Links tagged “black list”
- Yet more problems with Anderegg et al ‘denier black list’ paper
'The public concern is whether scientists agree that we are due for dangerous warming and other problematic climate change due to continued GHG emissions. The past is past. It is the future we should be concerned about. Several authors point out that the Anderegg et al is therefore not helpful to today's debate'
- ‘97% to 98% of climate researchers (if not more) are paid by the government…to advance the global warming hypothesis’
'The study's premise that unless you've published 20 papers on climate your views don't matter or are uninformed is patently arbitrary and absurd'
- Climate Fallacies: ‘The’ consensus is a form of the appeal-to-authority fallacy, but it is more so a stacking-the-deck fallacy’
'It works thusly: the IPCC goes out among the credentialed and asks, 'Doest thou agree with me?' If the answer be 'Aye', the person is added to the Nice list; if it be 'Nay', the unfortunate is entered into the Persona Non Grata ledger. The IPCC then reports that there is a consensus among its membership, and that because this consensus is a consensus, its conclusions are beyond question'
- Climate Depot’s Morano on Christie: ‘Christie’s absurd claim that more than 90% of scientists agree is the verbal equivalent of sitting on a love seat with Nancy Pelosi’
Christie has no clue what he is talking about: Flashback: Climate Con: 97% 'consensus' claims exposed! Only 75 anonymous scientists are behind the media's 97% of scientists 'agree' claims!
- Warmist Haydn Washington, co-author of ‘Climate Change Denial’ claims ‘Denial is a delusion that has become a pathology’ — Cites 97% agreement claim as ‘proof’ of [email protected]
For more debunking on other claims of 97% alleged 'agreement' among scientists see here.
- Debunking Stephen Schneider’s Blacklist Paper, Part 1
- Analysis: Late Stephen Schneider’s ‘Blacklist’ Paper ‘violates every ethical standard…I think it is clear that the paper, wrong on the facts, is unethical in its intent and outcome’
'I call for the pape to be withdrawn and for Prall's website to take down the Blacklist'
- The late Schneider speaks about Climate Depot: ‘Implying that our [black] list is comparable to that created by Marc Morano when he worked for Sen. Inhofe is decidedly unconvincing and irresponsible’
- UN IPCC Scientist: ‘National Academy of Sciences creates virtual blacklists of scientists who dare to disagree with ‘the consensus’
- John Christy on Blacklist: ‘I think the study was pathetic. It basically says, ‘Those of us who agree with each other like to cite the work of our friends and not the other guys.’ Duh’
-
TIME Pushes Climate PANIC, Admits Green Transition’s Threat to Blue-Collar Workers
-
Compost That Corpse. It’s for the Planet – Report laments donating your body to science may have big ‘environmental impact’
"From a sustainability perspective, evaluating donations of bodies to science is not straightforward. While prolonging the ‘useful’ life of the body, donation to science still holds sustainability implications. Firstly, the body is embalmed, usually using formalin, a toxic substance. Secondly, the body is kept in refrigeration for up to four years, with a resulting energy footprint relating to electricity use. Finally, at the cessation of its use in anatomy labs, the body is then cremated in a conventional cremator or buried—meaning that its overall environmental impact is generally not less than that of a body disposed of immediately after death—and may, in fact, be higher."
-
Justin Hart: ‘Here’s what really happened with Covid’ – ‘Free speech, right to assembly, right to bodily autonomy, representative government all fell’
"Free speech, right to assembly, right to bodily autonomy, representative government all fell within months of the first COVID-19 cases announced in almost every country."
-
Which is it?! 2022 claim: ‘Climate change increases milk production’ – But wait: 2014 claim: ‘Climate Change Could Lower Dairy Productivity’
Marc Morano: "Whether milk production increases or decreases, you can rest assured the experts will blame 'climate change!' If you pick both teams to win the Super Bowl, you can always safely say, you predicted the winner!"
2022:
2014:
