Links tagged “chu”
- Energy Dept: ‘Super Bowl City Leads on Energy Efficient Forefront’
- Energy Secretary Chu steps down, blasts climate-change skeptics as trapped in ‘the Stone Age’
Chu: 'The overwhelming scientific consensus is that human activity has had a significant and likely dominant role in climate change. There is also increasingly compelling evidence that the weather changes we have witnessed during this thirty year time period are due to climate change'
- Climate Depot Response to Chu’s resignation: ‘Good riddance.’
Energy Sec. Chu doesn’t own car, but his wife drives BMW gas-guzzler — ‘There’s no Chevy Volt in the Chu household’s driveway
- Flashback: Obama Energy Sec. Chu: ‘We don’t understand downward trend that occurred in 1900 or in 1940. We don’t fully understand the plateau that’s happened in the last decade’
- Flashback: Climate astrology: ‘Energy Sec. Chu, the Televangelist?’ Chu: ‘At no other time in the history of science have we been able to say what the future will be 100 years from now’
Climate Depot Response: 'Shouldn't Sec. Chu be touting these scary predictions on a boardwalk with a full deck of Tarot Cards?'
- Flashback 2010: Steven Chu is still suggesting that carbon dioxide caused Hurricane Katrina
- Flashback 2009: Energy Sec. now admits he was ‘Silly’ to call for $8 per gallon gas in U.S.
- Flashback 2011: Washington Post Fact Checks Secretary Chu: ‘And gives him Three Pinocchios, defined as, ‘significant factual error and/or obvious contradictions’
- Flashback 2009: Sec. Chu’s assertions ‘quite simply being proven wrong by the latest climate data’
- Energy Sec. now admits he was ‘Silly’ to call for $8 per gallon gas in U.S.
-
Trump tweet promotes Climate Hustle 2 film & Morano’s praising of Trump’s ‘energy dominance’
President Trump's tweet on November 25, 2020:
-
Landmark Danish study finds no significant effect for facemask wearers
The ‘Danmask-19 trial’ was conducted in the spring with over 6,000 participants, when the public were not being told to wear masks but other public health measures were in place. Unlike other studies looking at masks, the Danmask study was a randomised controlled trial – making it the highest quality scientific evidence. ...
In the end, there was no statistically significant difference between those who wore masks and those who did not when it came to being infected by Covid-19. 1.8 per cent of those wearing masks caught Covid, compared to 2.1 per cent of the control group. As a result, it seems that any effect masks have on preventing the spread of the disease in the community is small. ...
The results of the Danmask-19 trial mirror other reviews into influenza-like illnesses. Nine other trials looking at the efficacy of masks (two looking at healthcare workers and seven at community transmission) have found that masks make little or no difference to whether you get influenza or not.
-
‘Sinking’ Maldives Clear Forests, Pave Beaches, To Construct Four New Airports For Future Tourism
-
Stay fat if you care about ‘global warming’?! Losing weight releases carbon dioxide – ‘To lose 100 grams of fat, you have to exhale 280 grams of CO2’
"Fat is converted to carbon dioxide and water. You exhale the carbon dioxide and the water mixes into your circulation until it’s lost as urine or sweat."
"If you lose 10kg of fat, precisely 8.4kg comes out through your lungs and the remaining 1.6kg turns into water. In other words, nearly all the weight we lose is exhaled.""To lose 100 grams of fat, you have to exhale 280 grams of carbon dioxide on top of what you’ll produce by vaporizing all your food, no matter what it is."
#
