Close this search box.

Can Republican Power in the House Make a Difference on Energy? Morano’s advice to GOP: “Relabel solar & wind as: Not green. Not clean. & as empowering China’

Can Republican Power in the House Make a Difference on Energy?

Top lawmakers and energy experts weigh in on American oil and gas, the role of oversight, and more
By Nathan Worcester

After talking up a “Red Wave” throughout 2022, the Republican Party ultimately failed to take the Senate in November. Yet, the GOP’s narrow majority in the House of Representatives will let them exercise more influence than they did during the first two years of Joe Biden’s presidency.

Judging by opinion research, energy-related issues are major priorities for the American people, though falling prices at the pump may have lessened their significance in recent months.

October polling from the Pew Research Center found that the price of gasoline and energy was the second-most concerning issue for registered voters, topped only by the price of food and consumer goods. Those numbers are also heavily shaped by the cost of energy for producers and retailers.

Of the people surveyed, 69 percent said they were “very concerned” about energy and gas prices.

Gallup polling throughout 2022 revealed that fuel/oil prices were generally the third largest economic problem listed by the Americans they surveyed. Problem No. 1, “high cost of living/inflation,” and problem No. 2, “economy in general,” are both influenced by the cost, accessibility, and reliability of energy.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), now negotiating with holdouts in his caucus as he seeks to become majority leader, made energy a key element of his “Commitment to America.”

In it, he pledged to “make America energy independent and reduce gas prices.” He vowed to “maximize production of reliable, cleaner, American-made energy and cut the permitting process time in half to reduce reliance on foreign countries, prevent rolling blackouts, and lower the cost of gas and utilities.”

But how?

All the same, control of the House gives the GOP room to maneuver on bipartisan priorities, such as nuclear power, as well as authority over appropriations. At the very least, they can slow down the Biden agenda.

“Even though their proposals will be DOA [dead on arrival] in a Democrat Senate, the GOP needs to lay out its vision and policy priorities for the next presidential cycle in 2024,” said Marc Morano, the proprietor of the website Climate Depot, in a Dec. 21 email interview with The Epoch Times.

What’s more, House Republicans could end up steering their Senate colleagues in a more conservative direction on various issues, energy among them.

An early sign of this is McCarthy’s opposition to the $1.7 trillion omnibus bill after Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) supported it.

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema’s (I-Ariz.) recent flight from the Democrats, along with Sen. Joe Manchin’s (D-W.Va.) moderate stance on energy, could also leave open opportunities.

To assess what newly empowered House Republicans can actually deliver, The Epoch Times reached out to the representatives currently serving as minority leaders of energy-related committees and subcommittees. Some will almost certainly continue in their leadership roles during the upcoming Congress; others may not.

The Epoch Times also contacted multiple energy experts.

One anonymous energy industry insider voiced a worry shared by many Republicans and fellow travelers.

When faced with the responsibility to lead, a GOP majority could, he warned, be like “the dog who caught the bus.”

American Energy Makes GOP Wish List

The people who spoke with The Epoch Times agreed that boosting the production of U.S. oil, gas, and coal was a top priority, in line with McCarthy’s Commitment to America.

It’s top of mind for Kish, a former Congressional committee staffer.

“There has never been an administration that has so abruptly and directly attacked energy,” he said.

“The incoming House GOP needs to lay out a vibrant, pro-energy, America-first energy policy largely modeled after former President Trump’s energy policies,” said Morano, another veteran of Congressional staff roles.

Rep. Randy Weber (R-Texas), currently the ranking member of the Energy Subcommittee of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, recalls a landmark moment for American oil and gas before Trump hit the White House.

It was when then-President Barack Obama scuttled the proposed Keystone XL pipeline between Canada and the United States.

“Of course, Trump opened it back up. And what happens? Biden shuts it back down,” he told The Epoch Times in a Dec. 19 interview.

Weber is working on a bill to prevent a similar incident in the future, by giving Congress some authority over transnational infrastructure projects like that pipeline.

The rapid depletion of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) under Biden also troubles Weber and many other Republicans. It has been drained to levels last seen in the mid-1980s.

A particularly influential bill from February 2022, the American Energy Independence from Russia Act, would require a plan for additional federal oil and gas leasing to be released before allowing more withdrawals from the SPR.

It would also approve the Keystone XL pipeline. Weber and 140+ other House Republicans co-sponsored it.

More Leverage Through Oversight

Congressional insiders agreed that oversight could be a useful tool for the Republican House, even with a Democratic presidency and Democrat-dominated Senate.

“Nothing is off the table,” said a spokesperson for Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee in a Dec. 21 email to The Epoch Times.

The current ranking member of that committee is Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wa.), once in the running for Trump’s Secretary of the Interior.

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.) speaks during a town hall event hosted by House Republicans in Washington on March 1, 2022. (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

Various committees and subcommittees, including those concerned with energy-related oversight, will likely work together to get to the bottom of the country’s challenges, such as the threat of cyber warfare, natural disasters, and other hazards to the nation’s fragile grid.

Weber believes oversight hearings can help members seek answers when it comes to the Biden administration’s controversial energy-related foreign policy decisions—for example, appealing to Venezuela and Saudi Arabia for oil even as U.S. hydrocarbon companies felt attacked.

On Sept. 30, just days before the Biden administration asked the Saudis to delay a production cut, Granholm left a potential export ban on the table during discussions with U.S. refiners.

President Joe Biden gives a thumbs up before boarding Air Force One to depart Israel’s Ben Gurion Airport on July 15, 2022. (Abir Sultan/AFP/Getty Images)

A spokesperson for Rep. Blake Moore (R-Utah), the ranking member of the House Natural Resources Committee’s oversight subcommittee in the 117th Congress, did not comment on the potential role of oversight in the 118th Congress.

State-level Republican officials who are battling environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) standards may also stand to gain from more action by Congress.

Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes, who recently protested against Vanguard’s utility investments because of the asset manager’s commitment to ESG-like principles, told The Epoch Times in a Dec. 21 interview that he hopes the House will hold oversight hearings focused on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in order to challenge its actions on ESG.

“I think that Congress, whether it’s a unified Congress or just the House, will really start holding people more accountable in terms of ESG,” he said.

Weber acknowledged the value of some recent Democratic actions on the energy source—in 2022’s Schumer-Manchin bill, for example, the tax credits for existing nuclear plants and advanced reactors.

“Let’s give credit where credit’s due,” the Republican nuclear hawk said.

Yet, even with the bipartisan momentum on nuclear, serious challenges persist in the country where much of the physics research, engineering, and commercial innovation behind the energy source originated.

Those who spoke with The Epoch Times lamented the United States’s relative decline, especially when compared with both Russia and China.

“In nuclear, it’s clear that the United States in so many ways has fallen far from its former leadership role,” Nelson said.

“Almost none of the reactors being built anywhere in the world are from America. Russia and China have tons of projects going not only in their own country, but around the world,” he added.

Even with the passage of NEIMA and similar legislation, the plodding pace of the NRC is a concern for nuclear energy advocates across the ideological spectrum.

The left-leaning Breakthrough Institute wrote that the NRC’s draft proposal to regulate advanced nuclear reactors in line with NEIMA “largely replicates the failed licensing rules that have hobbled the legacy nuclear industry for decades.”

“The regulator can be reformed to be faster while keeping its independence,” Nelson said.

Texas Congressman Weber pointed out that his state is a national leader on wind and solar, with the former supplying about a fifth of its total electricity.

Yet, other Republicans strike a more critical tone on climate, particularly the taxpayer-subsidized push for non-nuclear alternatives to coal, oil, and natural gas.

Morano, of Climate Depot, told The Epoch Times that McConnell—and especially McCarthy—fall short “when it comes to reframing the climate narrative.”

“The GOP needs to lead the way in labeling solar and wind as: Not green. Not clean. And they serve as China’s empowerment policy for the West,” he said.

McMorris Rodgers made a similar point in a recent interview.

“I’m very concerned about us becoming reliant upon supply chains that are controlled by the Chinese Communist Party. They control supply chains around wind, solar, and batteries, and that is a dangerous future for us,” she said, as quoted by The Washington Post.

Skepticism on climate change, or at least on measures supposedly necessitated by climate change, is a feature of the Republican base.

Gallup polling from 2021 showed that only 11 percent of Republicans think global warming is a serious threat to them during their lifetimes. That’s against 67 percent of Democrats and 43 percent of independents.

While Democrats argue that Republicans are undermining the transition to a “green economy,” Republicans complain that Democrats are making it harder to mine and process the minerals and elements for the underlying technologies (those that can be obtained in the United States, anyway.)

The spokesperson for Westerman highlighted a bill, the Securing America’s Mineral Supply Chains Act, that Westerman hopes to advance in the new Congress.

It would overhaul the permitting process for mining on federal land. Additionally, it would lay the groundwork for a strategic uranium reserve program.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reform, a perennial Republican concern, is at the core of another Westerman-supported bill, the Building U.S. Infrastructure through Limited Delays and Efficient Reviews Act.

Rep. Pete Stauber (R-Minn.), ranking member of the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources of the House Natural Resources Committee, has permitting in his sights too. He’s on track to lead that subcommittee in a few weeks.

Stauber-sponsored bill from several months ago also seeks to expedite permitting. The Permitting for Mining Needs Act would, among other things, place a time limit on judicial review of federal approvals related to a mining project.

In a recent Twitter thread, Stauber vehemently criticized the Biden administration’s move to finance mining in Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo, even as American mining projects face what he sees as excessive obstacles.

“It’s well-documented that the mining industry in the Democratic Republic of the Congo uses child slave labor,” Stauber wrote.

‘Energy Blackouts Should Be Named’

The Biden administration and Senate Democrats could hinder much of the energy agenda from House Republicans. No matter what happens with permitting, though, colorful rhetoric won’t be off limits to enterprising lawmakers.

Morano, of Climate Depot, had a creative suggestion.

“Just like we name hurricanes, energy blackouts should be named—for anti-energy policies, politicians, and ideas that encourage and enable blackouts,” he said.

A neighborhood experiences a power outage after winter weather caused electricity blackouts in San Marcos, Texas, U.S. on Feb. 16, 2021. (Mikala Compton/Reuters)

The Epoch Times reached out to McCarthy and Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), who is challenging McCarthy for the House Majority Leader position. Neither responded to multiple requests for comment.

Nathan Worcester cover national politics for The Epoch Times. He can be reached at [email protected].
Full comments to Epoch Times: Marc Morano, publisher of Climate Depot. Author of 2021’s Green Fraud & 2022’s The Great Reset. 
Morano: The incoming House GOP needs to lay out a vibrant pro-energy America first energy policy largely modeled after former President Trump’s energy policies. Even though their proposals will be DOA in a Democrat Senate, the GOP needs to lay out its vision and policy priorities for the next presidential cycle in 2024. The GOP needs to push back hard and reframe the narrative of climate fears and the Net-Zero agenda. The GOP needs to lay the legislative framework for rejecting energy shortages and central planning every aspect of our lives.
The biggest thing is to reframe the concept that solar and wind are “green” energy and somehow “clean” or reduce emissions. The GOP needs to lead the way in labeling solar and wind as: Not green. Not clean. And they serve as China’s empowerment policy for the west.
The GOP needs to be blunt and declare they will lay the legislature groundwork to stop the climate agenda from collapsing our food, energy, and transportation systems. The GOP needs to stop the efforts to hinder high-yield agriculture by liming nitrogen fertilizer and limiting meat production through Net Zero goals and methane restrictions.
The GOP needs to pass legislation opposing gas-powered car bans and opposing electric vehicle mandates.
The GOP needs to stop solar and wind mandates and push U.S. domestic fossil fuel energy. The GOP needs to declare a national ethical energy policy that try to limit importing energy from countries with horrendous human rights and environmental standards. It’s time to apply ESG to China!
The GOP needs to reframe “green energy” as not failing any basic cost-benefit analysis. You can’t ban energy that works by manding energy that can’t possibly replace it on any near-term timescale.
The GOP should also have Congress pass legislation that bans private jet travel before considering general aviation carbon taxes or new climate regulations.
Sadly, both Kevin McCarthy & Mitch McConnel are ill-suited to take all of this on. While they are both acceptable in promoting rational energy policy, they fail, particularly McCarthy, when it comes to reframing the climate narrative. McCarthy proudly says climate change is a problem that needs ‘solutions.’ See:
The GOP Congress needs to pass a law limiting the usage of the future president’s SPR. Congress must ensure future presidents can’t drain our SPR for cheap political purposes like midterm elections.
The GOP needs to reset the agenda to demand domestic energy dominance return instead of seeking out dictators to sell us their energy.
Also, expect the GOP to push permitting reform and review grid stability to avoid blackouts and brownouts due to winter weather and heat extremes.
McCarthy has revealed himself clueless on battling the climate agenda. He concedes climate is a problem that we need to reduce emissions to fight it, and he pushes climate “solutions.” If we are not careful in restraining him, McCarthy could come up with a Green New Deal-lite.

Banning energy that is powering America while mandating energy that is not ready to take over is not the moral or rational option. Energy advocates need to be unapologetic about the moral case for cheap domestic and abundant fossil fuels. We need an innovative free-market approach to environmental policy.

Establish an “Ethical Energy Index”: GOP Legislators need to approve pipelines, support fracking expansion, keep coal plants running, support oil drilling and all manner of energy production that would help make America less dependent on Russian, Chinese, Iranian, or Venezuelan energy. In short, stop outsourcing pollution to nations with lower environmental standards than ours and horrible human rights records. This Energy Contract with America has to be presented not as a climate “solution” but rather as a way forward regardless of your views on man-made climate change.

Name Energy Blackouts: Just like we name hurricanes, energy blackouts should be named—for anti-energy policies, politicians, and ideas that encourage and enable blackouts.
Also, we need endangered species act reforms and empower more nuclear energy.
And speed up the process for rare Earth and other forms of mining in the U.S.