Watch: The Little Ice Age: The Climate Change Event They Forgot
🧊 The Little Ice Age: The Climate Change Event They Forgot Many believe climate change is a uniquely modern crisis. But history tells a far more complex story. In this Freedom Research original documentary, we explore the dramatic climate shifts of the past 1,000 years, from… pic.twitter.com/sYynFUt6Dt — Freedom Research (@freedom_rsrch) February 25, 2026
Meteorologist explains why Carbon dioxide (CO₂) is not ‘pollution’ – ‘Atmospheric CO₂ level is currently 428 ppmv, & the concentration has only been as high as 7,000 ppm within the last 600 million years’
Carbon dioxide (CO₂) is not “pollution.” All science is numbers, so here are some numbers for you, Congresswoman. CO₂ makes up only 0.04% of the Earth’s atmosphere. For every 1 million molecules of air, about 428 of them are CO₂. That is, 4 out of every 10,000. A century… https://t.co/Oc2DNFeWbB pic.twitter.com/Xo1ZUJBksa — Chris Martz (@ChrisMartzWX) […]
Flashback: Obama’s EPA Chief Lisa Jackson, who signed the CO2 Endangerment Finding, later declared. ‘our aim is to permanently remove carbon from the atmosphere’
Never forget the person who signed the Endangerment Finding in the Obama administration wanted to “permanently remove carbon from the atmosphere.” Yes, permanently remove a trace gas in the atmosphere that’s necessary for life on Earth. ☠️ Now, environmental policy serves… pic.twitter.com/PvfetLgcci — Fmr. Rep. Jason Isaac (@ISAACforEnergy) February 11, 2026 Lisa Jackson was the […]
Princeton Physicist Dr. William Happer: Earth is ‘in a CO₂ famine now’ – ‘It’s unbelievable that they’ve managed to turn this beneficial gas (CO2), a part of life, into a threat’
"We're in a CO₂ famine now." Leading physicist Dr. William Happer argues that more carbon dioxide is beneficial for the planet—dismissing efforts to reduce it as "absurd". "It's unbelievable that they've managed to turn this beneficial gas, a part of life, into a threat." pic.twitter.com/GYivXovvN7 — Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) January 26, 2026
Greenland’s Ancient Melt: The Bombshell Study That Buries Climate Alarmism – ‘Greenland has been dramatically warmer in the past’ without human emissions
https://irrationalfear.substack.com/p/greenlands-ancient-melt-the-bombshell New Nature Paper Reveals Holocene Hotter Than Today… Without CO2 By DR. MATTHEW WIELICKI Excerpt: A brand-new paper published in Nature Geoscience on January 5, 2026, about Greenland’s Prudhoe Dome. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-025-01889-9 This ties directly into what I’ve called the “Greenland Warming Paradox,” which I detailed in a previous article. In short, Greenland has been dramatically […]
New Study: Temperature-Driven CO2 Outgassing Explains 83% Of CO2 Rise Since 1959
New Study: Temperature-Driven CO2 Outgassing Explains 83 Percent Of CO2 Rise Since 1959 By Kenneth Richard on 5. December 2025 “[T]he fraction of [fossil] fuel-related emissions still remaining in the air (about 23 ppm out of 425 ppm at the end of 2024) cannot have any climatic effect.” – Veyres et al., 2025 A few years ago Dr. Koutsoyiannis and […]
Greenhouses Pay the Costs of Demonizing ‘Greenhouse Gas’
https://pjmedia.com/vijay-jayaraj/2025/09/09/greenhouses-pay-the-costs-of-demonizing-greenhouse-gas-n4943487 By VIJAY JAYARAJ The era of hypothetical warnings about the cost of green policies is over. We have now entered the brutal phase of reporting with empirical data on the economic devastation that the foolish “decarbonization” agenda has left in its wake. The latest exhibit in this gallery of ruin is New Zealand, where […]
Prominent Physicists Lindzen & Happer to National Academies of Sciences: ‘The CO2 Endangerment Finding is not based on science’ – ‘Carbon dioxide & other greenhouse gases & fossil fuel use will have a trivial effect on temperature’
https://myemail.constantcontact.com/National-Academies-of-Sciences-Ignores-Science.html?soid=1101509381788&aid=ZbyWOGNgCGI Lindzen-Happer Statement to National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine We are career physicists with a special expertise in radiation physics, which describes how carbon dioxide and other GHGs affect heat flow in Earth’s atmosphere, and in the dynamics of atmospheric transport of energy and momentum on our rotating planet Earth. We are both […]
Interview with Atmospheric scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen on climate change: ’50 years will pass. There will be no climate catastrophe’ – Talks fraud of 97% ‘consensus’ & debunks extreme weather claims
Lindzen: “What happens if I get rid of about 60-65% of the CO₂ in the atmosphere? … We’ll die. We’ll die of starvation. At 160 parts per million, virtually no plant will survive. No plant survives, there’s no food.”
…
We hear it more and more nowadays. That there is now a 97 per cent consensus.
Oh, that’s fake! How should I put it? It always depends on the question. So, for instance, if you asked a question if doubling CO₂ is more likely to warm than to cool the Earth, I would think you’d get 100% agreement. But that’s not the same as saying it’s a serious problem. So, at that level, if you ask the right question and put a funny interpretation on the answer, you can say all scientists agree. You just haven’t said what they agree with.
In 1988, you had a Senate hearing in the US, and you had a man called James Hansen (US climatologist – HS) testifying. He came there and said that increasing CO₂ was going to cause a lot of warming. And Newsweek had a cover showing the Earth on fire, and it had a label: “All scientists agree”. And that was very interesting, because at that time, almost no scientists were working on this. People were told all scientists agree. Now, think of that from a propaganda point of view. You don’t know science, you haven’t studied it, most people haven’t studied it. Even among the people who studied the science, for this problem, a big part of the problem is fluid mechanics. Almost no physicist ever studies fluid mechanics. So you have something that hardly anyone has studied. And you’re saying: “What am I going to do? I don’t understand this.” You are told all scientists agree. This is a source of comfort. You don’t have to understand it. If all scientists agree, you can agree, too.
New study: Data reveals CO2 residence time is 3-7 years. 90% of human emissions since 1750 have thus already been removed, precluding a human-CO2-driven climate. But the UN IPCC uses model assumptions to claim CO2 residence time is over 100 years
New study: Per empirical data CO2 residence time is 3-7 years. 90% of human emissions since 1750 have thus already been removed, precluding a human-CO2-driven climate. The IPCC consequently uses model assumptions to claim residence time is >100 years. https://t.co/Cle5jtz1rf pic.twitter.com/KuUkeq737g — Kenneth Richard (@Kenneth72712993) August 22, 2025