Links tagged “black list”
- Yet more problems with Anderegg et al ‘denier black list’ paper
'The public concern is whether scientists agree that we are due for dangerous warming and other problematic climate change due to continued GHG emissions. The past is past. It is the future we should be concerned about. Several authors point out that the Anderegg et al is therefore not helpful to today's debate'
- ‘97% to 98% of climate researchers (if not more) are paid by the government…to advance the global warming hypothesis’
'The study's premise that unless you've published 20 papers on climate your views don't matter or are uninformed is patently arbitrary and absurd'
- Climate Fallacies: ‘The’ consensus is a form of the appeal-to-authority fallacy, but it is more so a stacking-the-deck fallacy’
'It works thusly: the IPCC goes out among the credentialed and asks, 'Doest thou agree with me?' If the answer be 'Aye', the person is added to the Nice list; if it be 'Nay', the unfortunate is entered into the Persona Non Grata ledger. The IPCC then reports that there is a consensus among its membership, and that because this consensus is a consensus, its conclusions are beyond question'
- Climate Depot’s Morano on Christie: ‘Christie’s absurd claim that more than 90% of scientists agree is the verbal equivalent of sitting on a love seat with Nancy Pelosi’
Christie has no clue what he is talking about: Flashback: Climate Con: 97% 'consensus' claims exposed! Only 75 anonymous scientists are behind the media's 97% of scientists 'agree' claims!
- Warmist Haydn Washington, co-author of ‘Climate Change Denial’ claims ‘Denial is a delusion that has become a pathology’ — Cites 97% agreement claim as ‘proof’ of [email protected]
For more debunking on other claims of 97% alleged 'agreement' among scientists see here.
- Debunking Stephen Schneider’s Blacklist Paper, Part 1
- Analysis: Late Stephen Schneider’s ‘Blacklist’ Paper ‘violates every ethical standard…I think it is clear that the paper, wrong on the facts, is unethical in its intent and outcome’
'I call for the pape to be withdrawn and for Prall's website to take down the Blacklist'
- The late Schneider speaks about Climate Depot: ‘Implying that our [black] list is comparable to that created by Marc Morano when he worked for Sen. Inhofe is decidedly unconvincing and irresponsible’
- UN IPCC Scientist: ‘National Academy of Sciences creates virtual blacklists of scientists who dare to disagree with ‘the consensus’
- John Christy on Blacklist: ‘I think the study was pathetic. It basically says, ‘Those of us who agree with each other like to cite the work of our friends and not the other guys.’ Duh’
-
An Inconvenient Truth for Environmentalists: Offshore Wind Endangers Whales
-
Climate Hysteria & Groupthink From Billionaires Who Want Your Money To Save The World
-
Bjorn Lomborg: Partisan ‘fact checkers’ spread climate-change misinformation
-
European Union Approves Mealworms & Cricket Powder For Use in Bread, Crackers, Chocolate, & Soups Despite ‘Inconclusive’ Allergy Data
Europeans now also allowed to eat cricket powder and small mealworms - Earlier in January, the Commission also approved the use of small mealworms. The small mealworm may be used as (spread) paste, frozen, dried and powdered. Powdered mealworm larvae will also serve as a food supplement.
Daily Wire: Cricket powder will now be permitted in a number of food products, such as multigrain bread, crackers, cereal bars, biscuits, beer-like beverages, chocolates, sauces, whey powder, soups, and other items “intended for the general population,” according to the new regulation. Cricket One, a company that asserts that the insects are “nutritionally more efficient” and serve as a more reliable “source of alternative protein” than livestock, submitted the original application.
The New York Allergy and Sinus Centers has nevertheless found that “several allergic reactions to crickets” have been reported in the past two years. Individuals allergic to shellfish such as shrimp, crabs, and lobsters “may develop an allergy to crickets” because the species share many of the same proteins. ... Proposals for the increased consumption of crickets and other insects occur as many policymakers voice concern about the impact of meat production on climate change.
