Nature Communications editors should be ashamed of themselves for accepting such monumental garbage for publication. They have lost any credibility they had left.
This new attribution “study” is questionable, at best. Why? Because “attribution science” is pseudoscience to the… https://t.co/ZkRdWkO3WD pic.twitter.com/GHe1Z4lwbj
— Chris Martz (@ChrisMartzWX) August 26, 2026

