Meteorologist explains history of UN’s involvement in climate con: First UN report in 1990 ‘found no evidence that catastrophic global warming is occurring’
Why do I distrust most scientists who write papers on climate change? Because everyone has bias. Everyone. Not one person on is immune from it, especially academics and most federal employees (research scientists) who are hard left or outright Marxist in their ideological… pic.twitter.com/ZT8PFptN6g — Chris Martz (@ChrisMartzWX) November 3, 2025
A Takeover of the UN IPCC By The ‘Extreme Event Attribution’ Effort – It was invented ‘to connect specific weather events’ to climate & ‘to get into the media & support climate litigation’
A Takeover of the IPCC–Roger Pielke By Paul Homewood The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has just released the names of its authors for its seventh assessment report (AR7). The author list for its Chapter 3 — Changes in regional climate and extremes, and their causes — suggests strongly that the IPCC will be shifting […]
Interview with Atmospheric scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen on climate change: ’50 years will pass. There will be no climate catastrophe’ – Talks fraud of 97% ‘consensus’ & debunks extreme weather claims
Lindzen: “What happens if I get rid of about 60-65% of the CO₂ in the atmosphere? … We’ll die. We’ll die of starvation. At 160 parts per million, virtually no plant will survive. No plant survives, there’s no food.”
…
We hear it more and more nowadays. That there is now a 97 per cent consensus.
Oh, that’s fake! How should I put it? It always depends on the question. So, for instance, if you asked a question if doubling CO₂ is more likely to warm than to cool the Earth, I would think you’d get 100% agreement. But that’s not the same as saying it’s a serious problem. So, at that level, if you ask the right question and put a funny interpretation on the answer, you can say all scientists agree. You just haven’t said what they agree with.
In 1988, you had a Senate hearing in the US, and you had a man called James Hansen (US climatologist – HS) testifying. He came there and said that increasing CO₂ was going to cause a lot of warming. And Newsweek had a cover showing the Earth on fire, and it had a label: “All scientists agree”. And that was very interesting, because at that time, almost no scientists were working on this. People were told all scientists agree. Now, think of that from a propaganda point of view. You don’t know science, you haven’t studied it, most people haven’t studied it. Even among the people who studied the science, for this problem, a big part of the problem is fluid mechanics. Almost no physicist ever studies fluid mechanics. So you have something that hardly anyone has studied. And you’re saying: “What am I going to do? I don’t understand this.” You are told all scientists agree. This is a source of comfort. You don’t have to understand it. If all scientists agree, you can agree, too.
New study: Data reveals CO2 residence time is 3-7 years. 90% of human emissions since 1750 have thus already been removed, precluding a human-CO2-driven climate. But the UN IPCC uses model assumptions to claim CO2 residence time is over 100 years
New study: Per empirical data CO2 residence time is 3-7 years. 90% of human emissions since 1750 have thus already been removed, precluding a human-CO2-driven climate. The IPCC consequently uses model assumptions to claim residence time is >100 years. https://t.co/Cle5jtz1rf pic.twitter.com/KuUkeq737g — Kenneth Richard (@Kenneth72712993) August 22, 2025
Dutch climate scientist rips AP’s Seth Borenstein’s ‘fact check’ as ‘politically motivated & ideologically biased’ – ‘Aimed to discredit a particular view’ deemed ‘politically inconvenient’
Via Dr. Roger Pielke Jr.: https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/where-were-you-when-i-needed-you “Where were you when I needed you?” – Climate scientist Jos de Laat on the DOE CWG and the biases of the climate beat This is a guest post by Jos de Laat, an accomplished climate scientist at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI). Jos explains of this guest post — “this […]
Watch: Energy Sec. Chris Wright: ‘We’re exposing the American people & the broader scientific community to what actually is in the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports, not the hyperbolic, summaries for policymakers or media headlines that claim all sorts of crazy stuff!’
We’re exposing the American people and the broader scientific community to what actually is in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports, not the hyperbolic, summaries for policymakers or media headlines that claim all sorts of crazy stuff! pic.twitter.com/DLXp5aXdgk — Secretary Chris Wright (@SecretaryWright) August 10, 2025
UN report finds — UN reports are not widely read! – In 2024, the UN ‘supported 27,000 meetings’ & ‘produced 1,100 reports’ – ‘Sheer number of meetings & reports is pushing the system…to the breaking point’
https://www.reuters.com/world/un-report-finds-united-nations-reports-are-not-widely-read-2025-08-01/ By Michelle Nichols UNITED NATIONS, Aug 1 (Reuters) – A United Nations report seeking ways to improve efficiency and cut costs has revealed: U.N. reports are not widely read. U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres briefed countries on Friday on the report, produced by his UN80 reform that focused on how U.N. staff implement thousands of […]
U.S. Dept of Energy publishes new climate assessment report breaking the alleged ‘consensus’ – First official U.S. Govt report to push back on UN climate reports
This is HUGE. It is the first comprehensive government scientific report to challenge the conventional narrative surrounding the climate change issue in a very long time, perhaps ever. I cannot underscore enough how big of a deal this is. https://t.co/0G75r94LS2 — Chris Martz (@ChrisMartzWX) July 29, 2025 The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has published […]
Analysis of UN court ruling: ‘When Science Fails, They Call the Lawyers’ – ‘Inside the UN’s Plan to Criminalize Climate Dissent’ – ‘Forcing Consensus at the Barrel of a Gavel’
https://irrationalfear.substack.com/p/when-science-fails-they-call-the DR. MATTHEW WIELICKI Excerpt: A Court in Robes, Not Lab Coats In a sweeping new advisory opinion released July 23rd, 2025, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has officially declared that states not doing enough to fight climate change may be held internationally liable for violating human rights. It’s a dense, sprawling document, but […]
UN IPCC’s & Michael Mann’s Hockey-Stick graph is ‘a technological virus of deception’ – ‘Scientifically unethical to spice ‘observed’ data onto ‘proxy’ data’
The hockey-stick graph is a technological virus of deception which continues to infect IPCC products. It is scientifically unethical to spice "observed" data onto "proxy" data. The IPCC is a "government" agency and not a place of rational science. pic.twitter.com/ok5uMwECwT — John Shewchuk (@_ClimateCraze) July 25, 2025