Links tagged “polar bear”
- Update: ‘Our Planet’ film crew is still lying about walrus cliff deaths
- Polar bears walking the streets on Novaya Zemlya are habituated garbage bears, not victims of climate change
- Warmist professor tries to spin increasing numbers of more polar bears: ‘You can’t equate seeing more bears with there being more bears’
- The truth behind the Baffin Bay starving polar bear video is worse than we thought
- Polar bears in good shape, Inuvialuit hunters say in study
'The study, published by the Wildlife Management Advisory Council, came from interviews with 75 hunters in all six Inuvialuit communities over a three-year period. It found traditional knowledge holders in the region say the bears are healthy and their population is stable.'
- Polar bears and melting ice: Three facts that shouldn’t surprise you
- Warmists promote ‘Polar bear-lesque’ as ‘the weirdest, sexiest way to confront climate change’
'PolarBare,' tackles one of the biggest issues of all: climate change'
- UK Guardian falsely claims: ‘Polar bear numbers in Hudson Bay of Canada on verge of collapse’ – ‘death rates have soared’ – Polar Bear Expert rebuts: ‘Where are all the bodies? Show us the starving bears!’
Zoologist Dr. Susan J. Crockford is a zoologist calls claims 'political posturing' by activists. 'The newest population estimate is based on data only [UK Guardian's Goldenberg] has seen' - 'It doesn’t matter how often Suzanne Goldenberg keeps repeating the lie that the ice-free season in Hudson Bay is steadily lengthening – it doesn’t make it so' - It’s better to get in bed with an activist environmental reporter who can generate headlines than to publish the data and let it speak for itself? Why are polar bear researchers still withholding data, if the stakes are so high?'
- NBC: Polar Bears Like ‘Passengers on the Titanic’ Because of Global Warming – Polar Bear Expert Ridicules Claims
NBC Nightly News, anchor Brian Williams warned of 'the habitat of the polar bears melting earlier and faster than ever' and promised 'a jaw-dropping look at a way of life quickly disappearing.' -- a sound bite ran of Steve Amstrup, chief scientist of Polar Bears International proclaiming: "Liken it to the passengers on the Titanic. It didn't matter how many people were on the Titanic or how well they were doing, when the Titanic slipped beneath the waves and they lost their habitat, that was it. Polar bears will also go away because of their dependence on the sea ice."
Reality Checks:
‘There is ZERO evidence that polar bear populations are in decline as a result of climate change’
New Peer-Reviewed Study: Polar Bear Population Growing Despite Declining Sea Ice
- Polar Bear Expert Challenging ‘save the polar bear’ propaganda from UK Guardian point by point: ‘Polar bears are not currently threatened or endangered – they have a healthy global population distributed throughout their traditional range’
Dr. Susan Crockford: 'It’s certainly true that there has been markedly less ice at the end of the summer than there was 20 years ago but the amount of summer ice is irrelevant to polar bears – and research by polar bear biologists themselves shows this to be true...Polar bear populations need to studied, monitored and managed, but surely this can be done without the hysteria promoted by Polar Bears International and the IUCN Polar Bear Specialist Group.'
-
Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: ‘The UN IPCC Reports have become ‘bumper sticker’ climate science’ – Report lobbies for ‘politically manufactured consensus’
Curry: " The IPCC Reports have become 'bumper sticker' climate science – making a political statement while using the overall reputation of science to give authority to a politically manufactured consensus." ... "The IPCC has strayed far from its chartered role of assessing the scientific literature in support of policy making. The entire framing of the IPCC Reports is now around the mitigation of climate change through emissions reductions. Not only has the IPCC increasingly taken on a stance of explicit political advocacy, but it is misleading policy makers by its continued emphasis on extreme climate outcomes driven by the implausible extreme emissions scenarios." ...
"The most important finding of the past 5 years is that the extreme emissions scenarios RCP8.5 and SSP5-8.5, commonly referred to as 'business-as-usual' scenarios, are now widely recognized as implausible. These extreme scenarios have been dropped by UN Conference of the Parties to the UN Climate Agreement. However, the new Synthesis Report continues to emphasize these extreme scenarios, while this important finding is buried in a footnote: “Very high emission scenarios have become less likely but cannot be ruled out.”
-
Great Water Reset: The UN & WEF are coming for your water now! ‘Sustainable development’ water dictates – Aim to ‘achieve internationally agreed water-related goals’
Cheryl K. Chumley: The United Nations plans to protect water that’s used for bathing; water that’s used for developments; water that’s home to sea life; water that’s used for transportation. So the up-and-coming controls would likely focus on residential limits to water usage, and costly increases to access that water; on bans on agricultural usage, and costly increases on farmers; on strict controls on the types and numbers of ships that can sail the seas and rivers and channels, and costly increases for this form of transportation. ... as with carbon offsets, the U.N. water czars will demand trades of activities to offset the supposed pollution of the waterways.
So much for jet skiing. So much for fishing on the weekends with the family. It’ll be too expensive — and regulated.
“Natural resources crises, including for water and food, come within the top 10 biggest risks facing humanity in the coming decade,” the World Economic Forum wrote. ... “[A]s global warming continues to take effect, ordinary weather is becoming a thing of the past, exacerbating our water crisis,” the World Economic Forum wrote.
#
-
Green Dictatorship? Netherlands Politicians Answering to the EU instead of Voters – Despite rejection of agriculture policies in recent elections
-
Lawyers Seek To Add Stock Of Lawyer Jokes By Demanding Oil Companies Be Prosecuted For Homicide
So if using oil is murder—and it has to be murder and not manslaughter, for our authors know of what they do—then lawyer Donald Braman and “public citizen” David Arkush are murderers. Perhaps they’ll turn themselves in? If it isn’t ink, it’s the gas they put in their cars, or the fuel in the planes in which they fly, or in heating or cooling their home, or running the electricity to pay for their Netflix accounts, or in manufacturing the clothes they wear, or in the plastic which surrounds them in their own homes, or in growing the food they eat. There is no way these sad individuals can remove the charge of hypocrisy, or escape the logic of their own argument. ...
If this “lethal harm”, caused by use of oil, is indeed “unparalleled in human history”, then our authors, who knowingly participate in this lethal harm, damn themselves. None of this can, or must, be taken seriously. The charge is absurd. It is asinine. It can only be the result of, as I said, lowly greed, or worse, profound stupidity and irresponsibility.