Search Results for: netherlands farms  – Page 2

‘Only one sausage per month for everyone!’ German Nutrition Society recommends over 90% reduction in daily meat eating– to combat global warming

https://www-bild-de.translate.goog/politik/inland/politik-inland/ernaehrungsverband-will-weniger-fleischkonsum-nur-noch-eine-currywurst-im-monat-84075944.bild.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp&_x_tr_hist=true#fromWall German daily newspaper Bild: Only one sausage per month for everyone! The DGE is no longer just about health – But the DGE is no longer just concerned with health reasons! The background to the planned meat reform is something completely different: in the future, environmental factors such as “sustainability” will also be taken into account in the recommendations.   Less meat consumption = better climate? The Lower Saxony Chamber of Agriculture has calculated that even halving meat consumption would bring Germany one percentage point closer to its climate goals. Rather, the big chunk of CO2 emissions is the energy sector (including lignite-fired power plants). ︎ Heike Harstick, general manager of the meat association, is appalled. She tells BILD: “Even in Germany, many people are already undersupplied with certain nutrients, such as iron or vitamin B12. If the new nutritional recommendations presented by the DGE were to remain and such a drastic reduction in animal-based foods recommended, the deficiency would increase.” The planned reference values ​​are “in no way scientifically proven”. … In general, the DGE emphasizes: “Nobody wants to forbid people to eat their currywurst occasionally. But overall meat consumption in the population is too high for health and sustainability reasons, that’s a scientific fact.” # https://time.news/only-10-grams-of-meat-per-day-in-germany/ According to a information reported by the German daily Bild, the German Nutrition Society (DGE) now recommends reducing meat consumption to 10 grams per day per person to combat global warming. A real earthquake in the land of currywurst. On May 22, it was the Court of Auditors which suggested to the French, in a detailed report, to reduce their meat consumption to 500 grams per week. A sudden and radical renunciation The average meat consumption of Germans is 109 grams per day, or about 763 grams per week. The population will therefore have to drastically change its eating behavior if it agrees to comply with this new strategy. A previous recommendation from the same organization was less severe (600 grams of meat per week), so why such a reversal? The German nutrition authority tells the daily Bild that it now takes into account factors other than just “health” to base its decisions on. Cattle farming sacrificed on the altar of global warming « No one wants to ban people from their occasional currywurst. But overall meat consumption in the population is too high for health and sustainability reasons, it’s a scientific fact“, indicates the DGE to the German newspaper. From now on, environmental factors are also an integral part of the evaluation criteria of the nutrition agency. This means that it no longer confines itself to stating how much meat is healthy, or what kind of meat to avoid, it also takes into account the CO₂ balance of food. Admittedly, the DGE only publishes recommendations. Just don’t follow them. Except that this body is also a certification body. Not just a recommendation Some activities depend directly on the approval of the DGE, this is particularly the case for school canteens. Indeed, it awards certificates to canteens. Those that do not have it are almost considered unhealthy. Will the nutrition authority continue to issue certifications to canteens that offer meat beyond the recommended quota? Note that the directives of the DGE have been taken into account in the new nutritional strategy proposed by the German Minister of Agriculture Cem Özdemir. “The Pathway to the Federal Government’s Nutrition Strategy” was adopted by his cabinet in December 2022 and a plan is due to be approved by the end of the year. Germany cutting back meat production to fight ‘global warming’ – To reduce all livestock on German farms by 50% Farmers have been protesting the decision in the same way they recently did in the Netherlands this summer, but the initiative is moving forward beginning this year. Now, to the great surprise of nobody who has been paying attention, the German Meat Industry Association has reported that the country will be facing a severe meat shortage by the time spring arrives and consumers should expect prices to skyrocket, potentially doubling in some cases. Let Them Eat Cake: Germany Plans To Make Eating Meat Expensive To ‘Protect The Climate’ – Hike Meat Tax German Gov’t Prepares To End Meat Consumption in 222-page report – Rations Of 2 burgers a month! Moves to roll out a ‘vegan surveillance state’ https://notrickszone.com/2023/06/07/german-government-prepares-to-end-meat-consumption-rations-of-just-10-grams-daily/ By P Gosselin Germany’s Federal Minister of Agriculture, Cem Özdemir (Green Party) is now moving to force Germans to radically stop meat consumption by limiting meat intake to just 10 grams daily, which is equivalent to about 2 burgers a month. The German government’s latest proposal stems from recommendations made by the Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen (SRU) – German Advisory Council on the Environment, which is set up to directly advise the German government on policy. … The government is advised to implement these radical nutritional measures as stealthily as possible. In the SRU document: “If it’s communicated in the future that cafeterias are required to follow the quality standards of the German Association of Nutrition, and it not be mentioned that it’s about a reduced amount of meat being offered, then there would possibly be less attack from the media.” … The 222-page government SRU report has it all down, black on white. This is not conspiracy theory. It’s the blue print for the future of humanity, authored by a small group of elitist Germans who believe they know what’s best for the entire world. According to Reichelt: “What’s coming at us from the Federal Ministry of Agriculture is nothing less than the largest, most radical and comprehensive upbringing measure in the history of the Federal republic of Germany.” […] “The language in this document  sounds like it comes directly out of the utopia of a vegan surveillance state.” … Meat should be difficult to access: In the event citizens insist on meat, then it should be made so that is hidden away and made difficult to find, advises the SRU – “like X-rated movies at a video store, hidden from sight in another room,” comments Reichelt. “Whoever reaches for it, should be ashamed.” Taken off restaurant menus: At restaurants and other public eateries, meat would not appear at all on the menus, and would only be offered on a separate menu that would be handed to the patron only upon request. What about the government  officials themselves? Would they follow there own rules? Of course not. It turns out that Agriculture Minister Özdemir is hearty meat-eater himself. His wife was recently videoed preparing a 2-kg steak #

John Kerry To Peasants: Die, To Save The Planet – ‘The world’s population must slash meat consumption’ – Statistician pushes back: ‘Net Zero is the lunatic idea’

https://wmbriggs.substack.com/p/john-kerry-to-peasants-die-to-save By WILLIAM M BRIGGS It doesn’t seem to make much difference whether a man inherits his money or earns it. Once he reaches a certain threshold of the green stuff, there’s a good chance he will begin to equate his own intelligence with the level of his wealth. He says to himself that only a true genius could have this much money, an attitude which is a special form of madness. The dumber, and richer, he is the more likely he is to fall prey to this fallacy. The reason is the rich man is surrounded by supplicants. Greedy leeches schooled in the art of flattery. Even ordinary people, not rapacious themselves, are overawed by stacks of cash and become prone to babbling meaningless compliments. They always have a distant hope some of that gold will shine on them. Stupid people, rich or no, are more likely to accept these endless and earnest praises. Surrounded by incessant praise, they come to believe it. Enter John Kerry, who, by marriage, got his money. But we needn’t hold this union against him. Because he could just as well have earned it himself and come to the same idiotic end. No other theory beyond the one I advanced adequately explains his theory that to “save the planet” we need to shut down farms. Yes, he did too say so. And he said it sitting next to another man who resisted Epictetus’s admonition to reject flattery, computer software salesman Bill Gates. Quoting: Kerry, Biden’s Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, issued the warning during a green agenda conference in Washington D.C. During the Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) AIM for Climate Summit, Kerry told the audience that “we can’t get to net zero, we won’t get this job done, unless agriculture is front and center as part of the solution.” Kerry warned attendees that his and other world leaders’ “lives depend” on farmers ceasing their operations. Stopping farmers from growing food will lower agriculture “emissions,” Kerry insists. Net zero is the lunatic idea that some bureaucrat’s measure of “carbon”—the midwits means carbon dioxide, but can’t bring themselves to say it, it sounds so nonsensical—will balance out in some Expert model they create for themselves. You don’t get to see what goes into these models, but must trust the Experts when the magical condition of “net zero” has been met. Now Kerry is right about one thing. Stopping people from farming will indeed stop their “emissions”. If by “emissions” he means breathing. Because once farmers stop farming, the food stops. And once the food stops, breathing stops. And once breathing stops, emissions stop. And once emissions stop, the nirvana of “net zero” will have been reached. I realize that this sounds stupid, and I am embarrassed to have to write it. My having to explain that it is food that keeps people alive means we have regressed in science to a point even before Neanderthal man’s contributions. Still, that is where we are. What in the unholy Hell else could “lives depend” on stopping farming mean? Kerry went on to say, with Gates drooling his agreement, that “the world’s population must slash meat consumption.” Which will be simplicity itself, once farms are shut down. But, now I think on it, I might have to explain to those Experts reading this that, believe it or not, animal meat comes from farms and not the grocery store. In practice, Kerry’s plan is like the Dutch government’s. They are using “nitrogen” to fret about in the Netherlands and not “carbon.” A matter of taste, I guess. The end result is the same. The government will shut down little- and mid-guy farms, while allowing mega-corporation donors—I mean farm owners—to keep running. Meaning Kerry, and Gates, are calling for a New & Improved! scientific method of collectivisation. Only instead of direct government ownership of farms, oligarchs will own them. The price they pay will be having Experts produce the regulations that govern them. Could it be a coincidence Gates has been buying up farmland? “That’s poor writing, Briggs. It is a coincidence. You want to ask what it means.” You’re right. The better thing to ask is, is Gates a raving madman, or is he merely greedy?

Meat is in the climate crosshairs: ‘Banning beef means fewer cows, so less methane, less warming & we save the planet’

https://eagleforum.org/publications/efr/may23/wheres-the-beef.html by Peter Murphy America and the rest of the world are headed for food shortages if policymakers enact laws based on climate change. The effort to “decarbonize” or to achieve “net zero” carbon emissions has led to deliberate policies to reduce consumption of fossil fuel energy, that is, oil, natural gas and coal. It also is leading to policies to reduce livestock, namely cows since they emit methane, and nitrogen gas, which is essential to produce fertilizer for farming and food production. The climate industrial complex comprised of non-governmental organizations, the United Nations, the Biden administration, government-funded scientists, activists, and virtue-signaling billionaires are relentless about wielding power and control over the global population, especially in the United States. The ostensible purpose for their tyrannical impulse is to address a supposed “climate emergency” affecting the planet they claim is inexorably turning warmer to the point of an “existential threat” to human life itself. The climate alarmists’ delusional idea of controlling Earth’s climate means controlling Earth’s inhabitants, including what kind of energy we can use and what we can eat. Meat is in the climate crosshairs, and not because climate fanatics are vegetarians who care about animal rights. Rather, they wish certain animals did not exist, especially cows, which they view as a major climate malefactor since they flatulate methane gas that purportedly is warming the atmosphere and contributing to eventual planetary doom. Their logic goes like this: banning beef means fewer cows, so less methane, less warming and we save the planet. Who knew that back yard barbeques and fast-food hamburgers put the planet in peril? Restricting energy and beef consumption; means the cost of both will rise to the point of being unaffordable to all but the wealthy. Food prices have increased sharply due to general inflationary actions by governments that are cheapening the value of currencies and from policies to raise the cost of fossil fuel energy, which is essential to produce and transport food to the marketplace. In the United States, food inflation has consistently exceeded overall inflation for more than a year. For example, in the 12 months ending in February, inflation jumped by six percent while food increased overall by 9.5 percent. A study by the University College, London, published in 2022, warned less fossil fuel also means extracting less sulfuric acid from these energy sources. Sulfuric acid is essential for producing phosphorus fertilizers that maintain global food supply. Restricting this ingredient will inexorably lead to less food production and greater shortages. Fewer cows, less fertilizer and undependable energy will lead to food shortages and higher prices. These climate policies are a recipe for malnutrition, starvation and revolution. The canaries in the coal mine are two small nations on opposite sides of the planet: Sri Lanka and the Netherlands. Sri Lanka banned the use of synthetic fertilizer and pesticides, which resulted in a major drop in the rice and tea production in 2022, both major exports of that nation. Rice alone is a staple food in Sri Lanka, which ended up having to import the product. The fertilizer ban greatly exacerbated underlying economic problems that led to rioting, a state of emergency and the fall of that nation’s government last July. In the Netherlands, since at least 2019, climate policies have caused upheaval in the agriculture sector, which is world’s second largest exporter of beef. To meet the European Commission’s rules for lower emissions, the Dutch government proposed to cut emissions from its agriculture sector in half by 2030. This necessitated reducing livestock through buying out or terminating farms, especially smaller, family-operated businesses which could not survive financially with fewer beef-producing cows. Unable to afford using nitrogen fertilizer and reduced livestock, Dutch farmers rebelled. In 2019, they also created a new political party, the Farmer-Citizen Movement, which has won several provincial elections that determine the make-up of the Netherlands Senate. Since the Senate can block legislation from the lower house of Parliament, the nation’s policies to curtail nitrogen emissions and livestock are in jeopardy. International organizations continue their crusade for meatless “climate smart” food production. The U.N. Environment Programme maintains that worldwide meat and dairy consumption — the cows, again — must be reduced by 50 percent by 2050. The World Economic Forum has promoted the eating of insects, which it claims is an “unsung category of sustainable and nutritious protein,” and that “insects require less care and upkeep than livestock [and] positively impacts climate change.” Still, at the annual WEC meeting last January in Davos, Switzerland, attended by many the world’s political and financial elites, I hadn’t noticed insects were on the menu. This penchant for power and control is not only replete in U.N. and other international organizations, but in the Biden administration. Samantha Powers, the head of the U.S. Agency for International Development, last year, said fertilizer shortages, particularly from the Russian invasion of Ukraine, are opportunities to “hasten transitions” in farming toward more so-called green alternatives. The climate obsessive Bill Gates believes developed nations should convert to synthetic meat. He has been steadily putting his billions of dollars to work to become the largest private farmland owner in the U.S. and is an investor in plant-based protein companies, Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods. All of this is designed to reduce and ultimately eliminate farming and ranching that produce meat and dairy products for a balanced, enjoyable protein-rich diet for Americans and the world. The founders of these companies in 2019 made the hysterical, self-serving assertion that, “the destructive impact of animal agriculture on our environment far exceeds that of any other technology on Earth, there is no pathway to achieve the Paris climate objectives without a massive decrease in the scale of animal agriculture.” Curtailing carbon emissions by reducing fossil fuel energy use and meat consumption is all about the year 2050, which stands as the latest of many arbitrary climate goalposts established by U.N. climate bureaucrats. During this imminent, yet distant enough period, we are told the global community must achieve net carbon zero emissions to keep the average global temperature from rising by more than 1.5 degrees — or else …what? No one honestly can say since the number is more political than science based. Nor can anyone accurately predict if the temperature will warm due to higher carbon emissions. In fact, some indications suggest average global temperature may cool. Global carbon emissions have risen steadily in the last 100 years (and longer) according to data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Yet, average planetary temperature has fluctuated throughout, while slightly warming overall during this period. Despite the predictions of so many climate charlatans, the polar ice caps remain, polar bears have proliferated, and wealthy people still own and build on oceanfront property. Moreover, warming periods are influenced by natural causes other than carbon and methane emissions, including ocean temperature and currents and sunspot activity. In reality, over millennia, CO2 levels in the atmosphere have no historic correlation to global temperature. So long as politicians, billionaires, celebrities and their media stenographers warn us of planetary risk and doomsday in the future, they will buttress their means for societal control and feed their self-importance. But, like our fellow citizens in Sri Lanka and the Netherlands, we should unapologetically embrace freedom and promote genuine science to work in our chosen profession, warm and cool our homes, travel freely, and decide our own meal choices.

Watch: Morano on OAN TV explains how Biden’s $11b ‘rural electrification’ plan is ‘a money laundering scheme for the green agenda’ – ‘Billions will go into the hands of bureaucrats & donors’

Climate Depot Founder On ‘Team Biden’ & The Radical Climate Agenda – OAN TV – In Focus w/ Alison Steinberg – Broadcast May 18, 2023  Rough Transcript: Morano: This whole idea of electrifying rural areas, this $11 billion program goes back in the 1930s under Franklin Delano Roosevelt. FDR had the Rural Electrification Admin which actually brought running water, electricity infrastructure to rural America. This was a serious effort to bring a big boost to a way of life to rural people, to bring them into the modern age. And it’s weird that they’re calling this green bill a electrify rural America almost like an homage to the old bill. Biden-Harris Administration Makes Historic, $11 Billion Investment to Advance Clean Energy Across Rural America Through Investing in America Agenda – This represents the single largest investment in rural electrification since President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Rural Electrification Act into law in 1936. Biden Regime Announces $11 Billion Investment to Tackle Climate Change Morano: The problem is, this is literally a money laundering scheme for the green agenda. That’s all this is. $11 billion to do more solar and wind which isn’t going to produce energy. At best, it’s going to make a few makeshift government jobs that expire when the money for the solar and wind mandates. We’ve already been through this with Obama administration when Solyndra was booming business until it wasn’t when the money ran out. And so they’re going to make their grids less reliable, more prone to blackouts. This is truly nuts, but they’re going to be spending these billions of dollars and it’s going to go into all the hands of the ‘right people’. And what I mean by that are the bureaucrats, the well-connected donors, all the investors, that’s the ‘right people’. As you mentioned, Alison, the people living in rural America aren’t going to be benefiting,they’re only going to be getting higher energy costs, less electricity, more prone to blackouts. And this is the green agenda literally in action. … Morano on CBS promoting insect eating to fight climate change: The most shocking part of this whole story was when they said a solution to the global food crisis. Newsflash, there is no global food crisis that has anything to do with climate change. And there wasn’t a global food crisis pre-COVID. Now we have the developing world that has problems getting food because of government supply chain interruptions and all the crushing of economic liberty and growth from lockdowns. Climate policy creates food shortages — which then they can say, ‘well, here’s a solution to the problem we created with our policy, you have to eat bugs, and it’s a game changer of a problem’. We’ve been farming for thousands of years. And if you think big agri-chemical farming is a problem, that’s one thing, a lot of people might think that,  — but what their solution is — if you look at what’s happening in Europe, they’re crushing small family-run generations of independent farmers in Europe to meet Net Zero climate goals. All the while telling us that we’re gonna have to eat Z-bugs! And that’s what 60 minutes is dutifully reporting here, is that eating bugs is inevitable. They’re they’re giving insects as psyops to kids in elementary schools in Australia and Europe. They’re giving them bugs so they can go home and, quote, pester their parents. This is a real thing. They’re pushing insect eating on us by manufacturing a food crisis through bad government policy. #

Now There’s a ‘Nitrogen Crisis’ – So Hand Over Your Land

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/04/27/now-theres-a-nitrogen-crisis-so-hand-over-your-land/ BY WILL JONES The big upset in the Dutch Senate elections in March was driven by a rebellion against the Government’s latest green agenda. But, bizarrely, on this occasion it had nothing to do with CO2. Fighting just one atmospheric gas is not enough now, it seems; Western elites have also declared war on nitrogen, emissions of which are alleged to cause plants to grow and die in ways not approved by the EU. There is said to be a ‘nitrogen crisis’ and taking action against it requires the destruction of large parts of the economy and the seizing of thousands of farms by the state. Are they just making this stuff up now? Eva Vlaardingerbroek has written about it in the Spectator. The Government, a four-party coalition led by Prime Minister Mark Rutte and his People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), has decided that 30% of all cattle farms need to be closed by 2030 in order to halve nitrogen emissions – which it says pose a threat to the Dutch environment, as protected under the European Union’s ‘Natura 2000’ regulations. Apparently we have a ‘nitrogen crisis’ because the gas causes certain plants to die or grow in areas where EU bureaucrats have decided that they shouldn’t. Dutch farmers will be forced to either sell their land to the state now or face expropriation later. If the destruction of Holland’s farming industry is carried out in the way the Government plans, there will also be consequences for the world’s food supply. Although we are not a big country, we are the second largest exporter of agricultural products in the world, after the U.S. It’s a remarkable position to hold, but if it’s up to our leaders we won’t have that title much longer. The attack on farmers is part of a larger conflict between the authoritarian green agenda being pushed by our Government and the silent majority paying for it all, but whose opinion is never asked. Dutch voters – many of whom aren’t usually overly political, but who understand that our farmers are feeding our nation and the rest of the world – are growing tired of globalists’ policies to ‘save the planet’ with synthetic meat, edible insects, solar panels and wind turbine parks. And so on March 15th, the elections resulted in a landslide victory for the BoerBurgerBeweging party (BBB) – which translates as ‘the Farmer-Citizen Movement’. The BBB won 17 out of 75 seats, making it the largest party in the senate. Rutte’s VVD won only 10. It was an unprecedented result, given that this was the first time the BBB was running for Senate seats. It was also, in words of the party’s founder and leader, Caroline van der Plas, a “big fat middle finger” to the establishment. The Government and EU are insistent however that the agenda must go ahead regardless of the popular revolt at the ballot box. Following its shock win, the BBB is facing huge pressure from both the Dutch government and the EU. On election night, Christianne van der Wal, the ‘Minister of Nitrogen’ (what a world we live in!) had the audacity to declare that, despite the BBB’s victory, “there is no choice but to move forward” with the nitrogen policies and expropriation plans. Two weeks later, the European Commission – an unelected body– proclaimed that “continued vigilance is needed to ensure the Netherlands will meet its emission reduction commitments”. The Government could, therefore, cite the EU’s response as the reason it has to press ahead with its highly unpopular policies. In reality, it is still as wedded to the idea of a nitrogen crisis as ever, whatever the European Commission might say. This is shaping up to be a massive clash between ordinary people and ideologically obsessed elites, particularly as on current polling BBB is set to take control of the Government in the coming elections. It’s not improbable that after last month’s results the cabinet will not survive its term and the General Election that is scheduled for 2025 will have to be brought forward. Based on the current polling, BBB would become the largest party in the House of Representatives; and Van der Plas would become Holland’s first female Prime Minister. But will the party stick to its guns and demand an end to the ludicrous talk of a ‘nitrogen crisis’, or will it cave in to pressure from above? Worth reading in full.

RFK Jr. red-pilled on climate agenda?! RFK Jr. declares climate ‘being exploited by the WEF & Bill Gates’ in ‘the same way that COVID was exploited’ – ‘Top-down totalitarian controls on society’

The Kim Iversen Show – Broadcast April 25, 2023 Show description: Joe Biden announces his run for President 2024 by video. Robert F Kennedy Jr. discusses with Kim the Biden announcement and the Democratic National Committee refusing to allow candidate debates for the 2024 Democratic primary.   Rough Transcript: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.:  I have a like I have a hundred things that I’m going do immediately: Unravel the agency capture in these agencies. The USDA was created to help the small farmer. They’re doing the opposite. Their job now is to make sure that large corporate farms crush the small American Farmer, and we can’t have democracy for long if the American small independent freeholds have completely lost control of the landscape. I’ll give you an example Smithfield Foods; it’s a company I litigated against. It basically invented a kind of farming, a factory farming for pork, and this was in the early 80s they built a huge slaughterhouse in North Carolina. There’s a lot of — thirty thousand pigs a day — and they dropped the prize hogs at 32 cents a pound from 60 cents a pound or two cents a pound from 60 cents a pound. They put it out of business — 28 000 independent hog farmers, and they got control. There are now 1800 factories in the state, and 80 of those are controlled by this one company. They put it out of business all the independent farmers. They now control the landscapes of North Carolina and then and the food production in this country, and then they sold themselves to the Chinese. So now you have a Chinese company that controls the landscapes and food production not only in North Carolina but Iowa and all over the country. And that’s not good for our country, and USDA abets that. It is a colonial model you have a foreign country that is coming in and stealing our natural resources polluting the landscapes, poisoning our rivers — 14 Rivers poisoned in North Carolina, and they control food production in this country. And USDA is abetting those kinds of policies.  So you know we shouldn’t be doing that, and it will end that overnight. Kim Iversen: Speaking of the small farmers, one question that I think a lot of people have is, we all know that you are you’re environmentalist; you’ve been in environmentalist for a long time fighting against pollution, fighting against many things that have to do with the environment but there’s a lot of questions about climate change and what we’ve seen around the world is that many of the climate change policies that are enacted by certain countries like the Netherlands or in uh very Sri Lanka we see that it crushes the small farmers that they cannot keep up with the big farms they don’t have enough land in order to do some of the more um you know natural ways to fertilize the land and so it is some of these policies are really crushing the small farms. Where do you stand on climate policies that are being enacted right now? There is a difference between environmentalism and climate change. Where do you stand on all of that, and what types of policies do you support? Robert F.. Kennedy Jr.: The climate issues and pollution issues are being exploited by the World Economic Forum and Bill Gates and all of these big Mega billionaires the same way that COVID was exploited. To use it as an excuse to clamp down — top down totalitarian controls on society and to then to give us engineering solutions. And if you look closely as it turns out, the guys who are promoting those engineering solutions are the people who own the IPs, the patents for those solutions. It’s being used. They’ve given climate chaos a bad name because people now see that it’s just another crisis that’s being used to strip mine the wealth of the poor and to enrich billionaires. I for 40 years, have had the same policy on climate and engineering. You can go check my speeches from the 1980s, and I’ve said the most important solution for environmental issues is not top-down controls, it’s free market capitalism and what we have in this country now is not free market capitalism; it’s corporate crony capitalism. It’s capitalism cushy, kind of socialism for the rich, and a brutal, barbaric merciless capitalism for the poor. A true free market promotes efficiency, and efficiency means the elimination of waste and pollution is waste. In a true free market would require us to properly value our natural resources and it’s the undervaluation of those resources that caused us to use them wastefully. In a true free market you can’t make yourself rich without making your neighbors rich and without enriching your community, but what polluters do is they make themselves rich by making everybody else poor. They raise standards of living for themselves by lowering the quality of life for the rest of us and they do that by escaping the discipline of the free market. You show me a polluter, I’ll show you a subsidy. I’ll show you a fat cat using political clout to escape the discipline of the free market and force the public to pay his production costs. In terms of the carbon industry, all of the things that people are trying to do to promote — to end carbon, we should be doing anyway because, carbon means cutting down all the mountains in West Virginia. It means you know we polluted 2200 miles of rivers and streams in Eastern Kentucky and West Virginia. Every freshwater fish in America now has mercury in its flesh from coal-burning power plants. That is a theft from the public. The waterways and lakes on the Appalachian, on the high Appalachian, every one of them is now sterilized from acid rain. We need to be reducing — whether you believe in climate change or not — carbon-based climate change — we need to be reducing our dependence on carbon. Carbon receives globally about 5.2 trillion dollars in subsidies a year. If you end those subsidies, carbon cannot compete against more efficient and cleaner energy sources, and that’s what we should be doing; we should be ending subsidies for where all for the carbon industry. And we should be using true free market capitalism and trying the most efficient sources of energy. Kim Iversen: Do you ever think that maybe you should have run as a Republican? End excerpt.  # Related: Listen: Morano discusses Great Reset, climate lockdowns & why Naomi Wolf & RFK Jr. are his new political heroes on the Richie Allen Show – Morano’s interview begins at 1:05:30 into into broadcast RFK Jr. smears skeptic orgs as ‘snake pits for sociopaths’ – Says CFACT, CEI, AEI, ALEC, Heritage, Heartland & CATO are ‘run by venomous carbon industry toadies’ Robert F. Kennedy on skeptic groups: ‘These front groups are snake pits for sociopaths. Run by venomous carbon industry toadies, they stable a craven menagerie of propaganda wizards, slick biostitutes, tobacco scientists, snake oil hucksters, voodoo economists and other so-called “experts” employed to publish beguiling studies, appear on TV and radio, and write deceptive articles critiquing the “flawed science” predicting climate change.’ ‘Front groups’ include: ‘The Cato Institute, The Heritage Foundation, the Cooler Heads Coalition, the Global Climate Coalition, The American Enterprise Institute (ALEC), Americans for Prosperity, Heartland Institute, Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), George C. Marshall Institute, the State Policy Network, The Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), and the American Enterprise Institute (AEI).’ Related Link:  Update: Video: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Wants To Jail His Political Opponents – Accuses Koch Brothers of ‘Treason’ – ‘They ought to be serving time for it’ 2014: Activist Robert Kennedy Jr. Denies He Wants to ‘Jail Climate Change Deniers’—Actually Wants to ‘Execute’ Climate Villain Corporations and Think Tanks Watch Now: Sen. Inhofe Responds to RFK, Jr.: ‘Five years ago RFK, Jr. called me a ‘traitor’ and I should be executed and now I am just a ‘prostititute’, so things are improving’ Flashback 2007: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on skeptics: ‘This is treason. And we need to start treating them as traitors’ (See also here.) My new hero?! RFK JR. SPOT ON on not being obedient to government and against lockdowns! WATCH him at German anti-lockdown rally – But he also makes odd 5g comments https://t.co/pfGVX56zS8 — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) August 30, 2020 All is forgiven by me for him wanting to jail climate skeptics after this anti-lockdown speech! Maybe climate skeptics can work with RFK Jr. on opposing climate agenda someday — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) August 30, 2020   See page 252 of my Great Reset book: Wow! Powerful. I fully endorse, support & agree with RFK Jr. here! Watch this 2 min clip if you want to understand COVID lockdowns. RFK Jr. once called for climate skeptics to be jailed at the Hague as war criminals. But all is now forgiven. https://t.co/Vvw7pD8C0F — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) November 14, 2021 Climate skeptics have a big tent. We welcomed progressives Michael Moore & Michael Shellenberger in 2020 and I am ready to welcome RFK Jr. to our issue aa well. — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) August 30, 2020 RFK Jr. seems to have evolved with his climate agenda views. See: https://t.co/340ZbOfIoDhttps://t.co/uYFdgAZJ7xhttps://t.co/GNqiNgDS30https://t.co/35RP964eBf — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) March 9, 2023 Great question! His organization is now on record warning against UN sustainable agenda & climate lockdowns. There is no way RFK Jr. could support climate agenda w/ UN, WEF & WHO. It is same orgs pushing COVID authoritarianism. Here are some of his group's recent climate reports: — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) March 9, 2023 Will RFK Jr. be next to reconsider climate doomsday?! https://t.co/ypjOCQuZfF — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) March 22, 2023 Question: Did RFK Jr. even utter the phrase climate change once in his launch speech today? https://t.co/keIIw5hJ17 — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) April 19, 2023 RFK Jr. Could easily topple any chance that Joe Biden will win re-election. Reagan ran against Ford in 1976. Ford lost. Kennedy ran against Carter in 1980. Carter lost. Buchanan ran against Bush in 1992. Bush lost. https://t.co/JWzajUxLJ1 — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) April 19, 2023

Morano: ‘Self-appointed earth saviors seek to manage every aspect of our lives’

https://joannenova.com.au/2023/04/a-technocratic-superclass-of-earth-saviors-seek-to-manage-every-aspect-of-our-lives/ A Technocratic Superclass of Earth Saviors seek to manage every aspect of our lives By Jo Nova Now rice controls the weather too: Meat, dairy and rice production will bust 1.5C climate target, shows study Damien Carrington, The Guardian Emissions from food system alone will drive the world past target, unless high-methane foods are tackled. The study showed that 75% of this food-related heating was driven by foods that are high sources of methane, ie those coming from ruminant livestock such as cattle, and rice paddy fields. The research, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, treated each greenhouse gas separately for 94 key types of food, enabling their impact on climate over time to be better understood. Rice is the primary staple of half the world’s population, and mostly the poorer half. They are not normally the target of the do-gooder set, but as Marc Morano argues below, it’s all about creating a technocratic superclass of elite managers — both bureaucratic and business types who decide the winners and losers, who control the purse strings and the profits with regulations. They cannot handle a decentralized world. They need to control the means of production, the distribution of food, and control of the movement of people. “Self-appointed earth saviors seek to manage every aspect of our lives” Marc Morano, CFACT by Marc Morano Climate Depot: The big picture is this: This isn’t about necessarily about shutting down rice production. This is about the climate agenda coming from the United Nations and the World Economic Forum, academia, the corporate world, identifying every facet of modern society as being a climate ‘problem’ that needs managing and thus a takeover.  So whether we’re talking about transportation, whether it’s airlines, whether it’s gas-powered cars, whether it’s eating meat, whether it’s high-yield agriculture, it’s all allegedly creating a ‘climate emergency’ and thus global elites want to take over and ‘manage’ them. They are looking for a managerial revolution. They want to put themselves in charge of saving the planet and thus put themselves in charge of all aspects of modern society. Self-appointed earth saviors seek to manage every aspect of our lives to save us from the ‘climate catastrophe.’ So it’s not that they want to ban rice eating, but they’re claiming that rice production contributes to the ‘climate crisis’. The climate agenda demand that rice production has to be forever altered and turned over to a corporate government collusion to ‘fix’ the problems with rice agriculture. Of course, these globalist plans mean that you need big agribusiness corporations which have sold out to the climate agenda to manage rice production, and this means small farmers and agrarian countries are going to be at the mercy of corporate agriculture, taking over more and more of food production. Every aspect of modern society is untenable due to our ‘climate crisis.’  It includes limiting freedom of travel, home thermostat controls, restrictions on your appliances, limiting the ability to eat meat, and bans on gas-powered cars. They’re doing all of this without a vote of democracy. A corporate government collusion that uses the climate agenda to manage every aspect of modern society. They’re collapsing our current system, they’re collapsing our energy, our food, our transportation, and they’re collapsing our free speech, and they’re putting themselves in charge because they are claiming we can’t leave rice production as is, or that we need to radically alter livestock practices and agriculture and transportation or we are doomed. If we don’t hand over the keys of modern society over to this small group of managers, we are led to believe that people left to their own devices will literally create a climate crisis, create inequity and racism, and in order to save the Earth, climate bureaucrats need to be in charge of everything because they believe we live in a finite world, and everything has to be managed. We are told we must consent to live in a technocracy where we will be ruled by experts who know better than us. So they’re going to tell nations where rice is a fundamental food that they can’t have agriculture the way they’ve done it for thousands of years because the climate can’t handle it. And therefore, big corporate agribusiness, in collusion with governments and international organizations, are going to come over and basically regulate the small and medium-sized farms out of existence. We’re seeing this attempt happening in real-time in the Netherlands. They’re killing up to 12,000 family-run, generational farms with net zero climate rules on on fertilizers. And big agribusiness will inevitably take over in this big corporate takeover of farms. John Lewis-Stempel, Unherd:  About 70% of global farmland is owned by 1% of “farmers”. Agri-business now rules the roost. Four companies — Cargill, Archer Daniel Midland, Bunge and Louis Dreyfus — control 90% of the global grain trade. Similarly, four companies — ChemChina, Corteva, Bayer and BASF — control 66% of the world’s agricultural chemicals. These businesses are hardly renowned for their care of the environment. Likewise, politicians. The post-Second World War intensification of agriculture, promoted in the West by national governments and the nascent EU as a path to food security, has starved the soil and exhausted crops. The climate agenda cannot handle a decentralized world. They need to control the means of production, the distribution of food, and control of the movement of people. It’s basically what the ruling classes have done for generations: Those in charge always come up with a reason why the rest of us cannot be free, why the rest of us cannot make these choices for ourselves. And the reason du jour is the climate crisis is forcing them to literally transform our modern way of life. They are actively collapsing our energy, food, and transportation. They’re pushing insect-eating as an alternative source of protein. And this is the United Nations doing this. It’s the World Economic Forum doing government.  Bill Gates, America’s number one farmland owner in the U.S. has publicly stated that his goal is to get the entire Western world off of eating livestock meat and instead eating his billions of dollars invested in lab-grown meat made in steel vats and literally printed from 3d printer. Morano: This is our future — if we allow it.  First, they came for your energy, then your transportation, then your meat and high-yield agriculture, and now they’re coming after rice production. The climate agenda just keeps expanding its reach and is moving rapidly to gain control of global food production so that they can manage it in a ‘climate friendly’ way. And many of the people pushing these policies believe they are altruistic. They actually think they’re saving the planet by doing this, and they are preventing the rest of us — the unwashed masses from destroying the planet. It’s so much easier if they concentrate power in the hands of a few. There are fewer people to buy off, fewer to protest, and fewer people who own tractors or trucks to make trouble. __________________________________ About Marc Morano … Marc Morano manages CFACT’s award-winning ClimateDepot.com news and information service. He is the award-winning producer, writer and host of CFACT’s Climate Hustle feature films. Marc served as a reporter for “Rush Limbaugh the Television Show” and as a senior advisor to Senator James Inhofe. He is author of “The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change,” “Green Fraud: Why the Green New Deal Is Even Worse than You Think,” and “The Great Reset: Global Elites and the Permanent Lockdown.”

Blame rice for global warming!? ‘Rice is to blame for around 10% of global emissions of methane’ – ‘Rice cannot be ignored’

Let's ban all meat and rice eating to save the climate! More reason to eat Bill Gates-funded lab-grown meat & eat insects?! https://t.co/W8726HKT3S — Marc Morano (@ClimateDepot) April 17, 2023 Study in the journal Nature: Future warming from global food consumption – Published: 06 March 2023 Nature study excerpt: Of the other food groups, rice contributes to a large fraction of end-of-century warming (19%), whereas vegetables, grains, seafood, oils, beverages, eggs, fruit and all other uncategorized food items each contribute 5% or less. … the dominance of meat, rice and dairy products towards the total climate impact of food consumption measured by each of these metrics is consistent. # Climate Depot’s Marc Morano comment: The big picture is this: This isn’t necessarily about shutting down rice production. This is about the climate agenda coming from the United Nations and the World Economic Forum, academia,the corporate world, identifying every facet of modern society as being a climate ‘problem’ that needs managing and thus a takeover.  So whether we’re talking about transportation, whether it’s airlines, whether it’s gas-powered cars, whether it’s eating meat, whether it’s high-yield agriculture, it’s all allegedly creating a ‘climate emergency’ and thus global elites want to take over and ‘manage’ them. They are looking for a managerial revolution. They want to put themselves in charge of saving the planet and thus put themselves in charge of all aspects of modern society. Self-appointed earth saviors seek to manage every aspect of our lives to save us from the ‘climate catastrophe.’ So it’s not that they want to ban rice eating, but they’re claiming that rice production contributes to the ‘climate crisis’. The climate agenda demand that rice production has to be forever altered and turned over to a corporate government collusion to ‘fix’ the problems with rice agriculture. Of course, these globalist plans mean that you need big agribusiness corporations which have sold out to the climate agenda to manage rice production, and this means small farmers and agrarian countries are going to be at the mercy of corporate agriculture, taking over more and more of food production. Every aspect of modern society is untenable due to our ‘climate crisis.’  It includes limiting freedom of travel, home thermostat controls, restrictions on your appliances, limiting the ability to eat meat, and bans on gas-powered cars. They’re doing all of this without a vote of democracy. A corporate government collusion that uses the climate agenda to manage every aspect of modern society. They’re collapsing our current system, they’re collapsing our energy, our food, our transportation, and they’re collapsing our free speech, and they’re putting themselves in charge because they are claiming we can’t leave rice production as is, or that we need to radically alter livestock practices and agriculture and transportation or we are doomed. If we don’t hand over the keys of modern society over to this small group of managers, we are led to believe that people left to their own devices will literally create a climate crisis, create inequity and racism, and in order to save the Earth, climate bureaucrats need to be in charge of everything because they believe we live in a finite world, and everything has to be managed. We are told we must consent to live in a technocracy where we will be ruled by experts who know better than us. So they’re going to tell nations where rice is a fundamental food that they can’t have agriculture the way they’ve done it for thousands of years because the climate can’t handle it. And therefore, big corporate agribusiness, in collusion with governments and international organizations, are going to come over and basically regulate the small and medium-sized farms out of existence. We’re seeing this attempt happening in real-time in the Netherlands. They’re killing up to 12,000 family-run, generational farms with net zero climate rules on on fertilizers. And big agribusiness will inevitably take over in this big corporate takeover of farms. See: The Great Food Reset has begun – Net Zero restrictions on farms designed ‘to squeeze small farmers from the market, allowing them to be bought out by multinational agribusiness giants’ See: JOHN LEWIS-STEMPEL in Unherd: About 70% of global farmland is owned by 1% of “farmers”. Agri-business now rules the roost. Four companies — Cargill, Archer Daniel Midland, Bunge and Louis Dreyfus — control 90% of the global grain trade. Similarly, four companies — ChemChina, Corteva, Bayer and BASF — control 66% of the world’s agricultural chemicals. These businesses are hardly renowned for their care of the environment. Likewise, politicians. The post-Second World War intensification of agriculture, promoted in the West by national governments and the nascent EU as a path to food security, has starved the soil and exhausted crops. Morano: The climate agenda cannot handle a decentralized world. They need to control the means of production, the distribution of food, and control of the movement of people. It’s basically what the ruling classes have done for generations: Those in charge always come up with a reason why the rest of us cannot be free, why the rest of us cannot make these choices for ourselves. And the reason du jour is the climate crisis is forcing them to literally transform our modern way of life. They are actively collapsing our energy, food, and transportation. They’re pushing insect-eating as an alternative source of protein. And this is the United Nations doing this. It’s the World Economic Forum doing government.  Bill Gates, America’s number one farmland owner in the U.S. has publicly stated that his goal is to get the entire Western world off of eating livestock meat and instead eating his billions of dollars invested in lab-grown meat made in steel vats and literally printed from 3d printer. See: Your Future Meals Could Come From A 3D Printer ‘to combat climate-related food insecurity’, Researchers Say – ‘Food paste is squeezed through a syringe’ into 3D printer The Great Food Reset: ‘Lab-grown meat’ harvested in ‘massive steel vats’ edges closer to fed approval & U.S. dinner plates – As EU approves human consumption of worms & crickets Morano: This is our future — if we allow it.  First, they came for your energy, then your transportation, then your meat and high-yield agriculture, and now they’re coming after rice production. The climate agenda just keeps expanding its reach and is moving rapidly to gain control of global food production so that they can manage it in a ‘climate friendly’ way. And many of the people pushing these policies believe they are altruistic. They actually think they’re saving the planet by doing this, and they are preventing the rest of us — the unwashed masses from destroying the planet. Related:  Climate science shock: Methane’s unexpected cooling impact unveiled # Flashback: Physicist Dr. Tom Sheahen: ‘Methane: The Irrelevant Greenhouse Gas’ – ‘Water vapor has already absorbed the very same infrared radiation that Methane might have absorbed’– ‘The tiny increases in methane associated with cows may elicit a few giggles, but it absolutely cannot be the basis for sane regulations or national policy.’ Study: ‘Methane emissions have a negligible impact’ on climate Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer has new study: Methane has ‘immeasurably small’ impact on climate Scientists Dr. Richard Lindzen & Dr. Will Happer: ‘The warming added each year from methane is about 10 times less than the small warming from carbon dioxide’  # Resetting Global Agriculture: The Destructive Road to Dystopia — Guest Post by Jaap Hanekamp – Excerpt: What is envisioned, through SCIENCE, is a global Great Food Transformation (capitals in original). Five strategies are proposed to accomplish this Transformation, with the obvious caveat that these strategies are not “exhaustive nor prescriptive”. Sure. Nevertheless (empasis added): 10. Achieving healthy diets from sustainable food systems for everyone will require substantial shifts towards healthy dietary patterns, large reductions in food losses and waste, and major improvements in food production practices. This universal goal for all humans is within reach but will require adoption of scientific targets by all sectors to stimulate a range of actions from individuals and organisations working in all sectors and at all scales. By the “adoption of scientific targets by all sectors” the Great Food Transformation can be achieved, or so the authors think. The planetary boundaries delineate the “safe operating space for food systems” (emphasis added): We use the planetary boundaries framework as a guide to propose a safe operating space for food systems that encompasses human health and environmental sustainability. This space is defined by scientific targets that set ranges of intakes for food groups … to ensure human health … and planetary boundaries for food production to ensure a stable Earth system. These boundaries include the total global amount of cropland use, biodiversity loss, water use, greenhouse-gas emissions, and nitrogen and phosphorus pollution that can be due to food production … These boundaries for human health and food production identify the safe operating space within which food systems should jointly operate to ensure that a broad set of universal human health and environmental sustainability goals are achieved. … “Planetary Boundaries”: advancing dystopia with scientism: “Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet” is a substantial piece in the journal Science. The title is pregnant with visionary meaning as only SCIENCE can bring, or so the authors maintain (one of which, again, is Wim de Vries; emphasis added): The planetary boundaries [PB] framework defines a safe operating space for humanity based on the intrinsic biophysical processes that regulate the stability of the Earth system. … [it] aims to define a safe operating space for human societies to develop and thrive, based on our evolving understanding of the functioning and resilience of the Earth system. Why are the authors proposing the planetary boundaries framework? Because: There is an urgent need for a new paradigm that integrates the continued development of human societies and the maintenance of the Earth system (ES) in a resilient and accommodating state. The planetary boundary (PB) framework contributes to such a paradigm by providing a science-based analysis of the risk that human perturbations will destabilize the ES at the planetary scale. … Disagreement with the Expertocracy – intellectually or practically – is deemed by them to be impossible, thereby claiming an idolatrous position for themselves: “Thou shalt have no other gods before us!”  

Hague mayor threatens to use military gear to remove protesting Dutch farmers’ blockades & tractors in his city

https://nltimes.nl/2023/03/06/hague-mayor-threatens-use-military-gear-keep-rival-climate-farmer-protests-check Mayor Jan van Zanen of The Hague said he could indeed authorize the use of military equipment to remove blockades or tractors in his city on March 11. On that date, the upcoming Saturday, both climate activists and farmers are set to demonstrate in the Zuid-Holland city. “I am not going to rule out the possibility that Defense equipment will be deployed. That is available if necessary,” he said in an interview with De Telegraaf. He has also asked police forces elsewhere in the country to provide officers to assist. “We cannot handle this alone,” Van Zanen told De Telegraaf. “Also to ensure that the demonstrations are safe.” Farmers’ organization Farmers Defense Force (FDF) hopes to attract 100,000 people for a demonstration in the Zuiderpark in The Hague next Saturday. Climate activists from Extinction Rebellion also plan to block the A12 motorway near The Hague again that day. And at the same time, construction of tents for the the construction of tents for the City-Pier-City half-marathon race will also be underway. The annual race is scheduled for Sunday starting at the Malieveld. Van Zanen says he will not consider banning any of the planned demonstrations for the time being. He called on those demonstrating to ensure that they can cherish a “great right.” That forces him to be “radically neutral.” But there are limits, he said. “Blocking a road indefinitely with people or equipment is not an acceptable way of demonstrating, but a blockade,” he told the newspaper. “I think that’s a disruption of public order.” Reporting by ANP # Netherlands attempting to SHUT DOWN 11,200 farms to meet climate goals – 1/5 of total number of farms Netherlands to forcefully shut down 3,000 farms Dutch Farmers Launch Revolt Against Climate Rules Threatening To End Their Livelihoods Dutch Farmers mass protest with tractors against regulations that will reduce farms and food The Great Food Reset: ‘Lab-grown meat’ harvested in ‘massive steel vats’ edges closer to fed approval & U.S. dinner plates – As EU approves human consumption of worms & crickets Climate Depot’s Marc Morano: “You Will Eat lab-grown ‘meat’ and bugs — and Be Happy. Or so the forces of the Great Food Reset believe. Bill Gates is gobbling up U.S. farmland (now the single largest owner) and the World Economic Forum pushes eating bugs, and the U.S. FDA and USDA edge closer to approving lab-grown ‘meat’ — Bon appetite?!  If you want to eat lab-grown or bugs, that should be your choice. But, the climate agenda/Great Reset goal is to collapse modern high-yield agriculture and meat production to meet net-zero climate goals. As shortages and prices skyrocket on meat and other foods, it will be much easier to push insect-eating and lab-grown ‘meat’ to the public.  A food crisis and transformation are just the ticket for even more chaos that the WEF can exploit for their Reset agenda. The World Economic Forum is so eager to promote synthetic ‘meat’ that they are touting numerous ways to print up to 6 kilograms of the fake meat an hour. As part of this new coerced Great Diet Reset, the WEF has advocated eating bugs to save the planet. The Davos-based group has explained, “Why we might be eating insects soon.” Our future is being planned by our overlords, load up on eating bugs to save the planet! It is a future that will happen, only if we allow it. It’s time for the Great Reject. Rise up and defy the Great Reset.”  . Watch: Morano on OAN TV on Great Food Reset – U.S. soon to be eating ‘lab-grown meat’ Great Food Reset: Germany Bans Farmers from Properly Fertilizing Land to Serve EU Green Agenda The ban is ultimately at the behest of the European Union, which is pushing to reduce the amount of nitrogen in certain parts of Europe as part of its green agenda. The policy has already wreaked havoc in the Netherlands, with the Dutch government now looking to either buy out or forcibly close up to 3,000 farms to meet targets set by Brussels. …  Political commentator Eva Vlaardingerbroek told Breitbart. “Despite all of the protest and (inter)national backlash, they’re pushing through with what I think are criminal policies.” “Our government doesn’t cater to the wishes of its own citizens, it caters to globalist institutions whose interest it is to control the food supply, so they can control us,” she continued. “It’s the great reset in full force.” Watch: Morano’s 20 min. speech on The Great Food Reset Takeover of Our Farms & Food Supply

The Great Food Reset: ‘Lab-grown meat’ harvested in ‘massive steel vats’ edges closer to fed approval & U.S. dinner plates – As EU approves human consumption of worms & crickets

Climate Depot Special Report Lab-grown meat moves closer to American dinner plates – ‘Grown in enormous steel vessels called bioreactors & processed’ into meat-like substance – Eat lab-grown meat from ‘massive bioreactors’ to save the earth! ‘Our planet is in crisis’ – Restaurateur Andrés, known for his work on global food security, told Reuters he wants to sell cultivated meat because of its environmental benefits. “We can see in what is happening all around us, in every country around the globe, that our planet is in crisis,” he said. (Reuters) – Once the stuff of science fiction, lab-grown meat could become reality in some restaurants in the United States as early as this year. Executives at cultivated meat companies are optimistic that meat grown in massive steel vats could be on the menu within months after one company won the go-ahead from a key regulator. … Cultivated meat is derived from a small sample of cells collected from livestock, which is then fed nutrients, grown in enormous steel vessels called bioreactors, and processed into something that looks and tastes like a real cut of meat. Just one country, Singapore, has so far approved the product for retail sale. But the United States is poised to follow. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said in November that a cultivated meat product – a chicken breast grown by California-based UPSIDE Foods – was safe for human consumption. … Another draw is that growing meat in a steel vessel instead of in a field could reduce the environmental impact of livestock, which are responsible for 14.5% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions through feed production, deforestation, manure management, and enteric fermentation – animal burps – according to the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Bill Gates wants to stop cows from burping & farting in latest investment – Funds Australian-based company to reduce livestock emissions European Union Approves Mealworms & Cricket Powder For Use in Bread, Crackers, Chocolate, & Soups Despite ‘Inconclusive’ Allergy Data Europeans now also allowed to eat cricket powder and small mealworms – Earlier in January, the Commission also approved the use of small mealworms. The small mealworm may be used as (spread) paste, frozen, dried and powdered. Powdered mealworm larvae will also serve as a food supplement. Daily Wire: Cricket powder will now be permitted in a number of food products, such as multigrain bread, crackers, cereal bars, biscuits, beer-like beverages, chocolates, sauces, whey powder, soups, and other items “intended for the general population,” according to the new regulation. Cricket One, a company that asserts that the insects are “nutritionally more efficient” and serve as a more reliable “source of alternative protein” than livestock, submitted the original application. Watch: Morano on OAN TV on Great Food Reset – U.S. soon to be eating ‘lab-grown meat’ – Broadcast January 25, 2023 – OAN TV – In Focus With Addison Smith OpEd: The Great Food Reset – By Marc Morano The Great Food Reset has arrived: Expect ‘real’ food shortages, Biden declares – Meanwhile, Bill Gates & China buy up U.S. farmland – Climate Depot’s Morano: “If the Davos crowd of the World Economic Forum were looking for a better global environment on which to enact their central planning vision of a Great Reset, it would be hard to imagine a more conducive chaotic time than right now.”  See: Watch video: World Economic Forum’s utopian Great Reset vision of 2030 – ‘You’ll own nothing, and you’ll be happy’ – ‘Whatever you want you’ll rent & it’ll be delivered by drone’ – Meat will be ‘an occasional treat’ .  Also see:‘Americans May Have to Say Goodbye to Steak & Burgers as Beef Costs Rise’ as inflation soars – Just what the climate activists always wanted! Watch: Morano’s 20 min. speech on The Great Food Reset Takeover of Our Farms & Food Supply Great Food Reset: Watch: School kids munch on insects as cricket snacks introduced to 1000 schools to ‘help save the planet from global warming’ Kid’s manipulated with bug-eating PSYOP: ”Chips are great aren’t they, and these chips are even better, because I think they are better for you, did you know that? Yeah, that way you know, mum and dad might let you have more chips. Good stuff” the interviewer said. …  ”Many children have the power of pester, so in some cases can be great agents of dietary change within the family” said Verity Jones from the University of the West of England in Bristol.  # Marc Morano commented: “The Great Reset is happening here and now. This is not circa 1991, when we we were talking about a shadowy secretive vision of a New World Order. This is 2022 now and we are seeing a ‘new normal’ being imposed upon the world.  1) Our current energy system is being intentionally collapsed ; 2) Our transportation system is being intentionally collapsed; (and our freedom of movement is being stripped away) 3) Our First Amendment free speech rights are being collapsed by government & corporate collusion; 4) Our high-yield agricultural system is being intentionally collapsed to create man-made food shortages and chaos; and 5) The ability to eat meat is being banned to compel us to eat ‘lab-grown’ fake meat and eat insects. Artificially caused food shortages will create demand for insect eating.  And our betters are using our children as hand-picked little ministers of propaganda to promote insect eating and ‘pester’ adults to comply with the agenda. (See:The Great Food Reset has arrived: Expect ‘real’ food shortages, Biden declares – Meanwhile, Bill Gates & China buy up U.S. farmland) Great Reset By Marc Morano – Chapter 12 Excerpt: ‘COVID Lockdowns Morph to Climate Lockdowns’ The Great Food Reset: ‘They really *do* want you to eat bugs’ – ‘They’ve made meat expensive & launched a PR campaign to promote bug-eating’ Michael Shellenberger: ‘I mean look at these guys. They’re obsessed’:     ‘Green Elitism Behind Farmer Crackdowns’ – ‘What role is the World Economic Forum playing?’ Watch: Morano on Fox News on the Great Food Reset: China & Bill Gates buying up U.S. farmland – Pushing fake meat & bugs – ‘Unfiltered w/ Dan Bongino’      Dan Bongino: Here to weigh in is the author of the upcoming book, The Great Reset…Marc, no one knows more about the Great Reset than you, you literally wrote a book on it, we just showed the cover. …Is what we are seeing in the Netherlands a sign of things to come if the climate activists get their way here in the U.S. and other places? Marc Morano: ‘We know that Bill Gates’ goal is to get us to stop eating meat and get us to start eating lab-grown, vegetable oil-processed fake meat. The same with Al Gore. The same with the World Economic Forum. They are pushing insect-eating as well. The United Nations, the World Economic Forum…That’s been their goal, the whole entire goal. First of all, you have the World Economic Forum which Bill Gates is a prominent member. You have Bill Gates buying up farmland — the single largest American farmland owner now, according to NBC News. I know no one likes a monopoly so don’t worry Dan. China is also gobbling up American farmland. So it’s a competition. We actually have good old market competition — China versus Bill Gates. Who do you want to win that battle? …  This will have devastating consequences because as the old Chinese proverb says, ‘When food is on the table there are many problems. When there is no food, there is only one problem.’ Listen: Morano on DC’s WMAL talks Biden’s ‘climate emergency’, lockdowns & the Great Food Reset: You Will Eat Nothing & Be Happy Analysis: The Lies Behind Lab-Cultured Fake Meat – A Great Food Reset – ‘Aim is to control populations by creating dependence on private companies that control the food supply’ The popularity of organic food has skyrocketed in recent years. But when one country decided to go 100% organic … the results were catastrophic. Our new video explores what it takes to feed a nation. pic.twitter.com/of9VpRJlDE — Kite & Key Media (@kiteandkeymedia) January 25, 2023   HOW TO FEED A NATION – THE MIRACLE OF THE MODERN FOOD SUPPLY

For more results click below