Facebook Youtube X-twitter

Tag: 97

Notable scientists & historical figures disagree on the application of ‘consensus science’

https://myemail.constantcontact.com/97–Consensus—Part-1.html?soid=1101509381788&aid=nciuaooLEBA You have likely heard that 97% of scientists agree that increasing greenhouse gas emissions are driving unusual and unprecedented dangerous warming. The 200-plus scientists and experts at the CO2 Coalition take strong exception to this. Many notable scientists and historical figures also disagree on the application of “consensus science.” I don’t see a whole lot of […]

Climate Inquisition Silenced a Generation of Dissenting Scientists: Goal was to ‘produce data supporting a political agenda’ & ‘Peer review…changed to a weapon for enforcing ideological conformity’

Climate Inquisition Silenced a Generation of Scientists By Vijay Jayaraj When researchers abandon empirical observation in favor of predetermined conclusions, science transforms into propaganda – something far more dangerous than the simple ignorance perpetuated. In climate sciences, funding agencies and international political bodies have dictated outcomes while authentic scientists faced systematic marginalization for questioning the […]

MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen: ‘Manufacturing Consensus on Climate Change’ – ‘How a political movement invented its own scientific basis’

Manufacturing Consensus on Climate Change By Dr. Richard Lindzen Modern political movements have not infrequently laid claim to being based in science, from immigration restriction and eugenics (in the U.S. after WWI), to antisemitism and race ideology (in Hitler’s Germany), to Communism and Lysenkoism (under Stalin). Each of these falsely invoked a scientific consensus that […]

Interview with Atmospheric scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen on climate change: ’50 years will pass. There will be no climate catastrophe’ – Talks fraud of 97% ‘consensus’ & debunks extreme weather claims

Lindzen: “What happens if I get rid of about 60-65% of the CO₂ in the atmosphere? … We’ll die. We’ll die of starvation. At 160 parts per million, virtually no plant will survive. No plant survives, there’s no food.”

…

We hear it more and more nowadays. That there is now a 97 per cent consensus.

Oh, that’s fake! How should I put it? It always depends on the question. So, for instance, if you asked a question if doubling CO₂ is more likely to warm than to cool the Earth, I would think you’d get 100% agreement. But that’s not the same as saying it’s a serious problem. So, at that level, if you ask the right question and put a funny interpretation on the answer, you can say all scientists agree. You just haven’t said what they agree with.

In 1988, you had a Senate hearing in the US, and you had a man called James Hansen (US climatologist – HS) testifying. He came there and said that increasing CO₂ was going to cause a lot of warming. And Newsweek had a cover showing the Earth on fire, and it had a label: “All scientists agree”. And that was very interesting, because at that time, almost no scientists were working on this. People were told all scientists agree. Now, think of that from a propaganda point of view. You don’t know science, you haven’t studied it, most people haven’t studied it. Even among the people who studied the science, for this problem, a big part of the problem is fluid mechanics. Almost no physicist ever studies fluid mechanics. So you have something that hardly anyone has studied. And you’re saying: “What am I going to do? I don’t understand this.” You are told all scientists agree. This is a source of comfort. You don’t have to understand it. If all scientists agree, you can agree, too.

Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry on alleged 97% climate ‘consensus’: It’s ‘a big joke’ – ‘Scientists do not agree on the most consequential issues’

“ ?” . … pic.twitter.com/B4KkcqnJT4 — Freedom Research (@freedom_rsrch) August 21, 2025   https://www.freedom-research.org/p/interview-dr-judith-curry-on-global Dr. Judith Curry on Global Warming: Where Is the Danger? Renowned climatologist Dr. Judith Curry says it is very tough to make the case of warming becoming dangerous. By HANNES SARV “People used to call the warm periods the optimums, the […]

New York Times reveals how ‘consensus’ is deceptively created by medical & climate science: Suppressing COVID lab leak theory required ‘circling the wagons & vilifying anyone who dared to dissent’

NYT Columnist Zeynep Tufekci: “So the Wuhan research was totally safe, and the pandemic was definitely caused by natural transmission — it certainly seemed like consensus. We have since learned, however, that to promote the appearance of consensus, some officials and scientists hid or understated crucial facts, misled at least one reporter, orchestrated campaigns of supposedly independent voices and even compared notes about how to hide their communications in order to keep the public from hearing the whole story.” … 

“For scientists and public health officials, circling the wagons and vilifying anyone who dared to dissent might have seemed like a reasonable defense strategy. That’s also why it might be tempting for those officials or the organizations they represent to avoid looking too closely at mistakes they made, at the ways that, while trying to do such a hard job, they might have withheld relevant information and even misled the public.”

For a video takedown of NYT’s COVID ‘consensus’ see The Jimmy Dore Show: NYTimes Admits Covid Was A Pack Of LIES!

“They have all been weaponized against dissent.” Dr. Pierre Kory explained how the medical boards act as gatekeepers, crushing doctors who go against the approved narrative.  

COVID & Climate – No Dissent Tolerated

“Climate change skeptics have seen this type of crushing of dissent for decades when it comes to ‘climate change.’ Whether you support COVID lockdowns equates to whether you support the UN Paris Pact or Green New Deal in the climate world. If you oppose mandatory masks, that is like not believing in the alleged ‘97% consensus’ on climate. Can the government ‘control” a virus equates to can government ‘control’ the climate. The COVID/Climate connection runs deep.” – Marc Morano reacting to Stanford University’s Michael Levitt’s facing cancel culture over COVID.

The myth of climate consensus: What they’re not telling you

https://www.americaoutloud.news/the-myth-of-climate-consensus-what-theyre-not-telling-you/ By Tom Harris We hear it all the time — the consensus of world scientists agrees that we are causing a climate emergency, and we must do everything possible to stop it! But it is a stupid statement that means nothing. Most scientists are not experts in the causes of climate change — people […]

Watch: Top scientists reveal how a ‘scientific consensus’ on climate was forced by shutting down natural causes funding & punishing scientists who dissented

How a “scientific consensus” that “climate change is mostly human-caused” was forced by: 1) Shutting down funding for scientific research into natural causes. 2) Punishing scientists who continued this research anyway. cc: @MatthewWielicki @nshaviv @TonyClimate @RossMcKitrick… pic.twitter.com/P714XT6fXj — Dr. Ronan Connolly (@1RonanConnolly) February 25, 2025