Links tagged “black list”
- Yet more problems with Anderegg et al ‘denier black list’ paper
'The public concern is whether scientists agree that we are due for dangerous warming and other problematic climate change due to continued GHG emissions. The past is past. It is the future we should be concerned about. Several authors point out that the Anderegg et al is therefore not helpful to today's debate'
- ‘97% to 98% of climate researchers (if not more) are paid by the government…to advance the global warming hypothesis’
'The study's premise that unless you've published 20 papers on climate your views don't matter or are uninformed is patently arbitrary and absurd'
- Climate Fallacies: ‘The’ consensus is a form of the appeal-to-authority fallacy, but it is more so a stacking-the-deck fallacy’
'It works thusly: the IPCC goes out among the credentialed and asks, 'Doest thou agree with me?' If the answer be 'Aye', the person is added to the Nice list; if it be 'Nay', the unfortunate is entered into the Persona Non Grata ledger. The IPCC then reports that there is a consensus among its membership, and that because this consensus is a consensus, its conclusions are beyond question'
- Climate Depot’s Morano on Christie: ‘Christie’s absurd claim that more than 90% of scientists agree is the verbal equivalent of sitting on a love seat with Nancy Pelosi’
Christie has no clue what he is talking about: Flashback: Climate Con: 97% 'consensus' claims exposed! Only 75 anonymous scientists are behind the media's 97% of scientists 'agree' claims!
- Warmist Haydn Washington, co-author of ‘Climate Change Denial’ claims ‘Denial is a delusion that has become a pathology’ — Cites 97% agreement claim as ‘proof’ of [email protected]
For more debunking on other claims of 97% alleged 'agreement' among scientists see here.
- Debunking Stephen Schneider’s Blacklist Paper, Part 1
- Analysis: Late Stephen Schneider’s ‘Blacklist’ Paper ‘violates every ethical standard…I think it is clear that the paper, wrong on the facts, is unethical in its intent and outcome’
'I call for the pape to be withdrawn and for Prall's website to take down the Blacklist'
- The late Schneider speaks about Climate Depot: ‘Implying that our [black] list is comparable to that created by Marc Morano when he worked for Sen. Inhofe is decidedly unconvincing and irresponsible’
- UN IPCC Scientist: ‘National Academy of Sciences creates virtual blacklists of scientists who dare to disagree with ‘the consensus’
- John Christy on Blacklist: ‘I think the study was pathetic. It basically says, ‘Those of us who agree with each other like to cite the work of our friends and not the other guys.’ Duh’
