Read the Full Article
Hulme: 'The populist notion that all climate sceptics are either in the pay of oil barons or are right-wing ideologues, as is suggested for example by studies such as Oreskes and Conway (2011), cannot be sustained.'
Flashback: Climate Scientist Mike Hulme: Claims such as ’2,500 of the world’s leading scientists have reached a consensus — are disingenuous’:
Hulme: 'That particular consensus judgement, as are many others in the IPCC reports, is reached by only a few dozen experts in the specific field of detection and attribution studies; other IPCC authors are experts in other fields'
Flashback: Warmist Mike Hulme: 'The “97% consensus” article is poorly conceived, poorly designed and poorly executed…it is a sign of the desperately poor level of public and policy debate in this country that the energy minister should cite it'
Flashback UEA warmist Mike Hulme: ‘I am increasingly unconvinced by the majority of climate impact studies – including some of those I am involved in’
By: Marc Morano - Climate DepotAugust 8, 2013 2:45 PM
« Climate Depot home