Links tagged “masks”
- Is the Science on Masks Settled? Yes. ‘Masks have no impact on the transmission of respiratory viruses’
As Dr. Andrew Bostom points out in an interview with noted liberal feminist Naomi Wolf, multiple randomized controlled tests—the “gold standard” of scientific evidence—performed prior to the pandemic found that masks have no impact on the transmission of respiratory viruses. The only RCT conducted since the pandemic began, the so-called “Danmask study,” reached the same conclusion. The World Health Organization grudgingly concedes as much.
- Keeping us masked forever? The Davos set’s dystopian ambitions are very clear
- Discarded masks litter beaches worldwide, threaten sea life
- Claim: Face masks are a ticking plastic bomb – ‘Cannot be readily biodegraded’
- Covid Masks Are Now Polluting Beaches, Coral Reefs
- Analysis: Masking Children: Tragic, Unscientific, & Damaging
Data now suggests (even though still nascent) that children not only have extremely low risk as mentioned above but also that they naturally have the capability of evading the SARS-CoV-2 virus due to the lack of the ACE-2 receptors in their nostrils. It escapes us as to why this deceit continues to be served to the public and has not been stopped forthwith.
- ‘If masks work, then why don’t masks work?’ CDC mask study debunked by statistician Dr. Matt Briggs
- Lockdowns: Which ‘Experts’ Were Right? ‘A year later it’s clear that most media & govt experts were dead wrong’
- CDC’s double mask mannequin ‘study’ is lunacy dressed up as science: ‘No human beings were involved in this study’ – CDC admits ‘double masking might impede breathing’
CDC report: “Double masking might impede breathing or obstruct peripheral vision for some wearers, and knotting and tucking can change the shape of the mask such that it no longer covers fully both the nose and the mouth of persons with larger faces.”
Jordan Schachtel: No human beings were involved in this study. And yes, it was that simple. The CDC sprayed aerosols at mannequins and slapped a science™ label on their experiments. ... First and foremost, it is not a completed study at all. These are mere experiments conducted on mannequins, not humans. A proper study on the efficacy of masks needs to be a randomized controlled trial involving human beings in their normal settings — such as the Danish mask study that showed there is no evidence that masks do anything to prevent COVID-19 — and not mannequins in a laboratory.
#
- STUDY: The weather has a bigger impact on COVID spread than social distancing – Temperature, humidity, & wind predict when 2nd wave will peak
