Lord Monckton on Muller: ‘If he had had a Classical training, he would have been made familiar with dozen logical fallacies first codified by Aristotle 2300 years ago’
Monckton: 'Natural variability, therefore, is sufficient to explain all of the warming since 1750. No other explanation is necessary. Accordingly, it is not legitimate to claim, as the Berkeley team claim, that in the absence of any other explanation the warming must be attributed to CO2. That claim is an instance of the argumentum ad ignorantiam, the fundamental logical fallacy of argument from ignorance. It is not sound science'