Biden: We’re down to 9 years to save Earth from global warming
Science doesnt say we have "9 years left" to save the planet from climate change. The 'years left' narrative is a complete fraud.
Biden didn't write the speech, of course. https://t.co/3Kzr3HoRqu
— Ryan Maue (@RyanMaue) July 14, 2020
Climate Tipping Points date back to at least 1864
“As early as 1864 George Perkins Marsh, sometimes said to be the father of American ecology, warned that the earth was ‘fast becoming an unfit home for its “noblest inhabitant,”’ and that unless men changed their ways it would be reduced ‘to such a condition of impoverished productiveness, of shattered surface, of climatic excess, as to threaten the depravation, barbarism, and perhaps even extinction of the species.’” —MIT professor Leo Marx
Earth “Serially Doomed”
Perhaps the best summary of the tipping-point phenomenon comes from UK scientist Philip Stott. “In essence, the Earth has been given a 10-year survival warning regularly for the last fifty or so years. We have been serially doomed,” Stott explained. “Our post-modern period of climate change angst can probably be traced back to the late-1960s, if not earlier. By 1973, and the ‘global cooling’ scare, it was in full swing, with predictions of the imminent collapse of the world within ten to twenty years, exacerbated by the impacts of a nuclear winter.”
Could not find a news article fact-checking or even mentioning Joe Biden's climate speech statement of "Science says we have 9-years left …" to save the planet.
This rhetoric of "years left" is not based in science but instead channeling Greta Thunberg doomsday preaching.
— Ryan Maue (@RyanMaue) July 15, 2020
So-called "fact checkers" and media activists are very eager to parse every statement of Trump's on climate or science in general. That is exactly the media's job.
But, they seem to turn a deaf ear and blind eye to the anti-science nonsense coming from the far left.
— Ryan Maue (@RyanMaue) July 15, 2020
Biden has been captured by the far-left on climate policy.
Of course, media, activists & scientists are overwhelmingly pro-Biden.
But his plans should be scrutinized fairly otherwise there is a significant risk of political damage especially in swing states.
— Ryan Maue (@RyanMaue) July 15, 2020