Soft-spoken sanity from Richard Lindzen: “But I would think any reasonable person would begin to wonder if this wondrous climate engine is simply a function of one parameter, CO2. And that would be implausible.
People are not only accepting it, but wishing to canonize it in… pic.twitter.com/VvluQr5wv5
— Tom Nelson (@TomANelson) November 25, 2024
Richard Lindzen: “But I would think any reasonable person would begin to wonder if this wondrous climate engine is simply a function of one parameter, CO2. And that would be implausible. People are not only accepting it, but wishing to canonize it in international law. And that would set back the science of climate generations. In fact the whole idea of international law deciding science would set back science centuries.”
And he explains the 'why' here https://t.co/T2vT8bx5nd. TLDR: https://t.co/pWHnmFk3Oy pic.twitter.com/jMspHBGWpc
— Chris Horner (@Chris_C_Horner) November 25, 2024