Links tagged “sunspots”
- Listen: DC’s WMAL Interview – Morano debunks dimming the Sun to save us from ‘global warming’
- Gutfeld Says The Media ‘Would Freak Out’ If Trump Suggested Blocking The Sun To Decrease Climate Change
- Watch: Morano on Fox and Friends rips efforts to block the sun with geoengineering to stop ‘global warming’
Morano: "This is a redo of the 1970s. Before fossil fuels caused global warming, fossil fuels caused global cooling and the coming ice age in the 1970s! They were worried that our fossil fuel pollution was blocking out the sun creating global dimming and the next ice age and they wanted to put black soot on the artic to melt the ice. They suggested using nuclear energy to melt ice. So they were trying to geoengineer the climate back in the 1970s and here we have come full circle now trying to do it the other way by essentially cooling the planet instead of trying to warm it." ...
They are saying, 'We are being forced to do this risky radical experiment on our planet' and so the implication is if we would only reduce our emissions, 'We need to embrace the Green New Deal. We need to embrace it so we cannot alter and dangerously experiment with our planet.' ...
Some people are terrified to think of Bill Gates as their doctor. But think of Bill Gates controlling Mother Nature. That may be scarier."
- Scientists Continue To Affirm Rising Incoming Solar Radiation Drives Recent Warming In Europe
- NYT’s Ezra Klein Ponders Having to ‘Dim the Sun’ to Fight Climate Change – Asks ‘Will we even have a choice?’
- Bill Gates’ Savior Complex: Funds Sun-Dimming Plan To Save the Human Race
- Consensus wrong? New sunspot cycle could be one of the strongest on record, new research predicts
- Physicist: ‘Evidence Mounting for Global Cooling Ahead: Record Snowfalls, Less Greenland Ice Loss’
- Physicist: Upcoming Grand Solar Minimum Could Wipe Out Global Warming for Decades
- Solar Cycle 25 To Repeat Low Cycle 24, Scientists Predict
-
New Study Crushes IPCC Alarm: Hails A 22% Global Decline In Natural Disaster Death Risk Since 1990s
-
Geologist’s skeptical global warming book is driving Norwegian climate alarmists nuts
-
‘Sink into your grief’: How a ‘sustainability’ scientist confronts her ‘feelings of sadness’ over ‘climate change’
Sustainability scientist Kimberly Nicholas new book, Under the Sky We Make: How to Be Human in a Warming World: "She has struggled to address her feelings of sadness." ... Q: You write that your own approach has included learning to “sink into your grief.”
A: There are things that are changing beyond recognition right now from climate change, and that makes me really sad. And to me, grieving is an important part of the process of acknowledging that. It does draw from my experience of losing a dear friend to cancer, who died at 37. ... it shouldn’t take a terminal diagnosis for life on Earth to wake us up to the urgency of working for climate stability." ...
“My dispassionate training,” the Lund University researcher writes, has “not prepared me for the increasingly frequent emotional crises of climate change,” or how to respond to students who come to her to share their own grief. ... I have pretty much stopped flying for work. It hasn’t meant I can’t be a productive researcher. I have collaborations and projects, but I try to focus on work that doesn’t require so much travel or is easier to reach by train. The only flight I haven’t yet given up is going back to the U.S. to see my family."
#
-
The Climate Blame Game: New paper debunks claims that humans are causing more extreme weather
Dr. Matt Briggs points out that most attribution claims are based around comparing simulations of the climate today to simulations of the climate as it might have been without human activity. But as he explains, this approach has a fundamental problem: “We simply have little or no idea what the climate would have been without human activity. Moreover, we can’t ever know what it was like.” ...
“In order to attribute individual weather events to humankind, scientists need a perfect model of the climate. They do not have this. Therefore, claims that we are responsible for any particular weather event are at best overconfident, if not plain wrong.”
