New warmist Arctic study challenged: Prof. Jim Bouldin of UC Davis ‘marvels at how the authors could state the conclusions they do, given the methods and data presented’
'We have four sites clustered together at one end of the 1000km sampling transect that give very anomalous results relative to the 135 samples collected all along that transect. So why in the world are they focusing on those four sites, to the exclusion of the much more geographically extensive 135? How can the authors just blow past this fact without discussing why in any way? Reviewers, HELLO??'
