BREAKING: POLITICAL CLIMATE EARTHQUAKE! Trump GUTS UN climate agenda! Withdraws USA from 1992 UN climate treaty that started the whole UN climate scam!
Climate Depot’s Marc Morano comments:
“Thank you, Mr. President, for tearing up this UN treaty!
On January 7, 2026, you have unleashed a long overdue POLITICAL CLIMATE EARTHQUAKE, by formally withdrawing the USA from the UN climate scam!
Our long national nightmare began 36 years ago when then-GOP President George H.W. Bush got the USA into this whole UN climate mess by signing the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, aka, the Rio Earth summit treaty. This treaty has served as the underlying basis for all of the climate nonsense foisted on the U.S. lo these many years.
President Trump has finally freed America from this 34-year-old UN climate terror campaign.
President Trump may have finished off the UN climate agenda with this bold action. POLITICO reported on May 14, 2025: “During his first term, Trump declined to exit the UNFCCC, which the Democratic-led Senate had ratified during George H.W. Bush’s presidency following the ‘Earth Summit’ in Rio de Janeiro.”
“If Trump does pull the country out of the framework, it could be difficult for a new president to undo. Joining a treaty requires a two-thirds Senate vote — a high hurdle even in less polarized times,” Politico reported.
By his action today, President Trump has now injected permanence into keeping the failing UN climate agenda from rising from the ashes again. America is now a significant step closer to avoiding wild climate ying-yang policy swings, ie, Obama to Trump to Biden & back to Trump.
Trump 2.0’s climate legacy could now become permanent, making it very difficult for a future President, AOC, or Gavin Newsom to get the U.S. back into the UN climate fiasco.”
Trump Pulls US Out Of Notoriously ‘Alarmist’ UN Climate Change Panel
https://dailycaller.com/2026/01/07/exclusive-trump-pulls-us-out-of-notoriously-alarmist-un-climate-change-panel/ By WALLACE WHITE President Donald Trump has signed an executive order (date) officially pulling the U.S. out of a notoriously “alarmist” climate change body that formed the basis for the Paris Climate Accords in the United Nations (UN). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was conceived as the United Nations’ (UN) scientific committee […]
Trump Dismantles Climate-Industrial Complex
https://dailycaller.com/2025/12/21/opinion-trump-dismantles-climate-industrial-complex-steve-milloy/ By Steve Milloy The Trump administration took a major whack at the climate-industrial complex this week. It’s a fantastic move. But another event this week spotlights the need to do more. White House Office of Management and Budget Chief Russ Vought announced this week that the Trump administration would “be breaking up the National […]
Meteorologist explains history of UN’s involvement in climate con: First UN report in 1990 ‘found no evidence that catastrophic global warming is occurring’
Why do I distrust most scientists who write papers on climate change? Because everyone has bias. Everyone. Not one person on is immune from it, especially academics and most federal employees (research scientists) who are hard left or outright Marxist in their ideological… pic.twitter.com/ZT8PFptN6g — Chris Martz (@ChrisMartzWX) November 3, 2025
A Takeover of the UN IPCC By The ‘Extreme Event Attribution’ Effort – It was invented ‘to connect specific weather events’ to climate & ‘to get into the media & support climate litigation’
A Takeover of the IPCC–Roger Pielke By Paul Homewood The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has just released the names of its authors for its seventh assessment report (AR7). The author list for its Chapter 3 — Changes in regional climate and extremes, and their causes — suggests strongly that the IPCC will be shifting […]
Interview with Atmospheric scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen on climate change: ’50 years will pass. There will be no climate catastrophe’ – Talks fraud of 97% ‘consensus’ & debunks extreme weather claims
Lindzen: “What happens if I get rid of about 60-65% of the CO₂ in the atmosphere? … We’ll die. We’ll die of starvation. At 160 parts per million, virtually no plant will survive. No plant survives, there’s no food.”
…
We hear it more and more nowadays. That there is now a 97 per cent consensus.
Oh, that’s fake! How should I put it? It always depends on the question. So, for instance, if you asked a question if doubling CO₂ is more likely to warm than to cool the Earth, I would think you’d get 100% agreement. But that’s not the same as saying it’s a serious problem. So, at that level, if you ask the right question and put a funny interpretation on the answer, you can say all scientists agree. You just haven’t said what they agree with.
In 1988, you had a Senate hearing in the US, and you had a man called James Hansen (US climatologist – HS) testifying. He came there and said that increasing CO₂ was going to cause a lot of warming. And Newsweek had a cover showing the Earth on fire, and it had a label: “All scientists agree”. And that was very interesting, because at that time, almost no scientists were working on this. People were told all scientists agree. Now, think of that from a propaganda point of view. You don’t know science, you haven’t studied it, most people haven’t studied it. Even among the people who studied the science, for this problem, a big part of the problem is fluid mechanics. Almost no physicist ever studies fluid mechanics. So you have something that hardly anyone has studied. And you’re saying: “What am I going to do? I don’t understand this.” You are told all scientists agree. This is a source of comfort. You don’t have to understand it. If all scientists agree, you can agree, too.
New study: Data reveals CO2 residence time is 3-7 years. 90% of human emissions since 1750 have thus already been removed, precluding a human-CO2-driven climate. But the UN IPCC uses model assumptions to claim CO2 residence time is over 100 years
New study: Per empirical data CO2 residence time is 3-7 years. 90% of human emissions since 1750 have thus already been removed, precluding a human-CO2-driven climate. The IPCC consequently uses model assumptions to claim residence time is >100 years. https://t.co/Cle5jtz1rf pic.twitter.com/KuUkeq737g — Kenneth Richard (@Kenneth72712993) August 22, 2025
Dutch climate scientist rips AP’s Seth Borenstein’s ‘fact check’ as ‘politically motivated & ideologically biased’ – ‘Aimed to discredit a particular view’ deemed ‘politically inconvenient’
Via Dr. Roger Pielke Jr.: https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/where-were-you-when-i-needed-you “Where were you when I needed you?” – Climate scientist Jos de Laat on the DOE CWG and the biases of the climate beat This is a guest post by Jos de Laat, an accomplished climate scientist at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI). Jos explains of this guest post — “this […]
Watch: Energy Sec. Chris Wright: ‘We’re exposing the American people & the broader scientific community to what actually is in the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports, not the hyperbolic, summaries for policymakers or media headlines that claim all sorts of crazy stuff!’
We’re exposing the American people and the broader scientific community to what actually is in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports, not the hyperbolic, summaries for policymakers or media headlines that claim all sorts of crazy stuff! pic.twitter.com/DLXp5aXdgk — Secretary Chris Wright (@SecretaryWright) August 10, 2025
UN report finds — UN reports are not widely read! – In 2024, the UN ‘supported 27,000 meetings’ & ‘produced 1,100 reports’ – ‘Sheer number of meetings & reports is pushing the system…to the breaking point’
https://www.reuters.com/world/un-report-finds-united-nations-reports-are-not-widely-read-2025-08-01/ By Michelle Nichols UNITED NATIONS, Aug 1 (Reuters) – A United Nations report seeking ways to improve efficiency and cut costs has revealed: U.N. reports are not widely read. U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres briefed countries on Friday on the report, produced by his UN80 reform that focused on how U.N. staff implement thousands of […]