Physicist Dr. Lubos Motl: RICO: IPCC and comrades may be prosecuted for racketeering
Naomi Oreskes claims 'only prove that she is a dishonest and hateful Marxist shrew who just doesn't want to look at any of these problems impartially.'
'Climate alarmism is clearly the greatest racket in the world as of 2015.'
Does it make any sense to try to prosecute climate skeptics by referring to RICO? The answer is obviously No. They are not racketeering, they are not influenced, they are not corrupt, and they are not even an organization in any sense. However, someone else could be tried as a violator of the RICO act.
Just think about it: Which people are grouped in organizations that corrupt others? Which group of people has received over $50 billions for having done nothing useful because this group has been connected?