Links tagged “oreskes”
- Naomi Oreskes’ Tale of Discovering Corrupt Skeptic Climate Scientists has a Fatal Glitch
Posted October 13, 20151:05 PM by Marc Morano | Tags: debate, intimidation, mkey, oreskes, Rico, tobacco
- Warmist Eco-Author Spoke To AG About Global Warming Skeptics Before Exxon Reports
- Analysis: Warmist Naomi Oreskes ‘Warps History’
- The Oreskes Death Cult Tweet: Warmist Naomi Oreskes: ‘Antonin Scalia found dead. Experts say his heart froze’
A conservative US Supreme Court Judge has just died. Naomi Oreskes tweeted: “Antonin Scalia found dead. Experts say his heart froze (just kidding)”
And Aaron McCright, sociologist, tweeted: “I rarely have joy when someone dies, but today’s a special day for supporters of human rights & progressive values.
- ‘Is Naomi Oreskes Using the Same Merchant of Doubt Tactics She Criticizes?’ she smears fellow warmists as ‘deniers’
- German Magazine Süddeutsche calls Morano ‘one of the most powerful climate skeptics’
- Warmist v. Warmist: Naomi Oreskes goes after fellow activists: ‘There is a new form of climate denialism to look out for – so don’t celebrate yet’
Oreskes: 'There is also a new, strange form of denial that has appeared on the landscape of late, one that says that renewable sources can’t meet our energy needs. Oddly, some of these voices include climate scientists, who insist that we must now turn to wholesale expansion of nuclear power.'
- RICO-teering: How climate activists ‘knew’ they were going to pin the blame on Exxon
- Exxon Hits Back: ‘When it comes to climate change, read the documents’
- ‘The Climate Mafia Rewrites Science History’: ‘RICO statute was passed to fight the mafia. Now it’s being used by the climate mafia to silence dissent’
Contrary to what Oreskes and McKibben believe, unearthing the thoughts of Exxon scientists from the late 1970s and 1980s illustrates a tendency among some scientists — even those in the pay of an oil company — to be prone to alarmism and to overstate what is known. Predictably, Oreskes and McKibben draw a different conclusion, one entirely unsupported by the evidence. Had Exxon been up-front about the dangers of global warming, we might have started to decarbonize decades ago, Oreskes argues. Instead, Exxon had behaved like tobacco companies who had “long delayed” public understanding by suppressing the truth about the deadly nature of their products.
-
Crisis looms in alarmist climate science
-
UN busted for exaggerated climate ‘disaster’ report
-
New Study: East Antarctica Was Up To 6°C Warmer Than Today During The Medieval Warm Period
-
‘Dirty little secret’: Warmist Harvard Prof. Schrag finally admits: ‘Even if we could become carbon-neutral tomorrow, the climate will keep changing for thousands of years, the ice sheets will keep melting, & the seas will continue to rise’
Harvard Mag: These are all important questions—but even they ignore a central certainty that no one appears to be addressing: what Dan Schrag calls “climate change’s dirty little secret.” “Even if we could become carbon-neutral tomorrow,” says the director of the Harvard University Center for the Environment, “the climate will keep changing for thousands of years, the ice sheets will keep melting, and the seas will continue to rise.”
#
Climate Depot's Marc Morano: "So now an allegedly esteemed Harvard professor admits that controlling the climate is futile. Are we supposed to be surprised at this 'secret' that climate skeptics have always known? Even the climate activists will now have to concede that the climate will not stop changing if we refuse to enact the UN Paris pact and the Green New Deal."
#
Renowned Climatologist: ‘You can go outside and spit and have the same effect as doubling carbon dioxide’ -'Scientists note that geologically speaking, the Earth is currently in a 'CO2 famine' and that the geologic record reveals that ice ages have occurred when CO2 was at 2000 ppm to as high as 8000 ppm. In addition, peer-reviewed studies have documented that there have been temperatures similar to the present day on Earth when carbon dioxide was up to twenty times higher than today’s levels'
Philip Stott, professor emeritus of Biogeography at the University of London, points out that “climate change is governed by hundreds of factors, or variables, and the very idea that we can manage climate change predictably by understanding and manipulating at the margins one politically-selected factor [CO2], is as misguided as it gets. It's scientific nonsense."
