Links tagged “overpopulation”
- Warnings of climate cannibalism are nothing new: Ted Turner in 2008 warned that AGW survivors ‘will be cannibals’ & Paul Ehrlich warned in 2014 that ‘climate change’ will force humans to ‘eat bodies of dead’
- Bernie Suggests Funding Abortions In ‘Poor Countries’ To Fight Climate Change
- Climate Activists Face Extinction As ‘Birthstrikers’ Refuse To Have Children
- Prince Harry: Two children maximum to fight ‘global warming’!
- ‘The earth is angry’: Miley Cyrus Won’t Reproduce Due to ‘Climate Change’
- The primal scream of climate change fanatics – Claims ‘aided and abetted by a dishonest media’
- Watch: Morano on Canadian TV: Warmists aren’t having kids because ‘white privilege and climate change’
- POPULATION BOMB? CHINA EXPECTED TO HAVE 400 MILLION FEWER PEOPLE BY 2100
- Here we go again: UN, Media recycle climate species ‘extinction’ fears – Dredge up discredited Paul Ehrlich
Update April 7, 2019: Rolling Stone mag rips Morano as a ‘quack’ & slams Fox News for allowing him on about UN species report – Morano responds
#
Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore explains the species scare: “Since species extinction became a broad social concern, coinciding with the extinction of the passenger pigeon, we have done a pretty good job of preventing species extinctions."
Moore bluntly mocked species extinction claims made by biologist Edward O. Wilson from Harvard University. Wilson estimated that up to 50,000 species go extinct every year based on computer models of the number of potential but as yet undiscovered species in the world. Moore: “There’s no scientific basis for saying that 50,000 species are going extinct. The only place you can find them is in Edward O. Wilson’s computer at Harvard University. They’re actually electrons on a hard drive. I want a list of Latin names of actual species.”
UK scientist Professor Philip Stott, emeritus professor of Biogeography at the University of London: “The earth has gone through many periods of major extinctions, some much bigger in size than even being contemplated today...Change is necessary to keep up with change in nature itself. In other words, change is the essence. And the idea that we can keep all species that now exist would be anti-evolutionary, anti-nature and anti the very nature of the earth in which we live."
- Climate ‘BirthStrike’: This woman won’t have children because of climate change. She’s not alone
The founder of a group of "birth strikers" says choosing not to have children is only rational when faced with the potential havoc that climate change may inflict on future generations."We're looking at famine and we're looking at mass displacement. We're looking at severe weather systems, we're looking at general drought and sea-level rise," said Blythe Pepino, who launched the BirthStrike movement.
