RevkinGate?! NYT’s ‘Revkin told POLITICO on Wednesday that he’s been able to confirm that the documents are legitimate’ — But Politico removes assertion with no explanation!?
'Note that when posted the link above at 3:15pm Central on 215-12, the text in quotes above was still in the Politico article. Now the text is gone, with no explanation by Politico.]
What gives? How did Revkin 'confirm' fake doc was 'legitimate'? Is Politico covering up for Revkin's mistake? Stay tuned...