Climate Depot Analysis
I've said this before, but if you think the costs of doing something about climate change are high, wait till you see how much it costs us to do nothing! https://t.co/nX58y1L0Qt
— Ezra Klein (@ezraklein) January 27, 2021
Climate Depot’s Marc Morano Responds:
If We Had a Problem, The Climate “Solutions” Wouldn’t Solve It
President Joe Biden’s Climate envoy John Kerry is wrong. And he knows he is wrong. See: January 2021: Kerry admits zero emissions in US wouldn’t make difference in climate change
“Doing nothing” on climate is actually an apt description for the climate activists and the UN Paris Agreement, past cap-and-trade bills, carbon taxes, and the Green New Deal. Even Obama’s EPA admitted that the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill will not have a measurable impact on global CO2 levels, let alone any measurable or detectable
impact on global temperatures. The man-made climate fear promoters have been promoting a do-nothing approach to climate change since the movement’s launch by consistently pushing purely symbolic “solutions” to global warming.
Green New Deal would have NO impact on climate even if you believe the UN & Al Gore’s scientific claims
A 2019 study by American Enterprise Institute found that Green New Deal Would Have ‘No Effect’ On Climate Change – even if you use UN ‘science,’ GND’s temperature impact would be ‘barely distinguishable from zero’. A new study from the American Enterprise Institute: “In total, completely enacted, funded, and efficiently meeting goals, – things AEI does not anticipate the GND would ever do — – the full plan would cut the global increase in temperature by a whopping “0.083 to 0.173 degrees,” a number, the report says, is “barely distinguishable from zero.”
In 2019, Climatologist Dr. Patrick Michaels ran the Green New Deal’s alleged climate impact through the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s so-called “MAGICC” climate model simulator, developed with funding from the Environmental Protection Agency. The results? “I seriously think the effect would – at best – be barely detectable in the climate record,” Patrick Michaels explained. “The year-to-year variation is very close to the total amount of warming that would be ‘saved’ by 2100, according to EPA’s own model,” Michaels said.
Green New Deal, EPA policies & UN pacts are not an “insurance policy” against “climate change.”
Would anyone purchase fire insurance on their home that had a huge upfront premium for virtually no payout if your home burned down? If you answered YES to such an “insurance” policy, then Congress, the EPA, and the UN have a deal for you with their “climate” regulations. The sponsors of the Green New Deal ought to be able to show that its benefits outweigh its costs—or at least that it has benefits! How much does the proposed new deal allegedly reduce temperature and storminess? Zero! If we actually did face a man-made climate crisis and we had to rely on the U.S. Congress or the United Nations to save us, we would all be DOOMED.
The Green New Deal, the UN Paris agreement, carbon taxes, and EPA regulations can’t control the climate
University of Pennsylvania Geologist Dr. Robert Giegengack noted: “None of the strategies that have been offered by the U.S. government or by the EPA or by anybody else has the remotest chance of altering climate if in fact climate is controlled by carbon dioxide.”
Shock graph of rising CO2 emissions despite ‘planet-saving’ UN climate pacts shows ‘farce’ of ‘climate action’ – Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore: “What a farce the IPCC Paris Accord and all previous ‘agreements’ to reduce CO2 emissions have been. If only the collective billionaire-class would recognize that CO2 is entirely beneficial we could get on with making the world a better place.”
Danish statistician Dr. Bjorn Lomborg, the President of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, noted in 2017 about the UN Paris agreement: “We will spend at least one hundred trillion dollars in order to reduce the temperature by the end of the century by a grand total of three tenths of one degree … the equivalent of postponing warming by less than four years. … Again, that is using the UN’s own climate prediction model.” Lomborg added: “If the U.S. delivers for the whole century on President Obama’s very ambitious rhetoric, it would postpone global warming by about eight months at the end of the century.”
In 2015: President Obama’s EPA Chief admitted the regulations have no measurable climate impact. – “One one-hundredth of a degree?” EPA Chief McCarthy defends regs as “enormously beneficial” – Symbolic impact.
Former Obama Department of Energy Assistant Secretary Charles McConnell slammed EPA climate regs as “Falsely sold as impactful” – “All U.S. annual emissions will be offset by 3 weeks of Chinese emissions.”
January 2021: Kerry admits zero emissions in US wouldn’t make difference in climate change – New York Post: Kerry’s remarks were made ahead of Biden’s signing of a host of executive actions on Wednesday pushing his $2 trillion Green New Deal-inspired climate agenda. “He knows Paris alone is not enough,” Kerry told reporters at a White House press briefing, referring to Biden re-entering the US in the Paris Climate Agreement in one of his first acts as president.
Flashback 2015: Then Sec. of State John Kerry explains climate futility: If U.S. zeroed out CO2 emissions, it ‘still wouldn’t be enough to offset the carbon pollution coming from the rest of the world’
Doing nothing is infinitely smarter than giving trillions of dollars to climate scammers for absolutely no measurable climate or weather benefit. https://t.co/PNviw7des6
— Tom Nelson (@tan123) January 27, 2021