Facebook Youtube X-twitter

Tag: 400

Greenhouses Pay the Costs of Demonizing ‘Greenhouse Gas’

https://pjmedia.com/vijay-jayaraj/2025/09/09/greenhouses-pay-the-costs-of-demonizing-greenhouse-gas-n4943487 By VIJAY JAYARAJ The era of hypothetical warnings about the cost of green policies is over. We have now entered the brutal phase of reporting with empirical data on the economic devastation that the foolish “decarbonization” agenda has left in its wake. The latest exhibit in this gallery of ruin is New Zealand, where […]

Prominent Physicists Lindzen & Happer to National Academies of Sciences: ‘The CO2 Endangerment Finding is not based on science’ – ‘Carbon dioxide & other greenhouse gases & fossil fuel use will have a trivial effect on temperature’

https://myemail.constantcontact.com/National-Academies-of-Sciences-Ignores-Science.html?soid=1101509381788&aid=ZbyWOGNgCGI Lindzen-Happer Statement to National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine We are career physicists with a special expertise in radiation physics, which describes how carbon dioxide and other GHGs affect heat flow in Earth’s atmosphere, and in the dynamics of atmospheric transport of energy and momentum on our rotating planet Earth. We are both […]

Interview with Atmospheric scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen on climate change: ’50 years will pass. There will be no climate catastrophe’ – Talks fraud of 97% ‘consensus’ & debunks extreme weather claims

Lindzen: “What happens if I get rid of about 60-65% of the CO₂ in the atmosphere? … We’ll die. We’ll die of starvation. At 160 parts per million, virtually no plant will survive. No plant survives, there’s no food.”

…

We hear it more and more nowadays. That there is now a 97 per cent consensus.

Oh, that’s fake! How should I put it? It always depends on the question. So, for instance, if you asked a question if doubling CO₂ is more likely to warm than to cool the Earth, I would think you’d get 100% agreement. But that’s not the same as saying it’s a serious problem. So, at that level, if you ask the right question and put a funny interpretation on the answer, you can say all scientists agree. You just haven’t said what they agree with.

In 1988, you had a Senate hearing in the US, and you had a man called James Hansen (US climatologist – HS) testifying. He came there and said that increasing CO₂ was going to cause a lot of warming. And Newsweek had a cover showing the Earth on fire, and it had a label: “All scientists agree”. And that was very interesting, because at that time, almost no scientists were working on this. People were told all scientists agree. Now, think of that from a propaganda point of view. You don’t know science, you haven’t studied it, most people haven’t studied it. Even among the people who studied the science, for this problem, a big part of the problem is fluid mechanics. Almost no physicist ever studies fluid mechanics. So you have something that hardly anyone has studied. And you’re saying: “What am I going to do? I don’t understand this.” You are told all scientists agree. This is a source of comfort. You don’t have to understand it. If all scientists agree, you can agree, too.

New study: Data reveals CO2 residence time is 3-7 years. 90% of human emissions since 1750 have thus already been removed, precluding a human-CO2-driven climate. But the UN IPCC uses model assumptions to claim CO2 residence time is over 100 years

New study: Per empirical data CO2 residence time is 3-7 years. 90% of human emissions since 1750 have thus already been removed, precluding a human-CO2-driven climate. The IPCC consequently uses model assumptions to claim residence time is >100 years. https://t.co/Cle5jtz1rf pic.twitter.com/KuUkeq737g — Kenneth Richard (@Kenneth72712993) August 22, 2025

Bloomberg News: ‘EPA Unveils Plan…to severely weaken Washington’s ability to fight climate change’ – Morano: Trump admin ‘removes the basis for all the climate nonsense that we’ve had to endure’

Bloomberg News features Climate Depot: “It removes the basis for all the climate nonsense that we’ve had to endure for the last several decades,” said Marc Morano, who runs the climate-skeptic website ClimateDepot.com. “The Trump administration’s goal is to ensure that future presidential administrations can’t quickly reverse climate and energy policies without having to undergo major bureaucratic hurdles.”

U.S. Dept of Energy publishes new climate assessment report breaking the alleged ‘consensus’ – First official U.S. Govt report to push back on UN climate reports

This is HUGE. It is the first comprehensive government scientific report to challenge the conventional narrative surrounding the climate change issue in a very long time, perhaps ever. I cannot underscore enough how big of a deal this is. https://t.co/0G75r94LS2 — Chris Martz (@ChrisMartzWX) July 29, 2025 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has published […]

Cheers! NYT: ‘Trump Hires Scientists Who Doubt the Consensus on Climate Change’ – John Christy, Roy Spencer & Steven E. Koonin

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/08/climate/trump-climate-energy-department.html Excerpt: The three scientists joined the administration after it dismissed hundreds of experts who were assessing how global warming is affecting the country. WASHINGTON – The Energy Department has hired at least three scientists who are well known for their rejection of the overwhelming scientific consensus on climate change, according to records reviewed by […]

EPA asks White House to bless rollback of 2009 CO2 endangerment finding

https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2025/07/epa-asks-white-house-to-bless-rollback-of-key-climate-finding-00432621 By: Alex Guillén Excerpt: At issue is the agency’s 2009 declaration that greenhouse gases endanger human health and welfare — a bedrock of federal climate regulations. The EPA’s proposal to reconsider its 16-year-old bedrock finding on the dangers of greenhouse gases is now in the White House’s hands — a move that sets the […]