NOAA: USA July Temps Below Normal For 3rd Year in a Row


By: - Climate DepotAugust 12, 2015 12:58 PM with 615 comments

Via: https://sunshinehours.wordpress.com/2015/08/12/noaa-july-2015-usa-below-normal-for-3rd-year-in-a-row/

NOAA July 2015 – USA – Below Normal For 3rd Year in a Row

— sunshinehours1 @ 8:08 AM

According to the NOAA , Maximum temperatures in the USA were -0.77F colder than the 1901-2000 average.

1936 was ranked 121 (121 is hottest) and was 4.93F hotter than 2015.

2015 was only ranked 34.

 

NOAA_July_2015_Max

 

Related Link:

A new record ‘Pause’ length: No global warming for 18 years 7 months – Temperature standstill extends to 223 months

A new record ‘Pause’ length: No global warming for 18 years 7 months – Temperature standstill extends to 223 months


  • rainwashed

    Global warming will end when Liberals no longer are allowed to fudge the numbers.

    • rjb69

      Liberals….in every country on earth. That makes a lot of sense.

    • Xanadu2

      That is why the environmental religious fundamentalist, extremists, had to change the narrative to man made “climate change.” That way no matter what the normal global variations in temperature or general weather conditions, the religious fundamentalists extremists, can still blame it on mankind.

      • 57nomad

        When did ‘religious fundamentalist extremists’ whoever they might be, start chiming in on global warming. I’m interested. Can you cite some examples or provide a link? It’s a new one for me.

        • disqus4700

          The High Priest of the UN aka head climate scientist said that AGW was his religion and dharma path to righteousness

          • 57nomad

            In that sense, perfectly correct. Although, I believe he would have been more forthright had he used the word ‘cult’ instead of religion, not to split hairs. Good catch.

          • Hopsaregood

            Must be a front and mouth piece for Al Gore.

        • WentWorth8022

          Does it actually require a degree in either SATIRE or SARCASM to understand the tongue in cheek use of ‘religious fundamentalist extremists’ AKA Al Gore’s unthinking believers? For a link watch ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ and note Rev. Gore’s false statement regarding the ten warmest years on record which all fall within the longest pause on record which can be viewed above.

        • jeffersonian_nc

          hmmmm – the Pope

          Also google “michael crichton climate change religion youtube”
          And watch the video how he compares environmentalism to a religion.

          • Linda MacLeod Goodman

            Crichton died soon after of a virulent cancer. “It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong” – Voltaire

          • roccotool

            I’ve read that from Crichton before. It’s brilliant and must-read for any of the Hoaxers. He was a great thinker.

        • knows the game

          He posted “environmental religious fundamentalist, extremist” meaning the environment is their religion. Take another look there easy reader.

        • Hominid

          You left out the critical word – “ENVIRONMENTAL religious fundamentalists” – and misunderstood his post.

        • nicehandnick

          How ’bout this. OBAMA is the world’s most evil soul crushing DICTATORSHIP power tripping incompetent gun grabbin’ weak namby pamby in History!!!

      • powers2be

        Correct. Now the media narrative is the weather is going to kill you. Read your fear inducing headlines. The weather that a decade ago couldn’t be conflated with the climate, as we were told by the talking AlGore puppets, is not the direct result of man burning fossil fuel which turned global warming into snowmageddon. Look out your window, if it is not an ideal day it is all your fault.

        • powers2be

          Sorry, it is NOW the direct result of man burning fossil fuel.

        • kanilammit

          We have become so reliant on air conditioning, any day that requires it is proof we are killing this planet. Spend the whole day in an office blasting AC and then leave when it is in the 90’s in July or August (I mean can you imagine it getting that hot in those months?) and some people think the whole world is going to end. I can only imagine someone from the 1950’s travelling into the future to 2015 sitting on their front porch with a fan and iced tea laughing because our reaction to a typical summer is more entertaining than the Ed Sullivan Show.

          • powers2be

            Hyperbolic NBC online has recently called high 80’s in July devastating heat and warns of rain (not storms just heavy rain for the plants and trees) moving west to east in a headline. Yet the worst part of this is that post 1990 public school graduates feel guilty about it, normal old weather, and think the Government can change temperatures and alter weather systems. The question is will we end up with a benevolent totalitarian rule ala Huxley’s Brave New World or is a malevolent Big Brother in our near future looks as if Orwell was off by half a century.

          • Eric Houghton

            I would love someone to answer this question: How could the climate scientists possibly know what the temps were on the ocean surfaces before satellites? It seems to me preposterous that they call 2014…and most likely 2015 the hottest years EVER when reading accurate temps in the ocean even now is considered impossible, let alone during the 80 years dating back to 1880. Do they have historical readings from U-Boat captains in the 1930s? Perhaps ships and schooners traversing the Indian Ocean were equipped with reading devises in those days?
            Putting that argument aside, how about accurate land readings from before…let’s say…the fall of the Soviet Union? There is no way they could possibly know with any degree of accuracy what temperatures were in February of 1952 in Siberia, Nigeria or anywhere out in the hinterland. Morons, one and all.

          • Hominid

            I.e., most people are stupid.

          • rhinotwo

            Actually most people are smart, never under estimate. The problem is not stupidity it is laziness. As evidenced by what I call “sound bite people”.

          • Hominid

            You must be very young, rhino. Remember half the population has a double-digit IQ and average ain’t very bright.

          • rhinotwo

            Ok, maybe you can tell me what percentage of the population has an I.Q. below 100.

          • Hominid

            Huh? I just did.

          • rhinotwo

            You are confusing intelligence with knowledge. Ignorance comes from the word ignore which denotes not to have knowledge of. Whereas stupidity means you don’t have the ability to learn.
            And you are right. 50% of the population has and I.Q. below 100. But I never put much stock in the I.Q. test. It’s really a measure of knowledge. Just give an I.Q. test to someone who has lived in the jungle all their life and never had any formal education.

          • Hominid

            You don’t know what you’re talking about.

          • rhinotwo

            Yea you’re right.

          • rhinotwo

            I guess only older, highly intelligent people like you really know. I’m too young to figure it out for myself. I’m thankful we have smarties like you.

          • rhinotwo

            Oh, by the way I’m on my 70th trip around the sun.

        • doug1961

          I had to work out in the Texas heat last weekend all day. It was 103.
          I did think the weather was going to kill me…a few times

          • powers2be

            Moral of that story is stop working out in 103 degrees. Or stop working out and see a doctor, hoping for a good prognosis. Problem solved. But nooooo! the left wants to drive up our cost of energy artificially against the dictates of supply and demand, drive down the quality of our lives and give over all power and control to a centralized government that is owned by the wealthiest of the 1%.

          • doug1961

            Good advice!
            And I second your position.

          • Linda MacLeod Goodman

            National Greed absorbed our local supplier in MA last year and our electric rates have now more than DOUBLED! King O wasn’t kidding.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlTxGHn4sH4

          • Thomas Jefferson

            Hope Trump wins and investigates this tyrant and locks him up in a cage next to Hitlery in one of those politically correct non gender specific prisens.

          • lloydc1234

            Trump? Really? Hope? Trump is not going to be President. So much for hope.

          • lloydc1234

            Stop wasting so much space.

          • lloydc1234

            What is wrong with you? The wealthiest are not all “democrats.” And, some have to work in 102 degrees.

          • powers2be

            Stop letting other people think for you. This two party system back and forth that is played out in the media is a magic trick and we all know the art of the trick is in the misdirection.
            When I say wealthy I mean Rockefeller Rich. When they want to buy a mansion for their Son/Daughter graduating from his/ her 4 year Ivy League vacation they instruct their trust manager to acquire it whole and add it to the real property asset column of their Multi Billion Dollar trust fund and then bribe the district council to wave the property taxes. They stock the garage with the cars of his/her choice and get them jobs at whatever New York Corporation he/she wants to work for.
            Lloyd The 1% of the 1% aren’t political they own the politicians who are their puppets. Politicians vote according to the whim of those who buy their seats and the wealthy whim is whatever is in their best interest. It isn’t a them and us, Republican/Democrat thing. It is We The Wealthy. This is the oldest of the old boys club with very strict admission standards for the nouveau riche. They think and act as a block and own more Assets, money and other peoples debt than you can wrap your brain around. They are the Puppet Masters who created this show called two party politics to distract you and me from the truth of who really is running the country.
            Now here is the thinking for yourself part. What percentage of the U.S. Net Worth do you suppose the 1% owns? that is your first homework assignment. Here is a hint, it is more than enough to move financial markets buying and owning controlling shares of corporations. When they painted themselves into the corner with the Real Estate bust and their derivative plan blew up in their face they instructed the politicians to pass TARP and go borrow money on the backs of the middle class to bail them out.
            99% of Americans have tossed and turned, at some point in their lives, sleepless over financial issues. What do you suppose keeps those who own the politicians and buy mansions like you buy new cell phone lose sleep over? Let me help you with this one. Would they lose sleep if gas went to $10 or gallon? no. They lose sleep over a growing population, third world industrialization and an ever increasing demand on limited fossil fuel. They can afford $10 gas for all 10 of their cars. They can’t afford to run out of gas.
            So Lloyd, this CAGW scare is a ruse so that a voting majority will turn to their politicians (read puppet masters) and vote them the power to control the flow of fossil fuels.

        • roccotool

          Now the Weather Service is into Panic. Every storm, every report of bad weather, has “dire” consequences. You never hear about good weather anymore. Why sell panic? Because it makes you tune in later, to see how bad it’s getting.

          • powers2be

            Actually, It is the major flaw in generalized tactic. The individual media outlets are given their marching orders, Rocco, and they run of in every direction like a pack of obedient barking dogs. What the puppet masters fail to realize is that, like the parable of the boy who cried wolf, their panic headlines are starting to fall on deaf ears and eyes. When storms appear as rain and fail to carry the commensurate devastation to the warning, people begin to tune out not tune in. Problem then becomes, when a real danger appears, people get hurt because they don’t heed the warning.

          • nicehandnick

            You mean like Fox News blasting out “WAR on CHRISTMAS !!!” every year? You mean it ain’t real??

          • powers2be

            I am saying they are advancing preset agendas. Anthropogenic Global Warming is one of their biggies. I am not a FOX apologist and find Bill O’reilly, along with most talking heads, supremely annoying

            But I don’t understand your problem? If you don’t like the agendas they are advancing at Fox change the channel. I don’t believe CNN or MSNBC are following the War on Christmas. They are preoccupied with finding a racist cop in every precinct woodpile. Check it out.

          • nicehandnick

            Well Fox News is excited about the WAR on Lightbulbs too. CNN is just Fox Lite, and MSNBC’s big hitter is Joe in the morning… corporate media are simply whores for the corporations. No news on any of them. It’s all corporate propaganda.

          • powers2be

            You appear to have a clue but you are not really digging deep enough. CNN is a ABNBCBs 24/7 amplipher. Fox is their counter propagandists. MSNBC stands for Made-up-of Socialist Ninnies (who are) Batshite Crazy.

            Digging deeply you find that The 2 party system is corrupted and consisting of Demoplicans and Republicrats who are the opposite side of the same coin and that coin is owned by the same principle wealth holders (often labeled the 1 percenters but really the 1% of the 1% and their minions) who own the billion dollar trusts that control majority shares in corporate America, the Ministry of Propaganda aka the Media, and the puppets on a string we call the 21st century Politician. Their bickering and finger pointing that plays out on the Propaganda channels is nothing more than kabuki theater to mask their joint cocktail parties and inbreeding. The GovMint Bureaucrats are the 1of1% front line generals who integrate policy for their profit. This is a very tightly controlled magic show using misdirection to mask the purposeful disappearing act of the vanishing middle class followed by every totalitarians favorite act the disappearing individual liberties. Poof! Now you see em, now you don’t!

          • nicehandnick

            Socialist Ninnies? What does that make Fox and their extreme war mongering far right? Do you have the same regard for the extreme far right war monger party as you do for the socialists?

          • powers2be

            So that was your takeaway? Oh we are so screwed. The Puppet Masters have managed to polarize this country so badly that people like you put on political team jersey’s and run around railing about the other team.

            I don’t care what that makes FOX. You are the one with a Fox derangement syndrome. I don’t give a minutes thought about Fox’s right wing manipulations because they can’t affect my thinking. You need to wake up and understand that you are the problem. Stop being an apologist for those nutjob tools of the manipulators at MSNBC, CNN, ABNBCBS, or Fox news. They have their orders from on high and they carry them out blindly. And based upon your reaction, effectively, brainwashing jersey wearers like yourself.

            Until you realize that you are an American, not a special interest American but the plain kind that other citizens of the world long to become. Until you can see you and your fellow Americans have been pitted against each other to the benefit of the wealth holders who direct both right and left wing messages while they hide in plain sight manipulating this puppet show we call politics, we will continue to degrade into this finger pointing blame game society on the verge of civil war.

            If you want to see the real problem take a long look in the mirror. The problem isn’t Fox or CNN or MSNBC (and yes they are absolutely batshite crazy over their). The problem is you for listening to them and not thinking for yourself.

          • nicehandnick

            Well I can see the media corporate whores own CNN, MSNBC, and FOX They are pushing the media corporate whore candidate Rubio and Hillary. Fox went to court to prove they can lie legally and misinform. They won a judgment. Media is nothing but an INFOMERICAL for the corporate oligarchs.

          • powers2be

            I don’t necessarily disagree with your final take but you have to live under a rock to not be aware that Trump is sucking all the air out of the media discussions so supplanting Rubio for Trump speaks volumes about who scares you the most.

            I will leave you with this thought. I would much rather meet you for coffee and have an informed and intelligent discussion about what is wrong with this country and how we can all come together to fix it rather.than to waste more time on this comment board playing the “Oh Yeah! Well this politician is this and that politician is that and this news outlet said this stupid thing and that media outlet said that stupid thing” game.

            I think we can both agree that the latter exercise is one of futility. It is in fact what those nameless wealth holders who own the corporations which includes these media outlets, who own the politicians who install the heads of bureaucracies, who run the public school systems and endow the Universities, who manufacture boogiemen under the bed like AGW to whip us into a state of fear and guilt, Those nameless few who run this country want to keep us citizens busily at each others throats and it is working for them.

            At the very least we should be looking for a politician who honestly try’s to unite us to work together in the best interest of all Americans. I don’t know how old you are but we haven’t had that kind of dialogue in this country of the UNITED States of America for a very long time. The propagandists (doing the job they are paid to do) have spent the last half century defining interest groups and then pitting them against each other to create the DIVIDED States of America.

            The best thing we can do is stop listening to them and start talking to each other.

    • libwithIQ

      Global warming is just the catch phrase for “Wealth Redistribution to Al Gores bank.”

      • 1mikejanz1

        And the Popes, and Obama’s and Hillary’s and every rich idiot who believes that buying so called carbon foot prints makes the better than the rest of us!
        By the way does anybody know some moron rich enough to buy my carbon foot print, I’m retired and I could sure use the extra cash!

        • Hopsaregood

          Carbon foot print. Hmm, will they buy anal gas.

          • 1mikejanz1

            Only from sheep because they’re the ones causing al the global warming

          • libwithIQ

            I thought it was all caused by the flatulent cattle. That’s why I do my part to battle climate change by eating all the beef I can. One steak at a time.

          • BobWilliams1950

            And I am a staunch member of P.E.T.A. – People Eating Tasty Animals!

            There’s room for all God’s creatures – right next to the mashed potatoes…

          • brewster01

            If God didn’t want us to eat animals he wouldn’t have made them out of meat…..

          • rhinotwo

            I laughed. That’s a good one.

          • LibertyBill_1776

            Love it! I use that term to the vegans I know..drives ’em CRAZY!!!

          • BobWilliams1950

            Ran into a woman carrying a PETA water bottle and told her, “Hey! We belong to the same group. People eating tasty animals!”

            Her head only spun around twice so I figured I left something on the table. The look from her was priceless. The laughter from bystanders was overwhelming! 🙂

          • slobotnavich

            Well said! I’m fixin’ to do my part by devouring a large T-Bone this very night. Gaia must be saved!

          • konc2

            Speaking of flatulent cattle, have you seen the ALGORE lately, that guy is spewing more gas into the air than a whole herd of cattle.

          • 1mikejanz1

            Naw, I read where some guy said it was the sheep in New Zealand that are causing the problems, but then again I also heard it was the cattle!
            I believe it is all that hot air coming out of the mouths of all those idiot liberals going bonkers over the end of the world because of global warming!
            I hope they all get caught out in the next extremely severe blizzard God throws at us, and that will solve the global warming problem because there won’t be anybody left to scream about it!

          • Daniel

            New Zealand had 71 million sheep in 1981, a lot for 4 million people but we only have 29 million now and we love them all. So it ain’t us!

          • 1mikejanz1

            Don’t worry about it, everybody with an IQ over 10 knows that global warming is the biggest BS scam ever perpetrated on mankind!

          • Ken Bowser

            Those sheep are picky breeders, hence the need for so many.

          • Hopsaregood

            Damn, old men can never make an easy buck.

        • Katherine McChesney

          It called CARBON CREDITS that they buy. The lie is that you leave a carbon footprint.

          • Juan

            No, I think 1mike has is right, oddly enough. The purchase of a carbon credit permits one to leave a carbon footprint. Of course, there will be speculators who profit from trading in carbon credits but leave no tracks…er, footprints.

          • Gayle Jackson

            If you wear charcoal shoes, you’ll leave a carbon footprint;)

          • knows the game

            Or diamonds on the soles of your shoes.

          • gei5saeghah

            my companion’s relative makes $73 hourly on the PC ………….at weekend day I nontransmissible a high of thedistinction McLaren F1 once I been earnin 10953 US-DOLLARS thismost up-to-date 4weeks and inway frightfully 10 miss month . inspiration driving truth sometimes|this willbe} once uncertain habituallythe key financialy fulfilling i even have ever done . i began this 9-months past and basically alterably started securing extraordinarily seventy. sevenUS-DOLLARS… p/h . loads of on the article..io…

            ➤➤➤➤ http://GlobalWorkWorldCOM/work/Best … ⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛

          • Snake Plissken

            He’s right. I know for a fact ’cause I tried it. So don’t lecture me about carbon footprints, until you’ve walked a mile in my charcoal shoes.

          • DR HUNTER THOMPSON

            ODOR EATERS HAVE CHARCOAL !

          • Cap_Native

            She’s got diamonds on the soles of her shoes.
            The walking blues

          • Huck Fillary

            Al Gore has personally pocketed half a billion bucks off of the AGW fairy tale (despite every single aspect of his goofy little sci fi flick being debunked) and there are literally trillions of more dollars to be made from carbon taxes on the middle class. People have been known to do some truly horrific things in their quest for money, the AGW scam is simply one more example of the abject evil inherent in the leftist psyche.

          • ZED

            Carbon footprint up their AS%

          • sandamhernandez

            ➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽my amigo’s sister makes 83$$/hour on the web……..on saturday I got a top of the degree audi since getting a check for 4216$$ this most recent 4 weeks in addition, ten thousand last-munth . irrefutably about it, this really is the most enamoring occupation Ive had . I really began six months/earlier and on an extremely fundamental level straight away was making more than 87$$ p/h . endeavor this site…………

            ➽➽➽➽➽ tinyurl.com/Jobs9sReportOnline4t ➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽➽

        • Snake Plissken

          Yeah! Me too. I think maybe Ebay for starters, then Craigslist just to see how many nigerian scammers want to steal it.

        • Roger Hilliard

          We have a communist pope raised on south american socialism. He did not get the memo that socialism doesn’t work, never has, never will.

          • LibertyBill_1776

            Hey! He just want life to be FAIR! (Of course it isn’t and never will be, as GOD did not design the world that way, but it is what the Pope wants…)

          • Lindsay Gough

            Have you ever read the Bible dickhead?

      • NHBill603

        THE SINGLE LARGEST REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH IN HUMAN HISTORY BEGAN IN 1985 TO THE PRESENT DAY FROM THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS TO THE EXTREMELY WEALTHY.

        SO MUCH HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED THAT THE TOP 0.01% OF AMERICANS OWN MORE WEALTH THAN THE BOTTOM 90% COMBINED.
        W A K E U P!

        • tntpop

          Thats because they know how to handle money and we know how to hand it to them….. Stop buying shit you don’t need… dont fall for the credit lie… live below your means… win the game.

          • NHBill603

            I’m not talking about successful capitalism.
            I’m talking about the redistribution of wealth from one group to another.
            Your advice is spot on but not relevant to that issue.
            The game has been rigged.
            Their Risk has been socialized at our expense.

        • roccotool

          Somebody will always make more money than you do. Grow a pair.

          • NHBill603

            Educate yourself.
            You are being robbed.
            Stop lying down and taking it you wimp!

        • LWAPolitics

          Please change NHBill603’s screen name to Chickenlittle.

        • LibertyBill_1776

          Learn about the Pareto Principle . There is good reason why certain people get rich and then richer…

          • NHBill603

            Except it’s not the 80/20 rule!!!
            It’s the 0.01/90 rule!
            WAKE UP!
            All was right with America when the 80/20 rule was in place.

      • nobody

        Too bad you can’t redistribute brain power, you really need some.

        • libwithIQ

          Really sparky? That’s the best you have? I’ve forgotten more than a cretin that beliefs the MMGW scam knows. Maybe your should remove your head from your posterior and actually do some research on the subject instead of believing the b.s. spread by AL Gore.

          • nobody

            Please try to obtain a brain transplant asap, you’re starting to sound even more dumb and delusional than usual – whatever is left of your brain must be on its last legs.

      • ay0phub8ahth

        ♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪

        :::::::

        ::::::::::::::::::

        ==OVER HERE===== Tinyurl.com/Start1ApplyCareers5h
        ………………..,……………………..
        …………………………………..,……………………….
        ..,…
        FOR WORK INFo LOOOK NEXT TAB IN PAGE WEBSITE
        ♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪

    • 2ndprotectsall

      And when $$$ won’t be made from enviro-guilt.

    • rich

      Or when they all perish jumping off the nearest ledge when Trump wins the presidency. Sorta like an ethnic cleansing thing.

    • 1mikejanz1

      The global warming scam will end when all the anti capitalist in the world die of global warming!
      I suggest they all commit suicide so they won’t have to go through the horrible agony of being burned up alive! Much better option for them!

      • Hopsaregood

        And when crooks and con artists such as Al Gore die and go to helll.

    • Jay Smith

      Correction… “Global warming” will end when grant money is more lucrative to study the next Armageddon scenario.

    • wiseoldfart

      The day that happens will be the day they start addressing the real problem – air, land, and water pollution. There has been no global warming for almost 20 years. If man is responsible for any warming during that period of time, our contribution masked the global cooling that would have otherwise been evident. Global cooling will soon make itself evident and that’s why the focus will soon be on pollution, if the left dares to contradict itself by venturing there.

      We can’t put a dent in climate change, but we can certainly put a dent in pollution. And just how much more pollution will the US be creating with a population double what it is today? With wide open borders, we’re in for a population explosion. You greenies need to seriously ponder that because rapid population growth means a rapid increase in all types of pollution.

      • powers2be

        Wise… You are a lot closer to a real problem than all this: carbon footprint – fabricated catastrophic warming – global political prestidigitation.
        The fact is the real problem, which the CAGW alarmist crowd doesn’t have the courage to discuss, is their actual, real. concern over growing global population i.e. its consequences to the earth environment, the demand and drain on natural resources etc. If they just spoke honestly to their real issue they might get an actual 97% consensus of the people. Instead they created a boogie man out of Climate Change without a word of acknowledgement to three principal issues:
        1.Some force other than burning fossil fuel (Honest scientists hypothesize the sun) caused the climate to change on planet earth before man crawled out of the primordial ooze. If you stopped the burning of all fossil fuel around the world forever the climate will still change of it’s won accord.
        2. Although they are calling for action from the Worlds Governments, The governments can not exercise control over the climate It’s going to change and all the scientists governments can buy, can’t alter it. Even if they could herd all these cats (World Governments) to act in unison they couldn’t move climate in a desired direction. We can and should however teach every citizen to be good stewards, conserve and keep our house in good working order.
        3. At some point one of three apocalyptic types events will likely happen before the Climate starts killing us off. a) a solar event extinguishes life on earth. Scientists estimate the sun is half way through a 9 billion year life cycle but it could explode tomorrow b) meter strike resets evolution c) global thermonuclear war. President Obama just built Iran a yellow brick (cake) road which will be completed in less than a decade. We can at least do something about b and c and all further Global Warming funding should be diverted to those ends.

    • Evolution is a fact

      It’s called “Global” warming, not “United States” warming. Moron.

    • WarOn?

      they need another religion first…….sounds like they are already moving to LGBTism

    • Marcus Cassius, aka Kaz

      “Global warming will end when Liberals (are) no longer are allowed to fudge the numbers”.

    • nobody

      Yes, because only what happens in USA counts on the global climate. And you’re wondering why you get branded as freaks.

  • High Plains Drifter

    AGW is settled science. Dont confuse with the facts such as lower than normal temperatures.

    • redneckkk

      settled where?

      • jon doe

        the UN

    • bobbybilly

      Just like Pluto was settled science?

      Science is never settled

      • powers2be

        BB I just read that in a survey of scientists the majority voted to keep it classified as a planet. I think they call that a consensus but we know that it doesn’t settle anything.

    • libwithIQ

      Settled Science? Really? Last I heard from the MMGW crowd was that it was a “consensus” Well a consensus is hardly settled science.

    • jon doe

      “settled” science = politics.

  • Ken

    Yes, no global warming. Well except for Iran which has seen temperatures as high as 165 degrees F during July. But that’s because some country is using ionosphereic heaters over them. No wonder Obama doesn’t care about the treaty.

    Breakfast in Iran is “Sunni” side up or “Shiite” on a shingle.

    Ken

    • Dr_Albert_Gortenbull

      The 165 degrees was the heat-humidity index. The surface temperature was “only” around 115 degrees F. Albert

      • tedlv

        Heat indexes, like wind chill, can be misleading. I wish the weather people would stick with the actual temperature being forecast or reported, not some made up extreme number. But the heat index sure makes it look a lot hotter, thus “proving” AGW.

  • capn-gary

    I guess Algore isn’t talking as much as he used to.

  • ronfromflorida

    What did NOAA do make a mistake and tell the truth?, that won’t sit well with Obama.

    • disillusioned

      Soon it will be ‘that wont sit well with Hillary’

      • ronfromflorida

        Not a freaking chance in hell.

        • neverliberal

          Hate to say it, but given the pathetic republican field you best get ready for Hillary and the destruction that will follow.

      • Adakjak

        Don’t think so ..
        it’s orange jump suit time for the 60’s loser !

        • jmg09

          I wish, but that’s not going to happen while Obummer is Prez. Not that it shouldn’t.

        • neverliberal

          Not gonna happen with Obama in power.

      • libwithIQ

        Want to bet?

    • cc

      don’t worry, they’ll adjust those data before long

      • t from NJ

        The Obama super super computer he wants is on the case,LOL

      • rich

        They’ll say with a straight face that the cooling was due to the warming. Really. I’ve already heard that one from these nuts as an explanation. Wheeeeew! Out there!

  • AaA1960

    At one given time or another Liberals have blamed

    Global Cooling/Warming/Climate Change for anyone of the following.
    Rising sea levels.
    Falling sea levels.
    Flooding.
    Droughts.
    Rising temperatures.
    Cooling temperatures.
    Decreased sea ice.
    Increased sea ice.
    More hurricanes.
    Fewer hurricanes.
    Increase in Polar Ice.
    Decline of Polar Ice.
    Increase in severe Thunder storms.
    Decrease in severe Thunder storms.
    Crashing computer hard drives.
    Erectile dysfunction
    One lasting for more than 4 hours…
    Lerner’s E-mails mysteriously disappearing.
    Lerner’s E-mails mysteriously reappearing
    Electronic voting machines inexplicitly selecting Democrat when Republican is chosen.

    And if you don’t religiously and unequivocally believe this, then…
    You are considered _______________. (Insert any one of many derogatory names
    the oh, so tolerant Left has for anyone who dares to have a different opinion than
    them).

    Oh, and if you even slightly question the BHO then you’re also a racist
    Intolerance will no longer be tolerated…

    World debt has now exceeded $600 trillion dollars as world governments prop up their failed economies fixing nothing as the US has been doing having the Fed buy securities to the tune of $85 Billon a month over the past 7 years. World governments need a new cash flow source to continue their lavish spending and “the people” are that source.

    Besides, even if one does believe in global warming, who in their right mind think that giving trillions of dollars to the likes of Al Gore and The Obama is really going to fix anything…

    • And, they don’t even realize what idiots it makes them look like. Not really that they care because it is all a big self-enrichment scam!

    • wiseoldfart

      Let’s not forget tornadoes!

      • Joe_D

        and sharknados! It must be true… I saw Al Roker reporting on an EF-5 sharknado just a few months ago. Damn that global warming.

    • Bullet Tooth Tony

      you forgot – it also created ISIS

    • lloydc1234

      Don’t have much to do, do you?

  • disillusioned

    Ummm, how do you say in English?.. BULL SHIT… not in these neck of the woods, brother!

  • Pistol_Pablo

    How can these numbers be true if global warming/climate change in the United States is a FACT?? Global warming alarmists will either stay quiet about this report or they will magically use it to “prove” their case as they like to do with EVERY SINGLE WEATHER/CLIMATE EVENT even when that event contradicts their case.

  • rjb69

    Continental USA = the globe

    Genius!

    • Hobbes

      Global Warming = the globe. No warming in part of the globe = A) no warming for the globe in the entirety or B) it is not GLOBAL warming.

  • disillusioned

    I watch Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth when I’m wanting a little comedy/Sci-Fi.

    • wiseoldfart

      Is that damn polar bear still clinging to that iceberg still floating on Lake Superior?

  • mikeb330

    I guess this can’t be considered “science”.

    • rjb69

      Or geography.

  • snapperman

    I guess the mental midgets at the EPA haven’t seen this…..

  • DufusofAustin

    Ummm….I can’t keep up with the scientists. First it was global warming, then cooling, then climate change, now climate cycle….. It’s giving me a headache.
    Maybe they just know. Now there’s a novel concept.

  • stnmn35

    Follow the Money!
    Carbon credit trading and liscensing and taxation will Eclipse the world Economy.
    And who Owns the only company that is authorized to enforce and trade Carbon Credits? — (The center of the Earth is Millions of Degrees) AL GORE!
    The Leader of the Global Climate Change movement.

  • Xanadu2

    That is why the environmental religious fundamentalist, extremists, had to change the narrative to man made “climate change.” That way no matter what the normal global variations in temperature or general weather conditions, the religious fundamentalists extremists, can still blame it on mankind…

  • psadie

    The mini Ice Age is here to stay for quite awhile!

    • Libertarianski

      Hoping the old days of -40 in ND will return and keep the riff-raff out again.

  • eburleso

    Don’t you just hate it when your mantra crasp out? Liberals, you’ll have to find a piper to follow.

  • snowden

    They definitely have been. Yet, the power company is still trying to hit me with a peak charge when temperatures are normal averages. Gotta love it!

  • Richard Dunnagan

    Isn’t it funny that the it’s only the places we can’t verify by direct observation and personal record keeping that are experiencing warming. You know, those hard to reach war zones or little third world holes that are expecting to benefit from the wealth redistribution that is the “solution”.

  • FlexoRick

    Look at all the CLIMATE CHANGE going on in those graphs. OMG Why can’t our government make that line go straight across with no fluctuation at all
    WHY ! OMG WHY ! If the Government continues to be ineffective against all this climate change we are all going to die one day OMG

  • MrQ

    Bummer

  • BigKnuckles

    Does this mean that every open space that we have in this country no longer needs to be covered with hideous solar panels?

    • Libertarianski

      Barry’s still got some Solyndra solar panels for old time’s sake tho.

    • jon doe

      The leftist de growthers don’t like those either. They kill birds. Wind too. Thats out. Hydro electric dams? Nope. That kills fish. Nuclear. Forget it. They have seen to it that a plant hasn’t been built since the 70’s. So what does that leave? Nothing. And that is the plan. To stand on America’ energy hose to destroy capitalism. Because its not “fair” that we have so much while socialist hell holes don’t.

  • FlexoRick

    Hey wait a minute….. could it be? All the efforts we are making to cool the planet are working? Maybe we should hit the breaks before it gets too cool.
    Naaa I can see Gores eye balls pooping out of his head while thinking …WHAT? and stop the cash cow…Never ! Climate change must always remain a problem.

  • BigKnuckles

    All those wind turbines are like big, giant fans…keeping us cool

  • Noneya

    I live in California unfortunately Jerry Brown is heavily invested in this scam he thinks it’s more important to be in line with the EU then be a part of the USA. We need a federal investigation stat.

    • Adakjak

      Fed investigation ? bawhawhaw .
      kalifornica needs a new gov ….. and 5 million less ILLEGALS …
      comprend’e Ha-Me_Go ….

      • libwithIQ

        Only 5 million? That would hardly scratch the surface. There’s that many in west L.A.

  • mar999

    Global Climate Change is one of the holy sacraments of the left. No amount of evidence will change their minds, their beliefs are set in stone.

    • Miagogo

      I won’t deny them freedom of religion, as long as it doesn’t become state sponsored. Oh, wait…

  • Jason

    Don’t bewilder the Liberals with the statistical facts.

    • BigKnuckles

      speaking of scientific geniuses….NOAA was holding the graph upside down.

  • PV Maro

    The sun is going to sleep. Buy blankets.

  • BigKnuckles

    Does this mean that the annoying solar electric companies will stop calling me?

    • jon doe

      I had two of these pukes show up at my door with a clip board and asked to see my electric bill. They seemed stunned that I was not interested in their “green energy is wonderful” speech. Meanwhile we are looking at a doubling or maybe tripling of our electric bill soon as the coal fired power plants are being regulated out of business.

  • Gillettestevens

    If anything we are meandering toward a major cool down, maybe even a mini-ice age. The sun has been very quiet for the last few years, few solar flares, CMEs or sun spots, and that points to colder times ahead.

    • Miagogo

      Winter is coming.

  • Libertarianski

    Nobody’s said it yet, so I will just for Sh1ts & Gr1ns; It’s Bush’s fault!

    • libwithIQ

      That’s racist!

    • jmg09

      Trigger warning!

    • wiseoldfart

      Which one? H? W? Jeb?

      • neverliberal

        All of the above, according to liberals.

  • zjak10

    How in the “heck” did this get out BEFORE NOAA had a chance to doctor the data??? this is totally unacceptable.

  • BreakingGood

    Well if the Temps are below normal for three years it means only one thing. It’s time to put away the “global warming” phrase and breakout the “climate change” phrase. Hey, this whole ‘coming global disaster’ stuff is easy.

  • Miagogo

    You mean to tell me that our heat comes from that huge bright orb in the sky?!? GW isn’t real?!? OMG they lied!!! – WTF?

    – said no progressive ever.

  • Duodecal

    I was on this flight one time and we hit some turbulence and this guy in an Obama
    T-shirt stood up and started yelling “WE’RE ALL GOING TO DIE!” – what a pussy.

  • BigKnuckles

    global warming has ended…but global insanity still rages on.

  • t from NJ

    Hey il Papa en Vaticano -No No No AGW capece?

    • Duodecal

      “The Nutty Pope” – funny movie

  • Jason

    I trust science, I do not really trust scientists. They are “cooking the books”.

    • N.D.

      Quite true.
      “Never theorize before you have data. Invariably, you
      end up twisting facts [or data] to suit theories, instead of theories to suit
      facts.”
      –Sherlock Holmes, 2009

      • BigKnuckles

        Are you quoting a fictitious character?

        • N.D.

          If you weren’t such a Gruberal, you’d recognize I quoted lines from a major motion picture. (and quite profound, at that).

          • BigKnuckles

            science brought to you by Hollywood?

          • N.D.

            Nice. Ok, I admit it. I laughed. Maybe the only lines worth quoting out of Hollyweird.

          • libwithIQ

            Why not? The left has been doing it for years. Liberal actors runs continuos stream into Congress to testify on things they haven’t the slightest idea about.

        • wxman

          Why not? Liberals quote fictitious climate data!

          • t from NJ

            Use fictitious characters with actors for out foreign affairs.

    • Duodecal

      Anyone who refutes formal Scientific Method is not a real scientist – these are the people refered to as “scientists” in Liberal publications – they are just politically biased egomaniacs.

  • maraboo

    global cooling would be catastrophic for a planet that needs to feed billions, but how would our leaders make money on carbon credits if the solution to the world’s woes is to pump more co2 and methane into the atmosphere. If they figure out the money problem, then cooling will be the new boogeyman

  • JohninRedding

    How could this be? Often we are told about short term increases in temperature and told it is evidence of global warming. We are foolish to think we can project what will happen longer term without better understanding of all the factors involved and their level of impact on the weather. I would bet that it is so complex that we will never achieve anywhere close to a 100% accurate rating.

  • NAMU00

    Live in Illinois and my lawn is still lush green right now. Normally this time of year it is brown and burnt out. Have had an unseasonably cool and wet Spring and Summer here. I love this Global Climate Change.

  • katie 10

    People living in Michigan would agree with this. It is where the Great Lakes froze over for the first time in a hundred years. Even in California this year we did not have many over 100 degree days.

  • MyOpinionPost

    We are told a lot of things, and most of it is for the teller’s profit.

  • 2ndprotectsall

    Darn that pesky global normal!

  • LIBERALSnotWORTHYofLIFE

    GLOBAL WARMING, GLOBULL WARMING GLOB…………OH WAIT…………

  • Chris King

    shame on EVERY SINGLE LEFTIST….
    shame on you for those 10000s of times you demanded we agree with you.
    shame on you for denying the possibility of corruption from the likes of verified liars like gore, clintons, obama.
    shame on you for trying to shut down conversation by simply claiming your superiority.
    shame on you for claiming that REAL scientists all agreed with your liar position.

  • Jonathan Gruber

    Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views

    • jon doe

      Of course they want to hear other views. How else are they supposed to know who to call racist?

  • DumpDemLiars

    Looks like its back to cooking the books and changing records again.

  • LIBERALSnotWORTHYofLIFE

    LIBERAL is a dog whistle/code word for TERRORIST and TRAITOR!

  • BigKnuckles

    Less cows belching?

    • Nick697

      Fewer cows, not less. Less refers to an amount (example: less snow). Fewer refers to a number (example: fewer people believe in AGW.)

  • N0TaLIB

    When is Obama going to hold a news conference and take credit for the cooling?
    Oh wait, then they would have to admit that it is cooling.

  • cccdude

    It’s global warming don’t cha’ know.

  • 1mikejanz1

    Someone please explain to me again how we’re destroying the Earth with man made global warming!
    I must be a dunce, I just can’t seem to grasp the Idea that every ones brain is going to melt because it’ seems to be getting cooler!
    And to think we have the Useless Nations, the Pope, the democrat party lead by the worst president that the country has ever had and who wouldn’t know the truth if it jumped up and bit him on the backside, and all those idiot liberals trying to convince us that destroying all the economies of first world nations is going to save the world from burning up!
    I love the way God makes these moron’s look so foolish!
    And by the way, lets not forget all those idiots that believe what leftist are saying because they’re too stupid to think for themselves!

  • Dr_Albert_Gortenbull

    According to scientists who study the sun, a “Maunder Minimum” cycle will begin about 15 years from now and throw the earth into a mini-ice age for many, many years. Albert

    • Joe Coe

      Actually not. Not even the scientist who put forth the new hypothesis says it will affect our current climate change path much. Check your facts again, but I appreciate your effort of actually looking at real science.

  • jon doe

    Notice that through the generations, all the things that “humanity” needs to do to save the planet from certain doom involve destroying capitalism by cutting off its energy supply? Whether its eliminating coal fired power plants, off shore drilling, fracking, whatever. Whether its because we are getting too hot, too cold, too much acid rain, too much deforestation, what have you. The solution from these progressive “experts” always means one thing. Reducing the amount of energy used by the USA. But if you suggest that the EPA and these environmentalist groups are a bunch of de-growther communist that want to use environmentalism as a vehicle to destroy capitalism, you are a kook. Well the game is over. We know who these people are and what their agenda is now. Global warming is nothing but a giant redistribution of wealth scam.

  • Cunno2001

    “97 % of scientists agree on AGW. Seriously?…..When has 97 % of anybody ever agreed on anything ? ( except N. Korean elections of their chubby Dear Leaders.

    • Miagogo

      They mean 97% of the scientists receiving grants agree on AGW.

  • Joe Coe

    Just had to see what disillusioned, bizarre, global conspiracy theorist goobers visit this site. Half the arctic ice is gone and you knuckleheads are still pretending all of science is lying to you?? … I’m just glad the NRA is finally onboard with removing guns from the mentally ill.

    • LJN

      Commie phaggot.

    • Miagogo

      That was so 2 years ago. It’s actually doubled. Feeling sheepish?

      http://www.isciencetimes.com/articles/6040/20130911/global-cooling-arctic-ice-cap-60-photo.htm

      • jon doe

        How many times have they been told about this? How do they deny this “science” over and over? With the left when the truth and reality collide its the truth that must become malleable and be bent to fir their agenda.

      • Joe Coe

        No,and certainly not with your old, unqualified opinion piece.

        Try some actual science websites:

        http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

        • Miagogo

          Anything that doesn’t agree with your agenda is “unqualified”. Anyway, go ahead and practice your religion. You are free to do that. On your own.

          • Joe Coe

            If following science’s best evidence is a “religion”, then consider me baptized. Although I would say it is the deniers who dogmatically cling to their gut feelings and cherry-picked charts. You are also free to do so.

    • jon doe

      The arctic ice is actually INCREASED Mr know it all. And no, we don’t think all the scientist are lying. Many are actually trying to tell people like you the same thing that all us conservative cave men are. That this is all a complete scam. Its not scientist that are lying. Its the politicians that fund their grants with subsidies that are lying. The ones that stand to get filthy rich scraping off the top of all this “carbon credits” crap from businesses that actually produce something. I don’t expect you to have a clue about that. And I’m sure you are on board with the anyone taking away people’s rights as you are obviously a progressive leftist. Got anything else you think you are right about?

    • disqus4700
      • libwithIQ

        Joe is a little beta male without the brain power or the incentive to actually look into the suspect data put out by the left.

    • libwithIQ

      I guess you’ve missed where the ice has increased at both poles….mmmmm…Wrong in your idiot assumptions.

    • Nick697

      Note, everyone, how the majority of global warming Algore KoolAid drinkers are also illiterate. The word is Arctic, not arctic (Google the words “proper noun.”)
      .
      Global warming alarmists’ computer models are confounded as Antarctic sea ice hits new record high in 35 years with 2.1 million sq. km.
      more than is usual for the time of the year. “The level of Antarctic sea ice last week hit an all-time high, confounding computer models that say it should be in decline. It is by far the highest since satellite observations, on which the figures are dependent, began in 1979. It represents the latest stage in a trend that started ten years ago, and means that an area the size of Greenland, which would normally be open water, is now frozen.” Source: IPCC 5th Assessment Report, July 2014. Also: “There is low confidence in the scientific understanding of observed increase in the extent of Antarctic sea ice extent since 1979 due to incomplete and competing explanations for the causes of change.”
      .
      Translation: All the taxpayer-funded drones sitting at their computers have no more idea of what’s going to happen – or has happened – in
      global climate than Poor Richard’s Almanac did. Probably less. Your $42 billion at work. AGW climatologists base their gloom-laden predictions not on Earth’s history but on computer simulations. These have long been subject to ridicule because their stunning failure to predict the nearly 19-year slight cooling instead of their forecast warming.
      .
      FYI: Glaciers are also expanding in many areas, but of course you don’t read about that. In Norway there are at least seven (Alforbreen
      Glacier, Briksdalsgreen Glacier (growing by over 7″ per year), Engabreen Glacier (second largest in Norway) and others.) Canada: Helm Glacier, Place Glacier and others. Canada’s tallest mountain, Mount Logan, is growing taller because of a growth spurt of its glaciers. France: Mont Blanc Glacier has almost doubled in size. Equador: Antizana 15 Glacier. Italy: Glaciers are growing on Mount Canin and Mount Montasio.Chile: Pio XI, the largest glacier in South America, grows 50 meters in height, length and density every day. New
      Zealand: All 48 glaciers in the Southern Alps have grown during the past year. Check also Switzerland, Kirghiztan, Russia, Greenland (Berlingske Glacier has grown for the past 100 years), Argentinia, the US and Spain.

  • jon doe

    Oh, and get ready to hear more about how this is “the hottest year on record!!” again. Because why stop lying now when your base is stupid enough to believe whatever you sell them?

  • Michael Burns

    The U.S. is about two percent of the Earth’s surface. Globally, 2015 is going to be the hottest year on record, and because of an intensifying ENSO, 2016 will probably be much hotter.
    Dangerous Heat Wave From Poland to Ukraine and Romania This Week:

    http://www.accuweather.com/en/

    Scorching Heatwave in Egypt:

    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/s

    All-Time Record Heat Returns to Germany:

    • t from NJ

      evens out- a couple of years ago Siberia hit the all time lowest temperature ever on planet Earth. Baghdad had snow for first time in 100 years. Jerusalem snow for first time in many years.

      • Michael Burns

        The planet is getting hotter, on average, decade by decade. Still, there will be snow events.

        • t from NJ

          no it has only warmed .01 deg/C

          • t from NJ

            that is with even suspect data

        • t from NJ

          no one knows the temperatures taken have been suspect or “fudged” so the data is tainted.

          • Michael Burns

            This is a myth. Scientists are constantly adjusting their data to make it more accurate. However, the fossil fuel interests would have you believe the data is intentionally being manipulated.

          • t from NJ

            scientists but these are “scientists”ajusting their data to suit their needs.

          • libwithIQ

            BOL. You are either naive, delusional or ignorant to believe the fossil fuels interest are remotely powerful enough to do something like that.

          • Michael Burns

            Perhaps you should ask Marc Morano.

          • libwithIQ

            Morano doesn’t work for big oil. He does call climate change advocates (thieves) what they are when he sees them.

          • Michael Burns

            Scroll down to the part that talks about his funding:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Morano

          • libwithIQ

            ooooo…really? Wikipedia is your fact source. Now you just lost what little credibility you might have had.

          • Michael Burns

            In this particular case, it’s an excellent source. Ask Marc how much money they are paying him.

          • t from NJ

            and the AGW crowd don’t have any interests in”AGW”?-Chicago Carbon Exchange

          • Michael Burns

            The oil companies make more money in one day than all the climatologists in the world combined make in a year.

          • t from NJ

            sure off of those “climatologists” like Al Gore,Obama ,etc flying in their petroleum filled jets telling us driving around we’re killing the planet sure

          • t from NJ

            Oil companies make money like every company. “Scientists” just live off taxpayers.Just look at these stupid studies-why monkeys self gratify themselves,really?

          • Michael Burns

            Your logic, or lack of logic, is incredibly stupid.

          • t from NJ

            it’s comparison. why just pointing out scientists getting high research dollars for inane research and have to come up with some conclusion to keep dollars coming in

        • t from NJ

          if you have AGW how do you have all time low ever recorded on planet Earth-this drives the whole baseline down

    • Nick697

      Snow in Sydney, Australia, for the first time in 120 years, and also in Hawaii. Three years ago, it also snowed in Cairo, Egypt, for the first time in history.
      .
      Oddball temperature and weather events are normal; they have been going on since the earth was formed, and man’s activities have no more effect on them than they do on the tides. The significant fact, as shown by the graph, is that we’re well into 19 years of no measurable global warming. Like the predictions of hurricanes being more strong and more frequent, and the same for tornadoes, and seal levels rising by inches, the forecasts by the global warming tinfoil hat alarmists have all been proven wrong. No matter, Obozo says man is warming the planet and causing extreme weather events, so we must pay third-world governments tens of billions of dollars while destroying the fossil-fuel industry that made America the richest and most powerful nation in history, instead, taking us back to the 1870s.
      .
      Speaking of the 1870s, the generally-accepted total increase in Earth’s overall temperature rise in the past 145 years has been, wait for it ………… 0.8 degrees. Oh no! We’re all doomed!

      • Michael Burns

        You don’t seem to understand how climate temperature averages work. Heat waves are becoming more common and more intense. This is from NOAA’s last global analysis:

        “The first six months of 2015 comprised the warmest such period on record across the world’s land and ocean surfaces, at 0.85°C (1.53°F) above the 20th century average, surpassing the previous record set in 2010 by 0.09°C (0.16°F). It should be noted that 2010 was the last year with El Niño conditions; however El Niño had ended by this point in 2010, while it appears to be continuing to mature at the same point in 2015.”

        • t from NJ

          over millions and millions of years the planet changed .01degC.To get an accurate picture data should be back much much longer. for periods of warmup can be once every 100 million years say. I very infrequent periodic failures over a very long time in electronics,same would be true for temperatures.

        • Nick697

          How many times does one have to repeat this? Here, I’ll make an exception and set it in all caps; maybe then it’ll sink in: THE EARTH HAS GONE THROUGH INNUMERABLE TEMPERATURE EXTREMES, FROM VERY HOT TO VERY COLD, AND INNUMERABLE EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS, FROM FLOODS TO DROUGHTS, HEAT WAVES TO BITTER COLD SPELLS. CLIMATE DISRUPTION IS PART OF EARTH’S HISTORY. IT HAS BEEN DOING THIS FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS BEFORE MAN, OR ANY OTHER LIVING THING, APPEARED. MAN HAS AS MUCH INFLUENCE ON WORLD CLIMATE AS HE DOES ON THE TIDES.
          .
          Speaking of the tides, you global warming tinfoil hat alarmists, who quote the odd temperature event in an attempt to prove your increasingly discredited hypothesis, remind me of when I took my son, age 2, to the beach for the first time. It was ebb tide and I showed him how to measure the movement of the tide by putting his little flag on its stick from his sand castle at the highest point each surf reached. At first he enjoyed this, but as each time he had to put the flag farther down the beach, he suddenly began to wail “the sea’s drying up!”
          .
          If you can’t see the analogy with your loony alarmism, you’re beyond hope. Here’s a last bit of awkward fact to chew on:
          .
          You guys, with your “man-made CO2 increase causes global warming” can’t explain how, during the fastest increase in CO2 ever, from 1940 to the early 1970s [the industrialized world went on an armament-making, ship-building spree in WWII, then lots of steel production for post-war reconstruction and infrastructure, plus consumer durables like cars and
          refrigerators in the post-war boom, 95% powered by coal-burning power plants] ………… and global temperatures went down for all 30+ years. Went down enough for the predecessors of today’s AGW nuts to predict, with equal confidence, the coming of a New Ice age, and suggest such remedies as increasing particulate emission to help the greenhouse blanket, and even covering the poles with soot to attract more sun’s heat. Read that again. The whole AGW industry is based on man-made CO2 raising global temperatures. But during the fastest increase in atmospheric CO2, global temperatures went down.

          • Michael Burns

            Here is the official statement from the AGU (more than 60,000 members):

            “Human activities are changing the Earth’s climate. At the global level, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases have increased sharply since the Industrial Revolution. Fossil fuel burning dominates this increase. Human-caused increases in greenhouse gases are responsible for most of the observed global average surface warming of roughly 0.8°C (1.5°F) over the past 140 years. Because natural processes cannot quickly remove some of these gases (notably carbon dioxide) from the atmosphere, our past, present, and future emissions will influence the climate system for millennia.”

            The reason I believe we are in serious trouble is that the feedback mechanisms have yet to kick in. When they do, the temps will go crazy.

  • Mickey

    This is perfectly normal for climate change, when it gets cooler, warming is sure to follow. This has gone from funny and stupid to criminal.

  • Hopsaregood

    Just like the Pope and Obama the global warming is driven by the leftist agenda and ideology. Science is irrelevant. It is about power and self aggrandizement at the expense of others. You know, the usual leftist way.

  • Billygoatpuke

    The science is settled. 110% of scientists agree.

  • Michael Burns

    It is called global warming for a reason. If you want the truth, please see this:

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201506

    “The first six months of 2015 comprised the warmest such period on record across the world’s land and ocean surfaces, at 0.85°C (1.53°F) above the 20th century average, surpassing the previous record set in 2010 by 0.09°C (0.16°F). It should be noted that 2010 was the last year with El Niño conditions; however El Niño had ended by this point in 2010, while it appears to be continuing to mature at the same point in 2015.”

  • Banksters_Rule_the_World

    Climate Change… No! It’s climate manipulation and it’s to get everyone scared into paying a global tax to the globalist like Al Gore.

  • wiseoldfart

    When cavemen discovered fire, the glaciers receded and the Sahara Desert went from a green paradise to the land of sand. And look where we are today because we dared use our brains to discover stuff!

  • cantsleep56549 .

    They will have to “correct” the numbers, again….

  • wiseoldfart

    Some other parts of the world are experiencing higher temps than normal this summer. It all averages out as it has for the last 19 years – the length of time in which there has been no global warming.

  • Throwback 59

    The left will say this is just “Weather” not climate. You know the definition of weather, right?
    It’s a meteorological event, occurring in an area ranging in size from a backyard to the entire planet, that doesn’t support the theory of climate change.

    • Michael Burns

      The driving force talking about climate change is the group of scientists called climatologists, not politicians. Before you make any more stupid comments, you might want to read this report in its entirety:

      http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201506

      • Throwback 59

        NOAA has already admitted to “adjusting” temps to reach the desired outcome (to please the politicians). The sainted climatologists you speak of have also been shown to be corrupt in the Climategate scandal. Perhaps before you throw around pejorative comments you get you head out of the sand and learn some facts.
        And my comment about the new liberal definition of “weather” remains spot on.

  • Charley Varrick

    I wonder whether the Caliph will finance another beach front estate on Hawaii with the scam.

  • Magnus Greel

    I thought we were supposed to be eyeing ocean front property in Upstate New York by now.

    • Nick

      Ocean acidity is increasing, Plenty of sea life populations are dropping, tuna, salmon, crab. It’s effecting a lot of commercial fishermen. Jellyfish seem to like it, but that’s about it. Ocean acidity is undoubtedly the result of pollution, since it’s the only place most of the chemicals come from. Climate change, or global warming, or whatever you want to call it may have some unanswered questions about both causes and effects, but the lowering PH of the oceans is not in question. That will ultimately make them incapable of supporting many types of sea life.

      What is frustrating, is that even if you don’t believe in climate models, why is the alternative to allow companies cart blanche to pollute? Without some form of oversight, companies would just dump industrial waste wherever they felt like. It’s certainly what the did before they were being watched. Oversight and regulation can be a good thing in moderation. Regardless of what your stance on climate change is, why wouldn’t you want less pollution?

      I don’t understand why there is no middle ground argument on this subject. You can certainly restrain harmful activities without strangling industries.

  • Michael Burns

    I’m a trans-man and worship Karl Marx. I don’t care about facts because I’m an effeminate commie.

    • Michael Burns

      Marc,
      I’m really getting to you, aren’t I? Disqus has strict rules about impersonation.

  • Michael Burns

    Marc Morano, great fighter against AGW. Please scroll down to the part about his Funding:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Morano

  • Michael Burns

    I’ll just come out and say it. It you don’t agree with my made-up statistics, you need to go to a FEMA camp. I’m liberal!

  • wiseoldfart

    Not to worry… Trump has a plan to cool the planet. He’s already buying up A/C companies left and right.

  • Michael Burns

    Why am I so feminized? Seriously, please help me!

  • Thomas J Gassett

    This is sacrilege! How dare NOAA attack GW? This is about faith in the one true God, Alvin Gore, not science! I want to know how they got the research money for this heresy! I thought we had all the research dollars going to prove GW, …. what happpened!? Some body has to pay for this!

  • Caitlyn Bodine

    Good think we have global warming, otherwise, it would be cold like 1992.

    • mwayne09

      *thing*

  • mwayne09

    Rut-Roh !
    And still a very inactive hurricane season. The Liberals arent gonna like that .

    • Blackula

      but after Katrina we heard that was the new norm. What ever happened to that?

      • TheRealTruthSerum

        It disappeared like a fart in the wind…

  • doug1961

    hmmmmmm…
    July temps below normal for the third year in a row, eh?
    It must be CLIMATE CHANGE!

  • Guest

    I demand to know how they fudged these numbers to show that it is cooling here!

  • Blackula

    Global warming.. i mean… eh.. climate change.. i mean climate disruption.. ehh

    • tedlv

      Oh, look –> LION!

  • TheRealTruthSerum

    Oooops! I guess the climate ‘scientists’ were wrong. I guess they will be issuing an apology and admission of error any day now…

    • tedlv

      Don’t hold your breath. I am sure NOAA will retract this report as soon as someone’s job is threatened for releasing un-doctored data.

      • Blackula

        nah they will just put out a fake facebook meme saying 2015 is the hottest year on record and the low brows will lap it up

        • tedlv

          Easy peasy. Use the “heat index”. They can make that look like anything they want to.

          • Blackula

            i read the methodology of the “study” for the 2014 hottest year, it is such complete $&&#*# that if any business were to use that they would be jailed with fraud.

          • tedlv

            I agree. If you have to change the past to “prove” warming, there’s something really wrong. As a young guy, late 1960s and early 1970s, I worked construction to put myself through college (read “white privilege”). There were many days in East Tennessee (Knoxville area) that were over 100 degrees. I know, I worked outside! It’s definitely cooler this year in East TN than back then.

          • Blackula

            in a nutshell it was a study based on the averages of computer models, a hand full of temps, (as little as one temp per 5 degrees of the earth’s circumference) and if something was too cold they through it out as an anomaly

          • tedlv

            Also, if there were rural areas that weren’t being measured, they used nearby urban measurements.

      • TheRealTruthSerum

        Yeah, I was being sarcastic. The only good thing to come out of the AGW scam is the re-awakening of real skepticism-based science.

  • John Edmonson

    Once, I tried to get a liberal to pay me $100 for me to plant a tree. He asked why he would do that, and I replied he could offset his carbon output that way, and feel better about himself. Then the liberal called me an asshole. I still don’t know why!

    • tedlv

      Liberals don’t want to pay for their own folly.

    • neverliberal

      Liberals don’t want to pay for anything, they want to be paid for doing nothing.

  • GlobalWrench

    Funny, no mention of the ongoing climate engineering programs we see in the sky daily.

    How can they hide it much longer…

    • tedlv

      Do you mean jet streaks, that have been around since, well WWII high altitude bombers that weren’t actually jets?

      • GlobalWrench

        Call it what you will…it amount to the same thing – climate modification.

        Dont forget…you have to breath this contamination every day.

  • Opinion8Ted

    Used to be when our family visited uncle Henry we were told we couldn’t talk politics or religion; couldn’t speak about the strange odors in and around the house, and we couldn’t talk about his new girlfriends. That left us with talking about the weather and damned if the libs didn’t taboo that topic off the table too. Funny how they tell us we will all be dead in 10 years but they can’t predict a rainstorm that will happen in the next 10 minutes.

    • tedlv

      According to 1970’s “science”, we have all frozen or starved to death due to the ice age. It was settled science.

  • Martin Van Nostran

    Who screwed up and told the truth? Quick! Hide the decline!

    • Mr Flippy

      “Normalize the data dammit, Normalize it!!!!”

  • josetoyou

    More cooked books. In the Northwest, this is the warmest summer in 120 years…, and not caused by man.
    A prominent scientist and former NASA researcher has added his voice to those who challenge the “scientific fact” that manmade carbon emissions are causing global warming.
    Dr. Leslie Woodcock is a professor emeritus of chemical thermodynamics at the University of Manchester in England, with a Ph.D. from the University of London, and served as a senior research consultant at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Laboratory in Ohio.
    In an interview with Britain’s Yorkshire Evening Post, Woodcock declared: “The theory of ‘manmade climate change’ is an unsubstantiated hypothesis.
    “The theory is that CO2 emitted by burning fossil fuel causes ‘global warming.’ In fact, water is a much more powerful greenhouse gas and there is 20 times more of it in our atmosphere [than carbon dioxide].
    “Carbon dioxide has been made out to be some kind of toxic gas but the truth is it’s the gas of life. We breathe it out, plants breathe it in. The green lobby has created a do-good industry and it becomes a way of life, like a religion. I understand why people defend it when they have spent so long believing in it.”
    Woodcock is also a Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry, a founding editor of the journal Molecular Simulation, a recipient of a Max Planck Society Visiting Fellowship, and a former guest scientist at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
    He went on to say: “If you talk to real scientists who have no political interest, they will tell you there is nothing in global warming. It’s an industry which creates vast amounts of money for some people.
    “The temperature of the earth has been going up and down for millions of years. If there are extremes, it’s nothing to do with carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, it’s not permanent and it’s not caused by us. Global warming is nonsense.
    “It’s become almost an industry, as a consequence of this professional misconduct by government advisers around the world.”
    But he added: “You can’t blame ordinary people with little or no science education for wanting to be seen to be good citizens who care about their grandchildren’s future and the environment.”

    • Gelston

      the northwest is affected by the “Pacific Blob” which may turn out to be an underwater eruption.
      – a writer from WA State

  • Jack Shepherd

    Sounds like a lot of “Appeal to Ridicule” & “Ad Homonem” fallacies. At least take the time to read the arguments for climate change. http://www.csicop.org/si/show/disinformation_about_global_warming/

    • The Abominable Dr. Phibes

      Read the arguments? Seriously?

      It’s a hoax. It’s fraud on a global scale…produced by scientists who sold their souls for government grant money in exchange for laughable “model science” and faked data.

      The hoax is now a 1 trillion dollar business…and what good has come from it?

      Not a GD thing!

  • BikerBen

    When average temperatures cool, it’s a sure sign of global warming, and there is a consensus about this, so there’s no need for an explanation. Just accept it and pay some sort of new “carbon” tax. Americans have too much wealth, it must be confiscated from them and re-distributed.

  • Thumper

    I’m sure NOAA will retroactively adjust the numbers back up to fall in line with the results they want people to believe.

  • The Abominable Dr. Phibes

    The Hoax Government Grant Money Created

  • Mr Flippy

    I blame Global Warming for this…

  • Goldmonger

    I find it hard to believe they would publish this unless they have an agenda somewhere in this. Watch for the other hand to move.

  • GoodTimeTraveler

    Hi, In our spare time my wife and I make $1,000,000 per year with this easy and so far not illegal trick! We have started printing carbon credit certificates in the comfort of our new luxury home using a simple computer and printer! We then sell the certificates to incredibly stupid liberal business owners! They love us!

    • RushRove

      my daughter makes 10k a day horring herself out n craigslist!

      • The Abominable Dr. Phibes

        That has to be the Washington DC area of Craigslist…because ain’t no where else got that kinda money.

        • RushRove

          bs. seek help

  • RushRove

    remember…lets keep it political! and then? throw on da race card!

  • RushRove

    cold lives matter!

  • The Abominable Dr. Phibes

    It has been hot and humid as normal here along the Gulf Coast this summer.

    Nothing out of the ordinary. Nothing strange.

    • RushRove

      hope yall git your aszes wiped out by a hurricane

      • The Abominable Dr. Phibes

        It won’t be the 1st time when (not if) it happens.

        I’d rather take on a hurricane than an earthquake or volcano. Those two things are nasty.

        • RushRove

          I can see st Helens from my window…but that curapp always happens to da other dudes!

          • The Abominable Dr. Phibes

            So you’re high. That explains a lot.

  • RushRove

    libz sell placental tishew!

  • Snake Plissken

    HA! Told ya so Told ya so Told ya so Told ya so Told ya so Told ya so Told ya so
    Naaa na na naaa naaa

    That’s about as much dignity as I can manage right now.

    • RushRove

      your in moms basement eating korn kurls

      • Snake Plissken

        your in moms basement eating korn kurls and watching porn

  • RushRove

    your all freaky morons

  • The Abominable Dr. Phibes

    Al Gore better git on down to the ITCZ and start blowing some air to get a hurricane spun up.

  • Andrei Vyshinsky

    When will the numbers be revised to reflect the models?

  • Tracksuit Al

    July in Seattle was the hottest month ever recorded in the city’s history. Records go back to around 1894.

    Some parts of the country have been really hot, others not as hot as usual. That’s life.

  • The Abominable Dr. Phibes

    Come and listen to a story about a man named Gore
    He wanted to rape a maid and became a climate whore
    After he lost a Presidential race
    He sold some carbon credits at a frenzied pace…fast that is…Chicago gold….Leftist tee-hee.

    Well the first thing you know old Gore’s a millionaire
    His Tennessee kin said “Move away from there!”
    “California is the place for loons like you!”
    So he bought himself a mansion on the cliffs of Malibu.

  • jhs

    perhaps the tampering off of sunspots?

  • The Abominable Dr. Phibes

    The devout Warmists are directly related to people who once worshiped the sun.

    But the sun did not come through for them…so now they hoping CO2 does the trick.

  • Tracksuit Al

    I was listening to the BBC Radio this morning and they were talking about massive amounts of seaweed coming ashore in the Caribbean. Guess what they blamed first?

    • Chris King

      the feces from the immigrant boats anchored off their coast wasn’t the first guilty party?

  • slobotnavich

    Finally, the Great Global Warming Fraud is exposed, dashing the hopes and dreams of all the verminous statists among us who dreamt fondly of having us all marching in lockstep to their spastic cadence. Of course, the next Great Climate Fraud will be Global Cooling, in truth a far more plausibly serious problem than warming if it were to happen. Another Ice Age, anyone? In any event, I don’t much care, since I’ll long have been under the ground when the new perma-frost arrives.

  • Jane Doe

    But yet the Demo-Nazis will attack you if you say there is no global warming. Go figure….

  • franc1sc0

    Obviously there is a problem with the measurements and they need to be adjusted by some arbitrary amount upward to show that AGW is factual.

    The real problem is (choose as many as you like):

    1) We have allowed many species that should have gone extinct to survive and their combined body heat is raising atmospheric temperatures.

    2) Proper shoes hold-in foot heat, preventing it from escaping into the atmosphere; as the number of sandal wearers increases so does the threat of AGW.

    3) Calling someone a racist, bigot, fascist, tea-bagger, etc causes them to get mad, which increases body temperature, which heats the surrounding air, which adds to global temperatures. As more people are called racists, bigots, fascists, tea-baggers, etc AGW becomes worse.

    4) Darker skin tones absorb more sunlight thus preventing it from heating the ground which in turn radiates that heat into the atmosphere. The mass migration of people from Africa to Europe and Central America to the United States is thus allowing too much sunlight to fall upon the ground in their warmer, more direct sun-light homelands, which is causing excessive ground heating in those areas, which is radiated into the atmosphere; exacerbating AGW.

    5) Liberal Activists are always angry, see #3 for how this causes AGW.

    • franc1sc0

      Almost forgot:

  • Linda MacLeod Goodman

    It’s about time it got acknowledged brrr.. I plan to post it to my lefty-warmy FB friends in MA, who will surely dismiss it as oily bias, despite us freezing our butts off here. So is there a link to NOAA itself that makes a clear statement of fact? Thanks. The NOAA page I saw buried it in gobbledygook. Turkeys.

  • But wait, Emperor of the World President OJT sas that there IS gloBULL warming. It must be rtue since he swore in 2008 that he’d lower the seas and stop gloBULL warming.

  • Yu So Wong

    I am so old that I can remember when NASA explored space rather than do fake global warming studies for the Federal government.

  • moonma

    1960’s: Pollution will choke us!
    1970’s: Ice Age will freeze us!
    1980’s: Greenhouse Effect will scorch us!
    1990’s: Hole in Ozone Layer will burn us!
    2000’s: Global Warming will fry us!
    2010’s: Climate Change will kill us!
    2020’s: Muslim Terrorists will nuke us!(that isn’t a lie)

  • D J

    That’s weather. Had it been hotter, then that would be climate.

    Note that they haven’t mentioned Australia lately. Why? Cooler down under, so again, just weather. Bit when it was hotter than normal down under, then that was climate.

  • Redeyerich

    OBAMA is a liar

  • 94c2500

    The coolness is because of the warming…right?

  • Cebes

    Where the hell is the global warming prophet of doom – al gore?
    Knows better than to pop his head up out of the hole of lies. The human turd.

  • James

    Just a quick note about foggy remedies. Many states won huge windfalls from tobacco company litigation under the guise of helping citizens lead healthier smoke-free lives. What happened in reality was most states sold their litigation winnings for pennies-on-the-dollar lump sum payments that were promptly spent for a myriad of purposes unrelated to tobacco. It seems that tobacco related health issues really weren’t the desired end – can we expect anything differently from cap and trade or similar GW mitigation schemes?

  • Sam Imam- Eli

    But, that doesn’t make sense. We are spending billions of dollars to fight global warming and President Obama just leveled regulations against coal fired power plants that will essentially bankrupt them (as he promised during his campaign), so why is there such contrary data reported now? Is something askew?

    • ItsPolitics101

      Those billions go somewhere, right? Follow the money….

  • We need to end the renewable energy hoax NOW!

    Google *The King of Starvation – Barack Obama* to find out why.

  • ReagansZombie

    Where is the link to the NOAA data?

  • ReagansZombie

    Ha Ha. Classic. I checked out the ACTUAL NOAA site, and it says the exact opposite of what this article says.

    From the NOAA Site:
    The July contiguous U.S. average temperature was 73.9°F, 0.2°F above the 20th century average and ranked near the middle in the 121-year period of record. The average contiguous U.S. temperature for January-July was 53.0°F, 1.7°F above the 20th century average, and the 10th warmest year-to-date on record.

    The July precipitation total for the contiguous U.S. was 3.16 inches, 0.38 inch above average. This was the 14th
    wettest July on record, and marked the fourth consecutive month of
    above-average precipitation for the Lower 48. Above average
    precipitation was observed across much of the West, Great Plains, and
    Ohio Valley. Below-average precipitation was observed in parts of the
    Southern Plains, Southeast, and Northwest.

    This analysis of U.S. temperature and precipitation is based on data back to January 1895, resulting in 121 years of data.

    ncdc(dot)noaa(dot)gov/sotc/summary-info/national/201507

    • sarra

      That is the data supplied for the democrats, the real data is hidden from view.

      • Leftwithrightbrain

        Certified idiot.

  • Bullet Tooth Tony

    don’t worry, they’ll fix that – they just haven’t gotten around to manipulating that data set yet

  • petitemouse

    What do you know the EPA is wrong about humans CO2 causing
    man made global warming. And the EPA turned a river
    yellow and they do not care.
    Government can never replace God, Christ and the Spirit.
    Even God gave us free will, in other words God admits
    he can not herd cats or humans or chickens.
    But, God love ’em, the Utopia EPA and other Climate Warmer
    Scientists think they can control people.
    The EPA can not even control a bulldozer; how can they
    control the yellow mess of heavy metals they released on
    people of the U.S. of A.

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      What a load of crapola. Is that what they teach in bible school these days? You sound like you graduated from the Bristol Palin Institute of Abstinence or the Duggar School of Hypocrisy.

  • VladTepesDracul

    Guess NOAA isn’t listening to the “People’s” Pope

    • ReagansZombie

      What’s funny is that NOAA actually said exactly the opposite of what this article claims they said. Isn’t that neat?

  • Miki Goodnight

    So much for that global warming bullshit

  • carl6352

    don’t know about other states but florida temps barely got above 92, and this month we have had rain and more rain that have broke every record on the books keeping temps in the 80’s. i think this chicken little science is is getting a flat tire and they need more and more lies to explain it! but when did political football ever pertain to a science!

    • Sandra

      You must be getting your news from the democrat’s control media if you have ever believed in global worming.

      • carl6352

        No just living in a much cooler sunshine state by about 4-5 degrees

  • puddintanes5

    I far ted

  • Charles Corso

    This article is false, it has to be. It implies it’s getting cooler. But we all know the planet has a fever.

    • larry

      Only if you are democrat, they are being told what to believe or not, individual knowledge is forbidden.

      • Charles Corso

        But a Hockey Stick only has one bend in it, and I know it was up.

  • realistic12

    Looks like someone at the NOAA is about to get an IRS audit in 5…4…3…2…

    • hanjs

      People are fed up of the lies the democrats spread, audit or not, it is about time the truth come out.

    • Linda MacLeod Goodman

      hahaha FUNNY! it’s the coolest summer in memory here in MA – averaging 10-20 degrees cooler than usual, yet not a peep about it from local media. Predictable.

  • Sartur

    Ha, tickle me to lough, if you were stupid enough to believe the democrats lies, well, you have the mud pie in your face now. It is the sun that makes or breaks the temperatures on earth, CO2 is 1000 less potent than a cirrus clouds to reflect the heat back on earth. If you want to know the truth, do not ever listen to a democrat, there is always a back door motivation coming from them for the last 20 years.

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      Science is apolitical. Deriding people who value science makes you come across as a wilful ignoramus. Your attempt at science is pathetic and total junk.

      • Linda MacLeod Goodman

        In theory it is, in practice it isn’t. And it’s a powerful tool, as evidenced by the junk science-perpetrated fraud$ of global warming, fluoride, vaccines, aspartame & most of the deadly crap that comes out of big pharma, to name but a few.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          You couldn’t be more wrong if you tried. Science shows why all on your list are reality and why vaccines are safe. Deadly crap from pharma may be true but that’s applied science which you’re conflating with research.

  • wasitsomethingisaid

    well,any climate nuts want to explain the above charts to us simple folk in a way that still keeps up the climate disruption lie?

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      If you’re that easily duped you shouldn’t be advertising your gullibility and under educated status in climate science.

  • Nick

    Meanwhile, globally, more than thirty years where not one month had an average temperature as low as the historical average.

  • noneck mcgee

    But, but, but it feels so much hotter…..

  • Orellian Tay

    Wow, is Obama’s plan working well.

  • JWales

    Did higher taxes fix it?

  • Glenn

    Any doubt that the people are being hoodwinked in order to transfer wealth to the idiots that have built alternative energy empires on the backs of the tax payers.

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      The only one hoodwinked is you who has been thoroughly duped by fossil fuel shill propaganda denier sites like this one.

      • Leftwithrightbrain sux Obama

        Says the bedwetting Obama blog troll.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          Is that code for “I’m so dumb and ignorant let me spew ad hominem and leave no doubt as to my stupidity.”

      • Glenn

        Facts are lost on you! You are just an ideological idiot.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          You didn’t provide any “facts” so nothing was lost on me. Fact by definition is an undeniable truth. Your emotive unsubstantiated puerile opinion is hearsay and not fact.

          • Glenn

            Enough with you Troll!!

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            The signs of desperation and defeat when the tired old canard “troll” needs to be invoked.

  • konc2

    The air raid sirens are going off and all the Eloi, I mean Gobots are heading to the Morlocks underground city to get marching orders from the High Priest of phony Global Warming…THE ALGORE. Liberalism is truly a mental illness, too bad it’s not terminal.

  • Imfedup

    Somehow, according to the left, this will be more evidence of ‘catastrophic climate change.’

  • acovenantinblood

    Don’t worry as soon as this data is “adjusted” that pesky little detail will go away After the farts from the AlGorasaurus have been proven to not effect the climate, everyone will then realize that catastrophic man made climate change is a fanatical religion.

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      this (sic) data is “adjusted”
      ——————————————–
      Such disdain and ineptitude for science. Picked up a physics textbook yet? You can get a good used one inexpensively on Amazon. Data are always manipulated with as it’s an essential part of the measurement process; what do you think calibration means in science?

      • acovenantinblood

        Yeah as a matter of fact I work in a wastewater plant and do scientific measurements every day. Calibration and adjustment are two separate things. In fact adjustment where I work might get you put in jail courtesy of the Washington State Department of Ecology. Especially when your “adjusted”data is different then the data recorded by other scientific agencies who aren’t beholden to a Federal Gummint with a wealth redistribution agenda. We call it Quality Control testing and the gummint checks up on us with it yearly. If we did such nonsense at best we’d pay a fine. It’s pretty easy to see through these shenanigans being pulled on us by petty little control freaks when you’re privy to the very inexactness of scientific testing. Science is not God, though many seem to believe it is. By the way, the more I read scientific journals the more I see that the “scientific consensus” on man made catastrophic climate change does not exist. Don’t need a physics book to find that out.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          That’s for confirming that you are neither a scientist nor scientifically literate. Calibrating instruments is not the same as calibrating data. The rest of your diatribe is vacuity or emotive opinion.

          • acovenantinblood

            Haha You can’t calibrate data. It is what it is, especially temperature. It’s pretty simple. When the thermometer reads 65.6 it’s 65.6. Unless its a NOAA temperature gauge. Yeah we read one of those for them too. It seems to always be 2 degrees higher then any other thermometer we put in next to it and they always claim that it’s OK. Convenient. Also they quit having us read “trace” when we got trace amounts of rain. Now we just read 0 when it actually could have rained a little bit. That must help the drought. Is this the “calibration” of data of which you speak. It sure seems to “calibrate” conveniently towards climate change. It’s not a diatribe when you live it every day and it takes scientific literacy to run, read and interpret BOD, suspended solids, ammonia, NTU’s, and chemical dosage every day. If it didn’t I’d be in jail. We don’t calibrate any data either. Or…well…we’d be in jail.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Load of crapola. There was no need to confirm that you’re scientifically illiterate as that was self-evident from your original post.

          • acovenantinblood

            I guess you’re just like the others to resort to such slanderous libel when you can’t prove your point. Let me help you out a little. When you run a BOD test you run a quality control bottle called a glucose/glutamic acid test. Now what that is is the addition of glucose/glutamic acid as well as Influent seed (the value of the seeds strength is calculated in seed control bottles). Now sometimes when you’re really distracted you might forget to put the seed or the acid in. 5 days later when you read the test you know by the numbers that you forgot one of the steps in the process of that test. Now I could “calibrate” those numbers to what I know it should be knowing that the only reason I got a wrong number was because of a missed step in the testing. The problem with that is that the Washington State Department of Ecology calls that falsifying data and would press charges for it. That is actually much more difficult of a test and reading then something as simple as temperature which really only requires the calibration of your thermometer (Which they don’t even seem to be concerned with). Sorry bud, not crapola. And also scientifically literate. You have to be in my field or you’re fired or in jail.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            slanderous libel
            ————————
            It is libel and not slander as it is written and neither can be an adjective for the other. That rookie mistake just detracts further from your pretend knowledge. Your long diatribe is about how to obtain empirical data and nothing about data calibration and manipulation in science which is not nefarious but rather a very standard basic tenet of science. I think we should be happy that scientists do correct previous shortcomings and look again at data. This is how science works. One learns new things, goes back and correct previous mistakes and report the findings. Changing data with the sole intention to support claims is a myth, at least in scientific discussions. Nobody gets articles published by describing how the data was modified with the sole purpose of supporting claims and without any scientific basis. If you have knowledge of any such publication, please do share with us.

  • DR HUNTER THOMPSON

    Last year we had early winter storms beginning in Sept. and they lasted nationwide until May
    Over 84 deaths due to the extreme cold. So by my count
    GLOBAL COOLING 84 ——- GLOBIE WARMIE 0
    YOU LIBERAL SCIENCE DENIERS BETTER BOOK UP

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      Isn’t it peachy when an ignoramus types in caps to reinforce its ignorance?

      • DR HUNTER THOMPSON

        RELAX
        NO MATTER WHAT ANY ONE ELSE SAYS
        YOU ARE STILL A LOSER

    • WanderingBill

      Global temperatures would disagree with you. Did you even learn about averages in school?

  • TMAC

    Its that damn global warming.

  • SMH2

    They will never admit the truth

  • clothos

    Maybe somebody ought to tell Pope Francis….

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      Why lie to the Pope?

      • randy s

        Noaa is lying?

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          No. But if less than 1.5% of the surface of the planet is below normal that is not a valid argument for anything while the global averages are all above and making new highs in the record. It is in fact fairly meaningless other than some areas will cool as others warm, that’s natural variability. So it would be lying if you concluded that there was a cooling trend or below average temperatures for the planet.

          • randy s

            Are the global readings from ground based systems or satellite readings?

            Seems like I’ve heard there is a difference in the two methods.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            If you have to ask that question then you don’t know how science determines global temperatures and confirm you’re ignorant and unqualified to discuss the topic.

          • Leftwithrightbrain sux Obama

            Says the lying, bedwetting Obama blog troll.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Isn’t it peachy when an ignoramus a$$hole embarrasses his fellow deniers with gutter mentality?

      • Leftwithrightbrain sux Obama

        Says the semensucking Obama blog troll.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          You’re a credit to deniers. I’m sure they’re cringing that an a$$hole is being puerile on their behalf to show how much they suck.

  • Mario Lopez

    CLIMATE CHANGE IS REALLLLLLLLL!!!!

  • Prelusive007

    Hmm…. what to make of this global cooling.

    PREDICTION:

    As we get closer and closer to December, it will get cooler in America. At least, that’s what I’m thinking. But I’ll go out on a limb and offer another prediction. By this time next year, it will have gotten warm again.

    I don’t know what to make of it. Maybe we should ban all automobiles and stop cooking food. And this “electricity” has GOT to go. mmm hmmm

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      Cupcake, you have the internet, use it. With internet searches a few seconds away there’s really no reason to be so snarkily ignorant these days. Mercifully you have escaped the ravages of intelligence. Weather is not climate and vice versa.

      • Prelusive007

        “Leftwithnobrain”, there is no global warming. It is a figment of your leftwingnuttyass imagination spawned by the leftwingnuttierass Al Gore. Give it up. You’ve been proven wrong.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          You’re entitled to your superstitious beliefs. I’m not surprised you’re so far off base if you think Al is an authority. You have the freedom to be ignorant in our society, it’s not a crime, but it does classify you as a person no one should pay any attention too.

          • disqus4700

            Talk about superstitions, the High Priest of AGW aka the UN Chief Climate Scientist said “AGW was his religion and dharma path to righteousness”. I don’t believe in his or your foolish religion.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            It’s a fanciful tale you tell, but the reality of the situation doesn’t support your fictional account very well. I won’t ask you for any evidence of it, because I know you can’t/won’t provide any of substance. So “bullshit” it is. Never mind, there’s nothing anyone could possibly write to get you even close to understanding what vacuity you wrote.

      • Larry Evans

        There is no surer sign of a syphilis riddled brain than starting all your replies with, “Cupcake”.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          Do you always lie? The unsupported opinions that you post have no value other than the comfort you derive from them.

    • Larry Evans

      My theory on Climate Change.

      It will get colder

      It will get hotter

      Repeat.

  • God is a denier.

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      Thor wants to know are if you are a graduate of bible school or the Bristol Palin Institute of Abstinence or the Duggar School of Hypocrisy as you’re a racist embarrassment to the most intelligent species on the planet.

      • You have to be both humorless and very stupid to throw that type of hissy fit over a facetious comment.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          No, it is your overt not so subtle racism which is the sign of a very sick individual. Seek professional help.

          • Guess what? If I were concerned about semiliterate liberal cockroaches calling me “racist” I wouldn’t have the Confederate Battle Flag as my part of my avatar. Like I said, you’re very stupid.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Sorry, I didn’t realize I was corresponding with one of the patients in the asylum.

      • Larry Evans

        Skank, so many comments have gone over your head a person would think you had knee pads.

        Well, you probably do.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          Ooops! We have a graduate from one of those not so esteemed institutes.

          • Larry Evans

            Is your Blue Dress back from the cleaners? Or does Obama prefer Brown Dresses?

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Thanks for confirming you’re still a student at the above mentioned institutes for the gullible.

  • reylaces

    Trillions from fossil fuel to alternative sources. Climate change is one of the biggest charades played on mankind. Plain and simple.

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      When you start including the cost of damage done by fossil fuel they become one of the least affordable sources of energy of all.

      • disqus4700

        For those that wish to know the Truth of things
        The energy budget for building a windmill (cost of forging, machining, mining etc) is that it requires more energy from conventional sources to manufacture then the energy from wind produces its useful life.
        Talk about science deniers, the AGW religion crowd are the true believers

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          The unsupported opinions that you post have no value other than the comfort you derive from them.

  • WanderingBill

    Well, I see most of the posters on here are horribly retarded when it comes to analysis.

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      That’s just below the belt WanderingBill. Just because you made it through middle school math it doesn’t mean everyone who didn’t is a loser. Can’t you be a tad tolerant towards the inept?

      • WanderingBill

        I believe its tolerance for ineptitude that led us to our present problems

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          You are so freaking right it hurts and embarrasses our society.

  • Rob2013

    “You guys just don’t understand the science. global warming causes both hot AND cold weather.”—Liberal Larry.

    • WanderingBill

      Global warming is quite compatible with colder temperatures. Do you even understand how averages work?

    • WanderingBill

      Furthermore, the July mean temperature for the contiguous US was .2 degrees f higher than the average.

      • disqus4700

        The NOAA ten years ago placed in service 114 pristine temperature sites that never need adjustments (big mistake) from Hawaii, Alaska and all the Americas.

        Wait for it, they show the last 11 years with slight cooling. Of course caught the NOAA will not use these numbers in their hottest year ever scenarios.

        Wait for it (the AGW Religion guys will scream the US is not the globe)
        Posting this for those that refuse to be Grubered. Question everything.

    • WanderingBill

      Oh yeah, also, the daily lows also ran higher than average.

      • Leftwithrightbrain

        You’re an informed American putting your fellow citizens to shame by demonstrating that you are cogent with at least middle school science knowledge. You’re like a breath of fresh air among the pervasive tide of wilful ignorami.

  • YoMamma

    I have a question…why is the LINE considered ‘NORMAL’? According to who? Where is the rest of the chart? Are they still hiding the decline? haha

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      What decline?

      • YoMamma

        They used to hide the decline of global temperatures to further push the global warming grant money. You know, the emails that got hacked before the huge summit that would have probably resulted in some drastic changes in the UN to take over further.

        Climate Change/Global Warming hasn’t been taken seriously since.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          Oh, I thought you were being serious. I didn’t realise you had been duped into thinking climategate had any substance. I guess you’re not a scientist or scientifically literate after all. If you were, you’d have known that the decline actually refers to a decline in tree growth at certain high-latitude locations since 1960. Unless you think tree rings are more accurate than thermometers then there is no conspiracy.

          • YoMamma

            Well I know coding (20 years of experience), and the emails I saw had code in it, with comments throughout admitting it. And the equations would be altered to fit the needs.

            I will believe my own eyes.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Exactly how does your knowledge of coding refute what I wrote. You’d be substantive if you had the grasp of the issue but instead you regurgitate flakey crapola.

  • Mervyn

    My problem with any US government agency, under the Obama administration, is I cannot trust anything coming out of them because the administration seems to have corrupted their objectivity for to push Obama’s political agenda.

    For the EPA to treat carbon dioxide as a pollutant, even linking an effect to asthma as Obama claimed, has to be the greatest lie ever told. If it were true, why has the US US government not banned carbon dioxide from all the soft drinks and beers manufactured or sold in the USA?

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      It is so sad that you are neither smart enough nor educated to know how ignorant you are. CO2 is rightly classified a pollutant based on it’s opaqueness to reflect long wave outgoing radiation. This is Middle school knowledge not a mystery.

      • disqus4700

        This guy won’t tell the whole story. The energy budget satellite readings show CO2 actually helps in regulating the temperature by transmitting Long Wave Infra Red Radiation out into space.
        Any one that says heat is captured is lying things absorb and release. There are published tables on the amount of heat gases absorb and conversely release. Think of the hot air balloon that eventually returns to earth although filled with Combustion Gas.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          Absolute junk science. Second sentence is a verifiable lie as we measure and observe what is being radiated into space. The observations show decreasing outgoing radiation with a warming troposphere and cooling the stratosphere, the reverse of what is stated by disqus4700. Didn’t say any heat was captured or absorbed then released, I did write correctly that it is reflected back which causes warming. This basic physics has been known for over 100 years. I guess if one is undereducated and ignorant it is normal to lie spewing junk science to dupe other gullible members of its ilk.

          • disqus4700

            Not!

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Feel free to visit NOAA. NASA, RSS or UAH or Scripps to see how puerile and misinformed your “not” is. A 3s Google search can set you on the right track. Ask if you need help with the science.

          • disqus4700
          • Leftwithrightbrain

            You are easily duped. Why? Pick up a used High School physics or science textbook, you can get a good used one inexpensively on Amazon.

          • disqus4700

            Projecting much or just plain Grubered you are

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Perhaps, but that till doesn’t explain why you’re so very easily duped.

          • disqus4700

            Don’t answer a fool according to his folly!

            http://www.spinonthat.com/CO2.html
            A interesting little experiment for all you others

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Why are you so easily duped, yet again? Have you not passed middle school science yet?

          • disqus4700

            Don’t answer a fool according to his folly!
            For all you others….
            http://www.spinonthat.com/Spinonthat%20Blog/Blog/C757C9F3-87F2-4B28-9EF7-AE1377FE2E06.html

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Deniers please do visit cupcakes link to get your CO2 education and be thoroughly duped in the process. It ain’t smart or educated enough to know better.

          • disqus4700

            I don’t think that word means what he thinks it means.

            http://finance.yahoo.com/news/not-hot-facts-global-warming-150900216.html

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Science denier. Why such disdain and ineptitude for science?

          • disqus4700

            Again I don’t believe this guy understands the meaning of denier, my fellow skeptics as we don’t embrace the New World Order propaganda.
            http://www.spinonthat.com/CO2.html
            Don’t you get the feeling this guy lives in his mom’s basement.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            de·ni·er, n
            one that denies

            With internet searches a few seconds away there’s really no reason to be so snarkily ignorant these days. Mercifully you have escaped the ravages of intelligence due to suffering from cranium intra rectum since your youth.

          • disqus4700

            Any of you fellow skeptics of AGW out there deny that climates change (crickets)
            Just as I thought the word doesn’t mean what he thinks it means.

            You are probably thinking, as I think that this guy lives in the basement of his mom’s house

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Rookie mistake, you don’t know what skeptic or sceptic means in science. Hence your projection and self-caricature which is so passé. You are, however, a denier of science.

          • disqus4700
          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Believing in reality is not a religion. Denying reality needs faith to support a belief or opinion when the evidence doesn’t support those positions. Ignorance is bliss only for the ignorant. Picked up a physics textbook yet? You can get a good used one inexpensively on Amazon.

          • disqus4700

            Ohhh this guy stepped in it!
            The former U N High Priest (aka Chief Climate Scientist said AGW was his religion and dharma path to righteousness.
            climatedepot.com/2015/02/24/un-ipcc-chief-admits-global-warming-is-religious-issue-it-is-my-religion-and-my-dharma/

            You can read it in the NY times also.

            This guy posting is one of the useful idiots of the NWO, he can almost be pitied.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            You deniers can’t keep your story straight. First you pan Pachauri for not being a climate scientist (which is true) and then you suggest he is chief climate scientist which is not true. Second, your desperation oozes everywhere as you avoid science as if it were the plague.

          • disqus4700

            Hey, he is your high priest not mine, take it up with the IPCC and U N.
            An axiom of science is to challenge every thing, appears to me that this every thing is settled guy is the science denier and the true AGW religion believer.
            just use him as a background for challenging ideas and let his juvenile comments display his lack of intelligence.
            Libs are so easy to lose cool and start name calling as they lose the arguments.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Sorry cupcake he is no one’s high priest other than the imaginary superstitions that wander around in your mental sky. The cut+paste didn’t work very well for the rest of your vacuous diatribe. Let us know when the edited English version is available. Science is apolitical, however, if being conservative means being opposed to everything liberal, then that means you must despise anything associated with liberals. Liberalism is strongly aligned with the values of science, reality and reason. Conservatives then oppose those values in and of themselves as you so eloquently demonstrate.

          • disqus4700

            As I bid bye to the true science denier.

            climatedeport.com

            Challenging the sophistry of AGW church and its minions

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Why do you bother to write lies so easy to google and verify? A more competent liar will make fabrications that are harder to debunk.

          • disqus4700
          • Leftwithrightbrain

            The poptech list is by now a very old, tired joke. Many of the authors indignantly wrote to the compiler to complain that their work was being grossly misrepresented. Many of the publications on the list are non peer reviewed nonsense. Most tellingly, not a single paper on the list offers any argument against the consensus that has not since been thoroughly discredited. That’s why it’s a consensus. I’m so sorry that you are so easily duped. If you want I can send you information of where climate scientists discuss these topics.

          • disqus4700
          • Leftwithrightbrain

            With internet searches a few seconds away there’s really no reason to be so snarkily ignorant these days.

          • disqus4700

            This guy is just a background for sending out truth to open minds.
            http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            No that is for gullible easily duped undereducated minds. The poptech list is by now a very old, tired joke. Many of the authors indignantly wrote to the compiler to complain that their work was being grossly misrepresented. Many of the publications on the list are non peer reviewed nonsense. Most tellingly, not a single paper on the list offers any argument against the consensus that has not since been thoroughly discredited. That’s why it’s a consensus.

    • disqus4700

      His children may have asthma due to Obama’s smoking cigarettes, msm won’t dare say that.

  • Mervyn
    • Leftwithrightbrain

      You are very easily duped.

      • disqus4700

        Projecting Much you are!

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          You deniers are so proud to display your ignorance.

          • disqus4700

            I don’t believe that word means what you think it means.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            I do. it’s time to quit Bible school or stop reading the Tea Party Guide to Thermodynamics or where ever you get duped.

  • Mike Gilmer

    This story cannot be true! We are all cooking to death in the man caused heat. We are all going to dry up and die! Obama and his sycophants have told us so and we know they would never lie to us, would they?

  • the earth is in the middle of a POLE SHIFT as planet-x is tilting the northern hemisphere away from the sun. all the planets in our solar system are moons of planet-x

    1 Thessalonians 5:4 But you aren’t in the dark about these things, dear brothers and
    sisters, and you won’t be surprised when the day of the Lord comes like a
    thief.

    Mark 1:15 “The time promised by God has come at last!” he announced. “The Kingdom of God is near! REPENT OF YOUR SINS and BELIEVE THE GOOD NEWS!”

    Proverbs 11:4
    Wealth is worthless in the day of wrath, but righteousness delivers from death.

    James 1:22 But don’t just listen to God’s word. You must do what it says. Otherwise, you are only fooling yourselves.
    =============================================================================
    Acts 24:14 “But I admit that I FOLLOW THE WAY, which THEY CALL A CULT. I worship
    the God of our ancestors, and I firmly believe the JEWISH LAW and
    EVERYTHING WRITTEN IN THE PROPHETS.

    Daniel 12:1 “At that time Michael, the archangel who stands guard over your nation, will arise. Then there will be a time of anguish greater than any since nations first came into existence. But at that time every one of your people whose name is written in the book will be rescued.

    AMIGHTYWIND D O T C O M
    James 1:22 But don’t just listen to God’s word. You must do what it says. Otherwise, you are only fooling yourselves.
    ============================================================================
    IMPORTANT INFORMATION YOU NEED TO KNOW

    htt ps://ww w.facebook.c om/rich.ross.9889

    WHISTLE BLOWER

    • WanderingBill

      You should read the Bible less and science books more.

      • why isnt planet-x in ANY of satans “science books”

    • WanderingBill

      How is it that the planets are in orbit around Planet X yet have a known elliptical orbit around the sun?

      • because planet-x has captured all the planets in its powerful gravitational field completely dislodging planets, look how close our moon came to being thrown into the sun. “elliptical orbit” i wouldnt listen to the false prophets “scientist” as they make lies up on the fly

        • WanderingBill

          Think about what our orbit would look like if we were circling planet x while orbiting the sun.

      • in the middle photo taken using google sky cant you see that our moon is orbiting planet-x?

  • GETBENDT

    Let’s try to make this simple enough so that even our libtard readers might have a chance at grasping reality. All of these charts and arguments give me a headache. So here we go….
    Apparently all the hub bub is over a possible one degree increase in global temperatures over the next one hundred years? Ok, let’s stipulate that this could happen. Ok…..SO WHAT! Geez, people live all over the planet. It’s cold as f**k in some places and hot as f**k in others. Let’s say between 20 degrees in cold places and 120 degrees in hot places. That’s a 100 degree differential and yet people, plants, animals and whatever else lives there survive. Humans have decided we like the temperate zones. So we avoid the equator and the arctic. That leaves a huge area above and below the equator where we all seem to migrate. That tells me that warmer temperatures are more desirable. So if we warm up a bit so what? More heat means more evaporation from the oceans and more rainfall inland. So as the ice melts water levels rise. When they rise, liberal morons, it is closer to the sun so they evaporate faster! Yea! That means more greenery! Compounded by the so called increase in Co2 we should have a really green planet in 100 years. Isn’t that what all the hippies want? So are we not doing them a favor by ignoring this garbage. Those fools will be growing pot in the arctic. Hopefully they all go there!

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      Maybe if you took a science class you wouldn’t post crapola.

      • David Eberhardt

        you really think your “science” class was strictly about facts with no bias on the part of your “teachers” ROTFALMAO!

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          Guess who flunked middle school science and has developed an inferiority complex which manifests in its disdain and ineptitude for science. Quite a well balanced fellow with chips on both shoulders holding a long lasting grudge towards educators too.

      • GETBENDT

        Can you dispute anything I wrote? Are we all at risk because of a predicted one degree rise in global temps over 100 years? We can’t accurately predict the temperature 2 weeks in advance and you want us to believe you have nailed 100 years out? Do you think science is static? Do you not think advances in the energy sector won’t benefit us over the next 100 years? 100 years ago the world ran on horse power and steam engines. Now we have numerous emerging technologies that will change the dynamic. I don’t think we need an upheaval in our standard of living because a bunch of clueless hippies think the world is going to end because of fossil fuels. The Earth is doing just fine. Our presence here is part of nature and therefor what we do is part of nature. Intelligent people understand our environment and our resources and we want it to be sustainable. It is not the wealthy or advanced societies that are polluting the planet, it is the poor and uneducated. The rich keep their areas clean and we have a reverence and respect for nature. We pay our way. The poor throw their trash and debris everywhere and don’t give a damn about the environment. Look at the major urban areas and tell me who cares more about the planet. Look at these poor countries and the ones run by dictators and socialists / communists and tell me who is a better steward. America is the richest, cleanest and most advanced country in the world. If we get rid of the morons running this country we would be at the forefront of advanced energy generation and the trillions in profit available. So before you attack me about my views on “global climate change” maybe you should be promoting our way of life to the rest of the world.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          I did. As I wrote before ‘Maybe if you took a science class you wouldn’t post crapola.”

  • lloydc1234

    Not lower where I am.

  • Leone
  • NHBill603

    You Drudgies know that the USA is not the whole world right?

  • Shawn Barkerj

    lets see how they spin this at the UN and the Whitehouse

  • rc fourn

    Well then ,we are a carbon based life form if we should exterminate our self’s and that would be the end of the problem. Very Simple! In addition to that I have many graphs and charts that now explain to me that asphalt and concrete are the real culprits here .They both absorb heat and contribute to global warming,,perhaps we should remove asphalt from all our cities and build straw huts for our houses and businesses.

    • Shawn Barkerj

      thats ok the UN has a plan for that called agenda 21

  • jwhid3

    Y’all are forgetting that polar bears are at risk here. Despite all of the facts, the liberals will drum up a cute little video of a polar bear and her cubs, and then ask “don’t you want to save the polar bears?” Works for the low info voters every time. You need to reground yourself if you think they will read any info with facts proving man made global warming is a joke.The people who believe this nonsense are the same ones who gave a Nobel peace prize to a terrorist, a liar, and our current president for doing nothing. Despite what we know from the emails, satellite data and climate scientist, the liberals and a helpful media will continue to push this stupidity.

  • David Eberhardt

    The “global warming” fear mongers recognized something a few years ago and decided to call it “climate change”. There are problems in this world but global climate change is not one of them. Gov’t mismanagement of finances (across the world) and the spread of GMOs threaten populations.

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      God, not this ancient trope again. It was Frank Luntz, the Republican pollster, who advocated calling it “climate change” because it seemed less threatening. And the climate has indeed been changing over time, but not over the last few thousands of years, and never near as fast. And while CO2 may have been a following indicator in the past, it is the leading cause at this time, as has been understood by atmospheric physicists for decades. You are a science denier on steroids with your GE (not GMO) and climate science disdain and ineptitude.

  • David Eberhardt

    somehow Texas seems to do quite well despite temps in the high 90’s all the time. I lived there for 4 years (west Texas and northern Texas). California’s central valley is always pretty hot too. Was there in the mid 80’s and it was plenty hot all the time.

  • Clauzer

    In fairness, give NOAA a little more time to adjust the actual recorded temperatures to those predicted by the AGW model. NOAA will prove conclusively with these alterations to the actual physical data that the last three Julys are the warmest on record.

    • no they are not.

      • Clauzer

        Of course they are not the warmest on record, yet. But NOAA will alter the actual temperatures, and replace them with their manipulated temperatures, and prove the actual temperatures wrong. And soon, the last three Julys WILL be the warmest on record, just as the should be according the AGW theory.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          How come deniers never substantiate their hearsay comments about data manipulation? Manipulation in science is not nefarious but rather a very standard basic tenet. I think we should be happy that scientists do correct previous shortcomings and look again at data. This is how science works. One learns new things, goes back and correct previous mistakes and report the findings. Changing data with the sole intention to support claims is a myth, at least in scientific discussions. Nobody gets articles published by describing how the data was modified with the sole purpose of supporting claims and without any scientific basis. If you have knowledge of any such publication, please do share with us.

          • PDCB

            There is no valid scientific reason to alter actual temperature data from decades ago. But NOAA routinely does and has done this more than once. The raw temperature data, before alteration by NOAA or Berkeley, already shows some global warming for a period from 1970 to 1998 or so. NOAA alteration enhances raw data warming by 10% or so. Why do this without explanation if their theories are supported with unmodified data?

            The methodology of temperature data adjustment, which almost always increases the global warming effect, was explained in a video by an English scientist recently. Temperatures at weather stations in Paraguay surrounding one showing a slight cooling trend are used to justify raising those cooler to match the higher ones. Although there are a slight few where the opposite occurs, they are rare, and the exception.

            Recently, there was a second upward readjustment to the already previously altered data to enhance the now almost 19 year steady or slightly cooling trend of the Earth, to pronounce the warmest year ever – warmer by 0.04°C!

            In the decades since data manipulation has been the underpinning for AGW, not one paper or directive or regulation or recommendation has been proposed by NOAA or Berkeley or East Anglia on where to put thermometers, or when to read them to get accurate measurements that won’t require upward manipulation later by NOAA or others to get the “true” temperature. They justify with absolute precision the changing of a temperature recorded 75 years ago at one obscure weather station in Paraguay, but not the neighboring stations. They seem to know that the thermometer was exposed to the sunshine for 30 seconds, or that the box containing the thermometer was bumped or had coffee spilled on it one morning.

            There’s no “denial” in stating the obvious: NOAA and other AGW theorists adjust the actual readings and records generally upwards in recent years, and downwards in earlier years. And the result is the almost without exception always the enhancement of AGW. They may have to answer to Congress soon, as if that would really matter, but they are generally held to account by no one but themselves.

            Why doesn’t NOAA simply do away with thermometers? They are so good at determining far more precise readings years or decades later by simple analysis.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            There is no valid scientific reason to alter actual temperature data from decades ago
            ———————————————————————-
            You state that without authority. The changes made and the reasoning are published by NOAA. Come back when you think you have a cogent scientific argument of where they have erred. If you need some good reading on the topic I suggest you Google “NOAA data set revisions Nature” or “Berkley BEST”. Once you have read up and informed yourself on what manipulations that were made and you still believe you have cogent and sound reasons to dispute them, come and state your case. If they are valid, I’ll help you submit them for peer review and hopefully publication. You could become one of the world’s most famous scientists.

            The rest of your very long screed is unsubstantiated emotional twaddle based on junk science.

    • currently at my location at 807am it is 55 degrees

      normal temp should be in the lower 80’s

  • CFLAP

    Liberals are mentally ill.

    • nobody

      *Conservatives , but i’m repeating myself here.

  • TheTruthIsNotPC

    Rest assured – these data will be adjusted to ensure a warming trend…

    • nobody

      Sure, because what happens in the american north-east is the only thing that matters in the planet’s climate. It’s USA after all.

      • <===== you simply cannot deny the facts.

        • nobody

          What facts? That the weather has been cooler in a quite small region while it has been a lot hotter in a much larger one for longer? That fact?

          • do you huff paint? live with mom in basement.

            PLANET-X is PROOF ENOUGH

            are you a paid “liberal” troll?

            i know about the scam to pass off fatal fivisions

            75 cents per comment

  • Artupstairs

    In New York. We had one hot week so far. In the 90s, but we used to get into the 100s. Now it’s August, and I am sleeping under a blanket. With no air conditioning or fan. NEVER could do that 30 years ago.

  • philip bergen

    liberals will always fudge the numbers just as they will always fudge pack their kind

    • nobody

      Sure, let us ignore what happens in the rest of the globe, only USA counts after all, even for the climate.

      • philip bergen

        you get your own house in order before you can tell others what to do. thats how it works . liberals use global warming[ climate change] as a fictious agenda to tax, control, indoctrinate, and distract from doing the hard work of helping this nation America become great again. we need infrastructure, water management, housing , border control, better education, more students understanding thats life is not texting and games. colleges that teach real career goals not majoring in stripper poles and anal sex just for students money. embrace your god and he will reward you with a kind soul. don`t glorify ghetto thug culture and rap music that debases women of all races. and last of all , keep liberals from just making up stuff to placate their kool aid drinking base

  • <====== whistle-blower

  • Mark Thompkins

    When the global warming crowd can tell me the EXACT temperature, on this day, in Washington DC, in 2036 BC, then I will pay attention. Not the average, or estimated. The EXACT temperature.

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      Picked up a physics textbook yet? You can get a good used one inexpensively on Amazon.

      • Mark Thompkins

        What’s your point? They cannot tell us what the exact temperature was 10,000 years ago, yet can tell us the average earth temperature is rising and what it will be in 100 years.

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          Please share with us your infinite wisdom why exact room temperature 10kA ago and 100 years in the future have meaning in climate science? Reinforce why you shouldn’t be discussing a topic about which you’re obnoxiously ignorant.

          • Mark Thompkins

            If you cannot tell the EXACT temperature on any given day 10k years ago, there is no way to predict the temperature exactly in 100 years. The hurricane models Algore was touting have fallen flat. In 1974 Time magazine was talking about a new ice age.
            Warmers have relied on 150 years of manipulated data, got caught manipulating the data, said we would see more hurricanes than ever before, claimed the east coast would be under water, etc.. None of their predictions Have happened
            It is the new religion of the left, fueled by the inventor of the internet, and the greatest scam of all time, carbon credits, Algore.
            But you keep telling us how the world Is ending, and I will continue to mow my grass on the hottest days of the year, just to create a little more “Global Warming”.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            Just stop. You are really bad at this. Make an effort to get knowledgeable to at least middle school competency in science. Otherwise you will just persist in making a fool of yourself with your gibberish that you think is science. I notice you avoided sharing your wisdom why exact room temperature 10kA ago and 100 years in the future have meaning in climate science. Are you illiterate when it comes to science?

          • Mark Thompkins

            The fool lies on the other side of the argument.

            Let me put it a way that a simple lefty “might” understand. Your team sayss the earth is warming at an alarming rate. Your team bases that on 150 years of manipulated data. The earth has been around for 3-4 billion years. It has been a tropic, it has been an ice sheet.

            The temperatures for Indianapolis Indiana, this week, were “predicted” to be 88, 91,90, 88, 87 That is Monday – Friday. Not ONCE did the temperature exceed 84. So if they cannot accurately predict the temperature 5 days out correctly, their “Models” can’t predict 20-100 years out.

            But you keep swilling Algores seed, ans spewing it forth. Fewer people by the day are listening.

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            There is not two sides to the story, just reality and evidence. You are confused with very basic issues such as the difference between weather and climate. As I said “make an effort to get knowledgeable to at least middle school competency in science. Otherwise you will just persist in making a fool of yourself with your gibberish that you think is science.”

  • pcraig

    The Earth’s carbon footprint was created 4.5 billion years ago during a supernova. Carbon is neither created nor destroyed, it is merely reconstituted into different molecules. Freed up during combustion and then reconstructed into organic molecules by photosynthesis. Warming climate increases plant growth, increasing photosynthesis, reducing carbon dioxide and increasing oxygen in atmosphere. A self balancing ecosystem.

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      Warming climate increases plant growth, increasing photosynthesis, reducing carbon dioxide and increasing oxygen in atmosphere.
      ——————————————————————————————————-
      Rookie mistakes. First, you show that you don’t understand that warming doesn’t increase plant growth but causes existing plants to die and new species to grow. You have no knowledge or evidence that that is a good thing. Turning prairie into semi-desert is not considered a positive for current extant. Second, increasing atmospheric CO2 results in a decreasing oxygen content. How is that a positive for extant? You do know we pay smart people to measure and evaluate these physical phenomena? A simple 3s Google search could have given you the knowledge not to make rookie science mistakes.

  • Mark Thompkins

    Can anyone here tell me what man made pollution caused the last ice age to end?

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      It didn’t. Scientists are the ones that told you this, right? But you think they forgot this when they built their theories of how the climate works? Claiming that climate changed in the past therefore humans can’t be driving it today is like saying fires existed before criminals so arson doesn’t exist.

  • we have an ice age coming.

  • the “governments” and “scientist” KNEW that planet-x was enroute since the early 1900 so they had tons of time to make up lies on the fly and pass off fatal divisions / divide and conquer “conservative” “liberal”

  • kirok

    OMG!!!!…………..I thought we were all going to burn up with rising temps. Now I’m going to freeze. Some one do something. Can we find another planet. Deep breath….deep breath…….. OK, I feel a bit better now. Wait a minute…our Lord and Savior Barry Obama will fix this. Ahhhhhhh!!!!! I feel much better now. I’m going to go get some Kool-Aid.

  • disqus_sBKZDGKiG8

    Relax. This is just weather, not climate. Ask any green rent seeker.

  • TioDon

    “But….but…….but”…hahahahahahaha…..Amerika is going down the toilet…..

  • Cory Corleone

    Wow. And our president stated that the hottest 15 years of our existence have been the last 15 years (or something as false as that). It comes down to who believes who since most don’t care to (or are not capable of) doing their own research.

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      You don’t get out or read much, do you? There is a whole planet involved and the data presented to you is purposely false to dupe the gullible and under educated. Well they succeeded in your case.

      • Cory Corleone

        What?? Please rephrase your blurry and nebulous statement to actually make a point one way or another. Are you saying that I don’t read much because I don’t believe POTUS? …or that I don’t read much because I think POTUS is full of sh*t? If you read the article above, and any other honest research, the last 15yrs have NOT been the hottest in our existence. And anyone that thinks warming of our climate (which has been happening since the Ice Age) is abnormal is a moron. So tell me, please oh wise one – what the h*ll are you trying to say??

  • Joe_E_in_the_IE

    Care to comment, former vice president and (must . . . not . . . smirk) climate activist Al Gore? Doesn’t the pla-YAN-et have a fa-HEE-ver?

    Yes, I see, and no, you can’t f❋❋❋ me or the horse I rode in on. I don’t even own a horse.

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      His words would be “how is that you are so easily duped?’

  • CalGunOwner

    And thanks to our beloved little boy king and the Clinton’s, San Francisco company Solazyme, charged $149 a gallon for algae based “alternative Eco-fuel”. For a mere $300,000 in donations the company ripped off taxpayers a total of $223,500 in 2009 alone. The big payback came from a $21 million stimulus grant from the Obama Administration.
    One more Global Warming hype Solyndra hoax for the dimocrats ruling class.

  • LibertyBill_1776

    Look! It is snowing in July! It must be caused by “Global Warming”!!!

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      Play time is over. Back to your ward.

  • Friendly and Rational

    Has it occurred to anyone that maybe that global warming cycle that takes millions of years might NOT be a constant incline in temperature? Maybe that’s occurred to someone? Or is this just the most convenient piece of evidence that makes you feel comfortable living in your self-centered ideology?

  • MorinMoss

    If it doesn’t happen in America, it just doesn’t count.

  • Gregory Holden

    What about the other 98.38% of the planet’s surface? That’s right Global Warming Deniers…the land area of the USA accounts for less than 2% of the planet’s total surface area.

    • disqus4700

      I don’t think that word means what you think it means.

  • in case anyone here is interested, here is the actual NOAA report: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/news/july-2015-us-climate-report

  • Obama’saracist

    Guess they can not cook the books on this one

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      Perhaps, but you (or anyone in your denier cult) have yet to show any evidence of wrongdoing. Your hearsay doesn’t count as evidence, fortunately.

      • Obama’saracist

        all you clowns have is useless computer models and a lunatic running the corrupt epa. We have facts the prove the Ocean is not rising and the Polar ice caps are indeed not melting loser

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          Such disdain and ineptitude for science. Climate has been studied for two centuries, most before modelling. The full theory of anthropogenic global warming was first formed in 1896. You have the internet. With internet searches a few seconds away there’s really no reason to be so snarkily ignorant these days. Your verifiable vacuity about the ocean levels and the polar ice caps makes you look weak, desperate, and disreputable.

          • Obama’saracist

            again where are your facts?

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            First, do you struggle to comprehend?

            Climate has been studied for two centuries, most before modelling. The full theory of anthropogenic global warming was first formed in 1896.

            Second, as to providing facts you have not provided one for your original vacuity about “cook the books”. I’m still waiting and have enjoyed your diversions into gibberish base on wilful ignorance. You have the floor, please proceed bozo and present the evidence.

          • Obama’saracist

            blah blah blah blah blah blah. state a fact please as to why not one of your pathetic predictions have yet to come true

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            I have made no predictions. You, however, have failed to provide any evidence for your vacuity and answer with a grade school yard tantrum out of desperation. A classic symptom of a loser.

      • disqus4700
        • Leftwithrightbrain

          Thank you for sharing that you’re neither a scientist nor scientifically literate but rather obnoxiously ignorant about climate science by choice apparently. Totally beyond me why anyone would be so proud of being completely scientifically illiterate. Most people would be embarrassed but not you deniers, you put it right out there for all to see. This is the problem with deniers. If they are not uneducated then they’re either intellectually lazy or wholly dishonest. If you’re educated then the former applies to you and you should strive to become scientifically literate. This is the information age. If the latter, see a psychiatrist; you need more help than I can offer you.

  • Mike Eaton

    this is why they have switched the narrative to “Climate Change” it’s a catch all phrase…they don’t have to explain it, they don’t have to justify it, and they can prove it easily…because it’s been happening for billions of years…just so they can blame US…..

    • Leftwithrightbrain

      God, not this ancient trope again. It was Frank Luntz, the Republican pollster, who advocated calling it “climate change” because it seemed less threatening. Scientists are the ones that told you its been changing over billions of years. They also have shown you that the current forcing is human-induced CO2 and not part of the natural cycle. Strange how you can understand the former but are confused about the latter, yet the same chemistry and physics laws apply to both. So that means you are a wilful liar and/or a m0r0n. Claiming that climate changed in the past therefore humans can’t be driving it today is like saying fires existed before criminals so arson doesn’t exist.

      • Mike Eaton

        really….a willful liar lol hilarious…how EXACTLY did they determine the CO2 is human induced? does it leave some magical footprint…have we seen the accompanying temp increases associated with this CO2 ? No we instead have seen near table top flat temps for almost 20 years now…and you might want to look at the Medieval Warming period and the Mini Ice Age that followed right after…In the late 70’s and early 80’s we were going to freeze to death…the Ice Age was coming…what happened..nothing…now we’re gonna fry..the Ice Caps will be melting..Gore said by 2013 the caps would be gone…have they? nope..actually they have grown in size…but you go on ahead sunshine..keep licking those windows..cause yer special…

        • Leftwithrightbrain

          If you need to ask the question in your first line it means that you don’t understand middle school science or where to look. Come back when you’re up to speed as the rest of your diatribe is vacuity.

          • Mike Eaton

            awwww is this your way of saying that you can’t explain why temps have not risen as they should have? or what was responsible for the aforementioned climate changes?? it’s you who has chosen to rely on manipulated data not I….

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            You are avoiding your own posit. Share why exact temperatures as you noted are important to you in climate science and what that knowledge would tell you. Now you are obfuscating by introducing a new question that you want answered. I will answer it as soon as you answer your original posit about exact temperatures are important and a vital factor to your understanding of climate change. And after you have brushed up on your CO2 knowledge. You have the internet. With internet searches a few seconds away there’s really no reason to be so snarkily ignorant these days. Mercifully you have escaped the ravages of intelligence due to suffering from cranium intra rectum since your youth. Pssst … Mike, everyone on this blog can read what you and I write and you’re showing zero climate science heft.

          • Mike Eaton

            you’re right…everyone can see and read what’s written..so show me exactly where i asked for exact temps? I simply stated a fact..the fact that temps that were supposedly to rise with the increased CO2 hasn’t happened..my original post stands..and those that followed…perhaps it is you who should remove your head from your ass…they cry about a 1/10th of a degree..sooo i decided to interject the medieval warming period..a point in time we’re we had literally no influence to the climate..a point where temps were much warmer than now..and you parrots can’t explain it..do your own search…

          • Leftwithrightbrain

            You are correct, I inadvertently placed my answer to another post to you. I apologize and will edit what was not germane to this thread. I’ll respond once you let me know you have ginned up on CO2 and in fairness allowed you to edit your response to my previous and now edited response to you.

  • dont censor me climate depot you human reprobate trash

  • Trent Black

    global warming is called GLOBAL WARMING. It is very hot other places. the reason most of the east coast has not seen this is that the polar vortex has basically split and you are getting arctic air. But the Arctic is being heating from the warm pacific currents, and all the Arctic ice may be gone late sept. If the cold air is in the USA, the cold air is not in the arctic. So the arctic is heating fastest on the planet. If that happens, there is no more polar vortex, and you get hot air, forever. The east coast will be screaming worse then California.

  • Glennsbluewater

    Actually, according to CNN- NOAA, NASA and the Japanese Meteroligical Society all state, July was the hottest month on record.

    NOAA: Hottest July on record confirmed

    http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/20/us/noaa-global-climate-analysis/index.html

    • Glennsbluewater

      This is globally speaking. Not just the United States

  • John OccupyTogether Mccoy

    fucking morons……

  • Lindsay Gough
  • Kenney Fehrenkamp Pedersen

    Since you use NOAA as a source: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/faq/global-warming.php
    It’s not a liberal agenda or even within the ideology of liberalism. It’s not even a political question that anyone can have an opinion of. It is a scientific question – a question that has been answered. What to do about it is the political issue, but denying is the ignorant path.

  • wackymike

    Do your homework guys – the ones “fudging” the numbers here are those that pick the number that suits their story. Maybe you should all take the time to explore more of the data available. While July may have been an “average” month for the US, it was also the hottest on a global scale – they do call it “global” climate change for a reason. Oh, and btw, average temps in June were the 2nd highest recorded in the US…..

  • gei5saeghah

    my companion’s relative makes $73 hourly on the PC ………….at weekend day I nontransmissible a high of thedistinction McLaren F1 once I been earnin 10953 US-DOLLARS thismost up-to-date 4weeks and inway frightfully 10 miss month . inspiration driving truth sometimes|this willbe} once uncertain habituallythe key financialy fulfilling i even have ever done . i began this 9-months past and basically alterably started securing extraordinarily seventy. sevenUS-DOLLARS… p/h . loads of on the article..io……

    ➤➤➤➤ http://GlobalWorkWorldCOM/work/Best … ⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛

  • EARN $98/hour By GOOGLE JOBS

    my mate’s mother makes $98 consistently on the tablet………After earning an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I’m finally getting 98 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online….It’s time to take some action and you can join it too.It is simple,dedicated and easy way to get rich.Three weeks from now you will wishyou have started today – I promise!….HERE I STARTED-TAKE A LOOK AT….ru…..

    ➤➤➤➤ http://googlefinaladvancedjobsworldenginenetwork/$98/hour…. ⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛

  • Mike Czubaj
  • Ken Bowser

    I used to haul bus tores to metro bus ststions in D.C. and St Louis.Know where their weather temperature sensors were? In direct sunlight on a blacktop pad. Know where the pollution index meters were? On the building, above the door where they tune the running busses at a higher rpm. The people who worked there told me about them when I saw a tv station van checking them out. We’re being lied to, people.

  • bubbles

    so this is where the nuts live. nice to see you all together.

  • Andrew Clavin

    It’s global warming, not United States warming, does anyone want to look at what the global average temp for July was in 2015? It was the highest ever since we started recording temperature… by nearly a degree farenheit I think.