Search
Close this search box.

International panel of geologists rejects notion of significant ‘climate change’ – ‘Stunning rebuke’ of ‘proposed geologic time division reflecting human influence’

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/05/climate/anthropocene-epoch-vote-rejected.html?searchResultPosition=4 Science Mag: ‘Panel rejects a proposed geologic time division reflecting human influence’ – The vote, first reported by The New York Times, is a stunning—though not unexpected—rebuke for the proposal, which has been working its way through a formal approval process for more than a decade. https://science.slashdot.org/story/24/03/10/1849256/are-we-in-the-anthropocene-the-human-age-scientists-say-nope Excerpts: Science magazine “has confirmed that a panel of two dozen geologists […]

Climate dissenting scientists fight back on ‘fact-check’ attempt to silence them

Our detailed (62 page!) response to Science Feedback's latest "fact-check" attack on the CERES-Science group:https://t.co/70a2kupCLX Relevant links1) The "fact-check" we were responding to: https://t.co/bH8XMPkwpy 2) The "fact-check" was about @TCNetwork's interview with Dr.… — Dr. Ronan Connolly (@1RonanConnolly) February 21, 2024

Pielke Jr.: The Weaponization of ‘Scientific Consensus’ – Only science offers a path to truth, not surveys of expert opinion

https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/the-weaponization-of-scientific-consensus By ROGER PIELKE JR. Excerpt: In September, 2022 California Governor Gavin Newsome signed into law a bill that prohibited medical professionals from sharing “misinformation” with patients. Specifically, the law stated that it would be [U]nprofessional conduct for a physician and surgeon to disseminate misinformation or disinformation related to COVID-19. The law defined “misinformation”: “Misinformation” means false information that is contradicted […]

Navigating the Complexity of Climate Change: A Closer Look at the Scientific Method and Its Challenges

https://mises.org/wire/navigating-complexity-climate-change-closer-look-scientific-method-and-its-challenges 01/31/2024Frank Hollenbeck The physical sciences have greatly advanced knowledge by elucidating the workings of simple phenomena. In a simple phenomenon, we have a limited number of important variables, all of which are identifiable and measurable. This allows us to run a scientific experiment. In such an experiment, we hold all other variables constant and […]

REPORT: Wrong Again: 2023 Edition – Hottest Lying Ever

https://9qqq.mjt.lu/nl3/lUAi1Z2jjShd1whDrmjM7A?m=AU4AADMjnRUAAc3GrSQAAAHT5McAAAAdHC4AAGYoAAxJ4ABlpuNzzLw-G93SSnyE96pHupFvpgAMUIc&b=113afda9&e=02e8ae89&x=1YxNY3NiKaFU7LqsDGwY0ND3-utQbM_50yf7vImEfmg Wrong Again: 2023 Edition – Hottest Lying Ever Starting in 2022, E&E Legal joined The Heartland Institute, American Energy Institute (AEI), Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), the International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC), and Truth in Energy and Climate to produce monthly and yearly reports chronicling the most outrageous climate exaggerations spewed out by […]

Climate scientist Dr. Willie Soon: ‘The whole problem of this global warming is a complete nothing’

https://twitter.com/ClimateDepot/status/1744852976093548628 https://www.ceres-science.com/post/dr-willie-soon-s-interview-by-tucker-carlson-december-2023 In December 2023, CERES-Science co-founder, Dr. Willie Soon, was invited to talk to Tucker Carlson about energy policy, climate change and approaches to science. The full interview covered a lot of topics and lasted 48 minutes. The interview was posted online on January 9th, 2024 and is available to view on Tucker Carlson’s […]

The award for one of the most vacuous phrases in climate goes to — ‘To avoid the worst impacts of climate change, scientists say…’

By Climate Scientist Dr. Patrick T. Brown: This framing misleads for at least three reasons.

The first is that the phrase “scientists say” implies that there is a scientific consensus on the need to limit global warming to some particular level and therefore a scientific consensus on the size of our supposed carbon budget. That is not the case.

The second reason is that tying the phrase “in order to avoid the worst impacts of climate change” to the particular 1.5°C level of warming implies that there is something special about that threshold. But that’s not the case either.

Finally, focusing only on “scientists” and “the worst impacts of climate change” takes an issue that should be looked at through a society-wide cost-benefit lens and puts the focus exclusively on the benefits of avoided warming—ignoring the costs involved in avoiding that warming.

Cause of Climate Change? It Isn’t Carbon Dioxide, former researcher with Center for Astrophysics-Harvard & Smithsonian, Says

Cause of Climate Change? It Isn’t Carbon Dioxide, Expert Says By Virginia Allen  The scientific community doesn’t all agree on the core causes of climate change, and according to climate expert Willie Soon, humanity should look beyond Earth to find the source. The Earth’s rotation around the sun affects the planet’s temperature, says Soon, a visiting fellow […]