The intrigue: It was supposed to surface hours ago, but negotiations between UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scientists and the panel’s government representatives blew way past their deadline.
- And that’s revealing. Countries were mired in battles over how to wordsmith key conclusions, including the need to quickly shift away from fossil fuels, and the necessary policy, financial assistance and technological levers to pull to accomplish this.
- The heated discussion — the longest in three decades of these big IPCC reports — reflected the fact that we are at a climate change hinge point.
Why it matters: The IPCC’s assessment reports set the terms of the climate debate with world leaders, CEOs and activists. A 2018 report galvanized a global youth protest movement.
- There is no time left to delay action to have any chance of meeting the Paris Agreement’s temperature targets. The agreement’s more ambitious target of limiting warming to 1.5°C above preindustrial levels is already slipping out of reach.
Context: The report’s expected call for radical changes is a huge departure from current policies and ways of doing business worldwide.
- While scientists determine the content of the reports, the summaries are negotiated by consensus between scientists and policymakers. One country’s objection to a single word can hold up the entire process.
- In this case, multiple countries were reported to have raised issues with different sections of the text.
- The combo of scientists and government representatives is unique to the IPCC and serves to encourage government buy-in.
- The summary for policymakers i