Sometimes I think the more degrees a person gets the dumber they are. This guy has a Ph.D in physics and doesn’t seem able to comprehend the basics physics of the CO2 molecule and its ability to affect climate change. Anyway, his point is well taken. If 95% of all slimate climatists agree than that means that the arguments made by only 5% of the real scientists have won the debate. What that proves is that the quality of the argument wins over the quantity of insults leveled by the “consensus.” Maybe is the climate alarmists would be less concerned with politics and more concerned with real science they might actually get people to listen to their nonsense.
Dr. Carroll, if you are reading this, why don’t you run an experiment to see if LWIR between 13 and 18µ can warm water. If it can’t, how can you explain what is warming the oceans? If you can’t explain how CO2 warms the oceans, you can’t explain how CO2 is warming the atmosphere.
BTW, no real Physicist would ever trust science and conclusions based upon the garbage data use in the field of slimate clience. Dr. Corroll seems to be following in the footsteps that led Einstein to his “cosmological constant,” a fudging of the model that he greatly regretted.