Analysis: ‘Why the IPCC Report Neglects the Benefits of Global Warming — It needs catastrophe scenarios’ – IPCC’s ‘negligence amounts to downright dishonesty’
'Of the 71 authors of the summary, only three are economists; of these, one did not engage in work on the summary for the last two years; and one, Richard Tol, insisted his name be removed from the summary because it is, as he put it, too alarmist and it makes silly claims.'
