https://libertysentinel.substack.com/p/un-deliberates-in-armenia-to-lock
The UN 30×30 plan will place a third of Earth’s land and water under control—threatening private property, national sovereignty, and economic freedom–as a first step to even MORE!
BY ALEX NEWMAN
Excerpt: YEREVAN, ARMENIA – Delegates from nearly 200 governments, United Nations bureaucrats, environmental NGOs, and assorted “stakeholders” are gathering here in Yerevan, Armenia, this month for the 17th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity with big plans for your life, liberty, and property. This writer is also here to bring you the facts about what they’re plotting.
Officially, COP17 is about “taking action for nature.” In reality, it is the latest chapter in a long-running effort to place vast tracts of land, water, and “genetic resources” under expanding international control, with national governments and private owners expected to fall in line. Also on the agenda is getting the UN-backed “biodiversity” agenda into all policy fields. The stakes could not be higher.
The UN’s 30×30 Land Agenda
The centerpiece is the first formal global review of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, adopted in 2022. That agreement sets 23 targets for 2030.
The most explosive of those is Target 3: ensuring that at least 30 percent of the world’s terrestrial, inland water, and marine areas are “effectively conserved and managed” through protected areas and other measures. Yes, almost one third of the world’s surface area should be under UN and government influence if not control, with more to follow.
Supporters call it 30×30. Critics, including American agricultural officials who have examined parallel domestic efforts, have described similar schemes as a vehicle for locking up productive land and restricting the people who own and work it.
The framework sits squarely inside the broader UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, which former UN officials have openly described as the “masterplan for humanity” and the “declaration of interdependence.”
The biodiversity targets are meant to mesh with climate goals, land-use planning, subsidy reform, and financing rules. So-called “National Biodiversity Strategies” and “Action Plans” are the delivery mechanism for it all.
Governments and dictators are expected to revise them, report progress, and face a “stocktake” that identifies who is “behind.” Even governments that never ratified the Convention on Biological Diversity—the United States among them—face soft pressure through subnational governments, financial institutions, and the sheer weight of coordinated international policymaking.
