Wave Bye-Bye: Climate Depot’s Morano statement on Pachauri’s resignation: ‘The IPCC is quietly popping champagne corks today. Pachauri gone can only be good news for the UN IPCC’


By: - Climate DepotFebruary 24, 2015 10:03 AM with 4 comments

Related Links:

Pachauri critic: Evidence ‘suggest strongly that Pachauri is a longtime sexual predator’ – Donna Laframboise: ‘What’s missing from this (Pachauri’s resigniation) letter is any suggestion of remorse. When a scandal-plagued leader resigns because his alleged misdeeds are nuking his organization’s reputation, that is a mark of failure. He has let everyone down. Where are his words of apology to the thousands of IPCC-linked scientists whose honour is now eternally tarnished by their association with him?’ Pachauri’s letter talks about his “greatest joy,” and his “sublime satisfaction.”

Wave Bye-Bye: Climate Depot’s Morano statement on Pachauri’s resignation: ‘The IPCC is quietly popping champagne corks today. Pachauri gone can only be good news for the UN IPCC’ – Marc Morano: ‘If Pachauri had any decency, he would have resigned in the wake of the Climategate scandal which broke in 2009. Climategate implicated the upper echelon of UN IPCC scientists in attempting to collude and craft a narrative on global warming while allowing no dissent. Or Pachauri could have resigned when he wished skeptics would rub asbestos on their faces or conceded that the IPCC was at the ‘beck and call’ of governments. There were so many opportunities to to the right thing and fade away. But it took the proceedings of the Indian court system over the allegations of sexual harassment to finally bring Pachauri down. Things can only be looking up for the UN IPCC now that it has ridded itself of this political and ethical cancer.’


  • Gus

    “>>> Things can only be looking up for the UN IPCC now that it has ridded itself of this political and ethical cancer. <<<"
    The cancer, I think, is spread far deeper than Pachauri alone. Also, note, it was not the UN, but the Indian justice system that got him. Clearly, whoever is going to replace him, will be no better. Anyone expecting better from the UN is simply naïve.

  • jimini9

    Snippets from “Heaven and Earth, global warming-the missing science” by Australian geologist Dr. Ian Plimer:
    The founder of Greenpeace says that all “green”movements have been taken over by neo-Marxists, who despise trade, capitalism
    and are anti-civilization.

    “Climate change” exists because recently the
    global warming pseudo-scientists learned that the globe hasn’t warmed since
    about 1995, despite an increase in carbon dioxide emissions (CO2).The term
    “climate change” was conveniently chosen because it cannot be challenged.
    Climate always changes. It is obvious to
    anyone with a pulse.

    CO2 is vital for every life form. All life would die without CO2. There is no connection between CO2 and
    warming of the earth.

    Hundreds of real scientific studies and studies
    of the earth’s history show that CO2 has been much higher than it is now, even
    during the earth’s cold periods. CO2 has been far higher than present during
    the last four glaciation periods. (Thousand year periods within an Ice Age).

    Greenland has been cooling since the 1940’s.

    The Arctic was warmer in the 1920’s and 1930’s
    than it is now.

    Antarctic ice has been greatly expanding since
    2008.

    In the medieval warming period, it was much
    warmer than today, even without automobiles and industrialization.

    Virtually all current “climate change science”
    consists of computer modelling, based on
    mathematics and atmospheric-ocean-land interactions. These ignore such variables as the Sun, the
    cosmos, bacteria, history, and the geological processes that take place beneath
    our feet. Computer models and climate
    science cannot predict weather beyond one week, never mind hundreds of
    years. Modelers do not even have
    confidence in their own models.

    We are currently in an Ice Age that started 37
    million years ago.

  • Paul

    Unfortunately I fear that Pachauri’s exit wont change much in the IPCC. His replacement will no doubt be a similar idealogue so his/her actions will be similar.
    Established organisations like the IPCC dont change their approach quickly so all I see for the future is more politicly based CAGW statement and, more summary’s for policy makers that dont reflect the scientific evidence in their AR’s.
    It’ll be same old, same old…….

  • Mervyn

    When Pachaurii was elected chairman of the IPCC on 20 April 2002, it was a display of blatant moral corruption. The IPCC, together with its creators – WMO and UNEP – are morally bankrupt in relation to their dangerous man-made global warming deception agenda.