Update: Climatologist Dr. Roger Pielke Sr. accepts global warming debate challenge!
'I would be glad to debate Dr. Schneider...he represents a 'narrow perspective on climate science'
Former Colorado State Climatologist Dr. Roger Pielke Sr. responded to Stanford University professor Stephen Schneider’s May 24, 2009 boast that he could “slaughter” skeptical scientists in a global warming debate. (See: Warming Professor Stephen Schneider boasts he could ‘slaughter skeptical scientists in public debate!’ )
Pielke Sr . May 24, 2009 Excerpt: I would be glad to debate Dr. Schneider (or any of the other individuals who are listed).
I also challenge them to refute in the professional literature (and in a debate) the numerous peer reviewed articles and national (e.g. see) and international climate assessments (e.g. see) that present scientific evidence that conflicts with the narrow perspective on climate science that Steve Schneider is representing.
I am disappointed that Steve Schneider personally attacked the websites that are listed. I have quite a bit of respect for Dr. Schneider’s past work [e.g. his book Genesis Strategy is an excellent example of why we need a resource-based, bottom-up assessment of vulnerability, as has been discussed in our peer reviewed papers (e.g. see) and books (e.g. see)].
However, his casual denigration of each of the websites, Watt’s Up With That, Climate Skeptic, Climate Audit and Climate Science (each of whose contributions to the discussion of climate science are informative and very valuable) represents a failure to engage in constructive scientific debate.
This cavalier dismissal of these websites illustrates that instead of evaluating the soundness of their scientific evidence, the authors of these websites, who provide a much needed broader viewpoint on climate science, are insulted. This is not the proper way to discuss scientific issues.
For Dr. Pielke Sr. full response see here:
Warming Professor Stephen Schneider boasts he could ‘slaughter skeptical scientists in public debate!’ – May 25, 2009
More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Democrats Refuse to Allow Skeptic to Testify Alongside Gore At Congressional Hearing – April 23, 2009
NASA’s James Hansen: Skepticism ‘can confuse the public’
Monkton’s Report: 35 Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore’s movie
Monckton: Have the courage to do nothing…US Congress told climate change is not real
Monckton’s Letter to Represenatives Ed Markey & Joe Barton – March 30, 2009
Al Gore Challenged to International TV Debate on Global Warming By Lord Monckton – March 19, 2007
Scientific Smackdown: Skeptics Voted The Clear Winners Against Global Warming Believers in Heated NYC Debate – March 16, 2007
Lord Monckton Declared Victor in Global Warming Debate – By His Opponent! – August 19, 2008
Debate Over Whether ‘Global Warming is a Global Crisis’ – March 6, 2009
Climate Depot’s Morano debates former Clinton Official Romm – April 6, 2009