https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/07/climate-assessments-chris-wright-trump
UK Guardian: Scientists decry Trump energy chief’s plan to ‘update’ climate reports: ‘Exactly what Stalin did’
Excerpt: Ex-fossil fuel executive Chris Wright said administration is reviewing national assessments made by past governments
The US energy secretary, Chris Wright, is facing growing criticism from scientists who say their “worst fears” were realized when Wright revealed that the Trump administration would “update” the US’s premier climate crisis reports. Wright, a former oil and gas executive, told CNN’s Kaitlin Collins earlier this week that the administration was reviewing national climate assessment reports published by past governments.
“We’re reviewing them, and we will come out with updated reports on those and with comments on those reports,” said Wright, who is one of the main supporters of the administration’s “drill, baby, drill” agenda to boost fossil fuels, which are the primary cause of the climate crisis.
…
Asked about Wright’s comments on the national climate assessment reports, respected climate scientist Michael Mann said in an emailed comment to the Guardian: “This is exactly what Joseph Stalin did.”
…
Climate panican Michael Mann – shocker! – is quoted in the @guardian article comparing @SecretaryWright to Stalin. pic.twitter.com/ET9z7PYcAG
— Gabriella Hoffman (@Gabby_Hoffman) August 8, 2025
#
Reality Check to UK Guardian and climate activists, scientists like Michael Mann, comparing consensus-busting reports to Stalin:
Climate Depot’s Marc Morano: “The old federal National Climate Assessments were pure political garbage reports masquerading as ‘science.’ Challenging the climate ‘consensus’ and updating federal climate reports is not a Joe Stalin move. Instead, what the Trump administration has accomplished in just eight short months, dismantling the climate cult — is a marvel to behold. Authentic dissenting scientific voices are now the voice of accurate federal climate science reports.
Scientists around the world should welcome the fact that the Trump administration is creating a scientific re-examination of ‘global warming’ and fostering a healthy climate debate. No longer do the American people have to have their tax dollars pay for predetermined climate fear propaganda manufactured by the likes of Michael Mann and the United Nations. Cheers!”
Bacground:
Politico: ‘Trump moves to hobble major US climate study’ – ‘A potentially fatal blow to the National Climate Assessment’ – April 9, 2025
Flashback:
Dr. Roger Pielke Jr.: “I took a close look at the authors of the US National Climate Assessment: Center for American Progress, The Nature Conservancy, Environmental Defense Fund, The Club of Rome, Project Drawdown, Ocean Conservancy, Union of Concerned Scientists, and more and more … Advocacy capture 101.”
Biden’s National Climate Assessment Links Climate Change To Pandemics & Pathogens
Media Ignores Reality – Goes Bonkers Over the Fifth National Climate Assessment Report
Biden Admin’s New Climate Report Touts Use Of ‘Indigenous Knowledge’
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/11/20/the-fifth-national-climate-assessment-report-is-driven-by-government-deception-climate-alarmist-politics/ by Larry Hamlin The U.S. Government recently released the Fifth National Climate Assessment report which falsely claims that: “The climate change signal is “even clearer today than it was five years ago,” Hayhoe said. In the U.S., people across all regions are experiencing hotter temperatures and longer-lasting heat waves, with nighttime and winter temperatures warming the […]
Media Ignores Reality – Goes Bonkers Over the Fifth National Climate Assessment Report
https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/original-sin Original Sin: The U.S. National Climate Assessment was Off Track from the Start By ROGER PIELKE JR. Excerpt: Over the past few days I have commented on X/Twitter about the just-released Fifth U.S. National Climate Assessment (NCA). It is much more a glossy promotional brochure than anything resembling a careful assessment of the scientific literature on […]
