Scientists in ‘ugly’ debate over whether AGW will increase violence: Accusations of ‘fudging the statistics’; ‘manipulating’; ‘bold misrepresentations’
By: Marc Morano - Climate DepotOctober 28, 2014 8:47 PM
A debate among scientists over climate change and conflict has turned ugly. At issue is the question of whether the hotter temperatures and chaotic weather produced by climate change are causing higher rates of violence. A new analysis refutes earlier research that found a link, and the two lead researchers are exchanging some pointed remarks.
Last year, a team of U.S. researchers reported a robust connection between climate and violence in Science. But in a critique published online yesterday in Climatic Change, a team of mostly European researchers dismissed the connection as “inconclusive.” The Scienceauthors are hitting back, claiming that the critics are fudging the statistics and even manipulating their figures. The new analysis “is entirely based on surprisingly bold misrepresentations of our article, the literature, basic statistics, and their own findings,” says Solomon Hsiang, the lead author of the Science paper and an economist at the University of California, Berkeley.
…
Solow adds that he is “not a big fan” of meta-analysis, in part because the technique sparks disputes like these. Rather than directly addressing the scientific question of whether climate change is causing an increase in conflict, he says, “this disagreement is over the degree to which studies of the climate-conflict link agree [with each other].”
Recent Articles
- Burning Yen: Japanese Government Scraps Last Wind Turbines in Failed $580 Million Offshore Project
- The Return of the Dead: Countering Species Extinction Claims – The most aggressive claims rest on shaky foundations’
- Report: Fossil fuels to dominate Africa’s energy mix this decade – ‘Non-hydro renewables likely to remain below 10% in 2030’
- CNN report buries this good news in paragraph 12 on polar bears: ‘They are doing quite well…Svalbard’s polar bear numbers do not appear to have decreased in the last 20 years’
- Justice Alito fails climate reality again: ‘Recuses himself from climate case because he owns oil company stocks…like most everyone else’ – Pressure now on Justice Barrett b/c her dad worked for Shell
- Electric vehicle mandates will require massive rare-earth elements to achieve
- UK PM Boris Johnson all in for Great Reset: Promotes ‘Build Back Better’ to ‘create a fairer, greener & more prosperous future’
- Economist rips lockdowns as creating ‘the most inhumane totalitarian society’ – ‘Is this our new ‘science’ – divested entirely from consideration of humanity and liberty?’
- Statistical politics: Prof. Mike Hulme on ‘politically charged’ climate baseline changes from 1961-1990 to 1991-2020: ‘In an instant; today, the world’s climate has ‘suddenly’ become nearly 0.5°C warmer’
- 2020 Hottest Year!?: ‘There has been no significant warming trend for 5 years’ – ‘2020 is statistically identical to 2016’ – ‘Thousandths of a degree’ difference
- UN’s ‘Harmony with Nature’ project: Urge need to ‘shift from a human-centered to an Earth-centred society’ – ‘COVID-19 pandemic was linked to the poor health of ecosystems’
- A new temperature pause? Zero global warming for 5 years 4 months
- ‘Climate action superhero’ – UN climate propaganda aimed at kids – Warns children that ‘climate change is a menace to our world’
- What Global Warming? 148 New (2020) Scientific Papers Affirm Recent Non-Warming – A Degrees-Warmer Past
- Shock graph of rising CO2 emissions despite ‘planet-saving’ UN climate pacts shows ‘farce’ of ‘climate action’
- Tesla Would Take Nearly 1,600 Years To Make The Amount Of Money The Stock Market Values It At
- Trump’s EPA launches surprise attack on Biden’s climate rules – Rule ‘would block future limits on greenhouse gases from industrial sources’
- Even With a 50-50 Split, a Biden Administration Senate Could Make Big Strides on Climate
- Report: Bill Gates owns 242,000 acres of farmland, making him America’s biggest private-farmland owner
- Newsweek mag: COVID lockdowns have no clear benefit vs other voluntary measures, international peer-reviewed study shows