Panel discussion: Ethics, Stanford: A question of balance
Response: 'Between all the 'Pal Review, the attempts to suborn editors and corrupt the peer review process, loss of data, 'Irreproducible Results', agenda driven science, grants being given to only one point of view, & Peter Gleick and mail fraud /computer fraud; there's a lot of 'ethical issues' in the way 'climate science' is being done. And Hansen both testifying that it's OK to commit crimes & damage private property if your cause is just'
