From climate activist Eric Holthaus on November 25:
Why do they have to be “non-white non-men” climate experts? Do ‘non-white men’ do different climate science than others? I am confused.
Climate Depot’s Marc Morano responded:
“Why do they have to be “non-white non-men” climate experts? Do ‘non-white men’ do different climate science than others? I am confused.”
This is not the first time white men have been targeted in the climate debate: See:
Claim: Global warming skepticism is a ‘white phenomenon’
Flashback: 1846, in Australia, Aborigines blamed the bad climate on the introduction of the White man in Australia
NY Mag: ‘Can Sunday’s People’s Climate march expand the movement beyond wonky white men?’
Flashback 1846: White Men Blamed For Destroying The Climate For Over 200 Years -1846: ‘That great changes have taken place in the climate of Australia all testimonies satisfactorily prove…It is evident to any observer,at some period, the country has been subjected to the mighty action of heavy rains, and of sweeping, deluging floods…The aborigines say that the climate has undergone this change since white-man came in country’
Mooney: ‘Fundamentally, this identity is all about testosterone firing and being an alpha male’
Climate Depot Response to Mooney: ‘Fundamentally, your analysis is nonsense and ignores the fact that the public sees right through the politically manufactured and unscientific climate fear claims’
