By: Daniel Turner
Using history as a guide, Gov. Deb Haaland will likely do to New Mexico what she did to America, and the state will suffer enormously as a result.
Haaland controlled access and leases and permits for oil, gas, coal, mining, timber, and ranching. She decided on the construction of access roads and other infrastructure projects like pipelines and transmission lines. She also had blanket approval of wind, solar, and other “green” projects with hundreds of billions of dollars from both the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Bill.
Let’s check the tape to see how she did.
Energy prices didn’t go down. They went up nearly 30 percent. Gas prices didn’t go down. No, they stayed at the highest four-year average for a presidential term in modern history. Not even consumption went down. It too increased. Emissions barely went down. They were basically flat, and at an enormous cost.
What do we have to show for four years of Deb Haaland’s tenure as America’s landlord?
Pain. We are weaker and poorer.
When Alaska wanted to build a road and needed an easement 450 feet wide for 25 miles across federal land, Deb Haaland said no, overriding the will of Alaska’s governor and the local tribal communities that supported the project. She knows better than Alaskans.
When Minnesota wanted to develop Twin Metals mine to produce the copper, nickel, and cobalt needed for the wind and solar, Haaland again said no. She knows why it is better for us to continue to buy these materials from markets controlled by Communist China and sourced from child slave labor in sub-Saharan Africa. Climate change, or something.
Haaland stopped legally required oil and gas leases, ultimately losing in the courts. She turned a blind eye to dead whales likely killed by offshore wind projects. She ignored the concerns of New England lobstermen when her push for offshore wind turbines limited their fishing waters and threatened their industry.
Like all self-impressed individuals who have failing records, Haaland will respond to criticism with accusations of racism. Or sexism. Whichever causes discomfort and compels you to stop questioning her, regardless of the damage she does.
Perhaps the most blatantly egregious use of DEI to mask a radical agenda was when Haaland claimed “indigenous knowledge” as the foundation for her decision-making. This was meant to silence all dissent. She should have just been honest: Don’t criticize me or I will call you racist.
Yes, Deb Haaland has more American Indian blood than Elizabeth Warren, but that is not a qualification for anything. And that will not silence me or my organization, which advocates for the rural energy jobs that have suffered at the hand of Deb Haaland’s tenure, regardless of the origins of her so-called knowledge.