policies: Sec. Chu said he favored gas prices at level of Europeans…Holdren once said the greatest ‘hazard’ in U.S. faced was cheap energy – Morano: ‘When you have food on the table you have many problems, when you do not have food, there is only one problem’– Obama’s energy policy can be summed up: ‘The more the plans fail, the more the planners plan’ Flashback 1975: Obama Science Czar John Holdren warned U.S. ‘threatened’ by ‘the hazards of too much energy’– Flashback 1975: Former Obama Science Czar John Holdren Said Real Threat to USA Is Cheap Energy: ‘The U.S. is threatened far more by the hazards of too much energy, too soon, than by the hazards of too little energy, too late.’ John Holdren lamented the masses driving to the store to get beer in 1975! Holdren: “In a society that uses its 5,000-pound automobiles for half-mile round trips to the market to fetch a six-pack of beer, consumes the beer in buildings that are overcooled in summer and overheated in winter, and then throws the aluminum cans away at an energy loss equivalent to a third of a gallon of gasoline per six-pack, this ‘primitive existence’ argument strikes me as the most offensive kind of nonsense.” # Welcome Back, (Jimmy) Carter: ‘Economy was in the tank, inflation was rampant, gas lines were long’ – ‘At least in 1979 we weren’t locked down, masked up, & socially distanced’ National Average Gas Price Surges To Highest Level Since Obama Era ‘There Is Not A Supply Shortage.’ Homeland Security Advisor Reacts To Concerns Of Fuel Shortages Following Pipeline Cyberattack Welcome back to the 1970s!? 1,000+ Gas Stations Run Out Of Fuel; States Declare Emergencies # ‘Maybe the Pipeline Terrorists Are Just Environmentalists’ – Flashback: ‘We will dismantle the Pipeline…by any means necessary’ 2013:  NASA’s James Hansen, a muse to Eco-Terrorists?! Morano on Fox News: ‘NASA’s resident ex-con James Hansen is inspiring these people to potential acts of eco-terrorism’ — Eco-activists at DC Climate Rally: ‘Dismantle’ Keystone pipeline by ‘any means necessary’ – Cite Hansen as their inspiration 2010: NASA scientist James Hansen endorses book which calls for ‘ridding the world of Industrial Civilization’ – Hansen declares author ‘has it right…the system is the problem’ — Book proposes ‘razing cities to the ground, blowing up dams and switching off the greenhouse gas emissions machine’ . NASA’s James Hansen, a muse to Eco-Terrorists?! Morano on Fox News: ‘NASA’s resident ex-con James Hansen is inspiring these people to potential acts of eco-terrorism’ — Eco-activists at DC Climate Rally: ‘Dismantle’ Keystone pipeline by ‘any means necessary’ – Cite Hansen as their inspiration  

‘Maybe the Pipeline Terrorists Are Just Environmentalists’ – Flashback: ‘We will dismantle the Pipeline…by any means necessary’

Maybe the Pipeline Terrorists Are Just Environmentalists @IERenergy @AEA https://t.co/Z7IszvBiNc — Kevin Mooney (@KevinMooneyDC) May 11, 2021     Via National Review: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/maybe-the-pipeline-terrorists-are-just-environmentalists/ By KYLE SMITH – KYLE SMITH is a fellow at National Review Institute and National Review’s critic-at-large. @rkylesmith Presidents never get to choose events, and you can always count on their dreams of spending four years signing bills and doing other fun stuff being shattered as they instead spend unexpectedly large portions of their time running around with their hair on fire trying to manage various unexpected crises. Weirdly enough, Donald Trump’s presidency was just about crisis-free, for the first three years anyway. “President says something” isn’t an actual crisis, just a pretend one. If Joe Biden doesn’t get out in front of the Colonial pipeline cyberattack that has shut down a major fuel pipeline for two days and is beginning to cause panic in some areas of the Southeast, it’s going to hurt him badly. People tend to closely tie the situation at the gas pump with the man sitting in the Oval Office. And guess what? In Biden’s case that is perfectly reasonable after his spokesperson blandly dismissed concerns about the ransom attack on a critical portion of U.S. infrastructure as merely a private matter for one business to hash out with their, I dunno, military and intelligence arms, I guess. You’re on your own, fellas! Good luck. Now Team Biden, the media report with uncharacteristic alarm, is “scrambling” to look like they’re doing something. Joe should ask his close pal Jimmy Carter how spending four years in perpetual scrambling mode worked out. Here’s a little hunk of “whoa, things are getting bad”: On Tuesday morning, more than 7 percent of gas stations in Virginia, 5 percent in North Carolina and nearly 4 percent in Georgia were without fuel, according to Patrick De Haan, an oil analyst at Gas Buddy. A number of stations in Florida, Alabama and South Carolina also reported dry pumps. De Haan said fuel demand in these states spiked 40 percent on Monday, and cautioned against panic-buying, which will only exacerbate the shortages. If Biden himself were not on record as being himself a fan of shutting down fuel pipelines — Keystone XL not only was a menace to our American way of life by bringing us energy, Biden thought it had to be cut off before his first afternoon nap — this brewing crisis wouldn’t be so potentially damaging to him. Biden is an ardently pro-fuel-limits guy in a moment when fuel is limited. As one of his other first acts in office — “Let’s own Trump by endangering our energy future” — he also banned new fracking leases on federal land. Maybe it would be nice to have more energy supply rather than less given what’s happened since? Prices are already ticking up at the pump. The media can hide Hunter Biden’s influence-peddling and downplay Joe Biden’s lying, but they can’t hide gas prices.

Ezra Levant explains why liberals should support domestic fossil fuels: ‘Why on earth would you buy oil from Putin or from a terrorist fascist theocracy that stones women accused of adultery?’

(WATCH) @EzraLevant on @AP_Scoop: Why Biden Shouldn't Kill Keystone XLhttps://t.co/79bycZyqvb — Rebel News (@RebelNewsOnline) February 4, 2021 Joe Biden has killed the Keystone Pipeline in the name of 'climate change.' But without the Keystone Pipeline, America will be forced to get our oil & gas from countries with SERIOUS human rights violations. Full episode with @EzraLevant: https://t.co/rb0yiFrkH6 pic.twitter.com/pWqYv56kPS — Unreported Story Society (@AP_Unreported) February 5, 2021 Why Joe Biden Should NOT Kill The KeyStone Pipeline With Ezra Levant Of Rebel News! The Ann and Phelim Scoop – Joe Biden may have KILLED the Keystone Pipeline project forever. Not only will this cost America thousands of high-paying jobs during one of the worst recessions in American history, but it’s will also cut off America’s access to oil and gas that isn’t from a country with serious human rights violations. On today’s podcast, we are joined by energy expert and free speech warrior Ezra Levant of Canada’s Rebel News. Ezra takes us through Biden’s disastrous decision and explains why Biden is WRONG when he claims killing Keystone will help fight climate change. Ezra Levant, founder of Rebel News: I have in my book four measurements by which Canadian and American oil is morally superior than conflict oil. Number one: Environmental protection. They don’t that’s not a thing in the third world. Number two: Peace we don’t use oil to you know fund terrorism which is what they do in Iran or places like that Number three: What the left might call economic justice is all the money going to the oligarch at the top or in the case of America and Canada are ordinary men and women who work in the oil fields making high five-figure six-figure salaries. …Some of the best jobs in America are in oil and gas. Number four: Finally, something we take for granted in Canada, America, the UK: Human rights. We don’t stone gays. We allow women to work. I mean what’s the gender analysis on Saudi oil? There are no women allowed to work in Saudi Arabia. So if you care about the environment, peace, economic justice for workers, or human rights — the way Maduro treats aboriginal people in Venezuela for example — if you care about that. The reason I chose those four measurements because those are what liberals talk about. I’m a right-wing guy, so I talk about money and security and things like that. But if you’re a liberal, you claim you care about the environment peace economic justice and human rights, but why on earth then would you buy oil from Putin or from tyranny or a terrorist fascist theocracy that stones women accused of adultery?

‘Too crazy’: Watch: Reformed climate activist Shellenberger condemns ‘terrorizing school children’ with false climate scares

https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6168491756001 Former climate activist Michael Shellenberger has condemned alarmists for “terrorising school children” with false claims that the world is about to end. The life-long environmentalist has given Sky News host Chris Kenny a lengthy interview about his decision to speak out against the alarmist rhetoric which he says is creating anxiety in young people. “I have a 14-year-old daughter and she is fine because I’ve explained the science to her (but) her friends are very alarmed,” he said. “Adolescents these days have a lot to worry about, anxiety and depression are rising among everyone really, certainly adolescents, and I thought it was not right to be terrorizing school children and giving them false information.” Shellenberger – who has been invited to be an expert reviewer to the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – maintains that climate change is occurring but says it is not a “catastrophic threat”. He says the science has been hijacked by a “handful” of activist scientists who are spreading “science fiction”.“The majority of scientists are not activists, there are actually only a handful of scientists who feel the need to terrify people,” he said. “I don’t think this is really that complicated, we need to lift everybody out of poverty, and we need to do our best to preserve natural places and things have just spiraled out of control.“ This climate change thing has just got too crazy.” Shellenberger said he had noticed a “dark tradition” of anti-human rhetoric spilling from climate change activists, including views that humans were a “cancer” or a virus. In the second half of the interview – which will air on Sky News Australia on the Kenny Report at 5pm on Thursday night – Shellenberger also weighs into whether climate change was a significant cause of the Australian bushfires. “Yes there is evidence of that,” he said. “However, It is massively outweighed by two factors; the accumulation of wood fuel in the forests and the development of new houses near forests.“Is there some contributing role of climate change? Yes. Is it very significant? No”.  

Vice Mag: ‘People of Color Experience Climate Grief More Deeply Than White People’ – ‘Disproportionately affected by the climate crisis’ & ‘carry a pain that comes from a long history of racial terror’

No offense, but the notion that white people need "a climate person of colour" to save them from white person-induced bad weather is very deeply insane. https://t.co/FPdKhtXd2A — Tom Nelson (@tan123) June 9, 2020 Claim: 'People of Color Experience Climate Grief More Deeply Than White People' – 'Disproportionately affected by the climate crisis' will & 'carry a pain that comes from a long history of racial terror' – VICE – https://t.co/d15klKQKc7 — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) May 17, 2020 Oh my! Also see: Flashback 2019: ‘White People’ blamed for causing Cyclone Idai in Africa – ‘Even the white man’s own science corroborates what we blacks know’ https://t.co/HHeQv2SYf8 — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) May 17, 2020 It just keeps getting more ludicrous and laughable. — Cosmo270 (@OlmsteadSam) May 17, 2020 https://twitter.com/InTreyb/status/1262127277766303744 Yet, just this week Twitter​ was awash with sappy lamentations about Vice's layoffs… According to Anna, an "objectively essential" writer penned that climate piece. pic.twitter.com/NpqeqIjNE0 — Mike Moss (@_MikeMoss) May 17, 2020 The (black) reverend Jesse Jackson's signature phrase for decades has been "Keep hope alive!" For any doubts, just search for his 1984 Democratic convention speech. — William Orange (@maillotorange) May 18, 2020 When you can’t make a logical, legitimate argument backed with data – thrown down the race card. https://t.co/TbAKhUiUk1 — 🎶Julann🌹🍿 (@julannwis) May 18, 2020 # https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/v7ggqx/people-of-color-experience-climate-grief-more-deeply-than-white-people Vice Mag: People of Color Experience Climate Grief More Deeply Than White People We are not only disproportionately affected by the climate crisis, but we carry a pain that comes from a long history of racial terror. By Nylah Burton When the wildfires hit Australia last year, Bee Cruse was horrified at the sight of the red sky, the black ash falling like snow, and the smoke choking the whole East Coast. The fires were a direct reminder of the British genocide against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people like her, and the tearing of them from country and their traditional ways of land management. In an article for Vox, Cruse, a Wiradjuri, Gomeroi, and Monaroo-Yuin storyteller, told me, “We see and feel the spirit of our animals and our land; they are our ancestor spirits. We don’t own country, country owns us; we come from her to protect her. When country hurts, we hurt. When our animals, our spirit cousins, cry, we cry.” What Cruse was describing was climate grief, a psychological phenomenon that affects Black and Indigenous peoples, and other people of color, in uniquely devastating ways. Just as we are seeing with the COVID-19 outbreak, environmental racism forces people of color, especially Black and Indigenous peoples, to bear the brunt of global disaster. We are not only disproportionately affected by the climate crisis—breathing in more pollution, living in communities with higher temperatures, suffering from more medical conditions, experiencing more natural disasters, and being displaced at much higher rates—but we carry the pain of the climate crisis deep inside us. In its 2014 report, Beyond Storms & Droughts: The Psychological Impacts of Climate Change, the American Psychological Association (APA) found that the climate crisis was affecting human mental health across the globe. Anyone can experience climate grief, regardless of their identity. But for us, our grief—and our anger—is rooted in centuries of painful history, and the current ecological violence hurled at our communities. “Just like other stressors that people of color experience, ecological grief is often magnified,” said Dr. Tyffani Dent, a licensed psychologist and author, in an interview. “People of color know…society is going to make sure we’re impacted first, and impacted the hardest,” Dent said. The climate crisis is linked to our oppression Xiye Bastida, a youth climate activist, a member of the Indigenous Mexican Otomi-Toltec nation, and an organizer of Fridays for Future, says that her climate grief is deeply tied to her Indigenous identity. “For Indigenous people, climate grief comes from when they’re first displaced by fossil fuel companies, by drilling, by fracking infrastructure that makes Indigenous communities be moved from their place of origin, their place that they have a relationship with. (Our) relationship with the land is the first thing that we care about,” Bastida said. For Black and Indigenous peoples, you could argue that the history of our oppression is the story of the Anthropocene itself—the current geological age defined by the dominant influence that human activity has had on mass extinction, climate, and the environment. Without colonization, the trans-Atlantic slave trade, and the genocide and oppression of Indigenous peoples around the world, we likely would be living in a different reality. Research has bolstered the idea that white supremacy has led to the climate crisis. Scientists from University College London found that the mass genocide that accompanied the colonization of the Americas in the 15th century permanently altered Earth’s climate, due to “a huge swathe of abandoned agricultural land” that “pulled down enough carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to eventually chill the planet.” Ravenous for the mass production of lucrative commodities such as salt, cotton, and sugar, the slavemasters and colonists stripped the land in what’s now known as Canada and the United States, the Caribbean, and South America, murdering countless Africans and Indigenous peoples along the way. Worldwide, the memory of indescribable racial terror informs the climate grief of our people. … Bastida, whose hometown in Mexico experienced a devastating flood, knows how these tears can move us to action. “Because Black, Indigenous, and brown communities are the most affected, it is indicative of not only more grief, but also more action. My personal climate grief was addressed when I started being an activist, having a purpose, (saying) ‘I’m not gonna let this happen.’” “Hope is such a white concept.” Heglar says that too often, the white-led climate community leans on the idea of hope, which can lead to inaction. Hope is “such a white concept,” Heglar said. “You’re supposed to have the courage first, then you have the action, then you have the hope. But white people put hope at the front. Their insistence on hope for all of these years has led to exactly where? Nowhere.” Working in the climate movement while trying to process climate grief can be difficult for people of color, whose voices are so often silenced and ignored. “There’s a certain loneliness that comes with being a climate person,” Heglar said. “Then there’s an extra layer of loneliness that comes with being a climate person of color, because you’re just stuck in this perpetual position of trying to save white people from themselves. And it’s so fucking exhausting.” But for Heglar, that feeling has been relieved somewhat by finding ways to help one another heal. “In 2019, people of color really took up space in the climate movement in a way that had never been done before; we made our presence known. And so that has (made me) feel a lot less lonely,” she said. People of color are connected by historical trauma. And when we come together and share our experiences, we can help reshape this world into something new. As Kritee said, “We are part of a river of grief. And we are never alone.” Nylah Burton is a writer based in Washington D.C., who covers mental health, climate, and race. Follow her on Twitter. Have a story for Tipping Point? Email [email protected] This article originally appeared on VICE CA. # Flashback 2015:  @ViCE Climate Depot’s Morano: HBO's VICE Show Manipulated My Antarctic Ice Interview http://t.co/cbuALTnhhT via @ClimateDepot — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) March 13, 2015  

For more results click below