The Great Retreat: NYT’s Andrew Revkin does low climate sensitivity: Revkin seems to conclude that things are just as the skeptics have said –He dares not mention Dr. Pat Michaels of CATO by name?!
Revkin: 'I can understand why some climate campaigners, writers & scientists don't want to focus on any science hinting there might be a bit more time to make this profound energy transition. (There's also reluctance, I'm sure, because recent work is trending toward the published low sensitivity findings from a decade ago from climate scientists best known for their relationships with libertarian groups.) Nonetheless, the science is what the science is'
