NY Times not buying claims of AGW/flood paper: ‘The problem is that the Nature paper is not definitive at all’ — NYT’s Revkin compares flood claims to discredited frog-warming study!
NYT: 'This is about responsible reporting. A previous instance occurred in 2006, when a paper in Science on frog die-offs in Costa Rica included this firm and sobering statement: Here we show that a recent mass extinction associated with pathogen outbreaks is tied to global warming. Things were far more complicated, of course'
