Revkin wins the fake-but-accurate race? ‘The Dan-Rather-esque ‘fake but accurate’ defense of the memo from teaching science’
'When presented with the fact that he may have published a fake memo, Revkin wrote: 'looking back, it could well be something that was created as a way to assemble the core points in the batch of related docs.' -- 'It sounds like he is saying that while the memo is faked, it may have been someones attempt to summarize real Heartland documents. Fake but accurate!'
