Links tagged “copenhagen”
- Report: Trump in 2009 supported UN climate treaty & ‘aggressive climate action’
Trump signed open letter in New York Times declaring: “If we fail to act now, it is scientifically irrefutable that there will be catastrophic and irreversible consequences for humanity and our planet.”
But this counters the above:
- Hillary Tries To Defend The Failed Copenhagen Climate Summit
- Warmist Laments: ‘Hillary Clinton Is Living in a Climate Change Fantasy World’
'Clinton staked her climate record on what’s widely perceived to have been one of the biggest diplomatic failures in recent history—the Copenhagen climate summit in 2009.'
'It’s hardly something Hillary should be proud of.'
- U.S. spied on UN diplomats at the 2009 climate summit
- Snowden Docs: U.S. Spied on Negotiators At 2009 Climate Summit
- UN climate summits ‘more about exotic locales than anything else’: Climate Depot’s Morano: ‘The United Nations knows how to throw a party’
Morano: 'I've been to Bali, I've been to Cancun, I've been to Kenya, S. Africa twice, to Rio, South America -- exotic locations, very nice places. I've stayed at five-star resorts on the ocean. The UN picks exotic locales in order to attract people to come because not many people would want to go to one in Trenton, NJ' -- 'Morano notes that while he worked for the U.S. Senate, his round-trip, business-class airline ticket (paid for by U.S. taxpayers) was $16,000 in 2006'
- Prof. Roger Pielke Jr.: Climate of Failure: ‘The world’s biggest emitters have reached a consensus of sorts, but not the one hoped for in Copenhagen’
'If the goal is to stabilize the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere at a low level by 2050 (in precise terms, at 450 parts per million or less), then the world would need to deploy a nuclear power plant worth of carbon free energy every day between now and 2050. For wind or solar, the figures are even more daunting'
- Exorcising the ghosts of Copenhagen: “The elephant in the room has been the ghost of Copenhagen…We are going to lose legitimacy. How many more conferences can we have without outcomes?’
- George W. Obama: NYT: Environmental Advocates Are Cooling on Obama
- Grist Mag.: ‘Is the Copenhagen Accord already dead? – ‘In private, [countries] are urinating all over it’
-
Crisis looms in alarmist climate science
-
UN busted for exaggerated climate ‘disaster’ report
-
New Study: East Antarctica Was Up To 6°C Warmer Than Today During The Medieval Warm Period
-
‘Dirty little secret’: Warmist Harvard Prof. Schrag finally admits: ‘Even if we could become carbon-neutral tomorrow, the climate will keep changing for thousands of years, the ice sheets will keep melting, & the seas will continue to rise’
Harvard Mag: These are all important questions—but even they ignore a central certainty that no one appears to be addressing: what Dan Schrag calls “climate change’s dirty little secret.” “Even if we could become carbon-neutral tomorrow,” says the director of the Harvard University Center for the Environment, “the climate will keep changing for thousands of years, the ice sheets will keep melting, and the seas will continue to rise.”
#
Climate Depot's Marc Morano: "So now an allegedly esteemed Harvard professor admits that controlling the climate is futile. Are we supposed to be surprised at this 'secret' that climate skeptics have always known? Even the climate activists will now have to concede that the climate will not stop changing if we refuse to enact the UN Paris pact and the Green New Deal."
#
Renowned Climatologist: ‘You can go outside and spit and have the same effect as doubling carbon dioxide’ -'Scientists note that geologically speaking, the Earth is currently in a 'CO2 famine' and that the geologic record reveals that ice ages have occurred when CO2 was at 2000 ppm to as high as 8000 ppm. In addition, peer-reviewed studies have documented that there have been temperatures similar to the present day on Earth when carbon dioxide was up to twenty times higher than today’s levels'
Philip Stott, professor emeritus of Biogeography at the University of London, points out that “climate change is governed by hundreds of factors, or variables, and the very idea that we can manage climate change predictably by understanding and manipulating at the margins one politically-selected factor [CO2], is as misguided as it gets. It's scientific nonsense."
