This Sunday’s NFL Game in Green Bay: Coldest Ever?


By: - Climate DepotJanuary 3, 2014 11:39 AM with 594 comments

Update: Bloomberg News: Green Bay Weather Threatens to Outfreeze NFL Ice Bowl Record

Update 2: NFL Wild Card Playoffs 2014 weather forecast: Brutal conditions in Green Bay

#

Via Climatologist Dr.  Roy Spencer:

This Sunday’s NFL Game in Green Bay: Coldest Ever?

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/01/this-sundays-nfl-game-in-green-bay-coldest-ever/

[Update: Spencer tells Climate Depot: 'The latest GFS MOS fcst for 6 p.m. Sunday is -10 deg. F]

The latest GFSx MOS temperature forecast is now -8 deg. F for game time in Green Bay on Sunday evening for the playoff game between the Packers and the 49ers. This is getting awfully close to the record coldest NFL game temperature of -13 deg. F, set Dec. 31, 1967 at Lambeau Field during “The Ice Bowl”, the NFL Championship game between the Packers and Dallas Cowboys.

The 2nd coldest game was Jan. 10, 1982 at Riverfront Stadium during the AFC Championship game between Cincinnati Bengals and San Diego Chargers, at -9 deg. F, so Sundays game might take the #2 spot. The top 10 coldest NFL games are listed here. Makes my hands hurt just thinking about it.

#

Also see: Flashback 2008: Has Global Warming Hurt the Green Bay Packers?

Related Links:

December 31 Global Sea Ice Area (Both Arctic & Antarctic Ice Combined) Was The Largest Ever Recorded For The Date  - Planet Earth currently has the most sea ice ever measured this time of year’

Clitantic scientists trapped in Antarctic ice claim expanding sea ice caused by ‘global warming’ — But data and studies refute claims – Global warming scientists faced with absurd reality

Scientists Trapped In Record Antarctic Sea Ice Announce That It Is Disappearing‘ (Via Real Science)

Less ice, more ice, whatever. It’s global warming! — Flashback 2007: Global warming means LESS ice around Antarctica — 2013: global warming means more ice around Antarctica

Forget global warming!? Earth undergoing global COOLING since 2002!  Climate Scientist Dr. Judith Curry: ‘Attention in the public debate seems to be moving away from the 15-17 year ‘pause’ to the cooling since 2002’

Growing number of scientists are predicting global cooling: Russia’s Pulkovo Observatory: ‘We could be in for a cooling period that lasts 200-250 years’

‘Sun Sleeps’: Danish Solar Scientist Svensmark declares ‘global warming has stopped and a cooling is beginning…enjoy global warming while it lasts’

Prominent geologist Dr. Don Easterbrook warns ‘global COOLING is almost a slam dunk’ for up to 30 years or more

Australian Astronomical Society warns of global COOLING as Sun’s activity ‘significantly diminishes’ 

2013 was a banner year for Antarctic Sea Ice Extent - ’The highest maximum for Antarctic Sea Ice Extent of all time was set on October 1st 2013. The highest average anomaly for a year occurred in 2013. 2013 averaged 850,000 sq km above the 1981-2010 mean’

Watch Now: Climate Depot Debates Global Warming on UN TV At UN Summit! UN Host to Morano: ‘There is no need to shout’ — Morano: ‘The UN IPCC is first and foremost a political process, not scientific’

Watch Video Now: CNN Hosts Rare Live Contentious Global Warming Debate – Marc Morano vs. Sierra Club’s Michael Brune & Philippe Cousteau Jr. – Full Transcript – Morano: ‘So record cold is now evidence of man-made global warming?

Climate Depot’s Morano At UN Press Conference in Warsaw Denounces Exploitation of Typhoon to ‘an unappreciative audience’: Morano ‘compared the belief that policy can change the weather to ‘medieval witchcraft’

UN Climate Summit Rejects Its Own Science – Links Typhoon Haiyan to Global Warming – UN Summit Degenerates Into Unscientific Claims to Advance Political Agenda – Climate Depot Special Report

 


594 responses to This Sunday’s NFL Game in Green Bay: Coldest Ever?

  1. 1mikejanz1 January 3rd, 2014 at 12:23 PM

    Makes me glad I have to watch it on TV!

        Reply

    • acmoreno January 3rd, 2014 at 1:19 PM

      …unless you’re in the local television market (from Green Bay through Milwaukee) and the game is blacked out for insufficient ticket sales. I’m doing my part by flying up from Florida to go see the game.

          Reply

      • jOkeR January 3rd, 2014 at 1:39 PM

        They just sold out. Black-out avoided.

            Reply

        • Elizabeth Fisher January 3rd, 2014 at 1:47 PM

          Awesome. I can’t remember for what game, but Kroger’s was going to buy up the tickets and distribute them to members of the military.

              Reply

        • acmoreno January 3rd, 2014 at 1:59 PM

          Just saw the headlines. Thanks to the local business and Associated Banc-Corp. Now, we can move between Curley’s and Lambeau without missing much.

              Reply

        • Smitty January 3rd, 2014 at 2:28 PM

          But will there be a whiteout instead?

              Reply

          • jOkeR January 3rd, 2014 at 3:56 PM

            That’s racist!

                Reply

      • Skipper January 3rd, 2014 at 2:02 PM

        they wont accept welfare like food stamps

            Reply

      • RETUSAF1995 January 3rd, 2014 at 2:17 PM

        Do you really think advertisers will allow the game to be blacked out? If anything, they will buy the tickets. The more people watch, the more crap they will sell.

            Reply

        • Sam Swift January 3rd, 2014 at 2:23 PM

          Who really cares about a bunch of overgrown negroes in tights playing with balls?

              Reply

          • Franken Stein January 3rd, 2014 at 3:31 PM

            Hmm, this story must be linked by drudge. The level of racism in these comments is outrageous.

                Reply

          • Sam Swift January 3rd, 2014 at 4:03 PM

            Then move on…..no one owes you anything.

                Reply

          • depressionbaby January 3rd, 2014 at 5:25 PM

            Why isn’t there Affirmative Action in professional football, baseball and basketball? Professional Hockey is safe for now.

                Reply

      • Jeffrey Gee January 3rd, 2014 at 9:24 PM

        Maybe, if our Roman Gladiators stopped supporting politics, people wouldn’t be turned off. It’s entertainment/distraction… I like watching a game sometimes and it is good for young children and teens to play sports. Take the politics out of sports, and the money out of politics is all I wanted to say! Go Green Bay even though I am Redskins advocate!

            Reply

    • RETUSAF1995 January 3rd, 2014 at 2:15 PM

      I like the way the media talks about how the SB should not be played in a cold weather city but no one talks about playing/moving the playoffs to say Miami. When i grew up playing and watching football in weather was part of the fun. This shows how soft Americans have become.

      I’am looking forward to watching the game in GB. I remember when Bud Grant (Viking coach) once said when asked, why didn’t he have heaters on his side of the field? He said he wanted the players to think more about the game than staying warm! Now that’s football!!!

          Reply

  2. JJErler January 3rd, 2014 at 12:33 PM

    Lame… shouldn’t the headline be 3rd coldest game ever??? Unless someone is predicting it’ll be -14, this story seems to be a cheap attempt to get attention.

        Reply

    • smarter than JJ January 3rd, 2014 at 12:37 PM

      That’s at kickoff. And weather isn’t perfect

          Reply

      • distillerman January 3rd, 2014 at 12:43 PM

        C’mon man…..don’t you know that “the science is settled?” (sarcasm noted….)

            Reply

  3. ** Civilian Target ** January 3rd, 2014 at 12:33 PM

    This cracks me up. A bunch of idiots freezing their a**es off to watch a team that doesn’t even know they personally exist. Dang…. the team should have been paying the fans for attending the game.

        Reply

    • FarmboyDuke January 3rd, 2014 at 12:41 PM

      The people sitting in the stands freezing their a**es off actually own the team. In Green Bay, anyway.

          Reply

      • ** Civilian Target ** January 3rd, 2014 at 12:43 PM

        Well, I sure hope those owners are getting their multimillion dollar checks.

            Reply

        • FarmboyDuke January 3rd, 2014 at 1:07 PM

          The fans are the owners. The Packers are a publicly owned NFL franchise. I doubt they are getting multimillion dollar checks, though…just the pride of owning a piece of a storied team.

              Reply

          • ** Civilian Target ** January 3rd, 2014 at 1:10 PM

            They are obvious dedicated.

                Reply

          • guest January 3rd, 2014 at 1:11 PM

            That’s total B.S. pseudo-ownership. People can buy ‘a share’ of the team but they have NO voting rights towards ownership decisions like one has with an actual stock purchase which entitles you to help decide the direction of the company you own. Furthermore, they can not sell their shares in the team to anyone and they get NO dividends from the investment. It is not at all like owning a share in anything, it is giving a donation to a professional sports team which then turns around and makes millions off of you while you receive nothing in return. Please look it up if you don’t believe me, it is all true.

                Reply

          • Raptormann January 3rd, 2014 at 5:52 PM

            Public ownership is the farce used to rape taxpayers for stadium updates. All financial studies of publicly owned teams has shown the economic spinoff doesn’t match expectations.

                Reply

  4. bill January 3rd, 2014 at 12:36 PM

    donkey

        Reply

  5. Samson Simpson January 3rd, 2014 at 12:38 PM

    With all the public financing for these so called “teams”, why are any games played in open air stadiums.?

        Reply

    • ** Civilian Target ** January 3rd, 2014 at 12:39 PM

      Because they don’t care about the fans.

          Reply

    • FLOYDINFLORIDA January 3rd, 2014 at 1:16 PM

      Well look at Seattle where the weather is bad 99% of the time!
      They tore their dome down and built a outdoor stadium?
      Go figure?

          Reply

    • The_RS_Gadfly January 3rd, 2014 at 2:01 PM

      Because it’s not football if there isn’t a chance of playing in the middle of a snow storm.

      That was always one of the great things about watching Penn State play before the wusses in the administration put up the indoor practice stadium. Our guys practiced in the weather, odds were theirs hadn’t. And it showed during the game.

          Reply

  6. Rex January 3rd, 2014 at 12:41 PM

    More proof of Global Warming, just like the global warming whackjob “scientists” whose ship is stuck in the Antarctic ice pack, in the summer time….
    Funny how the democrat media never mentions the global warming scientists are studying MELTING SEA ICE!!
    The Socialist Semite democrat media has lied about everything!

        Reply

    • constructionworker January 3rd, 2014 at 2:08 PM

      Their rescue ship is now stuck. Hope these so called scientists on the trapped shipped wake up and realize that global warming is a hoax.

          Reply

      • vinny January 3rd, 2014 at 2:40 PM

        No they already stated that what has happened is due to global warming. You can’t argue with fanatics hell bent on an agenda.

            Reply

        • 123Star January 3rd, 2014 at 3:07 PM

          Will Al Gore finally cave ?

              Reply

          • Pete January 3rd, 2014 at 6:53 PM

            “Fat Al” Gore was seen in his countinghouse, totaling up his winnings from his scam of the gullible, impressionable and ever willing to follow Biology 101 types that populate his phalanx of lemming/believers.

                Reply

          • Robert Govan January 3rd, 2014 at 9:37 PM

            Al Gore is aka actor Bruce Willis in a fat suit and face latex. No Joke. He is not the only A-list actor doing this……..Wellaware1.com

                Reply

          • seanster5977 January 4th, 2014 at 9:26 AM

            He is sending his jet to circle and take high aerial photos. Will only use around 8000000 gallons of fuel so worth it

                Reply

          • 123Star January 4th, 2014 at 1:53 PM

            now your making it sound like obama, he burns more fuel than south west airlines. we pay that bill as well. you wonder why obama is not in touch with people, he’s always up in the air….

                Reply

          • TheBitterClinger1 January 4th, 2014 at 10:58 AM

            No but his substantial girth could fill most caves.

                Reply

          • twinstick1 January 4th, 2014 at 12:56 PM

            Will Al Gore finally go back to his cave???

                Reply

      • erehwon53 January 3rd, 2014 at 6:15 PM

        DUH its wither time up north its supposed to be cold

            Reply

        • pruttmaster January 3rd, 2014 at 6:44 PM

          Haaa …last time i checked the Antarctica was in the south and currently experiencing summer ….thx for the laugh …also if it wasnt for your condensending “DUH” Id let you get away with your spelling mistake “wither time ” ! (or was it a mistake ;D)

              Reply

          • mdillof January 3rd, 2014 at 8:07 PM

            pruttmaster, in your post, you wrote “Id,” when you should have written “I’d.”

            Also, “wither time” is poetic, since the cold weather causes everything to wither, both twigs and prigs, like yourself.

                Reply

          • Amos2 January 3rd, 2014 at 10:34 PM

            HA! The pot calling the kettle black!

                Reply

          • Beallthere January 3rd, 2014 at 11:30 PM

            Poetic or not, wither doesn’t associate with cold or Winter. Its meaning relates to drying out due to dry conditions, drought, lack of rain. Hence, ‘wither on the vine.’
            ..That said, look back at the era when plants and animals grew so thick that their carcasses eventually morphed into oil, coal or natural gas. Was it warm or cold then ? Id say it was VERY warm. Else how would so much oil be under the Arctic Ocean ?

                Reply

          • mdillof January 4th, 2014 at 12:02 AM

            Yes, to be more precise, the heat causes withering, while the cold causes shriveling.

            What you state about oil, coal and gas, is interesting, even though I’m not exactly sure that I understand your point. Are you contending that the earth was originally hot and has been cooling off since its creation? If so, you’re probably right. Whither goest thou?

                Reply

          • rockribbed January 4th, 2014 at 7:14 AM

            Had a freshening heifer cast her withers once… winter of ’65 it was…
            Like the weather, there was nothing I could do about it… So we butchered her and ate her.

                Reply

          • erehwon53 January 4th, 2014 at 4:14 AM

            your right its spelled wrong, too late at night to makes comments and proofread. as for the comment just because the Antarctica is colder in summertime has nothing to do about the facts of climate change.Antarctica is a very cold place. But global warming is affecting it as predicted: Antarctica is losing ice overall, according to the latest report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. However, sea ice is a different matter than land-based or glacial ice. Antarctic sea ice is increasing, and moreover, the reason for this may be climate change!

                Reply

          • constructionworker January 4th, 2014 at 7:41 AM

            Are you able to see how very twisted your thought process is? Overly it is, but is doubtful that you have the ability to see the forest for the trees! Just WOW at your convoluted thinking!!

                Reply

          • erehwon53 January 4th, 2014 at 3:04 PM

            Whats convoluted about the facts. The earth is getting warmer, thats a fact and at a rate never send before. The polar ice caps are melting. Because of the rise in temps we are seeing abnormally extreme weather all around the world. The typhoon in the Philippines to hurricanes Sandy and Katrina. these sorts of storms used to happen maybe one every 10 to 20 years. Now they are now happening every 3 to 5 years. Global warming is actually expected to increase “heavy precipitation in winter storms,” and for the northern hemisphere, there is evidence that these storms are already more frequent and intense, according to the draft US National Climate Assessment.

            You can believe what you want. its too late now to really change this pattern and most of us won’t be alive to see its affects but our children and grand children will.

                Reply

          • cookielee January 4th, 2014 at 8:37 AM

            Climate change? The climate changes every minute of everyday since the earth was formed. The sun is the most anemic it has been in this active cycle.

                Reply

          • mdillof January 4th, 2014 at 9:10 AM

            “You are right” is abbreviated as “you’re right.” The “you’re” is a contraction. And so, “your right” is incorrect, which means you’re wrong about grammar and wrong about so-called “global warming.

                Reply

          • erehwon53 January 4th, 2014 at 2:53 PM

            wow you passed grammar in school but failed science.

                Reply

          • mdillof January 4th, 2014 at 3:28 PM

            Maybe so, comrade, but the word “wow,” in your sentence should have a comma after it and should be capitalized. Also, there should be a comma after “but.”

            Thus the sentence should read, “Wow, you passed grammar, but failed science.”

                Reply

          • erehwon53 January 4th, 2014 at 3:33 PM

            Lol.

                Reply

          • Schmedley January 5th, 2014 at 8:22 AM

            Well i tried not to judge you by “your” looks (though it was tempting), yet the more you post the more you show what an uneducated idiot you are. I hope “you’re” not offended by this, just stating what i see. Not only don’t you know the north from the south, but apparently you don’t know your Arse from a hole in the ground. Perhaps you should run along and plant a few trees, you know, to offset the carbon footprint created by flapping “your” gums and spewing all your HOT AIR!
            Last, i must ask, did being up late as you stated and i suppose you meant being tired cause you not only to misspell words, but to confuse north with south? In closing lets just say I’m HWLTMBHAY meaning, “HOWLING WITH LAUGHTER TILL MY BALLS HURT AT YOU!!”

                Reply

          • Schmedely January 5th, 2014 at 8:26 AM

            And yes there is a word ommission in my post, let’s (for “you’re” benefit that means “let us”) see if you can find it. And again, since now you understand the meaning I’m HWLTMBHAY! HAHAHAHAHAHA!

                Reply

          • Schmedley January 5th, 2014 at 8:08 AM

            Yes, but it is still SOUTH and you’ve yet to explain that brain fart?

                Reply

          • erehwon53 January 5th, 2014 at 5:42 PM

            Maybe you should take a new hobby, education. I have a feeling you still believe the world is flat and we never landed on the moon. How’s creationism working for ya..

                Reply

        • constructionworker January 4th, 2014 at 7:36 AM

          Erehwon53: those ships are stuck in ANTARTICA. Last time I checked Antartica is in the Southern Hemisphere, and summer is starting there. 6 people gave you thumbs up, all 7 of you need to take geography lessons!!;)

              Reply

          • erehwon53 January 4th, 2014 at 3:06 PM

            and whats your point. so its cold in Antarctica in the summer. its always cold in Antarctica in the summer. its the south pole.

                Reply

          • constructionworker January 5th, 2014 at 11:48 AM

            Now you’re dancing around your statement, very funny indeed.

                Reply

          • erehwon53 January 5th, 2014 at 5:38 PM

            maybe some need to read about Antarctica.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctica#Climate

                Reply

        • 123Star January 4th, 2014 at 1:57 PM

          live in it and then make a statement.

              Reply

      • Adam January 3rd, 2014 at 7:43 PM

        Wouldn’t it be better if all of congress went with them?

            Reply

        • 123Star January 4th, 2014 at 12:39 AM

          That’s been the problem, they think they know everything, and it’s turning into a joke. They elect to put themselves in God’s position. Have we forgotten who controls ALL earth, from creation,births, deaths,life,air, winds,storms,oceans,destruction,wars,blessings,food,family,fuel,miracles,rainbows,water,friends good and bad,and our finger prints. The list goes on and on, and these Enviromentalists are telling us to believe in them. Take a minute to think what God may be thinking of this situation. happy new years

              Reply

      • PeopleAreLazyANdNotSmart January 4th, 2014 at 11:34 AM

        Global Warming is about the change in weather patterns. Every time you idiots think its about warm weather you get laughed at. Why don’t you find out what you are talking about before you talk trash. Al Gore by-the-way never said to have invented the internet just in case you guys decide to bring that up because everyone brings up those two hand and hand. You don’t believe in global warming? Then why did 180 (not sure how many countries signed the bill) agreed to stop heavily allowing emissions into the air? Are you saying you are smarter then most of these countries that KNOW its a problem?

            Reply

        • CincyChris January 4th, 2014 at 11:46 AM

          The exact same reason Obamacare was implemented- to bring the citizenry down to feudal serfs.

          Take a lesson in life: Learn history, or be damned to repeat it.

          “A true patriot protects his country from his government.” -George Washington
          “Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.” -Albert Einstein

          “Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant, and a fearful master..” -George Washington

              Reply

        • constructionworker January 5th, 2014 at 11:55 AM

          Look at the money trail. Most of those countries have received a lot of money from the US alone. You will learn. The earth’s temperature has stopped rising 17 years ago. Look at this year, hurricanes and tornadoes were below their normal numbers. Has we continue to cool will you continue to blame it on global warming? It used to be called Global Warming and then Climate Change and now Climate Disruption. Do you realize climate change has been occurring well before humans appeared on this planet???

              Reply

        • sodacrackers2 January 5th, 2014 at 4:19 PM

          The whole global warming scam is another “spread the wealth” scheme cooked up by the globalists, who want open borders, no ownership of private property, destruction of all religion, culture, and art. The only ones accumulating all this wealth are our brilliant elite permanent political class.

              Reply

      • ColdEnoughFor You? January 4th, 2014 at 3:12 PM

        No, they helicoptered them to a global warming shrine ship and they are praying to Al Gore to melt the ice.

            Reply

    • Minnesota Madman January 3rd, 2014 at 2:14 PM

      Expel the Israelis.

          Reply

      • 123Star January 3rd, 2014 at 3:16 PM

        Are you nuts, those are God’s chosen, don’t mess with negative talk about Israel.

            Reply

        • Minnesota Madman January 3rd, 2014 at 7:14 PM

          Whatever zombie. Go back to eating brains and watching the NFL.

              Reply

    • Ray Williams January 3rd, 2014 at 4:16 PM

      Not to mention it is summer time in the southern hemisphere.

          Reply

      • Amos2 January 3rd, 2014 at 10:43 PM

        If it is summer in Antarctica, and these idiots’ ship is stuck in ice, what chance is there of having it freed when it is winter in Antarctica? Methinks this ship will serve as a frozen monument into the unforeseeable future mocking the arrogance, mindlessness, and abject intellectual depravity of all who preached and espoused the pseudo-religion of “Global Warming.”

            Reply

        • Ralph Anderson January 4th, 2014 at 1:56 PM

          They better get it out pretty soon or it will not get out. It is essentially June now in Antarctica, so there are two months of “summer” there, thought summer is not the right word.

              Reply

          • Amos2 January 4th, 2014 at 4:04 PM

            Get a life!

                Reply

          • Ralph Anderson January 4th, 2014 at 4:47 PM

            Typical gibberish unintelligent reply. In your world, I guess, you are so limited intellectually that thinking seriously about anything is way out of your skill set. I have a great life, season tickets for the Hawks play off games, just got out of the Washington Arizona basketball game, and just got back from a week in SF. Basically, your reply is a confession of your ignorance and lack of education. You are exactly why this country is going in the shitter.

                Reply

    • SoulLeister January 3rd, 2014 at 5:02 PM

      I saw a man made global warming scientist (using that term loosely) by the side of the road with a flat time… he refused to acknowledge it was flat… insisting the other three had swollen up because of warming.

          Reply

      • John Clausen January 3rd, 2014 at 6:53 PM

        Soul, What is a flat time?

            Reply

        • murlo2y January 5th, 2014 at 1:45 AM

          A music term, opposed to “sharp”. Basically he was bored to death staring at his tires.

              Reply

        • SoulLeister January 18th, 2014 at 6:38 AM

          TYPE O, you got me (public schooled, not my phalt… see what I did there? ph-alt instead of fault). I fixed it for your viewing pleasure (so you don’t have to pleasure yourself so much).

              Reply

      • Dick Tubigg January 3rd, 2014 at 8:01 PM

        I saw the same guy, only he a flat tire and no time to change it. I think I got that right.

            Reply

        • SoulLeister January 18th, 2014 at 6:39 AM

          another correct assessment, thank you… pity we are not all as reasonable… as in capable of reason.

              Reply

    • james January 3rd, 2014 at 5:28 PM

      “The Socialist Semite democrat media has lied about everything!”

      they are not democrats. they are marxist, globalist, collectivist, secularist, humanist, facist nutjobs. and the phony big government republicans who have the same foreign policy and support the same spending are no better. they are bought and paid for by the same globalist central bankers as the democrats and dont give a rats a$$ about the constitution. not a single true conservative or classic liberal in the whole bunch. wake up dummy!

          Reply

      • popkorn January 3rd, 2014 at 6:01 PM

        Every one of these global warming fruitcakes is a democrat. This big lie is just to make the United States pay money to loser countries because of the failure of their liberalism that they love and con not make work any longer.

            Reply

        • james January 3rd, 2014 at 6:02 PM

          oh yeah, not one republican?! do some research moron.

          “As recently as his 2010 book, No Apology, Romney wrote, “I believe that
          climate change is occurring. … I also believe that human activity is a
          contributing factor. I am uncertain how much of the warming, however,
          is attributable to man and how much is attributable to factors out of
          our control.””

          it is better to keep your mouth closed and look the fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.

              Reply

          • gorgonzo January 3rd, 2014 at 7:02 PM

            That’s just one more reason at least 4 million 2008 election Republican voters didn’t even bother to show up in 2012. They believe mostly the same things.

                Reply

          • enemy_of_the_statist January 3rd, 2014 at 9:00 PM

            Rinomney may be a republican but he is not a conservative, moron.

                Reply

          • Ralph Anderson January 4th, 2014 at 1:54 PM

            Romney is a conservative by any fair definition. Most of the commentators here, regardless of all the problems with global warming proof, are NOT CONSE3RVATIVES. Barry Goldwater and Bill Buckley were conservatives. The term for the modern right wingers from Fox to the Tea Baggers is REACTIONARY. Look it up.

                Reply

          • Amos2 January 3rd, 2014 at 10:53 PM

            RINO Romney is no Classic Conservative. He pandered to the wrong people and he got his just deserts.My only regret is he didn’t lose by a larger margin. Now, this phony along with another all-time loser, McCain, are sticking their ginder-filled noses into the 2016 race. May they both die of old age before they are ever considered again as contenders.

                Reply

          • beanbag2020 January 4th, 2014 at 2:10 AM

            Since when did Romney become a conservative?

                Reply

        • james January 3rd, 2014 at 6:04 PM

          they aren’t liberals!!!!!!! thomas jefferson was a liberal.

              Reply

          • popkorn January 4th, 2014 at 6:36 AM

            Wrong. Obama is a super liberal and he is the worst thing that has ever happened to this country.

                Reply

      • Jiskwa Agiya January 4th, 2014 at 5:37 AM

        And they are getting the vote by catering to environmentalism. Empty people who just want to save the earth from its inevitable destruction and humanity from its inevitable self destruction.

            Reply

    • Mickey January 3rd, 2014 at 5:30 PM

      Do you REALLY have to sneak “Jews” into the discussion, Heinrich? What century do you think this is?

          Reply

      • Amos2 January 3rd, 2014 at 10:57 PM

        So, who is the real anti-Semite? The elite Jews are still very relevant to the discussion since they hold positions that give them access to the levers of power.

            Reply

        • Mickey January 3rd, 2014 at 11:13 PM

          Which has what to do with them being Jews? I think it has more to do with them, as individuals, being ambitious and working hard. They don’t get where they are by sitting around drinking beer and watching NASCAR.

              Reply

          • Ralph Anderson January 4th, 2014 at 2:13 PM

            So true: the losers sit around and complain about the success of those of us who go to school, work hard, sacrifice for family and career, and achieve success through hard work. I am a Lutheran, but can testify that no matter what your faith or creed, there will be those who sit on their asses and were incapable to achieve academic or business success, so they are envious and jealous of those who have succeeded. It is much like the pretty boys in HS who never turned out for football, never spent a minute practicing in rain, snow, heat, cold, and every sort of foul weather, who put their names and reps on the line by playing in public where people can see them win or fail: but always would say “I could star in football. I was a running back in fifth grade and I am better than those guys playing now.” No you are not: you have neither the will, the guts, nor the talent to do anymore than talk. So if you succeed, harden yourself against the whining of the couch bound losers.

                Reply

          • Amos2 January 4th, 2014 at 4:09 PM

            Obama’s political and economic activities belie the fact that he and his handlers are not in league with the elite Jewish moneyed class (read Soros, Zuckerberg, Alderson, The Sulzberger Media Empire, etc.) Through Obama and the Democrats, they have co-opted the government to do their bidding. They are the real power behind Obama’s throne. They strive to keep the spotlight off themselves, by using Obama and his thugs in the Media, in government, in education and entertainment, to stir up chaos in the body politic and pit one citizen against another in class, generational, and ethnic warfare. While citizens are sparring with one another, the elitists are busy consolidating their power and exercising, through the Democrat party control, over the American populous. This is not rocket science. Americans need to open their eyes and see that their freedoms are being brokered away while they merely wring their hands and do nothing to ensure their future and the future of their posterity.

                Reply

        • Ralph Anderson January 4th, 2014 at 2:01 PM

          No they don’t. They only live on in your Nazi racism and bigotry. As my dad said about people like you after serving the entirety of WW II aboard a destroyer: I don’t understand these skinhead Nazis and right wingers. I spent five years killing those people to preserve our freedom. I guess there will always be morons. That was from a decorated war veteran and political conservative. The modern right is far closer to Mussolini that Buckley or Goldwater. They will probably take of the Republican Party (Lincoln is spinning in his grave along with Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower, and the other old time, true conservatives. The new crop are bigoted anti Semites and generally uninformed name callers.

              Reply

          • Amos2 January 4th, 2014 at 4:01 PM

            Zucker is part of the Obama and Democrat-Marxist open endeavor to disarm the American Citizen. There is not one Jew, who either owns, manages or writes for the Main Stream Media or is evolved in the communications and entertainment industry that does not support Obama and the Communist Left-Wing ideologues. Lenin was a Jew. Trotsky was a Jew. Most of the Soviet ideologues were Jews. You draw your own conclusion about the Jewish elitists like the Sulzberger and Newhouse families, who influence gun control policies in America. This is not anti-Semitism. This is calling it as it is.

                Reply

          • Ralph Anderson January 4th, 2014 at 4:56 PM

            Calling it as it is for a bigot and Nazi, maybe. That world only exists in your fevered imagination. I know it must have been hard to be dumber than most of your classmates, but there are Roman Catholics, Methodists, Episcipalians, Lutherans, Mormons, Unitarnians and agnostics who have had positions of power far more influential that your made up “evidence.”. But then mindless generalization without real evidence is the best your can do with your second grade education and shoe size IQ. Most of the Soviet idealogues WERE NOT JEWS. You are either lying (a Nazi trick from way back) or are just too ignorant. This kind of fascist progaganda (and that is what it sounds like Herr Goebbels!) is too lame and facile to fool anyone with any sense. You are not a patriot: you are a traitor and treacherous hyena. Go back to your shift at McDonalds.
            And by the way, one of the best parts of my life, on top of the best year I ever had in my business last year (had to pay a lot of B&O taxes for the quarter, but glad to do so since it meant I had a solid quarter), is attacking lying, thieving bigots like you. I agree with my dad on that: people like you don’t deserve to live in a free society.
            Go Hawks!

                Reply

          • Amos2 January 4th, 2014 at 7:27 PM

            People believe Communism to be a recent phenomenon. This is not true. It has been around for at least two thousand years. The Jewish community that grouped itself around Jesus was a religio-communist practicum. Judas, one of the Twelve, held the common purse. The “Acts of the Apostles” is replete with communist practices by early Jewish-Christians.

            Monasteries and convents that began to crop up in the 3rd and 4th centuries were religio-communistic in their rules and practices.

            Fast forward a couple of millennia and we find the Jew Karl Marx providing an economic justification for communism by basing his reasoning on the philosophy of the German Jew, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Other Jews, Lenin and Trotsky promoted Marx’s economic ideas in Russia.

            Today, we find the Sulzbergers, also Jews, and scions of a media empire encouraging Obama in his efforts to impose socialism, a form of communism upon Americans. This whole leveling enterprise, from beginning to end, breathes the Jewish ethos. This is a way of life many people espouse and see as useful for their purposes. Others do not. What is objectionable is the effort to shove this way of life down other peoples’ throats.

                Reply

          • Ralph Anderson January 4th, 2014 at 4:58 PM

            I assume you never heard of Buckley or Goldwater, who was by the way an Episcopalian. Typical.

                Reply

          • Amos2 January 4th, 2014 at 7:41 PM

            The Jewish media seek to aim the spotlight on any and all persons, groups, issues, events, that will distract the general population from everything and everyone but the elitist Jews. In the meantime, the elitist Jews, using their influence in communications, media, entertainment, politics, banking, education, seek to undermine the public confidence, cause chaos within the social comity, and accuse any and every one, who sees their objective as being anti-Semitic. I have supported the State of Israel, financially and with the written word. This is more than can be said for the elitist Jews in America, who pay lip service to Israel and seek only to use their influence and money to undermine America, its citizens and the American way of life. P.S. I worked for and supported Goldwater in his campaign against Johnson. I happen to know more about Goldwater than I believe you will ever know.

                Reply

    • cold January 3rd, 2014 at 6:46 PM

      I saw on the news that this game is being referred to as the Global Warming Bowl!

          Reply

      • John Clausen January 3rd, 2014 at 6:55 PM

        cold, Funniest Award Post of this article!!! Congratulations!

            Reply

    • Adam January 3rd, 2014 at 7:45 PM

      2007 “Melting sea ice means global warming”
      2013 “Freezing sea ice mean global warming”
      You tell me the stupidity

          Reply

      • erehwon53 January 4th, 2014 at 4:08 AM

        you comment is what is stupid

            Reply

        • Clayton Peterson January 4th, 2014 at 7:26 PM

          No, YOU are what is stupid!

              Reply

          • erehwon53 January 5th, 2014 at 3:19 AM

            what are you 9 years old.

                Reply

      • Earl Murphy January 4th, 2014 at 9:57 AM

        How many sunspots were there in 2005.. Hundreds, that means hotter in 2007
        How many sunspots were there in 2011.. near 0, means cold in 2013
        Sunspots plus a 2 year delay gives you cold or heat for the year. look at the charts since 1900.

            Reply

        • JeffyTheQuick January 4th, 2014 at 4:49 PM

          You mean to tell me that a glowing sphere on nuclear fusion 332,946 times the mass of the earth has something to do with the temperature here?

          Stop the presses! We cannot control the dumb masses with the sun anymore! It has to be man made!

          ***edit***
          For erehwon and his ilk, this is sarcasm, folks…

              Reply

    • methylchloroisothiazolinone January 3rd, 2014 at 8:30 PM

      would love to agree but why add the Semite part? You mean all liberal loons are Semitic?
      Sorry, don’t get it.

          Reply

    • Governor Lepetamane January 3rd, 2014 at 8:48 PM

      Too bad the professor from Gilligan’s Island is not aboard this stranded ship … he’d think of something !

          Reply

    • dj00t84l January 3rd, 2014 at 9:30 PM

      Kinda like you did on that 2T war lie and 5500 dead fiasco ? Benghazi lie concern for US deaths…

          Reply

    • noname January 4th, 2014 at 3:13 AM

      It’s summer in
      Antarctica!

          Reply

  7. kentex1146 January 3rd, 2014 at 12:42 PM

    And we can count on seeing some nitwits without a shirt…………why? Because the desire to be seen, even seen being an idiot, seems to be overwhelming to some.

    Without cameras on the scene……….most stupidity disappears.

        Reply

    • Nick SketchCat Wilson January 3rd, 2014 at 12:54 PM

      And yet here you are on the internet, striving to be seen.

          Reply

      • kentex1146 January 3rd, 2014 at 1:03 PM

        Wow, if I’d only known people could see me, I would’ve shaved, gotten all spiffed up.

            Reply

    • Jon January 3rd, 2014 at 1:05 PM

      Skiers and other extreme sports participants are dying at record rates because of GoPro cameras and cellphone cams.

          Reply

      • constructionworker January 3rd, 2014 at 2:12 PM

        GoPro cameras aren’t killing anyone that I know of.

            Reply

    • garylee123 January 3rd, 2014 at 2:06 PM

      I don’t know about that. There has always been a gene out there that causes people to start a sentence with “Hey, y’all….watch this”.

          Reply

  8. PJK in BD January 3rd, 2014 at 12:44 PM

    The NFL is crazy. Just switch the two NFC games to avoid this debacle. Who the hell wants to sit out in that kind of weather? Sure, it’s supposed to be an outside game, but not at the risk of spectator life and limb (or digits). The stadium may be close to sold out, but it will still be half-empty…

        Reply

    • ** Civilian Target ** January 3rd, 2014 at 12:45 PM

      Frozen brain syndrome.

          Reply

      • Warm Buns January 3rd, 2014 at 1:21 PM

        Which reminds me, is there a 7-11 near the stadium? I want to get a large Slurpee.

            Reply

    • acmoreno January 3rd, 2014 at 1:21 PM

      I was at the NFC championship game in 2008 between the Giants and the Packers and no one died or suffered. So, 80,000 people sat through the game just fine and allow the wimps of of society to sit home and watch the game.

          Reply

    • whatever January 3rd, 2014 at 2:29 PM

      Give me a break. I was outside last night for three hours in -15. If you bundle up its not that big of a deal. You must be from CA.

          Reply

      • PJK in BD January 3rd, 2014 at 2:53 PM

        Wrong – WI. I just have a brain. IF you spent three hours outside last night in -15°F (couldn’t have been in WI, since it only got down to -8°F, or so) I can just imagine how “fun” that was. Maybe with enough anti-freeze in your blood it was “fun”. I’ve sat out literally all day (that’s >8 hrs) when deer hunting in Northern WI and didn’t freeze, obviously. It just wasn’t exactly awesome, and I wouldn’t have wanted to spend >$100 for the privilege, to sit on an overly-crowded bleacher. Lambeau has shitty aluminum benches, and there isn’t enough room for the people to sit in November with medium-weight colthes, let alone now when they’re all “bundled up”…

            Reply

        • whatever January 3rd, 2014 at 3:25 PM

          Sorry Pal, Got down to -15 where I was and that was in WI. I’ve been to Jan games in Lambeau and it is still really fun. If I had the money I would go this weekend. You wear warm clothes and bring something to sit on. The stadium won’t be anywhere near half empty. And if you are going to complain about getting cold when deer hunting then why would you go? Just stay home with the rest of the wives.

              Reply

  9. BRJ in Chicago January 3rd, 2014 at 12:47 PM

    Who cares about this game anyway. No matter who wins WILL LOSE TO THE SEAHAWKS at Century Link Field. -8 or +8 the temperature still feels about the same. No wonder they are having a hard time selling out the stadium. Neither team has a chance for the Superbowl and the public doesn’t care. Back to Drudge for a more important story…like snow trolling…Chris Hayes is a moron.

        Reply

    • whatever January 3rd, 2014 at 2:34 PM

      Well, both teams have a better chance than Da Bears!

          Reply

  10. Carol Waltman January 3rd, 2014 at 12:47 PM

    Do you realize what you are doing. and they do it. You are asking people to sit through a game, a stupid game, expose themself to a the weather, get frostbite and may die or lose a leg or an foot or something and the people are stupid enough to do it but how many the next day called off work? They get paid to go to work but they rather risk their life for what a game?

        Reply

    • John January 3rd, 2014 at 12:56 PM

      I think the same way BUT it was done back in 1967. Anyone die or get sick as a result? Or are we just wimpy people these days? Just something to think about. I would not want to play in that weather even if I was offered $5 million. Not worth the risk for me but yet it was done in the past many times.

          Reply

    • RLS1024, Druid - American January 3rd, 2014 at 1:10 PM

      The temperature for tomorrow in my hometown of Copper Harbor MI is expected to be – 4°F to -11°F, which is normal for this time of year.
      So…what’s really your point?

          Reply

      • JohnnyTremain January 3rd, 2014 at 1:54 PM

        Understood, the temp for me tonight is -13 with wind chills around -25 …. but I’m not planning on going out and sitting in a lawn chair for 4+ hours in my backyard … maybe that was her point….

            Reply

    • Cindy Miller January 3rd, 2014 at 1:34 PM

      And then hope that Obamacare pays for it!

          Reply

    • The_RS_Gadfly January 3rd, 2014 at 2:07 PM

      So long as it isn’t raining, it shouldn’t be too much of an issue. And at those temps, it won’t be raining.

      When you pack that many people side by side, body heat helps a lot. Also, you dress appropriately for the weather, preferably layers. I haven’t been out in weather that cold, but I’ve been in Beaver stadium when it was well below freezing without trouble. On the other hand, I’ve been to a few rainy somewhat above freezing games and had to take shelter by the heaters. Some of the rain come in through the poncho, or worse, you get wet from sweat even though it’s cold. Once the dampness is in all the clothing, you’re done.

          Reply

  11. josetoyou January 3rd, 2014 at 12:49 PM

    Suckers, willing to sit in the freezing weather to watch a bunch of thugs (with few exceptions) play a grossly OVERPRICED game…

        Reply

  12. Commander McBragg January 3rd, 2014 at 12:52 PM

    A fine display of stupidity.

        Reply

    • Red_State_Eddie January 3rd, 2014 at 1:14 PM

      You mean AGW? Why yes, it is.

          Reply

  13. Catler January 3rd, 2014 at 12:59 PM

    Wait, it was COLDER 32 years ago? What about Globull warming? I thought it must have gotten hotter these past decades?

        Reply

    • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 1:41 PM

      ^ Another fine example of this country’s poor math and science education.

          Reply

      • Catler January 3rd, 2014 at 1:51 PM

        You and Al Gore are prime examples of your comment…..

            Reply

        • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 1:54 PM

          Tell you what. Why don’t you go get two studies that have been published in the most recent edition of the journal Nature Climate and tell me exactly why they’re wrong.

              Reply

          • Catler January 3rd, 2014 at 1:57 PM

            Because the writers were bought and paid for by the same people who OWN Al Gore and the companies profiting from the globull warming SCAM!

                Reply

          • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 1:59 PM

            Then they should be easy pickings! You should be able to disprove all of them if they’re all bought and paid for and using phony science. I’m still waiting. Just ONE article. Tell me why the study’s conclusions are incorrect.

                Reply

          • Catler January 3rd, 2014 at 2:06 PM

            http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2294560/The-great-green-1-The-hard-proof-finally-shows-global-warming-forecasts-costing-billions-WRONG-along.html

                Reply

          • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 2:23 PM

            Except this doesn’t prove anything wrong. The temperatures are still within the predicted levels.

            I’m asking YOU to go and read a paper in the latest edition of Nature Climate and tell me what’s wrong with it. If it’s all a scam as you say then it should be clear exactly what was wrong with their hypothesis or methodology.

                Reply

          • Catler January 3rd, 2014 at 2:49 PM

            If it is paid to be falsely written, it is. The fact is that it is now colder than ever. That alone disproves your mindless B.S. Now, go back to the basement and get off Mommy’s computer before she spanks you.

                Reply

          • RHO1953 January 3rd, 2014 at 5:00 PM

            Cite an independent source. One that doesn’t have a vested interest. You are simply a parrot for the company line.

                Reply

          • IllKeepMine January 3rd, 2014 at 2:10 PM

            You can’t prove a negative.

                Reply

          • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 2:25 PM

            I don’t think you understand what that means…

                Reply

          • IllKeepMine January 3rd, 2014 at 2:40 PM

            Modus Tollens. The trouble is you can’t apply it.

                Reply

          • Sodbuster January 3rd, 2014 at 3:32 PM

            Here’s a reasonable suggestion. Go back to articles written in these same journals 7 to15 years ago, and see if you can find one that correctly predicted the cooling that we have experienced since then. I’ve actually seen some that predicted a “few” years of cooling that might happen till maybe 2009.. then hotter than ever after that. But I’ve seen none that predicted the degree or duration of the cooling (or delayed warming) that we have seen. You can include articles on predicted sea level rise, sea ice increases, etc. It should be relatively easy to analyze their conclusions and methodology in hind sight. If what you discover is article after article of errant predictions, then be honest and open-minded enough to reconsider the objects of your trust.

                Reply

          • RHO1953 January 3rd, 2014 at 4:59 PM

            There are thousands. Go to Climate Depot and do some reading. It is just as credible as your propaganda rags that you cite so often.

                Reply

          • Skipper January 3rd, 2014 at 2:05 PM

            because they have no evidence

                Reply

          • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 2:14 PM

            Ah, so it’s their methodology for gathering temperature statistics. Okay, pick out a paper and tell me what exactly is wrong with the methodology.

                Reply

          • Sodbuster January 3rd, 2014 at 2:43 PM

            If someone makes a prediction, using any given methodology, and the predicted result fails to materialize, it’s safe to assume there was something wrong with the methodology, without even analyzing the methodology. Can you tell us how the methodology in this paper you reference differs from the methodology Al Gore used to come up with his obviously erroneous predictions?

                Reply

          • Skipper January 3rd, 2014 at 3:20 PM

            show me the evidence

                Reply

          • RHO1953 January 3rd, 2014 at 5:04 PM

            Bad siting for measuring stations (hot spots like over concrete, blacktop, airport taxiways), cherry picking of only measurements that confirm warming. They have omitted thousands of sites that have shown no warming. The Russians were livid when thousands of their data inputs were disregarded. The models don’t work, none of them have delivered proper results. Their “solution” was to simply skew the models with corrective multipliers until they yielded the desired results. Yeah, that’s real science alright.

                Reply

      • RHO1953 January 3rd, 2014 at 4:58 PM

        Yes, you are exactly that. But you are a fine example of the “follow me” crowd. Jump on the bandwagon and enjoy the ride.

            Reply

    • whatever January 3rd, 2014 at 2:22 PM

      Dude, did you read what you wrote?

          Reply

  14. robroy2 January 3rd, 2014 at 1:06 PM

    NFL Insanity!

        Reply

  15. RLS1024, Druid - American January 3rd, 2014 at 1:12 PM

    This is the way football should be played!
    Too many wusses out there!

        Reply

  16. FLOYDINFLORIDA January 3rd, 2014 at 1:13 PM

    No Big deal as the Packers have installed heating coils beneath the ground!
    They have ruined the field! The one Big advantage Green Bay had and they
    destroyed it! Now if the heating coils accidentally break before the game, well things do happen?

        Reply

    • Aussievick January 3rd, 2014 at 1:25 PM

      I noticed how bad the stadium turf looked last wk.

          Reply

  17. BuyGuns January 3rd, 2014 at 1:14 PM

    Follow the money………that’s all this is about…….robbing the American Tax Payer……..7.5 Billion spent on Global Warming in other countries…..paid by who? The US TAX PAYER!!! Un-F’ing Real.

        Reply

    • constructionworker January 3rd, 2014 at 2:13 PM

      More wealth re-distribution.

          Reply

    • 123Star January 3rd, 2014 at 3:24 PM

      Plus 9.1 million people out of work since obama was elected. Sad isn’t it. That means 9.1 million people are not paying taxes from work checks, but receiving government checks. Now Obamacare is going to hit America, HOW MUCH CAN WE THE PEOPLE ALLOW TO HAPPEN ?

          Reply

    • Sea Rock January 3rd, 2014 at 3:30 PM

      … “Follow the money” …

      Scandal: Obama, Gore, Goldman, Joyce Foundation CCX partners to fleece USA by Gregory DailOrange County Conservative April 27, 2010

      As posted at: http://www.examiner.com/article/scandal-obama-gore-goldman-joyce-foundation-ccx-partners-to-fleece-usa

      What is CCX, the Chicago Climate Exchange, projected to gross 10 Trillion a year is Cap-N-Tax passes. Obama played a pivotal role in the formation of the CCX. (The $10 Trillion Climate Fraud / Posted 04/28/2010 07:11 PM ET Read More At Investor’s Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/042810-531731-the-10-trillion-climate-fraud.htm#ixzz2pMwpBFRe Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook )

      Barrack Hussein Obama, Board Member of the Joyce Foundation, funded the formation of the CCX. ( Valerie Jarrett is still on the board, Obama’s top adviser.) Obama sat on board and funneled money to Ayer’s brother (wild huh, just a guy in his neighborhood) and to form the CCX …

      … AL Gore–Goldman Sachs– GIM: Hold on to your britches, London-based Generation Investment Management sees the Trillion and they purchased a huge stake in Chicago Climate Exchange (fifth largest shareholder.) The founder of GIM is none other than former Vice President Al Gore along with Goldman people. For example other founders are David Blood (former Goldman executive), Mark Ferguson (Goldman) and Peter Harris (Goldman) to name a few. “ …

      PART ONE: Glenn Beck explains Obama, Al Gore, Goldman Sachs, and CCX
      As posted at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75D_qghz5fw

      PART TWO: Glenn Beck explains Obama, Al Gore, Goldman Sachs, and CCX
      As posted at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyotJSZr1ww

      Glenn Beck Lord Christopher Monckton World Government p1 10.30.09.mp4
      As posted at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oHVv-SHIW4&list=PLA73CDF5C3EB5C294

      Glenn Beck Lord Christopher Monckton World Government p2 10.30.09.mp4
      As postedat: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jn-IHkULWnc&list=PLA73CDF5C3EB5C294

      Is Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty? / Lord Christopher Monckton
      As posted at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40

      The Great Global Warming Swindle Full Movie.
      As posted at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-m09lKtYT4

          Reply

  18. rufedup2 January 3rd, 2014 at 1:15 PM

    Prediction: at kickoff, the frozen football will shatter into pieces forcing officials to microwave a replacement ball every four plays. Spectators will need to be removed from seats with a giant heated spatula. Hot Cocoa and Chili sales records will be broken. Campfires will be built in the stands. Game attendees will not thaw out until Wednesday.

        Reply

  19. Kittery January 3rd, 2014 at 1:16 PM

    What’s the big deal, first half of December was like that in SLC and we didn’t make the news. How about some common sense and delay the game until it warms up a bit not only for the players but the spectators. OH, that’s right, no common sense these days.

        Reply

  20. Jennifer January 3rd, 2014 at 1:24 PM

    Global warming? Ummm…not so much. :-(

        Reply

    • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 1:39 PM

      Your understanding of weather vs climate? Not so much…

          Reply

      • Jeff January 3rd, 2014 at 1:44 PM

        I wouldn’t trust your understanding on any subject.

            Reply

        • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 1:47 PM

          Fine by me. I’ll tell you what, why don’t you go and read 10 of the most recent scientific papers written on the subject of global warming and then come back to me and point out what is wrong with them. There’s a new one this week in the journal Nature. I’ll wait…

              Reply

          • Jeff January 3rd, 2014 at 1:53 PM

            You trust these paid-off hacks? You need to educate yourself about life.

                Reply

          • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 1:56 PM

            It’s not about trust, it’s about verifiable evidence. How about you pick just one study in the most recent edition of Nature Climate and tell me why it’s wrong. Methodology? Conclusions? Again, I’ll wait…

                Reply

          • Jeff January 3rd, 2014 at 1:58 PM

            If you don’t own a car, don’t own a computer, and live in a grass hut, I’ll then listen to you. in other words, don’t be a hypocrite and stop trying to control people you disdain.

                Reply

          • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 2:02 PM

            Hey, I never said that I don’t contribute to the problem. I try to do my part but let’s be realistic, there’s only so much one person can do. Believing in the science doesn’t make me a hypocrite if I run my heat in the winter or AC in the summer.

            Still waiting on you to tell me what is wrong with a study. You seem so certain that global warming isn’t happening yet you appear to have no reason to back that claim up. Just ONE paper in the most recent Nature Climate. Just one. Tell me why it’s wrong.

                Reply

          • Jeff January 3rd, 2014 at 2:08 PM

            Follow the money. That’s all you need to do.

            I don’t care if it’s hotter or colder. That’s been going on since the beginning of time.

            Explain the Ice Ages to me and why things got cold and then warm without human influence. Also, do you think sun activity may be a factor and a wee bit more powerful than a few SUVs on the road?

            Like I said, you move into the grass hut and send all your money to the cause. That’s your call but leave level-headed, smart people out of it, and stop the distortions.

                Reply

          • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 2:13 PM

            Then we agree that the earth is getting hotter we just disagree about the cause. Good, that’s a start. And yes, the Earth has gone through several different climate changes in the past. The difference is the speed at which it’s happening now.

            How about you find a paper on anthropogenic global warming and tell my why that’s wrong. If the scientists are simply getting paid off to publish phony papers with bad science, then it should be easy to point out what is wrong with those studies. There are a couple of papers dealing with anthropogenic global warming in the latest edition of Nature Climate. Pick on of those and tell me why it’s wrong.

                Reply

          • svobodnik January 3rd, 2014 at 4:43 PM

            Why don’t you pick one of them and tell us why it’s “correct”….??

                Reply

          • TootlesMcgee January 4th, 2014 at 12:59 AM

            Exactly.

                Reply

          • RHO1953 January 3rd, 2014 at 4:57 PM

            No, the earth has not been getting hotter for almost eighteen years, and that is admitted in the UN climate report. They have excuses for why it is not, but there is no argument any longer that measurable warming stopped almost two decades ago.

                Reply

          • enemy_of_the_statist January 3rd, 2014 at 9:07 PM

            They’re wrong because they not only cherry pick their data, they also use statistical methods that wouldn’t survive peer review by Sister Murphy’s second grade class.
            You climaphobes are just rancid pimples on the arse of mankind.

                Reply

          • rickey January 3rd, 2014 at 9:58 PM

            Umm you are demanding that those of us who respectfully disagree with the falsehood of climate change go to a publication like Nature Climate and debunk it? Wouldn’t it be better just to return to the IPCC email scandal? Or was that fake, too?

            I can make up my own numbers, as CC alarmists do, in order to start a global means of taxation through “carbon credits”, but nature itself belies those “numbers” or “studies”.

            Follow the grant money for Pete’s sake.

            refresher: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/11/23/climategate-2-0-new-e-mails-rock-the-global-warming-debate/

                Reply

          • MarkMarkowitz January 3rd, 2014 at 2:13 PM

            Wasn’t this the year we were supposed to not have any ice caps left?

            This year is the largest they have been in something like 10 years.

            www dot dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/And-global-COOLING-Return-Arctic-ice-cap-grows-29-year dot html

                Reply

          • MetamorphosisCatalyst January 3rd, 2014 at 2:16 PM

            Yup. The Goreacle Himself said that our northern polar ice cap would be GONE “by the year 2013.”

                Reply

          • RHO1953 January 3rd, 2014 at 4:56 PM

            Nature Climate? Seriously? They aren’t going to publish anything that doesn’t back up their position. You are intellectually dishonest. You only cite left wing publications that won’t even allow a dissenting opinion. Why don’t YOU name a single dissenting opinion in any of those rags?

                Reply

          • down_with_Bathhouse_Barry January 3rd, 2014 at 5:16 PM

            Can fiction actually be “wrong”?

                Reply

          • John McCurdy January 3rd, 2014 at 2:10 PM

            Here’s the truth of the matter. There is a very small percentage of climate change that is not currently captured by the models, which all predict global temperature models based on natural factors (sun activity, tides, meta weather patterns, etc.). Science has postulated that the evidentiary gap can be filled by taking into account human activity. That’s a reasonable hypothesis. Another reasonable hypothesis, and the one which you will eventually come to realize is the correct hypothesis, is that the models are simply inadequate and that climate change is essentially entirely due to natural phenomena. But even if the latter is not true, we can do whatever we wish in the west to limit greenhouse emissions, etc., but unless we take over the world and establish a worldwide government, there is virtually no chance we can “save the planet” from mankind. Eventually, if you silly people are actually correct (you are not), the planet will return to balance by reducing human population and activity. Either way, we’ll all be fine. Or we won’t. Therefore, since any rational person would take a far more accepting attitude towards so-called global warming, the left (as usual) is really motivated by a sick desire to control people rather than any bonafide concern over the planet.

                Reply

          • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 2:29 PM

            You make the claim that there are other natural phenomena that are contributing to global warming. If you’re so sure this is the correct hypothesis then surely you can show me a study which proves you’re correct. A study that correctly identifies the cause of the rapid spike in global temperatures that is unrelated to the spike in greenhouse gases.

                Reply

          • svobodnik January 3rd, 2014 at 4:42 PM

            Solar activity is the most likely cause of either heating or cooling on a planetary scale. But then again, that’s kind of commons sense.

                Reply

          • RHO1953 January 3rd, 2014 at 4:54 PM

            There are thousands. Do some research, oh lazy one. See what the Russian Academy of Science has to say. There is NO rapid spike in temperature. The only one to be found is the rigged chart that omits the Maunder Minimum in order to give the impression of a temperature spike. The AGW shills deliberately omitted the data.

                Reply

          • Al Stewart January 3rd, 2014 at 5:05 PM

            Please explain the “warming” on Mars that has been identified. Are all those SUV’s to blame? All the Martians blowing hot air? All those coal mines? Fracking? Republicans? Warm oceans trapping all that hot air?
            Can’t wait for this answer

                Reply

          • down_with_Bathhouse_Barry January 3rd, 2014 at 5:15 PM

            Or, in the alternative, he could just do what your guys do and make up some data to justify his conclusion. That would be alot easier, wouldn’t it?

                Reply

          • CincyChris January 4th, 2014 at 10:00 AM

            Dont Followme- You should stop arguing with John McCurdy- you see, you two are after the same endgame- a New World Order, and forced population reduction (i.e. mass murder). You two just can’t agree on a viable mode to achieve it! (Psycopaths.)

                Reply

          • fulredy January 3rd, 2014 at 4:10 PM

            Good post. Another issue is how much will we have to spend to see any improvement to the problem as identified by these climate change scientists? These people display an arrogant, idealistic attitude that is truly absurd.

                Reply

          • CincyChris January 4th, 2014 at 9:55 AM

            Whoa! Hold up! It’s good that you’ve figured out that man-made global warming is a farce, but to me, you sound just as bad, if not worse, than “the left”!

            “..unless we take over the world and establish a worldwide government..”! (Are you f-ing kidding me?) “..the planet will return to balance by reducing human population..”. (Eugenics)

            Those are the phrases of a Progressive Republican Neocon; not a whole lot different than “the left”, except their acceptance of AGW. Those phrases are spoken by a person who wishes to control the free will of others, much like “the left”.

            This proves once and for all that there is not much difference between “left” and “right”- they agree on controlling the world, just not on how to go about it.

            The paradigm of life is not “left” or “right”, or Democrat or Republican, it is freedom or oppression! Get with the program! And if you believe that reducing human population is good for the planet, why don’t you do us all a favor then, and go ahead and kill yourself!

            (At least 40 people agree with you, SMH- lemmings.)

                Reply

          • John McCurdy January 4th, 2014 at 1:03 PM

            Sorry, CincyChris…you misunderstood my point. You and I are in violent agreement, I suspect.

            I was trying to point out the futility of it all. I thought that would have been obvious; but you’re correct to criticize my post since these days one cannot take for granted that someone might not actually believe worldwide government to be a desirable and viable solution.

            FWIW, my personal political beliefs are far more libertarian but strictly constitutional.

            Also, I haven’t figured out that man-made global warming is a farce. My point was that if man-made global warming is real there’s nothing we can do about it. Global government is the only way we could do anything about it, but that won’t happen. Ultimately, if man causes global warming man will suffer the consequences.

            What I do believe is that attributing the gap in our knowledge to man’s activities is the most enticing hypothesis for a number of reasons (political, the ability to receive grants, the desire to control, etc.). However, it’s not the only viable hypothesis.

            I suspect the ecosystem is far more capable of self-correction than climate change advocates believe it is, and that global warming (what little there is…remember we’re talking about 1 degree of change over the past century) will be negated. If it really exists.

            (I also believe that if there has been significant warming over the past century we will eventually understand that it was caused by systemic inputs beyond our control).

                Reply

          • InternetSavage January 3rd, 2014 at 3:23 PM

            What if the “evidence” is rigged because that’s never happened before right?

                Reply

          • svobodnik January 3rd, 2014 at 4:40 PM

            Marxist methodology. These scientists receive grants in order to “prove” Global Warming. They are already scientifically biased because they want the money.

            Now that they can’t “prove” Global Warming, they then changed the idea to “Climate Change” – again based upon the presumption that it’s related to man-made activity. At the heart of this activity is the idea that the “elites” get to tell everyone else how to live – how much fossil fuel to burn, etc.

                Reply

          • RHO1953 January 3rd, 2014 at 4:51 PM

            We have been down this path. The AGW people got caught red handed falsifying data. They take raw data and “correct” it so it shows warming that is nonexistent. Don’t trust your own common sense, don’t believe the snow and ice and bitter cold. Don’t trust the last two summers of cool weather or the thousands of cold temperature records. Don’t trust the Russian scientists or the others who are laughing at this. Just believe your government that wants to raise taxes and control your travel and lifestyle.

                Reply

          • Jim Sears January 3rd, 2014 at 6:40 PM

            methodology, set-up of experiments, following of standard theory/proof rules to validate results, vilianization of all that challenge or question the data or results…..and the list goes on and on for what is wrong with the reports you quote. All predictions of rise in temps and sea levels have been drastically wrong. Any other “theory” with this many incorrect results would have been thrown out the window years ago.

                Reply

          • Punisher January 3rd, 2014 at 3:35 PM

            http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=732&Itemid=1

                Reply

          • Punisher January 3rd, 2014 at 3:40 PM

            This guy is a pretty good read. http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=732&Itemid=1

                Reply

          • vonvervengarten January 3rd, 2014 at 4:08 PM

            The papers that say higher temps, lower temps, stronger storms, weaker storms, less snow, more snow, less ice, more ice are all markers of global warming? Yeah, we’ve already seen it all, all day every day on the TV, in the papers, on blogs and in tweets. All nicely pushed on a population that can see how the con works. And amazingly, the less snow, more snow, higher/lower temps, less/ more ice problems are always fixable with more money, never less.

                Reply

          • RHO1953 January 3rd, 2014 at 4:48 PM

            And what demographic is that particular periodical marketing itself to? Not the people who think this is silly. They have a vested interest in perpetuating the sham of global warming, as do the “scientists” who are selling themselves like two dollar a night hookers for funding.

                Reply

          • down_with_Bathhouse_Barry January 3rd, 2014 at 5:14 PM

            Why do you supposed the CRU at East Anglia found it necessary to falsify the data in their studies? It’s sort of a waste of time to read these papers when you’re in possession of the knowledge that these people will simply make things up and put the falsified date in their studies when the actual data doesn’t work, isn’t it? Once you know someone is a liar or a group contains liars, how are you supposed to know when they’re telling the truth?

                Reply

      • Diana Lee January 3rd, 2014 at 1:52 PM

        Funny how that “weather versus climate” distinction goes away when a hurricane or tornado hits, all of a sudden it’s “this is what global warming looks like”.

            Reply

        • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 1:58 PM

          News organizations that report that kind of nonsense are wrong to do so. What they are right to report is the increase in strength over the last couple of years of these storms.

              Reply

          • JMD52 January 3rd, 2014 at 3:21 PM

            And that’s not true either.

                Reply

          • InternetSavage January 3rd, 2014 at 3:25 PM

            Except the last couple of years hurricane activity has dropped significantly, funny how the con artists can’t get nature to go along with their giant scam.

                Reply

          • popkorn January 3rd, 2014 at 6:02 PM

            They do not need to. They have democrats and the liberal media for that.

                Reply

          • dnhook January 3rd, 2014 at 3:41 PM

            There has been ZERO increase in strength. What should be reported is morons like yourself who spit out crapola like this and don’t back it up with…oh…I don’t know….FACTS!!

                Reply

          • svobodnik January 3rd, 2014 at 4:34 PM

            But is that really true? I read a book on the 1900 storm that destroyed Galveston. That was one “mutha” of a storm.

                Reply

          • Jim Sears January 3rd, 2014 at 6:35 PM

            Wow, step away from the koolaid. Hurricanes every year since Katrina have been lower than or equal to historical averages. This season was the most calm in decades. This also was one of the lowest seasons for number of tornadoes in decades. The news reports as if every storm is one of many and the worst ever toget viewers, and thus advertising, and because their liberal masters in DC need the favor….and why don’t you do some research on the temp monitoring stations…even before the global warming scam began there was a consensus that most stations did not meet the agreed upon standards for placement from heat sources, vents, blacktop, airport runways, etc….and 6-7 years ago 100′s of stations in northern areas like Siberia were excluded from the data because they were slanting it, yep cold temps would bring the average down and blow the warming hysteria mob’s theory out of the water…so your beliefs are based on special effects(Inconvenient Truth), fabricated and manipulated data, skewed data, lies, lies and more lies, and a very short term and misunderstood understanding of climate.

                Reply

          • 123Star January 4th, 2014 at 12:50 AM

            weatherman jim, most calm in decades tell that to the MANY cities that have been removed from earth.

                Reply

          • DelQ January 3rd, 2014 at 7:10 PM

            These storms are not “increasing” in strength you rubes…we humans have developed more sophisticated measuring instruments, technology that was unavailable to meteorologists and scientists in past decades. You want an example? Laser based speed detectors are 30% more accurate than the old “radar guns” used by police to measure your speed. Don’t buy into the hype of these fake “experts” who cannot tell you accurately how long a specific cold or warm front is going to stay in your part of the country past 72 hours. Do you really trust these morons and their predictions for 10 years/20 years or 50 years in the future – for the entire planet? Get a grip on reality.

                Reply

      • MetamorphosisCatalyst January 3rd, 2014 at 2:02 PM

        The funny thing about this is that there will always be an obfuscation, there will always be another excuse for why the obvious isn’t so.
        This one (“weather” vs. “climate”) is an especially effective deflection, because: how long will it take before we agree that we’re talking about “climate” and not “weather”? 25 years? 50 years? 1,000 years?
        It will never be long enough for you suckers.
        Disbelieve your lying eyes! Do not look at the man behind that curtain!
        Frankly, it’s getting a bit embarrassing.

            Reply

        • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 2:10 PM

          Eventually yes, we’re going to see increased temperatures worldwide (and that is in fact what we’re seeing). There are still going to be places that in the winter get very cold. Over the last 100 years, global temperatures on average haven’t increased all that much. The average increase for the globe is about 1.53 degrees F. This will have a huge effect on the planet as a whole but not so much in your local area. It is enough for sea temperatures to rise significantly leading to decreased ice pack which in turn raises the sea level.

              Reply

          • MetamorphosisCatalyst January 3rd, 2014 at 2:15 PM

            You say this as though I haven’t heard it fifty-six quintillion times already.
            It’s the exact same thing you deebags have been saying for the past 25 years.

                Reply

          • Dont Followme January 3rd, 2014 at 2:29 PM

            Can’t argue based on facts so resort to name calling. Thanks for coming out.

                Reply

          • MetamorphosisCatalyst January 3rd, 2014 at 2:47 PM

            FACT: The worldwide average temperatures have not changed for 17 years.
            But you’ll just say that the excess energy is being stored in the deep ocean.
            This is why arguing facts with you types is useless. You just obfuscate again.
            Here’s another FACT for you: The staff of the East Anglia University was caught RED HANDED forging scientific data, and talking about it via email, in order to keep the scientific grant money flowing.

                Reply

          • dnhook January 3rd, 2014 at 3:44 PM

            When the name fits…

                Reply

          • MetamorphosisCatalyst January 3rd, 2014 at 6:02 PM

            Cat got your tongue?

                Reply

          • Burbank Burner January 3rd, 2014 at 5:06 PM

            What’s it like to go through life with absolutely no brains in your head?

                Reply

          • Dwan Parkyn January 4th, 2014 at 2:48 AM

            The decreased ice pack that has now captured two ships? In the summer?

                Reply

      • RHO1953 January 3rd, 2014 at 4:45 PM

        You guys really slay me. When it is hot is because of global warming and climate change,not weather. When it is cold it is just weather and not climate. You tie your hypocritical butt into knots trying to defend this stupidity.

            Reply

      • gorgonzo January 3rd, 2014 at 7:06 PM

        Look, I’d really like to argue your faulty logic as a “believer” in your RELIGION of global warming, but it’s not worth it. So why don’t you and your buddy algore go jump off a bridge, take your Grant whoring “scientist” buddies with you.

            Reply

  21. nhale January 3rd, 2014 at 1:24 PM

    Playing this game just makes a mockery out of Goodell’s player safety policy, not to mention the fans. IMO

        Reply

  22. DiscustedONE January 3rd, 2014 at 1:28 PM

    I would like to see ice sickles on Al Gores face.

        Reply

    • Elizabeth Fisher January 3rd, 2014 at 1:49 PM

      Al Gore will NOT be at the game. He will be too busy trying to come up with an explanation of how the global scientists, and the rescue vessel, got trapped in ice… while studying global warming.

          Reply

    • dnhook January 3rd, 2014 at 3:44 PM

      He’s too busy. He jetted off to his home in the islands.

          Reply

  23. Dave Edmonds January 3rd, 2014 at 1:33 PM

    Not being a big sport fan of really any sport I cannot imagine what would drive a person to sit in a stadium in those conditions? Can anyone?

        Reply

  24. JohnnyTremain January 3rd, 2014 at 1:40 PM

    Can’t believe these pussies are gonna play in that….they’ll call the game…just wait….

        Reply

    • Robert Jones January 3rd, 2014 at 1:41 PM

      Man, I hope they don’t. Nothing would surprise me anymore. I ve been looking forward to this game all week

          Reply

  25. Jeff January 3rd, 2014 at 1:43 PM

    Mentally, the Niners aren’t ready for this. They are a better team, but this weather is the equalizer.

    Packers win.

        Reply

    • Prelusive007 January 3rd, 2014 at 2:13 PM

      If the Niners win, they’re planning to change their name to the San Francisco Packers. It’s a liberal thing.

          Reply

  26. Mamzer_FEMA_REGION_IV January 3rd, 2014 at 1:44 PM

    FROZEN BAY 2014 Go Packers! Can I git some more cheeeese on that?

        Reply

  27. pologuy January 3rd, 2014 at 1:45 PM

    All you right wing nut jobs are the same. This is climate change not global
    warming. We changed the name when it became obvious global warming
    was too easy to dispute.

        Reply

    • Frank Castle January 3rd, 2014 at 1:49 PM

      So carbon emissions and greenhouse gases are causing colder weather? If you have been following the climate you would know the winters keep getting colder. The Sun is putting out record low heat and the Sun is the primary body that controls the Earths climate.

          Reply

    • Catler January 3rd, 2014 at 1:52 PM

      You changed the name when it came out that there has been no “warming” in 17 years…..You had to try to keep fooling the liberal idiots.

          Reply

      • bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 5:30 PM

        They don’t have to try to hard. They’re still fooled. They think they’re getting Barrycare, or is it barely care.

            Reply

  28. BeaveVillage January 3rd, 2014 at 1:45 PM

    I’m gonna tell Obama NO on UN Global Climate Treaty.

        Reply

  29. Robert Denis January 3rd, 2014 at 1:45 PM

    I was at the Ice bowl. I don’t want to see the record broken. Anybody know where the weather station is at the Green Bay Airport ?

        Reply

    • Prelusive007 January 3rd, 2014 at 2:10 PM

      ah…. I’ll take a guess.

      At the Green Bay Airport?

          Reply

    • bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 5:27 PM

      I think it’s at the lake.

          Reply

      • Robert Denis January 3rd, 2014 at 5:29 PM

        I’m on it propane torch in hand

            Reply

        • bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 5:31 PM

          With all this global warming you’re gonna need it.

              Reply

  30. Tumek January 3rd, 2014 at 1:49 PM

    Where is global warming now that we need it?

        Reply

  31. Skipper January 3rd, 2014 at 1:57 PM

    Al Gore and his Buddy will be at the game in T shirts , Drunk and talkin sht

        Reply

  32. Jeff Dalrymple January 3rd, 2014 at 1:58 PM

    “what would make somebody sit and watch that?”— it’s called fandom, its fun, its ridiculous and it can bring a community together. people see their team as a reflection of themselves on the field. call it simple mindedness all youd like, you have that right!…now go away and stop ruining the party. people act as if there’s gonna be frozen corpses everywhere, gimme a break already. the NFL NEEDS these games, all fans look forward to it each season. heck, even the europeans took notice of our snow games this year and enjoyed it…that says alot right there lol

        Reply

    • MetamorphosisCatalyst January 3rd, 2014 at 2:04 PM

      The behavior I’ve never understood is the guys who go to those frozen games HALF NAKED with the team names pained on their beer guts, one letter per person.

          Reply

      • Jeff Dalrymple January 3rd, 2014 at 2:07 PM

        i agree…..EFF THAT!

            Reply

  33. Wills510 January 3rd, 2014 at 1:59 PM

    The “global warming fools” are now running around with their hair on fire, still sounding the alarm that global warming is a real bad thing. The photo of “Hatchet” Jack is what they would like everyone to believe is happeining.

        Reply

  34. Frank Castle January 3rd, 2014 at 2:03 PM

    Funny how Global warming turned into Climate Change when it was proven that the climate was getting colder.

        Reply

  35. djh January 3rd, 2014 at 2:08 PM

    Man, I wouldn’t want to kick that ball.

        Reply

  36. Prelusive007 January 3rd, 2014 at 2:09 PM

    Look at the temps across the nation. Can you imagine how freaking cold it would be if there were no ”warming”?!

    Thank God for global warming.
    ~and~
    Thank God there’s no global cooling.

        Reply

  37. Jim Hise January 3rd, 2014 at 2:10 PM

    What you hear from goreites today is just what you get from a snake. Slithering around, changing the impact and never admitting they had it wrong.

        Reply

  38. constructionworker January 3rd, 2014 at 2:14 PM

    The earth has it’s own cycles, influenced by sun activity, who would’ve thought?

        Reply

  39. bb_959 January 3rd, 2014 at 2:14 PM

    Psalm 147:16
    He gives snow like wool;
    He scatters the frost like ashes.
    17 He casts forth His ice as fragments;
    Who can stand before His cold?

        Reply

  40. whatever January 3rd, 2014 at 2:17 PM

    Could we just all agree that Lambeau Field is the most awesome stadium in the world and that Green Bay Packer fans are the most awesome fans in the world? I mean, you really can’t argue against that statement.

        Reply

  41. jfgalt January 3rd, 2014 at 2:23 PM

    It seems like solar warming and cooling have more to do with it than anything. There is direct correlation with earth’s temperatures and solar cycles, sunspots, etc. All the other stuff is hokum but it is sensational enough and can be used to generate money for research scientists that otherwise couldn’t get funding to study something like the relationship between strippers’ tips and the kind of liquor served at their strip joint.

        Reply

  42. Disqus January 3rd, 2014 at 2:25 PM

    Global warming is such an annoyance. Oh wait…

        Reply

  43. Smitty January 3rd, 2014 at 2:29 PM

    Al Snore, save us!!

        Reply

  44. ferm January 3rd, 2014 at 2:31 PM

    fa fa fa fa fagedaboudid.

        Reply

  45. santa January 3rd, 2014 at 2:33 PM

    welcome to the party pals!

        Reply

  46. ShinTayloNY January 3rd, 2014 at 2:33 PM

    Is God a Democrat?

    1. Hurricane heads straight for Tampa during the Republican National Convention.
    2. Hurricane Sandy hits just before the election giving Obama another chance to show his leadership.
    3. Major winter storm hits taking up most of the news coverage just when Republicans are supposed to be shreaking about the ACA’s problems.

        Reply

    • Catler January 3rd, 2014 at 2:50 PM

      Storms like that are the work of Satan. Which proves that Democrats are pure EVIL.

          Reply

  47. pruttmaster January 3rd, 2014 at 2:34 PM

    Im guessing the size of the jockstrap “cup” drops on these cold days… does the football shrink too? ;D

        Reply

    • Juvenal January 3rd, 2014 at 6:16 PM

      I don’t know, but I stepped outside to get the paper this morning in my skivvies, and my nads are still up hugging my liver trying to get warm.

          Reply

  48. Proud American January 3rd, 2014 at 2:43 PM

    Everyone please send more money to Al Gore so he can help stop the upcoming ice age!!!

        Reply

  49. leebert January 3rd, 2014 at 2:46 PM

    The coldest game (and still most likely will be) was the Bengals vs. Chargers (1982) playoff game where it was 9 degrees below zero with a wind chill factor making it 37 degrees below zero. As a long time Charger fan, I remember this game. Sadly, my team (and coach Coryell) lost the playoff game and a promising season was over.

        Reply

  50. Patton January 3rd, 2014 at 2:47 PM

    Even though the Freezer Bowl was only -9°. the windchill was -57°. Gusts of 35mph winds. It was REALLY the coldest game ever. Ask Forrestt Gregg, he played in the Ice Bowl, and coached the Bengals in the Freezer Bowl.

        Reply

  51. skipper January 3rd, 2014 at 2:52 PM

    American hubris can be pretty ugly.

        Reply

  52. Thomas January 3rd, 2014 at 2:55 PM

    They must be paid well to pound the turf in rain, snow, sleet, and bitterly cold temps. Idiots

        Reply

  53. tacomatuttle January 3rd, 2014 at 2:56 PM

    Hey it’s winter and it’s supposed to be cold and snowy
    although no doubt those in Green Bay might love some of that promised globull warming

        Reply

  54. Uncle Milo January 3rd, 2014 at 3:01 PM

    Looks like Al Gores snake oil has frozen solid.

        Reply

  55. Nucking Futs January 3rd, 2014 at 3:02 PM

    It’s Green Bay, they will still sell out. Layers of clothes and layers of antifreeze to be had by all….. yay!

        Reply

  56. Texas Patriot January 3rd, 2014 at 3:03 PM

    SF: better bring your mittens! Hahaha.

        Reply

    • bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 5:24 PM

      The 3 little kittens have lost their mittens.

          Reply

  57. Real_Fine_Cuppacoffee January 3rd, 2014 at 3:08 PM

    Dang ol global warming again. Blast it! Poor ol San Franciso 49ers and Green Bay Packers are gonna suffer from it. Al Gore, make it stop! Tax us more please!! Anything to stop this terrible global warming.

        Reply

  58. denverkid666 January 3rd, 2014 at 3:12 PM

    I’m from Packerland, and recall flying back to my college town during wintry days in the late 60s, early 70s when Packer fans returning to wherever from either Green Bay or Milwaukee (where the Pack sometimes played some home games in the old county stadium) would swagger onto the plane directly from the tarmac (usually prop jets) all tanked up on schnaaps or whatnot (and still nipping), dressed for the arctic regions. They were a lively bunch, though this “exuberant” behavior would not be tolerated on commercial aircraft in these dreary times! Go Pack!!!

        Reply

  59. George Jang January 3rd, 2014 at 3:25 PM

    Global warming “scientist” will claim that the earth is melting when the temperature at the game rises to -5 degrees!

        Reply

    • bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 3:38 PM

      Are you one of those deniers?

          Reply

      • MetamorphosisCatalyst January 3rd, 2014 at 4:31 PM

        Are you one of those f@gg0ts?

            Reply

      • RHO1953 January 3rd, 2014 at 5:06 PM

        I am. Anyone who isn’t at this point is an imbecile. Are you one of those slow learners?

            Reply

      • freedomlost January 3rd, 2014 at 5:34 PM

        I admit it. I’m coming out of the closet TODAY. Listen up world, I AM A DENIER!!

            Reply

  60. Jaels_Song January 3rd, 2014 at 3:30 PM

    Al Gore will sell you carbon credit to cover the cost of the CO² that spews from his mouth each time he opens it.

        Reply

  61. DirtBagg January 3rd, 2014 at 3:35 PM

    “Climate Change” a.k.a. “Global Warming” is a United Nations project (with paid scientists and scientific “studies”), to legitimize a theory of impending doom for the planet unless immediate, drastic measures aren’t taken. The real purpose of this fear mongering was not to save the inhabitants of the earth but to Tax them. Each and every one of them, who dare to use more than “their allotted” share of it’s resources, which as we all know, belong to the Elite and privileged. ie:Bill Gates, the Rockefellers, the Royals.etc. Oh and they would also like a 90% reduction in the population on “their” planet as well, so most of you out there Please! “stop being part of the problem and become part of the solution” Take your shots. Eat your GMO’s, Breath your Chemtrails, Drink your Fluoride, Give up your Liberties, Obey all authority and ALL will be well.

        Reply

  62. Allentown January 3rd, 2014 at 3:37 PM

    Well obviously, our attempts at reducing Global Warming have worked. :0)

    We should get billions of dollars of our money back for our efforts, seeing as how we brought down the temperatures so much. :0D

        Reply

  63. leopardcolony January 3rd, 2014 at 3:38 PM

    If it wasn’t for “global warming” it would be much colder! Search the web for “orbits and ice ages”. To quote one scientist “Another important aspect to consider is that the orbital configuration we now have is almost exactly where it was 20,000 years ago, during the Last Glacial Maximum, but this time we’re near a glacial minimum,” he said. “If you think about what the difference is between then and now, it’s not the orbital configuration, it’s the CO2.”

        Reply

    • MetamorphosisCatalyst January 3rd, 2014 at 4:30 PM

      Riiiiiiiiiight.

          Reply

  64. imatellau January 3rd, 2014 at 3:44 PM

    Was al on that ship and they just dont want to tell us?

        Reply

    • Jaels_Song January 3rd, 2014 at 3:45 PM

      He was sharing a cabin with Cynthia McKinney…

          Reply

  65. merdenoire January 3rd, 2014 at 3:45 PM

    Screw professional sports! They went to ESPN, ie PAY TV, and left us poor people in the dark.

        Reply

  66. leopardcolony January 3rd, 2014 at 3:46 PM

    Most news coverage of scientists stranded in Antarctica fail to mention their goal was to prove global warming and ice melt. Seems even in Antarctic summer the ice is now thicker and reaches farther than before. What a surprise! Many are obsessed with warming. If they bothered to include known causes of cooling, ie. ice ages, they would find that warming is on hold. But only for a short while. Because we should be in an ice age now, off setting the greenhouse effect. Eventually temperatures will rise as green house effect continues to drive temperatures up and eventually it will get hotter. Just not right now.

        Reply

    • Jaels_Song January 3rd, 2014 at 3:47 PM

      LOL!

          Reply

  67. Jaels_Song January 3rd, 2014 at 3:49 PM

    If Al Gore finds this heat uncomfortable, I volunteer to give him a frozen enema.

        Reply

  68. AmericanBraveheart January 3rd, 2014 at 3:54 PM

    I am going to start stockpiling ice blocks for the End Time. Should make billions in profits for this frozen stuff!

        Reply

  69. historyguy48 January 3rd, 2014 at 3:54 PM

    I don’t care how much they are being paid playing football in below zero weather is insane while those foolish enough to freeze their butts off sitting in the stands to watch the game redefine the word “dumb”.

        Reply

    • MetamorphosisCatalyst January 3rd, 2014 at 4:29 PM

      I would play in the cold, wearing players’ standard thermal underwear, for a few million a year.
      Don’t know what it would take for you. Whatever.

          Reply

      • historyguy48 January 4th, 2014 at 11:05 AM

        If your playing your biggest problem would be sweating. It’s sitting on your duff and watching the game while freezing that duff off that I wouldn’t do.
        Television, my easy chair, a cold beer, and some good cheese and crackers inside my nice warm house with its clean bathrooms and nobody sitting behind you that would puke all over your jacket.

            Reply

  70. ocean January 3rd, 2014 at 3:55 PM

    That looks like a Frozen Global Warming Democrat
    trying to enroll using the Obamacare website
    HealthCare.

        Reply

    • BalsterFudd357 January 3rd, 2014 at 5:03 PM

      Isn’t that the dude on “Jerimiah Johnson” That kilt the bear that kilt him?
      Hawkin 50 cal….
      Thought he looked familiar!
      LOL

          Reply

      • denverkid666 January 3rd, 2014 at 6:26 PM

        Dude, dude…that’s the one and only Jack Nicholson as Jack Torrance in Kubrick’s “The Shining.” You’re welcome!

            Reply

  71. AmericanBraveheart January 3rd, 2014 at 3:56 PM

    Can we donate Tony Romo to the city of Green Bay ? He needs to be put on ice. He SUCKS.

        Reply

  72. fulredy January 3rd, 2014 at 3:57 PM

    They talk about player safety and yet plan on playing a game in -8 degree temperatures. Exposed skin freezes in 15 minutes.

        Reply

    • Tee Hee Word January 3rd, 2014 at 4:21 PM

      you’ve got the wrong idea, pal. the players will be wearing full body thermal wear. a little cold isn’t going to injure them.

      PS football has always been played in the elements. these big, air conditioned domes are relatively new to the scene.

      and dont worry. football is for men. you will never have to play a down in your life.

          Reply

      • fulredy January 3rd, 2014 at 4:58 PM

        Why don’t we ask the players? Want to bet on what their opinion would be? BTW, I played in both high school and college, second team All-American.

            Reply

  73. Carrie Singer January 3rd, 2014 at 4:10 PM

    If you think the weather is cold, the greed of the players, owners, and media is even colder.

        Reply

    • Tee Hee Word January 3rd, 2014 at 4:19 PM

      ugh. go have another bowl of granola and strum your acoustic guitar in the park

          Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:57 PM

      Move to Colorado and stay stoned. It’s a great lifestyle choice…

          Reply

  74. Anyone but Obama January 3rd, 2014 at 4:19 PM

    Who’s going to this game? You got to be out of your mind to freeze your butt off just to watch a football game. With all the millions of dollars spent on players, you would think the geniuses running the show would build stadiums with domes.

    This way fans will show up, will buy food and other things and most importantly, will ENJOY the game. It will also give both teams the same advantage of playing indoors and not have weather affect it.

    MORE MONEY will be made by EVERYONE. Tickets can be cheaper because every game will sell out.

    Oh yeah and for you people that think football should be played in all kinds of weather, you’re morons. Whenever indoor playing fields are mentioned, that’s their ONLY reply, that football should be played outdoors no matter the weather.

    Usually the ones screaming this the loudest don’t even go to games, they watch on a 50 inch TV at home or in a bar like I do. You wouldn’t catch me at a game even if it was free in cold weather or any weather for that matter. I got my remote and can do rewind, slo mo and all that fancy stuff.

        Reply

    • Tee Hee Word January 3rd, 2014 at 4:21 PM

      i did not read this post.

          Reply

    • MetamorphosisCatalyst January 3rd, 2014 at 4:27 PM

      wut

          Reply

    • WealthOfNations January 3rd, 2014 at 5:00 PM

      That’s just plain pvssy talk!

          Reply

  75. whatever3210 January 3rd, 2014 at 4:26 PM

    All global warming alarmists should be put on a ship and sent to check on all that melting ice.

        Reply

  76. TeaParty100 January 3rd, 2014 at 4:40 PM

    Wouldn’t it seem logical to have the game anyplace else in an available stadium in one of the NFL cities? I can just hear them now..” yep, I was at the game and have a hand missing to prove it ”

    Absolutely crazy….

        Reply

    • WealthOfNations January 3rd, 2014 at 4:59 PM

      Packers fans aren’t pvssies.

          Reply

      • ruzzty January 3rd, 2014 at 10:06 PM

        Cue Monte Pytons one arm, one leg knight.

            Reply

        • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:54 PM

          I’m not cold yet!

              Reply

  77. OldTimerUSNCB January 3rd, 2014 at 4:49 PM

    I can remember back in the Sixties when Broadway Joe got made fun of for wearing panty hose during one of his NY games when it was colder than a well diggers butt.

        Reply

  78. BalsterFudd357 January 3rd, 2014 at 5:00 PM

    Isn’t that the dude on “Jerimiah Johnson” That kilt the bear that kilt him?
    Hawkin 50 cal….
    Thought he looked familiar!
    LOL

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:53 PM

      That mountain lion never did get used to him…

          Reply

  79. drvannostrum January 3rd, 2014 at 5:00 PM

    Screw -8. That’s doable. The question is…any wind in the forecast?

        Reply

    • BalsterFudd357 January 3rd, 2014 at 5:00 PM

      Cold can be dealt with…wind SUCKS!

          Reply

  80. SoulLeister January 3rd, 2014 at 5:00 PM

    Will the “icebowl” between the Packers and Bears in the ’60′s be frozen out of the records books by the this years “cry me an icicle bowl” between the Packers and 49′ers?

        Reply

  81. frankfan42 January 3rd, 2014 at 5:07 PM

    But worry not, Obama loves you, you can keep your Doctor and your health care plan and all will be right in the world.

        Reply

    • hopeagainsthope January 3rd, 2014 at 5:30 PM

      Whew, thanks! That was reassuring.

          Reply

      • frankfan42 January 3rd, 2014 at 6:00 PM

        And Al Gore has got your back as well…..LOL God Bless ya!

            Reply

    • BigBoa January 3rd, 2014 at 5:47 PM

      And don’t forget….the world will LOVE us…

          Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:52 PM

      Well, he stopped the seas from rising…

          Reply

  82. Curt Bach January 3rd, 2014 at 5:08 PM

    If its too cold to sell out a Packer Game, it MUST be colder than usual.

        Reply

  83. Ben January 3rd, 2014 at 5:12 PM

    Get Al Gore to come in and thaw out everything with his global warming speech.

        Reply

  84. VINCE January 3rd, 2014 at 5:12 PM

    No one has a fkg Clue as the Climate changes

        Reply

  85. wargamer1969 January 3rd, 2014 at 5:19 PM

    And I thought it was cold this morning working out in 17 degrees with a 4 degree windchill here in the south…Nothing on Green Bay.

        Reply

  86. bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 5:23 PM

    New soap opera. As the climate spins. It’s about the high priest of global warming rescuing a climate change ship stranded in the ice. Starring Owl Gore as the high priest of global warming.

        Reply

  87. docfjs January 3rd, 2014 at 5:25 PM

    We can call it the “Global Warming Bowl”. Make all the players wear bikinis because you know that -8 is really just Conservative propaganda.

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:50 PM

      Great comment! Irony is so ironic…

          Reply

  88. crazyworld January 3rd, 2014 at 5:27 PM

    Well, all I can say is thank goodness for global warming. Without it, they may have cancelled the game due to cold.

        Reply

  89. younailedit January 3rd, 2014 at 5:28 PM

    Sir Albert Gore sayeth, “Pay no attention to the bitter cold behind the curtain!”

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:49 PM

      Crazy Uncle Albert also likes to say, “I am large! Fear me!”

          Reply

  90. M75462 January 3rd, 2014 at 5:28 PM

    Well when someone gets a concussion, they wont have to scramble to get ice for his headache….

    sorry, that’s all i got….

        Reply

  91. Mickey January 3rd, 2014 at 5:29 PM

    Now THAT is FOOTBALL, by God.

        Reply

    • bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 5:34 PM

      I think they call this Bears weather.

          Reply

      • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:48 PM

        And who are the Bears playing in the Playoffs?

        Sorry, I’m a Packers fan…

            Reply

  92. letsmakeadeal January 3rd, 2014 at 5:32 PM

    Welcome to Freezeball where the football is a block of ice and the players are Eskimos.

        Reply

    • Ross Gustafson January 3rd, 2014 at 5:34 PM

      The Edmonton Eskimos?

          Reply

      • letsmakeadeal January 3rd, 2014 at 5:35 PM

        Works for me.

            Reply

      • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:46 PM

        RAAACIST! You would be using a racial stereotype as a mascot.

        (If you don’t know me, I will add the SARC tag)

        Sarc

            Reply

  93. Ross Gustafson January 3rd, 2014 at 5:33 PM

    Obviously these people have never been a Canadian football game. It’s snow from mid-October onward in half of the cities. One grey cup in Edmonton was -30 degrees celsius. We’re crazy and do this every year.

        Reply

    • globalwarmingmyazz January 3rd, 2014 at 5:40 PM

      You sound like a Global Warming denier. I may have to report you.

          Reply

      • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:43 PM

        We may have to audit you, even though you live in Canada. We (the Obama administration) are OMNIPOTENT!

            Reply

    • bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 5:40 PM

      Why?

          Reply

  94. bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 5:33 PM

    Owl Gore is gonna make a halftime speech about the danger of man made global warming.

        Reply

    • justmy2cnts January 3rd, 2014 at 5:37 PM

      All that hot air should warm up the crowd real well.

          Reply

      • bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 5:39 PM

        There might even be a temperature.

            Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:38 PM

      Maybe he’ll do a fly-over in his private jet..

          Reply

  95. GovSlacker January 3rd, 2014 at 5:37 PM

    Al Al Gore Where are you. Oh I see your stuck to the fire hydrant. I told you before, you can’t pee in public – on a cold day.

        Reply

  96. Obooger Eater January 3rd, 2014 at 5:47 PM

    ITS HOT ICE! THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS!

        Reply

  97. Georgia Boy January 3rd, 2014 at 5:51 PM

    If all the players on both teams offered to pay me $50 each to watch them …. I might consider it. But I cannot understand how any otherwise intelligent person will pay good money to watch a bunch of minorities treat a bag of air like it was important.

    I mean … even if the weather was perfect.

        Reply

    • Tee Hee Word January 3rd, 2014 at 6:01 PM

      But i’ll bet you like watching the Georgia Bulldogs minority players play without compensation huh Georgia Boy?

          Reply

      • Georgia Boy January 3rd, 2014 at 6:43 PM

        Without compensation? I thought they paid those boys. Why else would they be there ? But .. no ! I do not watch them.

            Reply

        • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:36 PM

          “I do not watch them, Sam I Am”

          “Try it, Try it, watch and see!
          You may like it, glum GB!”

              Reply

  98. erehwon53 January 3rd, 2014 at 6:14 PM

    When it’s winter on Earth, it’s also summer on Earth… somewhere else. Thus, allow us to counter anecdotal evidence about cold weather with more anecdotal evidence: It’s blazing hot in Australia, with temperatures, in some regions, set to possibly soar above 120 degrees Fahrenheit in the coming days.

        Reply

    • bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 10:33 PM

      Maybe they can share.

          Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:30 PM

      It’s weird how it gets warm in the summer here, and then it cools off in the winter. I think it’s some kind of grand conspiracy. That’s why I live in my parents’ basement.

          Reply

  99. philpan4 January 3rd, 2014 at 6:20 PM

    QB is gay who cares

        Reply

  100. ratsofred January 3rd, 2014 at 6:26 PM

    It’s all B.S. and they damn well know it. They should all hang, including Obama.

        Reply

  101. Zhivago January 3rd, 2014 at 6:28 PM

    This is nothing new to bicycle racers. Sounds like some are wimpy wimpy wimpy!

        Reply

  102. disqus_NvGqSE9Prl January 3rd, 2014 at 6:37 PM

    the real truth is getting to the sheeple. it is time to arrest and imprison the bankster owned , buffoon , politician whores…. and start hanging them for treason… the sooner the better,

        Reply

  103. cold January 3rd, 2014 at 6:43 PM

    I saw on the news that many people are referring to this football game as the Global Warming Bowl.

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:27 PM

      Classic!

          Reply

  104. politicianssuck January 3rd, 2014 at 6:47 PM

    what BS.. has anyone ever sat in the stand of Soldier’s Field in the 1940s to the 1990s when the wind chills in Chicago reached -30 or greater? Having grown up in Chicago and spend my youth there, 1948-1967, I can telll you that this -9 is not the coldest game ever played in the NFL…..

        Reply

    • Chevy InlineSix January 3rd, 2014 at 7:45 PM

      Yes, but what will the wind-chill factor be on Sunday? It may well break any records.

          Reply

  105. gorgonzo January 3rd, 2014 at 7:08 PM

    These idiot global warming cultists can no longer be considered “scientists”, they are money hungry grant whores.

        Reply

  106. dave72 January 3rd, 2014 at 7:14 PM

    Too bad Michael Piltdown Mann wasn’t aboard with more of his Global Warming Hysterics. They might have stayed on board to watch the ice melt.

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:18 PM

      Do you mean Michael Moore?

          Reply

  107. justanothernoneygrab January 3rd, 2014 at 7:19 PM

    Global warming just another (of the many) cons being played on the goyim public. Current movie, ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’, is their most favorite way and easiest way to scam the goyim sheep. The only one who went to jail, was Madoff, and his crime was scamming his own kind. The trillions they stole of the goyim is not a crime, in their eyes, therefore NOBODY went to prison.

        Reply

  108. David Adam January 3rd, 2014 at 7:31 PM

    Wrong again. Cincinnati/San Diego is considered the coldest game ever because of the -59 degree wind chill.

        Reply

    • Chevy InlineSix January 3rd, 2014 at 7:51 PM

      You are forgetting that the wind chill factor applies to Sunday’s game.

          Reply

      • David Adam January 7th, 2014 at 9:01 AM

        No, and -59 WC (Cin/SD) was 42 degrees colder than the -17 in GB game and almost 30 degrees colder than the -30 WC in the GB/Dal Ice Bowls.

            Reply

  109. AR Defense January 3rd, 2014 at 8:03 PM

    Question: Is global warming just a big scam?
    ↑Yes ↓No

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:17 PM

      No, it’s also a big money-maker for AlGore and the Global Warming scientists. Also, a big winner for Obama, so he has an excuse to raise energy prices beyond belief, in another step to eliminating Capitalism in the USA, and making us all live politically-correctly (in goose-step fashion).

          Reply

  110. nightsong January 3rd, 2014 at 8:28 PM

    With those below frigid and morbid temperatures there is no way this could be played as a legitimate fair game. It should be rescheduled. Players could die from this. No one’s death is worth a football game.

        Reply

  111. American Made January 3rd, 2014 at 8:52 PM

    Al Gorelioni owes the American people reparations for the global warming sceme.

        Reply

    • taconite January 3rd, 2014 at 9:35 PM

      The only thing you will get that bunch are excuses, name calling, and bravo sierra. Best one I heard today was that it is getting colder because it is getting warmer and the ocean currents are slowing down.

          Reply

    • veteran222 January 3rd, 2014 at 10:32 PM

      heard this on Savage. Nice.

          Reply

  112. MKDAWUSS January 3rd, 2014 at 8:52 PM

    At least Roger Goodell isn’t going to postpone the game. We hope.

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:12 PM

      The lawyers are getting ready to pounce if anyone gets a cold pinky…

          Reply

  113. gary lacey January 3rd, 2014 at 8:52 PM

    Trying to place the photo on Drudges headline, I think that’s Jack in “The Shining”?

        Reply

  114. fritzidler January 3rd, 2014 at 8:55 PM

    I’m a Vikings fan. But I forecast the Packers winning.

        Reply

  115. enemy_of_the_statist January 3rd, 2014 at 8:57 PM

    Detain the climophobes now. They are a danger to themselves and others.

        Reply

  116. DrBobNM January 3rd, 2014 at 8:57 PM

    thanks Dr Spencer Love your work. I think they will call off the game.

        Reply

  117. conservinFL January 3rd, 2014 at 8:58 PM

    Brrrrr! Its cold!!!!

        Reply

  118. Jeffrey Gee January 3rd, 2014 at 9:18 PM

    Drudge linked up Jack Nicholson in “The Shining” for this headline is the only reason I clicked! I bet those huddles lasted a long time… Get a cold “keister” out there for hrs. and hrs…!

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 10:36 PM

      Thanks, I was wondering where the image came from…

          Reply

      • Jeffrey Gee January 4th, 2014 at 4:29 PM

        Yeah man a classic! Drudge rocks!

            Reply

  119. Duke56 January 3rd, 2014 at 9:25 PM

    coldest in history my ass… i remember the ice bowl, i wasn’t there i was maybe 90 miles south of there, in oconomowoc, WI. i was 10 yrs old, and i remember the temp reported as 13 below, 51 below with wind chill. my sister and i were outside at halftime, throwing a football around in the snow.

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 10:35 PM

      I saw it on TV in Milwaukee. The wires underground designed to heat the turf failed. It was painful to see the players hit and skid on the frozen ground. The film of Starr’s TD lounge show him digging into the turf to try to get some traction. I can’t imagine playing in the game or watching it in the stands.

      p.s. Who was the hero of that final drive? I’ll give you 20 seconds to try to answer, then scroll down…

      A: Chuck Mercein (not sure if I’m spelling it correctly)

          Reply

      • Duke56 January 5th, 2014 at 11:18 AM

        Anderson scored, and the refs took it away… I remember my dad was beside himself, thought he was gonna have a stroke.

            Reply

  120. Robert Govan January 3rd, 2014 at 9:35 PM

    Al Gore is aka actor Bruce Willis in a fat suit and latex. No Joke…….Wellaware1.com

        Reply

  121. finalquest January 3rd, 2014 at 9:37 PM

    -8…-8… Get over it ! It’s -10 and getting colder in my backyard in Vestal, NY !!! Call me when it get’s around -40 with no wind chill… Now that’s cold and I’ve been in it !!! Never ever want to see that temperature again !

        Reply

  122. Murman January 3rd, 2014 at 9:40 PM

    How the hell do you dress for -8 degrees when you’re sitting still in a stadium? I can’t even imagine cold like that!

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 10:28 PM

      On a radio show in Milwaukee, a guy said he was going and wearing 6 layers (6!). You couldn’t pay me to go to the game…

          Reply

      • Jeff January 3rd, 2014 at 10:54 PM

        I’m in Milwaukee. It’s been cold for a few weeks. It was bad the first week. I’m used to it by now and it just feels like a normal winter day….

        And that’s why the Packers will win this one.

            Reply

        • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 4th, 2014 at 12:00 AM

          The Packers will win because of their running game, just like in the Ice Bowl.

              Reply

  123. yubagod January 3rd, 2014 at 9:41 PM

    It’s called climate change retards.

        Reply

    • JoeBroe January 3rd, 2014 at 9:45 PM

      Umm…sure. Al???

          Reply

    • Jeff January 3rd, 2014 at 10:52 PM

      I’m not sure if yubagod is joking. Global Warmists are so absurd it’s hard to tell if they are serious or are being made fun-of.

          Reply

  124. Bytor January 3rd, 2014 at 9:42 PM

    I guess they’ll have to play all the vogue gay players… they can wear their “hot pants”!

        Reply

  125. 1984isnow January 3rd, 2014 at 10:03 PM

    If you believe the global warming nonsense there’s a bridge in Brooklyn I’d like to sell you.

        Reply

    • veteran222 January 3rd, 2014 at 10:31 PM

      really, how much? #sarc

          Reply

    • bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 10:31 PM

      Does it have a name?

          Reply

      • 1984isnow January 3rd, 2014 at 10:34 PM

        Does it matter?

            Reply

        • bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 10:36 PM

          I might need to plough the snow.

              Reply

          • 1984isnow January 3rd, 2014 at 10:43 PM

            I have it on good authority that there will no longer me any snow due to global warming, so help me Al Gore.

                Reply

          • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:02 PM

            Don’t you get it? Global Warming causes Global Cooling. Any idiot knows that.

                Reply

          • 1984isnow January 3rd, 2014 at 11:12 PM

            Sorry, stupid of me.

                Reply

  126. drofmanythings January 3rd, 2014 at 10:16 PM

    The blubbering liberals, the inept Obama administration, and now the political climatologists are all looking like fools and liars at the same time. A perfect storm of intellectual failure. Beautiful.

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:09 PM

      Smells like Victory in 2014 and 2016…

          Reply

  127. bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 10:23 PM

    Come on global warming.

        Reply

  128. tomroberts January 3rd, 2014 at 10:32 PM

    How many times do Dumbofuc Party fanatics, have to tell you, in the name of the glory of their party, how Global “Warming” will involve freezing blizzards, the N. Atlantic ice pack failing to melt and polar bears freezing to death???

        Reply

  129. Fat Kid Yellow Teeth January 3rd, 2014 at 10:32 PM

    haha that picture of jack nicholson keeps reminding of that SP episode where randy buys the blockbuster and it totally bombs and he goes crazy ..

        Reply

  130. drofmanythings January 3rd, 2014 at 10:35 PM

    “Honey, I’m really cold, can you turn the themostat up a few degrees?” “Dear, it’s getting warmer because you fiddled with the system. It will be burning up in here soon because of you emitting all that gas.” “But it sure feels like it’s getting colder and now I can barely feel my face.” “No, Dear One, that must be heat you are feeling. You just can’t trust your senses, so believe what I say. Our models says it is definitely getting warmer. Period” “But, Honey, my breath is freezing and my toes are turning black.” “I am telling you it is getting scalding hot because of this chill.” ” I don’t care what you say, I’m freezing cold. Think I’ll close my eyes and go into a deep sleep. Goodnight, Dear.”

        Reply

  131. bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 10:37 PM

    It’s so cold the polar bears are heading south.

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:08 PM

      Good – polar bear meat is delicious…

          Reply

  132. Ray Tort January 3rd, 2014 at 10:41 PM

    For the Chargers-Bengals game (2nd coldest) the wind chill factor was -59 degrees. So I think it should rank as the coldest. See pictures at utsandiego.com

        Reply

  133. Mike Litoriss January 3rd, 2014 at 10:46 PM

    15 yard penalty for flicking your opponents ear when it’s that cold.

        Reply

  134. Mike Litoriss January 3rd, 2014 at 10:48 PM

    Climatologist=FortuneTeller

        Reply

  135. Jeff January 3rd, 2014 at 10:48 PM

    I hope Global Warming makes a comeback. Not only am I freezing to death, now I have to worry about Polar Bears in the Upper Midwest.

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 4th, 2014 at 1:58 AM

      I’m afraid of the Russians invading across a frozen Bering Strait…

          Reply

  136. ncpg January 3rd, 2014 at 11:03 PM

    CLIMATE CHANGE GLOSSARY

    PEER REVIEW: The act of banding together a group of like-minded academics with a funding conflict of interest, for the purpose of squeezing out any research voices that threaten the multi-million dollar government grant
    gravy train.
    SETTLED SCIENCE: Betrayal of the scientific method for politics or money or both.
    DENIER: Anyone who suspects the truth.
    CLIMATE CHANGE: What has been happening for billions of years, but should now be flogged to produce ‘panic for profit.’
    NOBEL PEACE PRIZE: Leftist Nutcase Prize, unrelated to “Peace” in any meaningful way.
    DATA, EVIDENCE: Unnecessary details. If anyone asks for this, see “DENIER,” above.
    CLIMATE SCIENTIST: A person skilled in spouting obscure, scientific-sounding jargon that has the effect of deflecting requests for “DATA” by “DENIERS.” Also skilled at affecting an aura of “Smartest Person in the Room” to buffalo gullible legislators and journalists.
    JUNK SCIENCE: The use of invalid scientific evidence resulting in findings of causation which simply cannot be justified or understood from the standpoint of the current state of credible scientific knowledge.

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 3rd, 2014 at 11:07 PM

      GLOBAL COOLING: A short-term delay in Global Warming, caused by Global Warming.

          Reply

      • Clouds Below Sea Level January 4th, 2014 at 12:33 AM

        Global cooling caused by global warming???
        And you still think you sound intelligent and logical!
        CLIMATE CHANGE: The new leftist, secular religion.

            Reply

        • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 4th, 2014 at 1:51 AM

          To Intelligence Below Sea Level: Do you understand the concept of Sarcasm?

              Reply

          • Clouds Below Sea Level January 4th, 2014 at 7:13 AM

            I had not picked up on the sarcasm, it sounded like a real enviro-religious speak.

            I stand corrected.

                Reply

  137. bluesky January 3rd, 2014 at 11:32 PM

    What if the football shatters when the kicker kicks off?

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 4th, 2014 at 12:01 AM

      What if the kicker shatters?

          Reply

      • Nathan Bedford Forrest January 4th, 2014 at 12:05 AM

        LOL.

            Reply

  138. eric johnson January 3rd, 2014 at 11:53 PM

    Bill Nye the fraud guy has nothing to say?

        Reply

  139. Nathan Bedford Forrest January 4th, 2014 at 12:07 AM

    If you’re on Drudge, love that pic of Jack in the closing shots of “The Shining”. Classic!

        Reply

  140. Trexx G January 4th, 2014 at 12:17 AM

    “The truth is what I say it is.”….

    Barack Hussein Obama

        Reply

    • Jasamine Molly January 4th, 2014 at 3:13 AM

      Even that would be a lie.

          Reply

  141. red January 4th, 2014 at 1:29 AM

    evil obamas next screw up to hurt the country

        Reply

    • Haha January 4th, 2014 at 2:13 AM

      Too late!

          Reply

  142. Jasamine Molly January 4th, 2014 at 1:29 AM

    Global cooling is caused by man made carbon emissions. We need a carbon tax to stop it.

        Reply

    • disqus_qIrSXYODkm January 4th, 2014 at 1:32 AM

      I hope you’re being sarcastic…

          Reply

      • Jasamine Molly January 4th, 2014 at 3:12 AM

        When you are dealing with liberals that is about the only way to keep your sanity.

            Reply

    • Earl Murphy January 4th, 2014 at 10:03 AM

      you forgot to mention that the Chinese wearing air masks are exempt from carbon tax.

          Reply

      • Jasamine Molly January 4th, 2014 at 10:16 AM

        We thought of that and it is OK because the sea levels will only drop in places that don’t have the tax and pretty soon their ports will be above sea level and they will have to pay the tax or starve.

            Reply

  143. Michael Bruce Combs January 4th, 2014 at 1:49 AM

    This is the least warm of the five warm periods since the end of the Ice Age, and each has been cooler than its predecessor. We’re not warming, we’re cooling gradually in steps. The Eemian interglacial 125,000 years ago was 10 degrees F warmer than any part of our current Holocene interglacial, with sea level up to 30 feet higher. So what are these natural climate change deniers on about? Click on the chart below to enlarge it and see the natural cycles of long glacial periods and short interglacials. Puck: “What fools we simple mortals be” – Well the anthropogenic climate change ones, anyway.

        Reply

    • Jasamine Molly January 4th, 2014 at 10:24 AM

      “So what are these natural climate change deniers on about?” Who are you referring to? I hope it is the Global Warming bunch because denying natural climate change is just plain stupid…and you can’t fix that. Never heard them referred to as the “anthropogenic climate change” group but it fits.

          Reply

      • Michael Bruce Combs January 4th, 2014 at 1:35 PM

        “Natural climate change deniers” is my term for the anthropogenic Global Warming bunch. I chose it because of their attempts (successful with the gullible main stream media) to label skeptics “climate change deniers”, which is the exact opposite of our central skeptic position that climate is always changing – always has, always will, at least during the brief period of eternity that Earth has existence. My studies of past climate change indicates that we are in a period of global warming, only not as robust as the four that preceded it – Holocene Optimum, Minoan, Roman, and Medieval – in the past 10,000 years since the end of the Ice Age., or the even warmer Eemian interglacial 125,000 years ago. This current warming period began about 1800, ending the Little Ice Age (1350-1800AD) and predating significant increases of CO2, the trace gas that comprises 0.035% of our atmosphere (and only 3% of greenhouse gases). Warming and sea level rise in the 1800′s looks quite similar to the 1900′s, both pre- and post-1950 when the anthropogenic alarmists think global warming began. As usual, they display their climate change ignorance – their starting date for warming, 1950, is over a century after warming began. The poor darling warmists haven’t gotten a thing right for so long – 17 years of no warming, fewer strong tornados and hurricanes, a slowing rate of what has been at most modest sea level rise, expanding global sea ice, diminished glacier retreat compared to the 1800′s, and rain, snow, flooding, drought, and wildfires all within their normal range. Pacific Islands in total have increased area and show no signs of inundation – although mining coral for new roads and airports has been damaging, as well as overfishing and using explosives for “fishing”.

        “So what are these natural climate change deniers on about?” Beats me. They seem to be making much ado about nothing, as Shakespeare noted is the prime pastime of the “ignorati” (“Ignorati” are like the castrati, who lost their testicles in their work. The warmist ignorati have lost their common sense in theirs.)

        Here are a sampling of charts showing how far the science of the warmist ignorati is out of touch with reality.

            Reply

  144. Haha January 4th, 2014 at 2:12 AM

    I’m freezing to death!

    I want Global Warming and I want it now!

        Reply

  145. Haha January 4th, 2014 at 2:17 AM

    The freezing temperatures are obviously a conspiracy to discredit Al Gore.

        Reply

  146. Franky January 4th, 2014 at 3:03 AM

    I thought it is illegal for an american prez to join any kind of organization including a UN seat?

        Reply

    • itwasthebestoftimes January 4th, 2014 at 3:36 AM

      It was this or al-Qaeda, Moochele said.

          Reply

  147. Franky January 4th, 2014 at 3:05 AM

    The lies are melting the poles in parma frost.

        Reply

  148. rromero January 4th, 2014 at 3:15 AM

    HEY !! HOW ABOUT GETTING THOSE SCIENTIST TO COME TO THE GAME THIS SUNDY NIGHT IN GREEN BAY

        Reply

  149. skippy skol January 4th, 2014 at 3:51 AM

    I hope you arrogant, conceited, ass hole Packers fans suffer! you barely got the game on TV, avoiding a black out because some “TV Station” purchased the tickets. Nice loyalty you fair weather idiots. ONE AND DONE!!!

    Reminder: you are below average with out Rogers, and you over rate that girl #52…the 49ers are going to mutilate your suck balls team.

        Reply

  150. D Pace January 4th, 2014 at 5:19 AM

    At what point is the game unnecessary? The breathing conditions alone could be serious. Also, it’s most likely the best team will not win. Postpone it, or play at a neutral field. Ticket purchasing may be a bitch, but even with the millions these guys make, this weather could be lethal. Not exactly worth enjoying if their hearts stop.

        Reply

    • Username__already__exists January 4th, 2014 at 8:39 AM

      Gee I don’t think anyone died during the “Ice Bowl” or the even worse “Refrigerator Bowl” between the Chargers and the Bengals in 1982 for the AFC Championship. If San Diego had come to Cincy one day later this time they might well have had a colder day to play. Forecast lows for Sunday night are -10F. If the cold gets to town early it could be even worse for the sunny S. Calif. team. Bengal players are more adapted to the cold of course so it’s a big advantage to them. I doubt you’ll convince them to give up that advantage. They do have doctors at the games to monitor the players you know. The fans might have it worse. A crazy friend of mine was at that game in 1982. He was with a group that all took their shirts off for the entire game. The tv cameras showed them time after time. SD QB, Dan Fouts said he knew they had no chance when he saw that group of crazies. He knew they couldn’t compete in a climate so much colder than what they were used to. It is football after all. They have made it a sissy game already. Now here’s a call to eliminate cold weather games. What’s next? Forfeits because of too much pollen in the air? Moving early season games from Florida to Alaska? Playing with umbrellas and rubber boots when it rains? I know. How about uniforms with their own heating and cooling systems. They could use all those old NASA spacesuits. They’re just lying around now. They could add enough pressure so that no one could possibly get hurt too. It’d be like playing in your own bubble. Heck we could all use one of those suits.

          Reply

  151. Willik January 4th, 2014 at 6:26 AM

    What about the ‘Ice Bowl’ between GB and the Cowboys in ’67?

        Reply

    • Kolef88 January 4th, 2014 at 7:54 AM

      next time try reading the article

          Reply

  152. Michael L January 4th, 2014 at 6:44 AM

    If you want to know what the LEADERS of the environmentalists are all about
    then just follow the money. Remember When it was discovered that the Al Gore
    compound used 12X the energy that George W Bush was using at his ranch?
    Gore had to quickly have some solar panels added to try to at least pretend
    he wasn’t burning through more carbon than most small villages! See:
    http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/house.asp and also
    http://voices.yahoo.com/george-w-bush-vs-al-gore-has-greener-home-338359.html
    Wake up and smell the hypocrisy!

        Reply

    • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 8:38 AM

      Sweetheart you “simple-folk” are so cute. You should read the articles before you post them, I love when you boneheads make fools out of yourself. Thank you.

          Reply

      • Screwthemilitary January 4th, 2014 at 10:24 AM

        piss off you homo

            Reply

        • sicario2012 January 4th, 2014 at 12:46 PM

          LOL I was at that game, in a bathroom trying to warm up.
          Never warmed up till 3 hours
          Later on the ride back to Chicago
          Didn’t see the winning score till
          The next day.

              Reply

  153. rockribbed January 4th, 2014 at 6:57 AM

    It won’t get cold enough to save the Packer defense, unfortunately.

        Reply

  154. rockribbed January 4th, 2014 at 7:03 AM

    Tip to the “experts”: just because people are complaining about something, that doesn’t mean they expect someone to do something about it.
    The attempt makes you look like a desperate pandering fool… And frankly most of us like having it around to complain about.

        Reply

  155. spin43 January 4th, 2014 at 7:39 AM

    Al Gorleoni has set scientific methods back 50 years.

        Reply

    • sicario2012 January 4th, 2014 at 12:43 PM

      Fat al has been rather silent lately.
      Maybe he froze to death.

          Reply

  156. Screwthemilitary January 4th, 2014 at 8:30 AM

    and the next maggot that says anything about “global warming” is gonna get smashed right in the face

        Reply

    • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 8:48 AM

      Sweetheart, it’s sad you “simple-folk” are too stupid to understand climate-change. But the owners of this country programed you that way. I’ll bet you don’t believe in evolution too, am I right? BATTA-BING!!

          Reply

      • danrighty January 4th, 2014 at 9:03 AM

        Eventually the batteries will run out of your overused o v o m i t dildo. Wake up D-bagger to the truth. Facts never mean a thing to left wing trolls.

            Reply

        • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 9:13 AM

          Sweetheart, you’re a conservative who wants to talk about facts, are you serious? If you knew anything about facts you wouldn’t be a conservative climate-denier. You “simple-folk” are so cute, Thank you.

              Reply

      • Screwthemilitary January 4th, 2014 at 10:23 AM

        I aint your sweetheart, you maggot

            Reply

  157. algebra January 4th, 2014 at 8:30 AM

    And they wonder why ticket sales are down. Give me a big HD TV and a warm room to watch it in!

        Reply

    • sicario2012 January 4th, 2014 at 12:41 PM

      Remember to politician who said about 20 years ago:
      All blacks want is a warm place to s h * t and a loose pair of shoes.

          Reply

  158. mrsgayle January 4th, 2014 at 8:30 AM

    lol… so funny to see greenies stuck in ice.

        Reply

    • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 8:44 AM

      Sweetheart, your kids aren’t gonna think it’s funny when they find out you sat on your ass and ignored climate-change. You “simple-folk” who are deniers, are gonna have a lot of explain to do, aren’t you?

          Reply

      • mrsgayle January 4th, 2014 at 8:50 AM

        My kids are grown and already know global warming is a profitable hoax.Grand kids even know it after being in liberal colleges…

            Reply

        • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 8:56 AM

          Sweetheart, are your kids are as stupid as you? Are they deniers too? Who dumbed them down? Who do you think is profiting from AGW? Be specific and name your sources. Thank you

              Reply

          • mrsgayle January 4th, 2014 at 9:37 AM

            Al Gore made millions from global warming for one plus the bogus studies and projects that cost the tax payer millions.
            Bet you loved spending 500 million on the Solyndra bankruptcy for solar panels.
            Environmentalism is a very profitable religion, with very greedy and mean spirited members as your reply indicates.They have a cash cow no one could ever pry from their hands no matter if they believe in it or not . In the mean time,simple and well meaning people are sucked in.

                Reply

          • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 10:08 AM

            Sweetheart How did Gore make million be specific and name your sources

                Reply

          • Dave January 4th, 2014 at 10:10 AM

            And what is the most profitable religion of all?? I’ll give you a hint. Their HQ is it’s own city in Italy, decorated with elaborate and ornate priceless art works. You can find huge mega-box satellite offices all over the world, especially in the American south. They recruit heavily, targeting people’s most basic desires, and they are relentless.

            If you’re going to poke fun at the environmentalists for being suckers, I’ve got a mirror I’d like to show you.

                Reply

          • mrsgayle January 4th, 2014 at 10:16 AM

            They haven’t got me, I’m to smart for that too.

                Reply

          • sicario2012 January 4th, 2014 at 12:39 PM

            The worlds two oldest professions

            Religion
            Prostitution

            With one you pray for Peace.
            With the other you pay for a Peace

                Reply

          • mrsgayle January 4th, 2014 at 10:22 AM

            Your a true believer in the faith of the EPA. I don’t think I will spread anymore pearls . I’m older so I wont be here when you come to the realization you bought into a false religion.

                Reply

          • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 10:36 AM

            Sweetheart, what do you have against the EPA?

                Reply

          • SoThere January 4th, 2014 at 10:14 PM

            What do you have against your children?

                Reply

      • Kemo Sabe January 4th, 2014 at 9:29 AM

        Spring,Summer, Autumn/Fall, Winter.
        That’s climate change.
        I don’t know if you knew this, but many eons ago, there was an Ice Age.But I’m sure you know at that time, there were too many humans around,too many factories and waay too many SUV’s.
        Capitalists were fracking and drilling for evil profits.
        That’s why the Ice melted.Such a pity too.
        Too many humans back then during the Ice Age. If only those Ice Age folks had believed in abortion and reduced the population.
        ya know, cull the herd.

            Reply

        • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 10:05 AM

          Sweetheart, you “simple-folk” are so cute. Thanks

              Reply

          • blueangel69 January 4th, 2014 at 12:33 PM

            By simple folk do you mean common folk that have to live in a world that morons like you insist on ruining for the rest of us?

                Reply

          • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 12:41 PM

            Sweetheart, if telling you the truth bothers you. Too bad!!! I’m not being a B!TCH-SLAPPER to make you feel good. I’m here to wake you up. Get the idea?

                Reply

          • SEC. 304 Violence against wome January 4th, 2014 at 4:57 PM

            Promoting violence against women!

            FLAGGED!

                Reply

      • mike January 4th, 2014 at 10:22 AM

        How do you explain the GW scientists claiming 3 years ago that there would be no more snow in North America from then on? Or that Cape cod and New York city would be under water in another 15 years? That claim was made 15 years ago claiming it would happen in 30 years.
        When these claims are made and nothing comes of them people start to take notice and see GW for what it is. A hoax!

            Reply

        • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 10:39 AM

          Sweetheart, can you post the articles that prove your point? Thank you.

              Reply

          • mike January 4th, 2014 at 11:05 AM

            Here’s one article that now moves the timeline out to 2,100 You may have noticed that predictions used to be “this or that will happen in 20 or 30 years”

            Now those predictions have been run out further after they see that they don’t come true in the short time frame. No getting laughed at if your not around.

            I’m still looking for the original posting. One other thing, they say in the article I give you here that new England seas have risen 6″ in the last 100 years. That’s bull. I grew up fishing in Beverly mass right on a seawall down the street from my house. I’m 54 now and the tide at high tide is exactly where it was when I was 10.

            http://www.neaq.org/conservation_and_research/climate_change/climate_change_in_new_england.php

                Reply

          • mike January 4th, 2014 at 12:08 PM

            http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/snowfalls-are-now-just-a-thing-of-the-past-724017.html
            Snowfall on the whole, not specifically North America. But it goes back to what I said earlier. Too many predictions that don’t come true.

                Reply

          • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 12:34 PM

            Sweetheart, why would you embarrass yourself, and your family, by posting the article that you did!!! Why don’t you read what you post? If you would have read it, you wouldn’t have posted it. You “simple-folk” are so easy to HITCH-SLAPP!! That’s why I ask you boneheads to post your proof so I can make fun of you. Thanks for co-operating. BATTA-BING!!

                Reply

          • SoThere January 4th, 2014 at 10:08 PM

            Folks,

            This guy is and embarrassment to his family for sure.

            “HITCH-SLAPP” ? He has to be the bonehead here.

            You can feel free to make fun of this cult fool.

                Reply

          • blueangel69 January 4th, 2014 at 12:31 PM

            Look in a mirror sweetheart. See that? It’s called an idiot.

                Reply

          • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 12:38 PM

            Sweetheart, why do you “simple-folk” always make yourself look foolish when I ask you to post your evidence?

                Reply

          • Maximus Max January 4th, 2014 at 1:57 PM

            What “Evidence” do you want? Evidence of the last ice age in north America and central Europe a few million years ago doesn’t seem to do it for you idiots, what the hell can ANYONE say to convince you of your ignorance?

                Reply

          • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 2:08 PM

            Sweetheart, I want the evidence that the climate-scientists publishing peer reviewed studies have concluded. Do you have any?

                Reply

          • Maximus Max January 4th, 2014 at 2:49 PM

            I just gave you some, but like I said, you will ignore it.

                Reply

          • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 5:14 PM

            Sweetheart you didn’t give me anything I could present in any court. Your opinion is not evidence. Get the idea? Try again.

                Reply

          • SoThere January 5th, 2014 at 10:22 AM

            vacmancan is only allowed to post what they tell him to post.

            Folks, vacmancan never posts anything to back up his BS. He only deals in insults. He’s a typical low information liberal.

                Reply

          • .. January 4th, 2014 at 4:55 PM

            Which ones? Be specific!

                Reply

          • SEC. 304 Violence against wome January 4th, 2014 at 4:58 PM

            We’re all waiting for you to post names and studies. So far you can’t

                Reply

          • mike January 4th, 2014 at 1:34 PM

            hey sweetie pie, I have a question for you. Why would they change from global warming to climate change? That was the perfect name if they were right. However, once they realized the earth wasn’t warming as they predicted, they changed the name. climate change is much more vague and allows them to slide with their predictions. They can also point to just about any major weather event and claim Climate change.
            I hope you see how much you’ve been duped before you leave this planet. You’ll be the one embarrassed.

                Reply

          • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 2:05 PM

            Mike sweetheart, I’ll type extra slow so you can understand this. When the globe warms up, it’s called global warming. Are you with me so far? When the globe warms up it causes the climate to change, we call that climate change. Get the idea?

                Reply

          • SoThere January 4th, 2014 at 10:04 PM

            Mike, this fool is a programmed cult member. He has no idea about anything. He’s a spammer sent by his cult. He’s all over the internet posting the same insults to everyone.

                Reply

          • mike January 4th, 2014 at 2:30 PM

            Hey cupcake, someday you’ll figure it all out. All it is outside is weather. it changes from year to year. Some are warmer, some are colder.
            One thing I’d like you to consider. Al Gore admitted 40% of what he calls manmade CO2 is produced by third world countries heating their homes and cooking their food with wood. 40%! that’s a major portion. I don’t see that changing anytime in the next century or two. Lets say we were able to stop 10% of manmade CO2. Compared to CO2 produced by decomposition of forestry around the world and the CO2 released from the warming of the oceans it’s a drop in the bucket and would have no negligible effect. 10% would also be a long shot.
            Also, do you know what percentage of CO2 is in the atmosphere? .039% It’s a trace gas and it’s a hoax that this is causing any rise in the climate.
            C ya

                Reply

          • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 5:11 PM

            Mike sweetheart, I asked you to post the article that proves your point and all you do is post more B.S. This is too difficult for you, isn’t it? You “simple-folk” are so cute. Thank you.

                Reply

          • SoThere January 4th, 2014 at 10:02 PM

            Mike,

            this fool is just a programmed cult member. He never presents anything but cult links that mean nothing.

                Reply

          • SEC. 304 Violence against wome January 4th, 2014 at 4:59 PM

            Post names of your ‘peer reviewed” studies.

                Reply

          • SoThere January 4th, 2014 at 10:13 PM

            POST YIOURS.

            Folks, this fool has no facts just AGW cultist BS.

                Reply

      • blueangel69 January 4th, 2014 at 12:30 PM

        Sell the tv and move to a 3rd world country. You’re totally out of touch with reality.

            Reply

        • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 12:36 PM

          Sweetheart tell me how you think I’m not in touch with reality? Be specific please.

              Reply

          • SoThere January 4th, 2014 at 10:06 PM

            Folks, read this guys posting history in his profile. He’s not in touch with reality, he’s just a cult TROLL.

                Reply

      • .. January 4th, 2014 at 5:00 PM

        Typical TROLL BS. Why do you hate your daughter and make an a$$ of yourself every day? Be specific.

            Reply

  159. Istvan2 January 4th, 2014 at 8:45 AM

    Instead of getting the USA to do more, how about these turkeys talk to China. China has more pollution and anyone else on our planet.

        Reply

  160. Kemo Sabe January 4th, 2014 at 9:17 AM

    The pic in the insert (on Drudge’s home page) that linked this piece should have been of a frozen alBore. W/ a cheese hat on his head..

        Reply

  161. RedstateDawnRising January 4th, 2014 at 9:17 AM

    Irony

        Reply

  162. The_Monk January 4th, 2014 at 9:44 AM

    People concerned about climate change are no doubt also frightened by the phases of the moon, the waxing and waning tides, green grass growing, April showers, new-born kittens, et al. Truly to be pitied, those sad folks….

        Reply

    • blueangel69 January 4th, 2014 at 12:28 PM

      Disturbing that there’s such a level of old fashioned dark ages ignorance still at play in the 21st century. We envisioned flying around in cars at one point but we’ve hit a wall instead. Really sad. Look to our leaders. What are they espousing?

          Reply

      • sicario2012 January 4th, 2014 at 12:36 PM

        They have the blacks living within the Goverment Plantation. As soon as they are done taxing your money, you get to join them.

            Reply

      • The_Monk January 4th, 2014 at 3:51 PM

        The thing that mystifies me is why the progressives choose to be the mindless, non-thinking folks they are. And a lot of them have jobs (but mostly government) and drivers licenses and kids and (like-minded) friends. Boggles the mind….

            Reply

  163. fluffalo January 4th, 2014 at 9:55 AM

    I can’t believe it’s 2014 and people think that “global warming” means it’s supposed to be warmer everywhere constantly. Republican culture breeds ignorance, praises stupidity and discredits scientific research. Our children’s children will be paying the consequences of idiocracy.

        Reply

    • mike January 4th, 2014 at 10:17 AM

      Fluff suits your name perfectly. Could trade it with gullible.

          Reply

      • blueangel69 January 4th, 2014 at 12:24 PM

        “Idiot” just works so well for me.

            Reply

    • Dave January 4th, 2014 at 10:18 AM

      I like reading the comments after articles like this. It makes me realize that whatever American Exceptionalism ever exsited is long dead. To be exceptional you have to allow for rational discussion, respect dissenting opinion, and have a true understanding of the difference between a “fact” and a “belief” and an “opinion”…. RIP American Exceptionalism

          Reply

  164. Kim Carrera January 4th, 2014 at 9:57 AM

    You have to love the delicious irony of a boatload of junk scientists frozen in the ice due to “anthropogenic global WARMING”. Oh, right it’s “climate change” now. You know, where warming equals cooling and changes that take hundreds of millennia happen in five years. The last retreat of the ice caps 50,000 years ago must have been due to the last of the Neanderthals driving around in Escalades. Hate to break to all the Al Gore kool aid drinkers…there is not one VALID study (non agenda driven, place the temperature monitor on a hot roof study) validating this whack-tard nonsense.

        Reply

    • waydel58 January 4th, 2014 at 10:07 AM

      My theory of why it was so cold a 1000 years was because the Vikings burned so many villages after pillaging them. That’s alot of CO2. Go Packers.

          Reply

      • WISFAR January 4th, 2014 at 12:39 PM

        I think all Packers fans would agree with you that if something goes wrong, its likely the Vikings fault!!

            Reply

  165. Earl Murphy January 4th, 2014 at 10:05 AM

    Farmers Almanac 101

    How many sunspots were there in 2005.. Hundreds, that means hotter weather here in 2007
    How many sunspots were there in 2011.. near 0, that means colder here in 2013
    Sunspots plus a 2 year delay gives you cold or heat for that year. look at the charts since before 1900.

        Reply

  166. ahmosis January 4th, 2014 at 10:07 AM

    Global Warming, Climate Change, call it what you will: is an invention of radical Leftists (and Osama Obama) following an agenda that wants to reduce the American economy to a point from which it will impossible to recover. Attacking the Energy sector goes hand in hand with their goal of turning our wonderful country into a Third World Socialist MESS!
    And the NATURAL Global Warming? Thats what ended the ICE AGE thousands of years ago.

        Reply

  167. mike January 4th, 2014 at 10:14 AM

    Global warming was the perfect phrase, if it continued to warm. Now that it isn’t warming they had to change it to Climate change. Next, it’ll be call Climate cooling. Still our fault of coarse.
    Can’t tax the sun.

        Reply

    • blueangel69 January 4th, 2014 at 12:22 PM

      Right. According to the looney libs God Almighty should have to pay his fair share. Pony up, God!

          Reply

    • hellbindercda January 4th, 2014 at 1:40 PM

      dear conservatives…
      global warming will cause massive shifts in planetary weather because of the changes it causes to the ocean currents. So one area could get buried in ice and another could face a severe drought of 10 years. regardless of the cause man or nature or both it doesn’t matter. its the effect that counts.

      forget about the idea of global warming being true or not and at least educate yourself on the details of what it is actually saying and predicting. Its all about the ocean.

          Reply

  168. Brutus January 4th, 2014 at 10:56 AM

    41 news reports on this story and 40 of the reports did NOT mention that they were observing the so-called global warming effect. Why does the press lie? Just one story, but I never did trust the press and now I definitely do not trust the U.S. government. Sad time for the U.S.A.

        Reply

  169. David Harrison January 4th, 2014 at 11:05 AM

    F**k Football, I need a job.

        Reply

  170. Guest January 4th, 2014 at 11:11 AM

    For God’s sake..DON’T TAKE YOUR KIDS TO THIS GAME..Little lungs breathing 4 plus hours of minus temps is just …STOOOPID..

        Reply

  171. Marsha Lakota January 4th, 2014 at 12:08 PM

    Oh wow.. wish the cold would just die already.. Looks like the weather is only going to get worse, here is a link to a weather update https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=191319741069648&set=vb.131551313713158&type=2&theater

        Reply

  172. Bigred37 January 4th, 2014 at 12:32 PM

    TIM TEBOW COULD HANDLE IT!

        Reply

  173. Kjell T. Ring January 4th, 2014 at 12:40 PM

    This story is obviously a complete fabrication and contains only evil lies!

    The planet it suffering of global warming; Al Gore told us so, so it must be true! Just ask the climate researchers (and their rescuers) that are now stuck in the ice on the south pole, I am sure they will confirm it too!

        Reply

    • hellbindercda January 4th, 2014 at 1:37 PM

      global warming will cause massive shifts in planetary weather because of the changes it causes to the ocean currents. So one area could get buried in ice and another could face a drought of 10 years.
      forget about the idea of global warming being true or not and at least educate yourself on the details of what it is actually saying and predicting. Its all about the ocean.

          Reply

      • Kjell T. Ring January 4th, 2014 at 1:47 PM

        I am sure the climate scientists (as well as their rescuers) that were recently stuck in ice on the south pole would wish for some global warming!

            Reply

        • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 2:13 PM

          No sweetheart, I’m sure that the climate scientists are hoping the “simple-folk” like you, can get to understand AGW!!! BATTA-BING!!

              Reply

          • John P January 4th, 2014 at 4:00 PM

            Is that all you got? Mocking people who disagree, or question your claim, does nothing to prove your claim. It just makes you look foolish and unable to prove your claim. I would think a sophisticated person, such as you, would know that BATTA-BING.

                Reply

          • vacmancan January 4th, 2014 at 5:18 PM

            Sweetheart, I got a lot. The question is how much can you handle. Why don’t we start with published peer reviewed studies from climate-scientists, sound fair? http://skepticalscience.com/97-percent-consensus-cook-et-al-2013.html

                Reply

          • SoThere January 4th, 2014 at 5:24 PM

            Again, name the scientists and their studies. Be specific.

                Reply

          • .. January 4th, 2014 at 5:26 PM

            Post your names and studies. I know you can’t. You’re a TROLL and nothing more!

                Reply

          • SoThere January 4th, 2014 at 10:01 PM

            Folks, this is programmed response that actually means nothing.

            He can’t produce any proof about anything.

                Reply

          • .. January 4th, 2014 at 4:54 PM

            Which ones? Be specific.

                Reply

          • SoThere January 4th, 2014 at 10:03 PM

            Which climate scientists? Name names.

                Reply

      • John P January 4th, 2014 at 3:53 PM

        “global warming WILL cause …”

        After 30 years of being told such things, when can we expect some evidence that tells us global warming HAS caused …?

            Reply

        • ** Civilian Target ** January 4th, 2014 at 7:14 PM

          It’s caused monetary profit for the promoters of global warming.

              Reply

  174. WISFAR January 4th, 2014 at 12:55 PM

    Poor 49ers. If they were playing today…its 30 degrees. If they played next weekend its going to be in the low 30s both days with possible freezing rain on Saturday. As a Packers fan….I love the schedule.

    In ’97, the Packers/49ers played in 34 degrees and freezing rain. Having played a college game in 33 degrees and freezing rain, I can tell you its hard to imagine being any more uncomfortable than I was with every piece of my uniform soaking wet and then freezing. They might prefer the weather tomorrow to the weather in ’97.

        Reply

    • Jonus Grumby January 4th, 2014 at 5:48 PM

      That had to suck. Snow would have been an improvement for sure.

          Reply

  175. Chip Payne January 4th, 2014 at 1:10 PM

    I’ll be drivong my motorcycle to the american Legion for football! Palm Springs, CA.

        Reply

    • hellbindercda January 4th, 2014 at 1:34 PM

      what is drivong?

          Reply

    • ** Civilian Target ** January 4th, 2014 at 7:12 PM

      Mid 70′s here in San Diego and I enjoyed getting out on the bike today. It sure sucks doesn’t it :-)

          Reply

  176. yubnub January 4th, 2014 at 4:06 PM

    Because everyone knows if east coast is colder than ever, than global warming is a myth! I mean the world evolves around the United States, doncha know (tm Palin)?!?!?!

        Reply

    • John P January 4th, 2014 at 5:43 PM

      Global warming is based on the average temperatures of the whole world. Unusually cold temperatures in one part of the world, when averaged in, will have an effect on the average global temperature, … doncha know.

          Reply

    • Jeff_Phillips January 5th, 2014 at 8:09 AM

      And just because Australia is having very hot summer days doesn’t mean the world is getting warmer either.

          Reply

  177. oilcanp January 4th, 2014 at 4:53 PM

    There is no such thing as an averae.

        Reply

  178. Doug Doakes January 4th, 2014 at 5:06 PM

    Any attendance at freezing games just shows the complete idiocy of football fans.

        Reply

    • Jeff_Phillips January 5th, 2014 at 8:08 AM

      I kinda have to agree. I’ll watch the game while my wife and I are curled up in front of the woodstove while enjoying the heat from burning trees.

          Reply

  179. Ben January 4th, 2014 at 8:14 PM

    Read Agenda 21 from the UN and you will get all the answers for what they want to do with the US they think that we are the cause climate change.maybe the continents willl shift again who knows.Just saying.

        Reply

  180. Joe Smith January 4th, 2014 at 8:17 PM

    I wonder what a frozen discount double-check will look like?

        Reply

  181. Jeff January 4th, 2014 at 8:49 PM

    Follow the money. That’s all you need to do.

    I don’t care if it’s hotter or colder. That’s been going on since the beginning of time.

    Libs, explain the Ice Ages to me and why things got cold and then warm without human influence. Also, do you think sun activity may be a factor and a wee bit more powerful than a few SUVs on the road?

    You Libs should practice what you preach. Drop the cars, computers, and move into a grass hut. Send ALL your money to the cause, that’s your business.

    Leave smart, level-headed people out of it, and stop the distortions.

        Reply

    • Jeff_Phillips January 5th, 2014 at 8:06 AM

      No Jeff, they want everyone ELSE to send all their money. Here in Vermont we actually do have some people who walk the walk. They’re off the grid. But to them, toast is a luxury as making it drains the batteries.

          Reply

  182. FREDERICK January 4th, 2014 at 9:34 PM

    The Al Goreleone’s of the world who make hundreds of millions of dollars on “the weather” have no shortage of brain dead followers who will follow anything they say, because they are such “experts”. First Al Gore and his corrupt family made billions on Big Oil (Occidental) then he made billions off Big Tobacco (Multiple big tobacco companies) then the Global Ice age and Famine of the 70s, and now he made over 400 million since 2001 on “Global Warming” lately changed to “Climate Change” – which all us non-experts that have been alive more than 5 decades call – the weather. Something that changes at will due to living on a chaotic planet within a chaotic universe – both of which man cannot control!

        Reply

  183. red January 4th, 2014 at 11:00 PM

    Question authority

        Reply

  184. Bob White January 4th, 2014 at 11:31 PM

    Was that a picture of Al Gore on the Drudge link?

        Reply

  185. Oybama January 5th, 2014 at 6:40 AM

    Whoever scores first will have a big advantage.

        Reply

  186. Jeff_Phillips January 5th, 2014 at 8:14 AM

    The earth warms, the earth cools. The earth warms, the earth cools. The earth warms, the earth cools. The earth warms, the earth cools. It’s been going on since the beginning. And there’s not a damn thing we can do about it. Taxing the “rich” definitely won’t solve a thing.

        Reply

  187. nightsong January 5th, 2014 at 8:19 AM

    They should pick another neutral city and play there instead. Simply move the the players from both treams to that safe location and let a fair game proceed. Maybe one with a dome.

        Reply

  188. dondoc January 5th, 2014 at 8:41 AM

    Global warming scientists have brain freeze and brain lock syndrome – they are frozen solid and packed into the same explanation and hypothesis, regardless of the evidence, until death do them part..

        Reply

  189. Texas Patriot January 5th, 2014 at 10:02 AM

    Educated beyond their comprehension. Even a fool may be counted wise when he is silent. Time for these educated foolish scientists to hold their tongues, while God’s earth refutes their PC-driven claims.

        Reply

  190. Kokon Ryu January 5th, 2014 at 10:19 AM

    Stop with the wind chill hyperbole. There is no such thing as the wind chill factor. That nonsense was created by news stations to make weather reports seem more interesting.
    Guess what, when it’s 5 degrees out with a ten mile an hour wind it’s 5 degrees out. It’s not 40 below due to the magical wind chill factor.
    If such a thing exists why doesn’t it work in the summer? You never hear reporters saying that it’s 80 degrees out, but with the wind chill factor it feels like 60. Instead they have to make 80 seem more interesting so they add humidity to it and call it the heat index. With high humidity the magical heat index makes 80 feel like 142 or some such silly number.
    It’s all just sensationalism, so stop with the damned wind chill factor!

        Reply

  191. Lawrence Kennard January 5th, 2014 at 10:40 AM

    i see that many of us have woken up and smelled the coffee. The media’s fascistic grip on us hasn’t worked. They may control the airwaves, but not our minds. I DON’T LOVE BIG BROTHER!

        Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>