A rebuttal to Steven Sherwood and the solar forcing pundits of the IPCC AR5 draft leak
'When skeptics point out that IPCC admit (in a hidden draft) the solar magnetic effect could change climate on Earth, the so-called Professors of Science hit back — but not with evidence from atmosphere, but with evidence from other paragraphs in a committee report. It's argument from authority, it's a logical fallacy...Just because other parts of a biased committee report continue to deny the evidence does not neutralize the real evidence'
