Results for: “lovejoy”
- Warmist Scientist Lovejoy says 99.9% certainty of AGW could be only 5% by 2019 if ‘pause’ continues
Shaun Lovejoy, proprietor of laughable 99.9% confidence that all global warming recovery since the Little Ice Age is from man-made CO2, has left comments at Dr. Judith Curry's blog claiming that if the 18-26 year "pause" in global warming lasts another 5 years to 2019, the global warming scam can officially be declared dead, buried, six feet under with 95% certainty:
Shaun Lovejoy-
As I indicated in a comment below, the pause will have to last until 2019 or 2020 before it’s probability gets down to the 5% level which would be needed to reject the anthropogenic hypothesis at the 95% level.
-
- Lord Monckton takes down latest warmist claim: Prof. Shaun Lovejoy continues active marketing of his paper purporting to prove that ‘the world desperately needs to drop the skepticism and change course – humanity’s future depends on it’
- Lovejoy’s 99% ‘confidence’ vs. measurement uncertainty: ‘It is impossible to determine climate sensitivity either to the claimed precision of 0.01 Cº or to 99% confidence from the temperature data’
- EU Heads Downgrade Climate Change To ‘A Footnote’
- Delingpole: Six Reasons Why You Should Ignore the UN’s Species Extinction Report – ‘It’s politics, not science’
- Reality Check: Mass extinction fears ‘have little support from science’ – Claimed losses ‘are absurdly large’
- The Great Pause lengthens again: Global temperature update: The Pause is now 18 years 3 months (219 months)
'The RSS (Remote Sensing Systems) satellite dataset shows no global warming at all for 219 months from October 1996 to December 2014 – more than half the 432-month satellite record.'
'The global warming that the IPCC had so confidently but misguidedly predicted 25 years ago has stopped altogether.'
'The Great Pause is a growing embarrassment to those who had told us with 'substantial confidence' that the science was settled and the debate over. Nature had other ideas.'
- New paper claims the ‘pause’ is ‘not so unusual’ & ‘no more than natural variability’
- Prof in NYTimes: Failure of climate models vs. reality not important since we use them to predict the future
