By Roy Clark
The Trump administration is starting to deal with the climate/net zero fraud by cancelling government contracts and rolling back government regulations.
However, it has not yet addressed the root cause of the climate scam. This is the use of fraudulent climate models to create the illusion of CO2 induced global warming, now rebranded as climate change/extreme weather.
Until this underlying fraud is eliminated, there is always the risk that a future administration will resurrect the climate cabal. The climate modelers need to be held responsible for their actions. This includes penalties for damages caused to U.S. agriculture, energy infrastructure, etc. and the clawback of funds obtained using false claims about global warming.
The climate modeling fraud was established by five papers published between 1967 and 1981. Three came from physicist Syukuro Manabe’s group at the U.S. Weather Bureau, now part of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the other two came from climatologist James Hansen’s group at NASA.
These papers provided the foundation for the pseudoscience of radiative forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity still used by the climate models today.
All of these models are characterized by a benchmark equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). This is the calculated increase in equilibrium surface temperature produced by a doubling of the atmospheric CO2 concentration, usually from 280 to 560 parts per million (ppm). The first ECS of 2.9 °C was created as a mathematical artifact using the simplistic one dimensional climate model described by Manabe and Wetherald in 1967. The ECS has remained between 1.8 and 5.3 °C for the climate models used in all six of the Climate Assessment Reports published by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) from 1990 to 2021.
The correct value should be ‘too small to measure.’
PlayUnmute
Fullscreen
Ads By Google
Ad will close in 26
Skip ad in 1
This provides a simple test that can be used to show that the results from a climate model are fraudulent. There is no need to look any deeper into the model configuration or software code.
Melodramatic claims of CO2-induced global warming based on these early climate model artifacts became such a lucrative source of funding that there was no turning back. The climate modelers trapped themselves in a web of lies of their own making.
The 1967 model errors were incorporated into the first global circulation model (GCM) described by Manabe and Richard T. Wetherald in 1975. This started the transition of climate science from small scale academic studies to ‘big science’ that required large and expensive computer facilities.
Eisenhower’s warning about public policy becoming the captive of a scientific technological elite has come true
