Forbes Mag: ‘America’s Decaying Wind Turbine Infrastructure’ – ‘Hidden Costs, Rusting Relics: Decommissioning Wind Turbines In The US’

https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielcohen/2024/12/23/hidden-costs-rusting-relics-decommissioning-wind-turbines-in-the-us/

By Ariel Cohen

The U.S. Wind Turbine Database contains more than 74,695 wind turbines built since 1980, spread between 1,699 wind power projects in 45 states. However, thousands of wind turbines are reaching the end of their operational lifespan and need to be either repowered to make way for updated (often larger) turbines or entirely decommissioned to allow for new uses of the land they occupy. Unfortunately, there is no uniform legal framework to regulate the steps involved, nor is there an accepted industry-wide set of best practices, and the environmental costs are considerable.

America’s Decaying Wind Turbine Infrastructure

Many first- and second-generation turbines with capacities between 0.5 and 1 MW are being retired and decommissioned as newer models—some with capacities of up to 3.5 MW—take their place. Complete decommissioning can include felling or dismantling the turbines, partially or wholly removing the turbine foundations and underground cables, removing the ground-level facilities, and restoring the land to a usable state.

One issue with decommissioning turbines is how to dispose of turbine components. Above ground, the towers, hubs, and some internal parts of wind turbines are made of easily recyclable metals, accounting for 86%-94% of the weight of each unit. In contrast, blades and other components, which account for 6%-14% of the weight, are made of composite materials that are more difficult to recycle. Foundations and underground cables made of concrete, plastic, and metal can usually be recycled but are often left underground when a project is discontinued.

The rare earth elements used in permanent magnets in wind turbine generators are difficult to retrieve for reuse. Last but not least, wind turbines’ large blades are constructed from fiberglass, carbon fiber, or epoxy resin, rendering conventional recycling procedures ineffective. New recycling methods are limited in availability and costly, which ironically means that landfilling is currently the most cost-effective disposal option.
Alternative waste management methods are available but have not attained market dominance. Mechanical recycling processes grind blades into materials for construction or fuel, while thermal decomposition converts fiberglass into new composite products. These energy-intensive processes generate greenhouse gas emissions, which may outweigh the benefits of the recycled products they create.

Share: