Day: July 7, 2010

An FOI Ruling More Significant than the Russell Review

Paper: SCIENTISTS HID DOUBTS OVER GLOBAL WARMING

Climate Audit’s McIntyre: ‘You Can’t Be Serious!’ ‘Muir Russell says that they ‘have seen no evidence of any attempt to delete information in respect of a request already made’

Climate Audit’s McIntyre: ‘Muir Russell’s [climategate report] contains many gaffes and errors’

Read all about it! Climate Depot’s Round up of Reactions to Muir Russell’s ‘Sham’ Climategate Report

For updated reactions see here. Shameful Sham Climategate report urges ‘campaign to win hearts and minds’ to restore confidence in global warming science — ‘University of East Anglia’s enquiry into the conduct of its own staff at its Climatic Research — The most serious charge is poor communication — Sir Muir Russell even calls for […]

‘The subjects of their criticism were not invited, nor were climate scientists critical of their behavior’

Shameful Sham Climategate report urges ‘campaign to win hearts and minds’ to restore confidence in global warming science

Climate Audit’s McIntyre on Climategate report: It ‘adopted a unique inquiry process in which they interviewed only one side – CRU. As a result, report is heavily weighted towards CRU apologia’

Meteorologist Watts: Muir Russell Climategate report is ‘another apologist who doesn’t ask relevant questions of both sides, only one side’

More Errors: Muir Russell writes that Oxburgh inquiry looked at the science. Lord Oxburgh has specifically stated that his inquiry did not look at the science’