New York Times reveals how ‘consensus’ is deceptively created by medical & climate science: Suppressing COVID lab leak theory required ‘circling the wagons & vilifying anyone who dared to dissent’
NYT Columnist Zeynep Tufekci: “So the Wuhan research was totally safe, and the pandemic was definitely caused by natural transmission — it certainly seemed like consensus. We have since learned, however, that to promote the appearance of consensus, some officials and scientists hid or understated crucial facts, misled at least one reporter, orchestrated campaigns of supposedly independent voices and even compared notes about how to hide their communications in order to keep the public from hearing the whole story.” …
“For scientists and public health officials, circling the wagons and vilifying anyone who dared to dissent might have seemed like a reasonable defense strategy. That’s also why it might be tempting for those officials or the organizations they represent to avoid looking too closely at mistakes they made, at the ways that, while trying to do such a hard job, they might have withheld relevant information and even misled the public.”
For a video takedown of NYT’s COVID ‘consensus’ see The Jimmy Dore Show: NYTimes Admits Covid Was A Pack Of LIES!
COVID & Climate – No Dissent Tolerated
“Climate change skeptics have seen this type of crushing of dissent for decades when it comes to ‘climate change.’ Whether you support COVID lockdowns equates to whether you support the UN Paris Pact or Green New Deal in the climate world. If you oppose mandatory masks, that is like not believing in the alleged ‘97% consensus’ on climate. Can the government ‘control” a virus equates to can government ‘control’ the climate. The COVID/Climate connection runs deep.” – Marc Morano reacting to Stanford University’s Michael Levitt’s facing cancel culture over COVID.
The myth of climate consensus: What they’re not telling you
https://www.americaoutloud.news/the-myth-of-climate-consensus-what-theyre-not-telling-you/ By Tom Harris We hear it all the time — the consensus of world scientists agrees that we are causing a climate emergency, and we must do everything possible to stop it! But it is a stupid statement that means nothing. Most scientists are not experts in the causes of climate change — people […]
Watch: Top scientists reveal how a ‘scientific consensus’ on climate was forced by shutting down natural causes funding & punishing scientists who dissented
How a “scientific consensus” that “climate change is mostly human-caused” was forced by: 1) Shutting down funding for scientific research into natural causes. 2) Punishing scientists who continued this research anyway. cc: @MatthewWielicki @nshaviv @TonyClimate @RossMcKitrick… pic.twitter.com/P714XT6fXj — Dr. Ronan Connolly (@1RonanConnolly) February 25, 2025
So This Is How They Get Their ‘Scientific Consensus’ – Academics are Democrats — therefore, ‘experts’ are Democrats too
Via: Unleash Prosperity Hotline – Weekend Edition – Issue #1117
Watch: VP Debate Coverage: 2nd question by CBS News on ‘climate change’ – Vance calls it ‘weird science’ as moderator pushes fake ‘97% consensus’
Vance on CO2 emissions pic.twitter.com/IdVCpDQtDI — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) October 2, 2024 Vance U.S. manufacturing & the Green agenda pic.twitter.com/JkKInp2fkF — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) October 2, 2024 Debate update: Vance deflected ‘the science’ nicely. I wish he would say “carbon dioxide” emissions not “carbon” But it would have been nice if he had thrown in […]
Harvard Professor Naomi Oreskes dubbed ‘The Queen of Climate Crackpottery’
The Queen of Climate Crackpottery By Tony Thomas Trigger warning: if your household companions include a cat, dog, canary, goldfish or turtle, this article is not a safe space. I’m writing about Harvard’s distinguished agnatologist Professor Naomi Oreskes (above) and her 2014 warning that global warming would kill your pets in 2023. The warning is in […]
International panel of geologists rejects notion of significant ‘climate change’ – ‘Stunning rebuke’ of ‘proposed geologic time division reflecting human influence’
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/05/climate/anthropocene-epoch-vote-rejected.html?searchResultPosition=4 Science Mag: ‘Panel rejects a proposed geologic time division reflecting human influence’ – The vote, first reported by The New York Times, is a stunning—though not unexpected—rebuke for the proposal, which has been working its way through a formal approval process for more than a decade. https://science.slashdot.org/story/24/03/10/1849256/are-we-in-the-anthropocene-the-human-age-scientists-say-nope Excerpts: Science magazine “has confirmed that a panel of two dozen geologists […]
The award for one of the most vacuous phrases in climate goes to — ‘To avoid the worst impacts of climate change, scientists say…’
By Climate Scientist Dr. Patrick T. Brown: This framing misleads for at least three reasons.
The first is that the phrase “scientists say” implies that there is a scientific consensus on the need to limit global warming to some particular level and therefore a scientific consensus on the size of our supposed carbon budget. That is not the case.
The second reason is that tying the phrase “in order to avoid the worst impacts of climate change” to the particular 1.5°C level of warming implies that there is something special about that threshold. But that’s not the case either.
Finally, focusing only on “scientists” and “the worst impacts of climate change” takes an issue that should be looked at through a society-wide cost-benefit lens and puts the focus exclusively on the benefits of avoided warming—ignoring the costs involved in avoiding that warming.
Mark Lynas ‘99% Consensus’ on Climate Change – Busted in Peer Review.
Mark Lynas ‘99% Consensus’ on Climate Change – Busted in Peer Review. By Anthony Watts From email: My name is Yonatan Dubi, I am a professor of chemistry and physics at Ben Gurion University, Israel. I am also one of Israel’s leading advocates for rational environmentalism and climate realism. Together with a few colleagues we […]
Climate scientist whistleblower Patrick Brown reveals how the media’s obsession with global warming manipulates the truth about wildfires – 80% are ignited by humans
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12482921/climate-scientist-patrick-brown-wildfires-started-people.html By LEWIS PENNOCK FOR DAILYMAIL.COM Patrick T. Brown, a lecturer at Johns Hopkins University, claimed the world’s leading academic journals reject papers which don’t ‘support certain narratives’ He also took aim at the media for focusing ‘intently on climate change as the root cause’ of wildfires, including the recent devastating fires in Hawaii The approach ‘distorts a […]
Stay in the Know
Sign up to get updates.