Welcome to our mobile site.
→ Go to the mobile site[x] Hide this

Climate Depot
  • A project of CFACT
  • DONATE

« Climate Depot home

Links tagged “pruitt”

  • Newsweek exposé: Ex-EPA chief accepted skeptical climate books while in office
    Posted July 8, 20188:31 AM by Marc Morano | Tags: epa, pruitt, Wheeler
  • Newsweek finds new DC scandal! Fmr. EPA Chief Pruitt ‘Was Gifted’ Copy of Morano’s ‘climate denial’ book – while Pruitt was EPA Administrator!
    Newsweek finds new DC scandal! Fmr. EPA Chief Pruitt ‘Was Gifted’ Copy of Morano’s ‘climate denial’ book – while Pruitt was EPA Administrator!

    Morano & Pruitt at EPA HQ - April 24, 2018

    NEWSWEEK: The three texts that the list said were accepted and "returned to Administrator Pruitt" were Warming? Yes! Man Made? No!​, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change by Marc Morano​ and The Climate Chronicles. The EPA did not immediately respond when contacted by Newsweek.

    #

    Climate Depot's Marc Morano's comment: I am proud to find out that former EPA chief Pruitt was interested in my best selling book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change.  (Also see: Morano’s award-winning book honored as one of Top 10 ‘best new climate change books’ – ‘The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change’) The book features a complete scientific and political A-Z rebuttal of the common claims made by the media, the UN, Al Gore, and environmental activists. It is nice to know that the EPA is well informed when it comes to man-made climate change claims. 

    Posted 8:31 AM by Marc Morano | Tags: epa, pruitt, Wheeler
  • MEDIA BIAS? FOIAS TO EPA FROM NYT AND WAPO EXPLODED AFTER TRUMP’S ELECTION
    Posted 8:31 AM by Marc Morano | Tags: epa, pruitt, Wheeler
  • EPA Career Staffers Freaked When Pruitt Tried to Stage Climate Debate – Would ‘set back the cause of combating global warming by legitimizing politically motivated skeptics’

    The biggest missed opportunity of the Trump Administration!

    Ultimately, Pruitt’s climate debate proposition was killed off before it could be launched, nixed by Chief of Staff John Kelly out of concern about blowback. But internal EPA emails from the time period when the idea was being considered illustrate the degree to which the Trump administration left officials within the EPA deeply shaken and fearful of politics overtaking scientific consensus.

    Posted 8:31 AM by Marc Morano | Tags: epa, pruitt, Wheeler
  • Former EPA official ‘Trump Admin. has done a good job of announcing various deregulatory changes, but have not been as effective in actually repealing regulations’
    Posted 8:31 AM by Marc Morano | Tags: epa, pruitt, Wheeler
  • Flashback: Analysis of EPA: Climate change ‘politicized the EPA’ – ‘EPA has (mostly) solved the most basic and widespread public health and environmental problems that plagued the U.S’

    Amy Harder of Axios: 'The EPA has (mostly) solved the most basic and widespread public health and environmental problems that plagued the U.S. back around the '60's. Climate change is now the top environmental issue in the country. That politicizes the EPA, makes it less of a big deal to average Americans and fuels antipathy from elected Republicans, most of whom don't acknowledge it's a real issue.'

    'The Obama administration issued a steady stream of major regulations on climate change...It was one of the most aggressive EPA's ever'

    'Most past Republican presidents nominated EPA administrators who were more to the left on environmental issues than the Republican Party writ large.'

    Posted 8:31 AM by Marc Morano | Tags: epa, pruitt, Wheeler
  • Former EPA whistle-blower laments the ‘Trump Administration’s Likely Unwillingness to End the Climate Scam’

    Alan Carlin: "It has become evident that the Pruitt EPA did not want to challenge the scientific climate “consensus,” either because they did not think that they could win the ensuing battle or because they wanted to avoid angering voters who accept the scientific “consensus” on climate."

    Posted 8:31 AM by Marc Morano | Tags: epa, pruitt, Wheeler
  • Counter UN climate report: ‘3,000 pages, 10,000 footnotes say don’t blame mankind’

     

     

     

    Posted 8:31 AM by Marc Morano | Tags: epa, pruitt, Wheeler
  • ‘Brave new world’ as team Inhofe takes over at EPA
    Posted 8:31 AM by Marc Morano | Tags: epa, pruitt, Wheeler
  • EPA’s ‘Andrew Wheeler will not only continue Pruitt’s deregulation agenda, but will be much more effective at it’
    Posted 8:31 AM by Marc Morano | Tags: epa, pruitt, Wheeler
  • Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: ‘The UN IPCC Reports have become ‘bumper sticker’ climate science’ – Report lobbies for ‘politically manufactured consensus’

    Curry: " The IPCC Reports have become 'bumper sticker'  climate science – making a political statement while using the overall reputation of science to give authority to a politically manufactured consensus." ... "The IPCC has strayed far from its chartered role of assessing the scientific literature in support of policy making. The entire framing of the IPCC Reports is now around the mitigation of climate change through emissions reductions. Not only has the IPCC increasingly taken on a stance of explicit political advocacy, but it is misleading policy makers by its continued emphasis on extreme climate outcomes driven by the implausible extreme emissions scenarios." ... 

    "The most important finding of the past 5 years is that the extreme emissions scenarios RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5, commonly referred to as 'business-as-usual' scenarios, are now widely recognized as implausible. These extreme scenarios have been dropped by UN Conference of the Parties to the UN Climate Agreement.  However, the new Synthesis Report continues to emphasize these extreme scenarios, while this important finding is buried in a footnote: “Very high emission scenarios have become less likely but cannot be ruled out.”

  • Great Water Reset: The UN & WEF are coming for your water now! ‘Sustainable development’ water dictates – Aim to ‘achieve internationally agreed water-related goals’

    Cheryl K. Chumley: The United Nations plans to protect water that’s used for bathing; water that’s used for developments; water that’s home to sea life; water that’s used for transportation. So the up-and-coming controls would likely focus on residential limits to water usage, and costly increases to access that water; on bans on agricultural usage, and costly increases on farmers; on strict controls on the types and numbers of ships that can sail the seas and rivers and channels, and costly increases for this form of transportation. ... as with carbon offsets, the U.N. water czars will demand trades of activities to offset the supposed pollution of the waterways.

    So much for jet skiing. So much for fishing on the weekends with the family. It’ll be too expensive — and regulated.

    “Natural resources crises, including for water and food, come within the top 10 biggest risks facing humanity in the coming decade,” the World Economic Forum wrote. ... “[A]s global warming continues to take effect, ordinary weather is becoming a thing of the past, exacerbating our water crisis,” the World Economic Forum wrote.

    #

    Flashback: Collapse of energy, food, transportation systems prompt calls for government nationalization of industries – Echoes 1930s push for Great Reset style reforms

  • Green Dictatorship? Netherlands Politicians Answering to the EU instead of Voters – Despite rejection of agriculture policies in recent elections
  • Lawyers Seek To Add Stock Of Lawyer Jokes By Demanding Oil Companies Be Prosecuted For Homicide

    So if using oil is murder—and it has to be murder and not manslaughter, for our authors know of what they do—then lawyer Donald Braman and “public citizen” David Arkush are murderers. Perhaps they’ll turn themselves in? If it isn’t ink, it’s the gas they put in their cars, or the fuel in the planes in which they fly, or in heating or cooling their home, or running the electricity to pay for their Netflix accounts, or in manufacturing the clothes they wear, or in the plastic which surrounds them in their own homes, or in growing the food they eat. There is no way these sad individuals can remove the charge of hypocrisy, or escape the logic of their own argument. ... 

    If this “lethal harm”, caused by use of oil, is indeed “unparalleled in human history”, then our authors, who knowingly participate in this lethal harm, damn themselves. None of this can, or must, be taken seriously. The charge is absurd. It is asinine. It can only be the result of, as I said, lowly greed, or worse, profound stupidity and irresponsibility.

Date Archive

Topic Archive

al gore arctic astrology avg az barack obama biden capandtrade climate depot co2 consensus buster cru debate development economics emissions energy epa funding global cooling global warming gnd gop hollywood hurricanes ice intimidation ipcc key kids media mediacd Michael Mann mkey models new study paris polling religion science solar transportation trump un wacky
Older Entries