Links tagged “ocean acidification”
- Dr. Patrick Moore: ‘The specter of ‘ocean acidification’ has no basis in the scientific data’ – Study finds fears ‘based on mathematical modeling rather than field data’
The CO2 Coalition of climate scientists today released a White Paper analyzing decades of peer-reviewed research on the impact on the oceans of carbon dioxide emissions from the conversion of fossil fuels to energy. ...
The White Paper reveals that the term “ocean acidification” was invented to scare citizens into opposing the use of fossil fuels, which power 80 percent of the U.S. and world economies. It also shows that carbon dioxide is a vital part of ocean health and the ocean food web, because additional CO2 input allows marine life to thrive. The foundation of the ocean food web is phytoplankton, which includes organisms such as microscopic plants and bacteria. These organisms require CO2 to make their food through photosynthesis.
CO2 Coalition chair Patrick Moore, a noted ecologist and a former top-ranking Greenpeace official: "The specter of ‘ocean acidification’ has no basis in the scientific data.”
- Another Crack in the Climate Censorship Wall – Dr. Patrick Moore Debates Ocean ‘Acidification’ in Inference Science Magazine
- Scientists Discover That Coral Reefs Can Adapt To Warming Ocean Temps
- Great Barrier Reef In Good Shape, Has ‘Vibrant Future’, Reef Authority Says
- Florida lawmakers grapple with statewide ban chemical sunscreens to protect coral reefs
- Ecological Grief – when scientists think they need therapy, but what they really need is debate
- False Alarm: Great Barrier Reef In Much Better Shape Than Climate Alarmists Claim
- Sea Level Fall at the Great Barrier Reef
- New Paper: Mammals Thrived and Diversified With ~2000-4000 ppm CO2, 20°C Warmer Oceans Than Today
- Coral reef health defies climate alarmists
-
Trump tweet promotes Climate Hustle 2 film & Morano’s praising of Trump’s ‘energy dominance’
President Trump's tweet on November 25, 2020:
-
Landmark Danish study finds no significant effect for facemask wearers
The ‘Danmask-19 trial’ was conducted in the spring with over 6,000 participants, when the public were not being told to wear masks but other public health measures were in place. Unlike other studies looking at masks, the Danmask study was a randomised controlled trial – making it the highest quality scientific evidence. ...
In the end, there was no statistically significant difference between those who wore masks and those who did not when it came to being infected by Covid-19. 1.8 per cent of those wearing masks caught Covid, compared to 2.1 per cent of the control group. As a result, it seems that any effect masks have on preventing the spread of the disease in the community is small. ...
The results of the Danmask-19 trial mirror other reviews into influenza-like illnesses. Nine other trials looking at the efficacy of masks (two looking at healthcare workers and seven at community transmission) have found that masks make little or no difference to whether you get influenza or not.
-
‘Sinking’ Maldives Clear Forests, Pave Beaches, To Construct Four New Airports For Future Tourism
-
Stay fat if you care about ‘global warming’?! Losing weight releases carbon dioxide – ‘To lose 100 grams of fat, you have to exhale 280 grams of CO2’
"Fat is converted to carbon dioxide and water. You exhale the carbon dioxide and the water mixes into your circulation until it’s lost as urine or sweat."
"If you lose 10kg of fat, precisely 8.4kg comes out through your lungs and the remaining 1.6kg turns into water. In other words, nearly all the weight we lose is exhaled.""To lose 100 grams of fat, you have to exhale 280 grams of carbon dioxide on top of what you’ll produce by vaporizing all your food, no matter what it is."
#
