Watch: Climatologist Dr. John Christy to Congress: NOAA data shows downward trend of extreme high temps since 1930s


By: - Climate DepotFebruary 2, 2016 3:57 PM with 16 comments

 

Testifying before Congress, atmospheric scientist Dr John Christy illustrates that NOAA’s own data clearly shows that many more 100 degree days occurred in the 1930’s than today.

Dr. Christy: “When you look at the United States record of extreme high temperatures you do not see an upward trend at all. In fact, it’s slightly downward. That does fly in the face of climate model projections.”

Paris Climate Promise: A Bad Deal For America
US House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
February 2, 2016

Christy’s full testimony here.

Related Links: 

EPA Say Heatwaves Much Worse in 1930’s: ‘Heat waves occurred with high frequency in the 1930s, and these remain the most severe heat waves in the U.S. historical record’ – ‘What is surprising is that the EPA acknowledged that the 1930’s saw much more severe heat waves and that there is no trend to heat waves becoming worse’

https://i1.wp.com/www.epa.gov/climatechange/images/indicator_downloads/heat-waves-download1.png

Climatologist Dr. John Christy Debunks NOAA’s Climate Claims at Cong. Hearing – Defends Satellites

Cong. Lamar Smith: Paris UN Climate Agreement a Bad Deal for Americans


  • Canuck

    I’ve read for years that the 1930’s particularly 1934 were the hottest decade until the zealots at NOAA started fiddling with the data to match the current hysterical narrative on AGW.

    • Tammyhclark2

      ❝my neighbor’ s mate Is getting 98$. HOURLY. on the internet❞….A few days ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a day ..with extra open doors & weekly. paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn More right Here:a10➤➤➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportsEdge/GetPaid/98$hourly…. .❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦::::a10…….

    • Diannerpereira

      ❝my neighbor’ s mate Is getting 98$. HOURLY. on the internet❞….A few Town ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a Town ..with extra open doors & weekly. paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn More right Here:a167➤➤➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportsCity/GetPaid/98$hourly…. .❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦:❦::::a167…….

    • Carolinerdevane1

      ❝my .friend’s mate Is getting 98$. HOURLY. on the internet❞….A few days ago new McLaren. F1 bought after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a days ..with extra open doors & weekly. paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn. More right Here;b50➤➤➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportsStore/GetPaid/98$hourly…. .❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:❦2:::::;b50……

  • MyOpinionPost

    Christy should have known there is no grant money in disproving global warming. It is settled science, like the sun spinning around the earth.

    • Ghostmaker

      lol

  • PhD

    There is some wonderful comedy in the AGW nonsense…. some of the biggest fools in the world are unveiled. I will miss it when it dies the death that all such unscientific nonsense deserves….. what will the Left do for an encore. It is difficult to see what could be more asinine than AGW but I am sure they will find something to make us all laugh.

    • Gus

      “>>> they will find something to make us all laugh. <<<"
      Or they'll parade us to the killing fields–if we let them–as their brethren have done in Cambodia.

  • AfricanTraveler1

    Considering the something like twelve of the last fifteen years were the hottest in the world on record since records have been kept, I think this web site misrepresents the state of climate change research and data. This is probably part of the Koch’s disinformation campaign, or perhaps something funded by their buddies. The one thing almost all of these deniers have in common is that they are paid and funded to misrepresent the situation. You note that the data shown here relates to climate change in the United States, not in the entire world. This kind of selective picking of data is known as “cherry picking,” and is a common tactic among those who deny that climate change and global warming exist, that they are a serious threat to mankind, and that at this point they are large anthropogenic.

    • AfricanTraveler1

      And in case you want to know something about the people and funding behind this web site, here is some information:

      ClimateDepot.com is being financed by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, a nonprofit in Washington that advocates for free-market solutions to environmental issues. Public tax filings for 2003-7 (the last five years for which documents are available) show that the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the ExxonMobil Foundation and foundations associated with the billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife, a longtime financier of conservative causes, including being the primary source of money used to fund attacks against Bill Clinton during the Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky eras of his presidency [1]. According to a report issued by the Union of Concerned Scientists, from 1998-2005, approximately 23% of the total ExxonMobil funding for the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow was directed by ExxonMobil for climate change activities [p. 32].

      Craig Rucker, a co-founder of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, said the committee got a third of its money from other foundations. However, Rucker would not identify them or say how much his foundation would pay Marc Morano. Rucker did say that ExxonMobil did not contribute anything to the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow in 2008 [2].

      Money from the EXXON-Mobil folks, the same folks who have tried to hide the facts about Climate Change and Global Warming for decades and are now going into litigation concerning their climate change denials, which have damaged the public across the world. They did not pay the money directly, which is how they can truthfully say that EXXON MOBIL did not contribute money. They funneled it through a foundation they maintained, so what they said was an evasion and really a lie.

      • TeaPartyGeezer

        Congratulations! You’ve got your alarmist talking points and copy-paste routine down pat. Too bad none of it is grounded in science, history, or critical thinking … but is based on dishonesty, innuendo, and character assassination.

        Good little alarmist troll.

        • AfricanTraveler1

          No need to retype when the information is right out there for anyone to see. It is all grounded on fact. And to take criticism about logic from a Tea Party member is nonsensical. Deal with the information, Geezer, and don’t try to deflect from the subject with how it is put up here for all to see. But of course you cannot do that. Deflecting the discussion from the relevant facts is a common tactic among you right-wing folks when you know you are wrong.

          • TeaPartyGeezer

            Excellent, Little Alarmist Troll! You are truly a ‘true believer,’ unshakable in your faith in spite of all the evidence to the contrary.

            You cited the Union of Concerned Scientists as a credible source of information. Did you know that the only requirement for membership in the UCS is a credit card? Meet a member in good standing since October 2011.
            http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/10/07/friday-funny-the-newest-member-of-the-union-of-concerned-scientists/

            Kenji is, of course, committed to keeping you well informed, in order to help motivate policy makers and business leaders to take positive steps … blah, blah, blah.

          • YouPoorVictim

            “unshakable in your faith in spite of all the evidence to the contrary.”

            So your faith in right wing bloggers’ and politicians’ opinions about climate science is not unshakable? You aren’t really a true believer in what they tell you?

        • YouPoorVictim

          ” but is based on dishonesty, innuendo, and character assassination.”

          Next sentence: “Good little alarmist troll.”

          <3 Love you Gramps

  • Don55Clifford

    That the models don’t match the facts is why we call people deniers, claim the debate is over, claim a 97% (faux) consensus, make huge exaggerated claims about sea ice and sea levels, continue funding billions in boondoggle projects. destroy legitimate science and academic scholarship, and engage in wholesale fraud for political and financial gain. Anyway, that’s the SHORT list…