Results for: “lovejoy”
- Warmist Scientist Lovejoy says 99.9% certainty of AGW could be only 5% by 2019 if ‘pause’ continues
Shaun Lovejoy, proprietor of laughable 99.9% confidence that all global warming recovery since the Little Ice Age is from man-made CO2, has left comments at Dr. Judith Curry's blog claiming that if the 18-26 year "pause" in global warming lasts another 5 years to 2019, the global warming scam can officially be declared dead, buried, six feet under with 95% certainty:
Shaun Lovejoy | September 1, 2014 at 6:04 pm |-
As I indicated in a comment below, the pause will have to last until 2019 or 2020 before it’s probability gets down to the 5% level which would be needed to reject the anthropogenic hypothesis at the 95% level.
-
- Lord Monckton takes down latest warmist claim: Prof. Shaun Lovejoy continues active marketing of his paper purporting to prove that ‘the world desperately needs to drop the skepticism and change course – humanity’s future depends on it’
- Lovejoy’s 99% ‘confidence’ vs. measurement uncertainty: ‘It is impossible to determine climate sensitivity either to the claimed precision of 0.01 Cº or to 99% confidence from the temperature data’
- Former Obama Scientist Dr. Steve Koonin rebuts attack from 12 climate activist academics: Cites Einstein: ‘If I were wrong, it wouldn’t take a dozen scientists to disprove me – one would be sufficient’
Koonin told Climate Depot on June 3, 2021: "I attach a response that I submitted yesterday to Scientific American. Not surprisingly, they declined to publish it."
Koonin: "To paraphrase a statement attributed to Einstein, 'If I were wrong, it wouldn’t take a dozen scientists to disprove me - one would be sufficient.' As I write in Unsettled, I welcome serious, informed discussion of any of the points I raise in the book. Unfortunately, the article by Oreskes et al. falls well short of that standard."
Scientific American Denies Steve Koonin Chance To Respond To Attack Article By Oreskes et al.
- EU Heads Downgrade Climate Change To ‘A Footnote’
- Delingpole: Six Reasons Why You Should Ignore the UN’s Species Extinction Report – ‘It’s politics, not science’
- Reality Check: Mass extinction fears ‘have little support from science’ – Claimed losses ‘are absurdly large’
- The Great Pause lengthens again: Global temperature update: The Pause is now 18 years 3 months (219 months)
'The RSS (Remote Sensing Systems) satellite dataset shows no global warming at all for 219 months from October 1996 to December 2014 – more than half the 432-month satellite record.'
'The global warming that the IPCC had so confidently but misguidedly predicted 25 years ago has stopped altogether.'
'The Great Pause is a growing embarrassment to those who had told us with 'substantial confidence' that the science was settled and the debate over. Nature had other ideas.'
- New paper claims the ‘pause’ is ‘not so unusual’ & ‘no more than natural variability’
- Prof in NYTimes: Failure of climate models vs. reality not important since we use them to predict the future